Settlement Level of Local Government in Russia: Social Functions and Financial Opportunities | South-Russian Journal of Social Sciences
Settlement Level of Local Government in Russia: Social Functions and Financial Opportunities
Vol. 19 (2018) No. 4, Regional and Local Policy
Vol. 19 (2018) No. 4
Regional and Local Policy

Settlement Level of Local Government in Russia: Social Functions and Financial Opportunities

Turovsky R.F.
National Research University Higher School of Economics
ORCID ID 0000-0001-8496-3098
PDF (Russian)
https://doi.org/10.31429/26190567-19-4-69-91
https://doi.org/10.31429/26190567-19-4-69-91

How to Cite Array

Turovsky R.F. (2018) Settlement Level of Local Government in Russia: Social Functions and Financial Opportunities. South-Russian Journal of Social Sciences, 19 (4), pp. 69-91. DOI: 10.31429/26190567-19-4-69-91 (In Russian)
Submission Date 2018-09-22
Accepted Date 2018-11-06
Published Date 2018-12-23

Copyright (c) 2018 Ростислав Феликсович Туровский

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

In this article the author analyzes the socially important powers of the settlement level of local self-government in Russia using statistical data of the Russia’s Ministry of Finance on the regional revenues and expenditures during the last decade both for all the settlements in Russia and for the particular regions. The main research goal was to define the really working functions (being probably different from those prescribed by law) of local self-government in the settlements. Besides it was important to study the degree of financial dependency of settlements and the volume of state support for them. The methodology is based on the theory of principal-agent relations which means that the local self-government in settlements can act as an agent of both the state and the local community. However in a centralized system it acts rather as an agent of the state dealing with the limited set of powers defined and partly sponsored by the state. The study shows rather unstable state support of the settlements and ever-changing structure of their expenditures. As a result settlements still cannot find an appropriate place in the system of multilevel government in Russia. Tiny political influence of settlements is entwined with the change of the state policy towards more pragmatism — from active state support of settlements to relative financial autonomy but with very small budget revenues. At the same time the state has moved to the policies of political business cycle recently, rising up the financial support of the settlements before the 2018 presidential elections. The study also shows that Russia’s settlements are mostly deprived of social functions while giving priority to infrastructure (housing, communal services, roads etc) and spending high shares of money on the maintenance of local administrations themselves. Finally the author reveals huge regional diversity of powers and influence of settlements which is the evidence of many regional models evolving according to the local policies of different regional governors.

Keywords

local government, settlement, fiscal federalism, expenditure policy

Acknowledgements

This article is a result of the study supported by Russian foundation for basic research, project № 17–03–00566 “Settlement level of local government in Russia: political status and problems of development”.

References

  1. Arhipkin, I., Karavaeva, I. (2011). Zarozhdenije otechestvennoj teorii mestnyh finansov [The Beginning of Russia’s Theory of Local Finances]. Vestnik Instituta Ekonomiki Rossijskoj Akademii Nauk [Bulletin of Institute of Economy of Russian Academy of Sciences], 3, 273-283.
  2. Boadway, R. & Shah, A. (2009). Fiscal federalism: Principles and Practice of Multiorder Governance. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  3. Chicherin, B. N. (1894). Кurs gosudarstvennoj nauki [A Course of the Science of the State]. Moscow: Tipografija tovarischestva I. N. Kushnerev.
  4. Danilova, Ya. А., Lavrov, А. М., Onischenko V. V. & Pokatovich, Ye. V. (2015). Stimulirovanie subnatsional’nyh vlastej v provedenii budzhetnyh reform: rossijskij opyt [Incentives for Subnational Authorities to Promote Fiscal Reforms: Russian Experience]. Nauchno-issledovatel’skij finansovyj institut. Finansovyj zhurnal [Scientific Financial Institute. Journal of Finance], 5, 5-25.
  5. Donovan, T., Smith, D. A. & Mooney, C. Z. (2013). State and Local Politics: Institutions and Reform. Boston: Wadsworth.
  6. Farvacque-Vitkovic, C. D. & Kopanyi, M. (Eds.). (2014). Municipal Finances: A Handbook for Local Governments. Washington: World Bank Publications.
  7. Harloe, M., Pickvance, C. G. & Urry J. (Eds.). (2006). Place, Policy and Politics: Do Localities Matter? London: Unwin Hyman.
  8. Ilyin, О. Yu., Stjalova, I. К. (2012). Suschnost’ mestnogo samoupravlenija v teorijah dorevolucionnyh rossijskih issledovatelej [The Essence of Local Self-government in Theories of Russian Pre-revolutionary Scholars]. Gosudarstvennoje i municipal’noe upravlenie v XXI veke: teorija, metodologija, praktika [State and Municipal Government in XXI Century: Theory, Methods, Practice], 5, 148-154.
  9. Judge, D., Stoker, G. & Wolman, H. (Eds.). (1995). Theories of Urban Politics. London: Sage.
  10. Kirillova, L. N., Chilikin, А. Yu. (2010). Osobennosti upravlenija municipal’nymi finansami v Rossii [The Features of Management in Municipal Finances in Russia]. Ekonomicheskij zhurnal [Journal of Economy], 19, 116-126.
  11. Kuznetsov, А. V. & Kuznetsova, О. V. (2015). Regional’naja politika: zarubezhnyj opyt i rossijskije realii [Regional Policy: Foreign Experience and Russian Reality]. Moscow: IMEMO RAN.
  12. Kuznetsova, О. V. (2015). Regional’naja politika Rossii: 20 let reform i novye vozmozhnosti [Russia’ Regional Politics: 20 years of Reforms and New Opportunities]. Moscow: Knizhnyj dom LIBROKOM.
  13. Laffont, J.-J. & Martimort, D. (2002). The Theory of Incentives: the Principal-Agent Model. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  14. Lankina, T., Hudalla, A. & Wollmann, H. (2008). Local Governance in Central and Eastern Europe: Comparing Performance in the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and Russia. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
  15. Miller, W., Dickson, M. & Stoker, G. (2000). Models of Local Governance: Public Opinion and Political Theory in Britain. London: Palgrave.
  16. Multi-level Governance Reforms: Overview of OECD Country Experiences. (2017). Retrieved from http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/governance/multi-level-governance-reforms_9789264272866-en
  17. Nordhaus, W. D. The Political Business Cycle. (1975). The Review of Economic Studies, 42 (2), 169-190.
  18. Tocqueville, A. (1992). Demokratija v Amerike [Democracy in America]. Moscow: Progress.
  19. Turovsky, R. F. (2015). Rossijskoje mestnoje samoupravlenie: agent gosudarstvennoj vlasti v lovushke nedofinansirovanija i grazhdanskoj passivnosti [Russia’s Local Self-government: an Agent of State Authorities in a Trap of Poor Financing and Civic Inactivity]. Polis. Politicheskije issledovanija [Polis. Political Studies], 2, 35-51.