Family Values of Student Youth as a Matrix for Building the Future | South-Russian Journal of Social Sciences
Family Values of Student Youth as a Matrix for Building the Future
PDF (Russian)
https://doi.org/10.31429/26190567-19-3-75-95
https://doi.org/10.31429/26190567-19-3-75-95

How to Cite Array

Verzhybok H.V. (2018) Family Values of Student Youth as a Matrix for Building the Future. South-Russian Journal of Social Sciences, 19 (3), pp. 75-95. DOI: 10.31429/26190567-19-3-75-95 (In Russian)
Submission Date 2018-07-29
Accepted Date 2018-09-30
Published Date 2018-09-27

Copyright (c) 2018 Галина Владиславовна Вержибок

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

The paper analyzes family values among student youth with reference to their future marriage and family life. The state of the institution of marriage which is rather controversial nowadays is closely connected with the fundamental changes in the life cycle of people and in their marital and family relations. The duality of the current situation is based on the contradiction between the consistent departure from traditional value systems and the claim that cultural traditions remain stable. Family and marriage today acquire new functions, meanings and characteristics that deviate from tradition, and it alters / modifies social interactions, as well as demographic and family behavior Changes in family patterns form a matrix which reflects the psychological improvement of family members. Dynamism of social and private life determines the necessity to study young people’s opinions concerning their values in their environments through systemic approach with the help of the theory of social conceptions. The aim of the research is to work out and reveal the totality of ideas and notions about the key concepts within this field. As a result, we have singled out the following most important units of analysis: family as value (family, marriage and love); marriage as a guiding line for a future family (ideal, interrelations and roles) and parenthood as evaluation of maternity and paternity. To verify the results, we have used psychological analysis and poling, as well as data processing. Essays were subjected to content analysis which included / covered three components of the students’ idea of a family. The array slice is represented by 415 first and second-year students at several Belorussian higher educational institutions (Minsk, Vitebsk and Gomel’), with special attention paid to gender and time context (2004, 2011, 2014). It has been found out that the ideas concerning family values and judgments about family life among the youth, have a complicated multi-stage character and are closely connected with the wish to cognize themselves and other people, the desire to reflect over the meaning of values and the sense of life, as well as with striving to get and assimilate information about their future matrimony and parenthood. The image of an ideal family is formed along the following parameters: marriage age (23–25 years old), equal rights for both husband and wife, children, a separate apartment and financial independence from parents. Some results of the research under analysis prove the rightness of the authors who analyze similar problems. However, their conclusions about a high level of pragmatism in marriage motivation and marriage partner among student youth have not been corroborated. This fact allows to state that it is necessary to research the problem in every detail.

Keywords

family, marriage, matrimony, parenthood, maternity, paternity, love, ideal, roles, relationships

References

  1. Adams, B. (2004). Families and Family Study in International Perspective. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 1076–1088.
  2. Antonova, N. L., Shcherbakova, M. V. (2017). Brachnyj vybor: povorot k racionalizacii [Choice in Marriage: Turn to Rationalization]. Diskussiya [Discussion], 8 (82), 44–47.
  3. Bashmanova, E. L. (2016). Social’naya gotovnost’ regional’nogo studenchestva k sem’e, braku i roditel’stvu v prizme transformacii cennostej sovremennoj molodezhi [Social Maturity for Marriage, Family Life and Parenthood among Students in View of Changing Values of Modern Youth]. Uchenye zapiski [Scientific Notes], 4 (40), 185–198.
  4. Baskova N. A. (2009). Osobennosti podkhodov k resheniyu demograficheskih zadach v sovremennoj Rossii. [Special Features of Approaches to Solving Demographic Problems in modern Russia]. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University], 1, 60–71.
  5. Berngard, E. V. (2016). Cennostnye orientacii studencheskoj molodezhi Belarusi na brak i sem’yu [Value Orientation to Marriage and Family among Belorussian Student Youth.]. Vesnіk MDPU іm І. P. Shamyakіna [The Bulletin of MDPU named after І. P. Shamyakin], 2 (48), 63–67.
  6. Bulkin, Yu. A. (2015). Institut sem’i v sociologicheskom issledovanii problem stratifikacii sovremennogo obshchestva [Institute of Family in Sociological Research on the Problems of Stratification in Modern Society] (Abstract of the Cand. Dissertation). Krasnodar.
  7. Butaeva, M. A. (2010). Formirovanie cennostnyh orientacij v semejnoj zhizni [Shaping Value Orientations in Family Life]. Sociosfera [Sociosphere], 2, 55–59.
  8. Dement’eva, I. F. (2011). Otnoshenie molodogo pokoleniya k sem’e kak zhiznennoj cennosti [Young Generation’s Attitude to Family as a Vitally Important Concept]. Social’naya pedagogika [Social Pedagogy], 6, 97–103.
  9. Dolgov, Yu. N., Smirnov, V. M. (2012). Sistemnyj podkhod k issledovaniyu sem’i i semejnyh otnoshenij [Systemic Approach to Researching Family and Family Relations]. In Aktual’nye problemy pedagogicheskih i psihologicheskih nauk (Materialy mezhdunaroy zaochnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii Chast’ II. 30 iyulya 2012 g.) [Actual Problems of Pedagogical and Psychological Sciences (Proceedings of the International Correspondence Scientific and Practical Conference, Part II, July 30, 2012)], (pp. 147–150). Novosibirsk.
  10. Dosina N. V., Smirnov, Ya. O. (2009). Demograficheskaya politika v gendernom kontekste [Demographic Policy in the Context of Gender]. Vestnik Yaroslavskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. P. G. Demidova [Bulletin of Yaroslavl State University named after P. G. Demidov], 1, 69–76.
  11. Dunaeva, O. N. (2016). Gendernyj resurs obshchestva: supruzhestvo i roditel’stvo [Gender Resources in the Society: Matrimony and Parenthood]. Vestnik Tyumenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Social’no-ehkonomicheskie i pravovye issledovaniya [Tyumen State University Herald. Social, Economic, and Law Research], 2 (4), 38–49.
  12. Egorova, N. Yu. (2013). Sovremennoe supruzhestvo: modeli otnoshenij [Modern Parenthood: Models of Relationships]. Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N. I. Lobachevskogo. Seriya: Social’nye nauki [Bulletin of Lobachevsky State University of Nizhni Novgorod. Series: Social Sciences], 4 (32), 20–26.
  13. Elkind, D. (1995). Ties that stress: the new family imbalance. Cambridge (Mass); L.: Harvard univ. press.
  14. Emel’yanova, T. P. (2014, May / June). Budushchij brak v social’nyh predstavleniyah yunoshej i devushek studencheskogo vozrasta [Future Matrimony as a Social Phenomenon among Student Youth, both Male and Female]. Informacionnyj gumanitarnyj portal “Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie” [“Knowledge. Understanding. Skill” Journal], 3. Retrieved from http://www.zpu-journal.ru/e-zpu/2014/3/Emelianova_Marriage-Students/
  15. Gurko T. A. (2016). Teoreticheskie podkhody k izucheniyu sem’i [Theoretical Approaches to Studying Family]. M.: Institut sociologii RAN
  16. Il’jinykh, S. A. (2014). Tipologiya semejnogo soznaniya studencheskoj molodezhi: opyt sociologicheskogo analiza [The Typology of Family Awareness among Student Youth]. Vestnik Buryatskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Pedagogika. Filologiya. Filosofiya [Bulletin of the Buryat State University. Pedagogy. Philology. Philosophy], 1 (14), 50–57.
  17. Kuchmajeva, O. V., Kuchmajev, M. G., Petryakova, O. L. (2009). Transformaciya instituta sem’i i semejnye cennosti [Transformation of the Institute of Family and Family Values]. Vestnik slavyanskih kul’tur [Bulletin of Slavic Cultures], 3 (13), 20–29.
  18. Kukulin, M. (2010, Avgust 11). Novoe roditel’stvo i ego politicheskie aspekty [New Parenthood and its Political Aspects]. Polit.ru [Polit.ru]. Retrieved from http://polit.ru/article/2010/08/11/parents/
  19. Levina, L. V. (2000). Ehvolyuciya semejno-brachnyh otnoshenij v usloviyah razvitiya sovremennogo obshchestva [The Evolution of Marital and Family Relations in the Developing Modern Society] (Abstract of the Cand. Dissertation). Kursk.
  20. Malenova, A. Yu., Samojlenkova, A. V. (2014). Predstavleniya o brachno-semejnyh otnosheniyah studencheskoj molodezhi: social’no-psihologicheskie riski i resursy [The Idea of Marital and Family Relations among Student Youth: Socio-Psychological Risks and Resources]. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Seriya “Psihologiya” [Herald of Omsk University Series “Psychology”], 1, 43–51.
  21. Merino, R., & Garcia, M. (2006). Emancipation enlargement and the acquisition of autonomy by young people in Catalonia. Young, 14 (1), 33–47.
  22. Morozova, E. A. (2010). Psikhologiya semejnoj mental’nosti u molodezhi [Psychology of Mentality among Young People]. (Abstract of the Doctoral Dissertation). Sankt-Peterburg.
  23. Nozikova, N. V. (2016). Dominiruyushchie cennosti semejnoj celenapravlennosti v zavisimosti ot nekotoryh social’no-demograficheskih faktorov [Domineering Values of Family–oriented Young People and Dependence on some Social and Demographic Factors]. Social’naya psihologiya i obshchestvo [Social Psychology and Society], 7 (4), 56–67.
  24. Parygin, B. D. (1999). Social’naya psihologiya. Problemy metodologii, istorii i teorii [Social Psychology. Problems of Methodology, History and Theory]. SPb: IGUP.
  25. Rontos, K. (2010). Demographic trends, young people’s attitudes towards marriage and socio-economic changes related to family formation in Greece and in Selected European Countries: A comparative analysis based on official and survey research data. International Journal of Criminology and Sociological Theory, 3 (2), 543–562.
  26. Rostovskaya, T. K. (2015). Sem’ya i semejnyj obraz zhizni v sisteme cennostej pokolenij [Family and Family Way of Life within the System of Generation Values]. Chelovek v mire kul’tury [Human in the World of Culture], 2, 3–9.
  27. Rybakovskij, L. L. (2002). Desyatiletie depopulyacii v Rossii (prichiny, rezul’taty, posledstviya) [Ten Years of Depopulation in Russia (Causes, Results, Consequencies]. In Eh. B. Gilinskaya (Ed.) Social’naya sfera: problemy i suzhdeniya (Materialy shestyh Mil’nerovskih chtenij) [Social Sphere: Problems and Judgments (Materials of the 6th Milner Readings)], 5–9. Moskva.
  28. Sazhina, L. V., Kovalev, V. V., Petrova, M. V. (2016). Problemy gotovnosti sovremennoj rossijskoj molodezhi k sozdaniyu sem’i: ideal’nye i real’nye povedencheskie modeli [Problems of Preparedness to Have a Family among Russian Young People]. Ehlektronnyj nauchnyj zhurnal “Inzhenernyj vestnik Dona” [E-journal “Engineering Journal of Don”], 1. Retrieved from http://www.ivdon.ru/ru/magazine/archive/n1y2016/3551
  29. Semushin, D. (2013, August 14). Brak stanovitsya udelom vysshih strat: ehroziya instituta sem’i i igry s LGBT v Evrope i SSHA [Marriage is Becoming the Destiny / the Lot of the Upper Layers of Society: the Erosion of the Institute of Family and Games with LGBTin Europe and the USA]. IA REGNUM. Novosti. Politika [IA REGNUM. News. Politics]. Retrieved from http://www.regnum.ru/news/polit/1695168.html
  30. Servaty, L., & Weber, K. (2011). The Relationship between Gender and Attitudes towards Marriage. Retrieved from https://slidex.tips/download/the-relationship-between-gender-and-attitudes-towards-marriage
  31. Social attitudes of young people (2014, December). HM government horizon scanning programme. Retrieved from http://www.gov.uk/government/publications/social-attitudes-of-young-people
  32. Tkachenko, I. V. (2008). Lichnostno razvivayushchij resurs sem’i: ontologiya i fenomenologiya [Personal Development Resource Family: Ontology and Phenomenology]. Moskva: Kredo.
  33. Urazajev, A. M., Shelekhov, I. L. (2009). Social’nye ozhidaniya sovremennoj molodezhi, zavershayushchej obuchenie v vuze [Social Expectations of Graduate Students]. Vestnik TGPU [Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin], 1 (79), 76–81.
  34. Yen, H. (2010, November 18). Leader-Telegram. The New American Family, 1A-3A.