Dynamics of Ethno-Confessional Identities in the Cultural Landscape of the Astrakhan Region | South-Russian Journal of Social Sciences
Dynamics of Ethno-Confessional Identities in the Cultural Landscape of the Astrakhan Region
PDF (Russian)
https://doi.org/10.31429/26190567-20-1-105-122
https://doi.org/10.31429/26190567-20-1-105-122

How to Cite Array

Khlyscheva E.V. (2019) Dynamics of Ethno-Confessional Identities in the Cultural Landscape of the Astrakhan Region. South-Russian Journal of Social Sciences, 20 (1), pp. 105-122. DOI: 10.31429/26190567-20-1-105-122 (In Russian)
Submission Date 2019-01-13
Accepted Date 2019-03-02
Published Date 2019-03-23

Copyright (c) 2019 Елена Владиславовна Хлыщева

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

The article discusses the process of transformation of ethno-­confessional identities in the modern world on the example of a particular multicultural region. The problem of cross-­cultural communication in similar areas is particularly acute very much, there are lifestyles alternative to the standard norms, the aspiration to adjoin to other which begins to position itself openly increases. The difference in valuable representations closes representatives of specific groups in a narrow framework of traditional thinking, and group distinctions become a peculiar marker of modern space. The identity is not static and changes under the influence of social transformations and cross-­cultural interactions. Emergence of new transcultural communities updates for science the searching of the samples developed and approved during historical development and scenarios of coexistence in the uniform cultural space of various traditions and mentalities. The changes in society design innovative understanding of identity. Globalization and migration processes lead to emergence of “indistinct identity” with the fragmented idea of the ethnic origin. As a result, the need for recognition which major line is “a claim on originality, fight for identity” increases (Malakhov, 2014). In this situation it is possible to speak about a cultural distance which is shown in the form of opposition of the cultural worlds of traditional and innovative forms. Therefore the analysis of cultural interaction of the people is connected with primary judgment of ethnocultural distinctions The aim of the article is to study the levels and forms of interaction between different peoples and to identify changes occurring in the process of transforming the traditional worldview of the separate cultures, leading to the formation of new levels of identity. Special attention is paid to the gradual change in the ratio of regional, national and civil values and corresponding self-­identification at all levels. It takes into account that the levels of identity associated with the national, ethnic, confessional spheres do not manifest themselves in pure form and are adjusted by other forms — civilizational, subcultural, racial, gender, sexual. In addition, the complex interweaving of cultural worlds makes it difficult to define one’s own identity and becomes an acute problem. The process of forming a multi-­level identity in the multicultural regions is most indicative; therefore, the Astrakhan region, which is notable for the diverse composition of the population and the absence of the aboriginal population, was chosen for analysis. The author traces the dynamics of identity changes among the peoples inhabiting the region from the time of its settlement to the present. The proposed theoretical constructs of development adequate mechanisms for the coexistence of cultures require careful analysis. Such problem demands a complex system of methods, which is based on comparative analytics. A cross-­cultural analysis of identification problems is required, and this cannot be done without identifying indicators of ethnic, confessional and regional levels of self-­awareness. We used both diachronic and synchronous research methods. The changes in society create an innovative understanding of identity. The emergence of new transcultural formations actualizes the search for patterns and scenarios of coexistence in the common cultural space of various traditions and mentalities developed and tested in the course of historical development. All this determines the need to identify new principles of building identity, based both on history, religion, mentality and on general citizenship. The formation of such transcultural identity is well demonstrated by the Astrakhan region.

Keywords

identity, globalization, ethnoconfessionalism, intercultural communication, transformation, transculturation

Acknowledgements

Статья выполнена при финансовой поддержке РНФ в рамках научного проекта 18-78-10064 «Трансформация механизмов формирования пострансгрессионной модели религиозной идентичности в современном информационном пространстве».

References

  1. Assman, A. (2017). Raspalas’ svyaz’ vremen? [Is the Time Out of Joint?]. M.: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie.
  2. Bek, U. (2003). Kosmopoliticheskoe obshhestvo i ego vragi [Cosmopolitan Society and its Enemies]. Zhurnal sociologii i social`noj antropologii [Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology], 6 (1). Retrieved from http://ecsocman.hse.ru/data/537/877/1219/002_Bek.pdf
  3. Benxabib, S. (2003). Prityazaniya kul’tury’. Ravenstvo i raznoobrazie v global’nuyu e’ru [The Claims of Culture: Equality and Diversity in the Global Era]. M.: Logos.
  4. Borishpolecz, K. P. (2001). Nacionalizm kak vy’zov global’nomu razvitiyu [Nationalism as a Challenge to Global Development]. In Mir i Rossiya na poroge XXI veka: Vtory’e Gorchakovskie chteniya. MGIMO MID Rossii [The World and Russia on the Threshold of the 21st Century: 2nd Gorchakov Readings]. M.: “Rossijskaya politicheskaya e’nciklopediya” (ROSSPE’N).
  5. Delo o priby`vshix iz-za granicy lyudej razny’x nacional’nostej [The Case of New Foreign Arrivals of Different Nationalities]. GAAO. F.542, op.1, d.135.
  6. Fedorov, V. (2013). Rossijskaya identichnost’ i vy’zovy’ vremeni [Russian Identity and the Challenges of Time]. M.: VCIOM. Retrieved from https://wciom.ru/fileadmin/file/reports.
  7. Godovoj otchet Astraxanskogo gubernskogo komiteta popechitel`stva o narodnoj trezvosti [The Annual Report of Astrakhan Provincial Committee on Guardianship of Popular Sobriety]. GAAO. F.582, op.9, d.18.
  8. Godovoj otchet o sostoyanii Astraxanskoj gubernii za 1839 god [The Annual Report on the State of Astrakhan Province for 1839]. GAAO. F.2, op.1, d.320. s.47.
  9. Hantington, S. (2004). Kto my? [Who are We?]. M.: AST.
  10. Karta etnoreligioznyh ugroz [The Map of Ethno-religious Threats] (2013). Retrieved from http://www.interfaxreligion.ru/?act=analysis&div=195
  11. Kazakova, G. M. (2009). Region kak subkul’turny’j lokus [Region as a Subcultural Locus] (Abstract of the Cand. Dissertation). Moskva.
  12. Khly’shheva E. V. (2011). Dinamika kul’turny’x modelej v globaliziruyushhemsya mire [The Dynamics of Cultural Patterns in the World Becoming Global]. (Abstract of the Doct. Dissertation). Astraxan`.
  13. Kidirniyazov, D. S. (1999). Nogajcy v izvestiyax russkix, zapadnoevropejskix i vostochny’x avtorov XVI–XVIII vv [The Nogays in the News of the Russian, Western European and Eastern Authors of the 16th-18th Centuries]. Makhachkala.
  14. Kostina, A. V. (2009). Krizisnoe sostoyanie identichnosti v sovremennom mire: prichiny’ i predposy’lki [Recessionary Condition of Identity in the Contemporary World: Causes and Prerequisites]. Informacionny’j gumanitarny’j portal “Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie” [Informational Humanitarian Portal “Knowledge. Understanding. Skill], 4. Retrieved from http://www.zpu-journal.ru/e-zpu/2009/4/Kostina_Recessionary/
  15. Kostina, A. V. (2011). Massovaya kul`tura kak fenomen postindustrial’nogo obshhestva [Mass Culture as a Phenomenon of Post-industrial Society]. M.: Izdatel’stvo LKI.
  16. Mal`kovskaya, I. A. (2008). Mnogolikij Yanus otkry’togo obshhestva: Opy`t kriticheskogo osmy’sleniya likov obshhestva v e’poxu globalizacii [Janus of Many Faces as a Symbol of Open Society: Experience of Critical Comprehension of the Society’s Images in the Epoch of Globalization]. M.: Izd-vo LKI.
  17. Malakhov, V. S. (2015). Integraciya migrantov: koncepcii i praktiki [Migrant Integration: Concepts and Practices]. M.: My’sl’.
  18. Malakhov, V.S. (2014). Kul’turny’e razlichiya i politicheskie granicy v e’poxu global’ny’x migracij [Cultural Differences and Political Boundaries in the Era of Global Migration]. M.: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie.
  19. Morozov, S. (2018). Uchity’vat’ vy’zovy’ i ugrozy’ v sfere mezhe’tnicheskix otnoshenij. Zasedanie e`tnokonfessional`nogo soveta pri Gubernatore Astraxanskoj oblasti po itogam realizacii koncepcii gosudarstvennoj nacional`noj politiki v Astraxanskoj oblasti v 2016–2018 godax [To Take Into Account Challenges and Threats in the Sphere of Inter-ethnic Relations. The session of the Astrakhan Governor’s Ethno-confessional Committee on the Results of Implementation of the State National Policy Conception in Astrakhan region in 2016–2018]. (December 25, 2018). Retrieved from https://etnokonf.astrobl.ru/press-release/sostoyalos-zasedanie-etnokonfessionalnogo-soveta-pri-gubernatore-astrahanskoy.
  20. Mukomel’, V. I. (2005). Grani intolerantnosti (migrantofobiya, e’tnofobiya) [Facets of Intolerance (Migrantophobia, Ethnophobia)’]. Sociologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies], 2, 56-66.
  21. Murzina, I. Ya. (2003). Fenomen regional’noj kul’tury’: by’tie i samosoznanie [The Phenomenon of Regional Culture: Being and Self-consciousness] (Abstract of the Doct. Dissertation). Ekaterinburg.
  22. Nakaz Astrahanskim voevodam 1677 goda. (1947) (bibliotechnyj fond GAAO) [Mandate Astrakhan voivode 1677. (1947) (library fund GAAO)]. Astraxan’.
  23. Nebol’sin, P. (1852). Ocherki Volzhskogo Nizov’ya [Essays on the Volga Lower Reaches]. SPb.: Tip. m-va vnutrennix del.
  24. Novichkova, A. (2010, December 15). Skazhi, v chem sila, brat? [Tell Me Where the Strength is, Brother]. Komsomolets Kaspiia [Komsomolets Kaspiia], 99 (6640).
  25. Otchet Petrovskogo obshhestva issledovatelej Astraxanskogo kraya [Report of the Petrovskii Society of the Astrakhan Territory Researchers] (1889). Astraxan’.
  26. Pal’mov, N. N. (1926). E’tyudy’ po istorii privolzhskix kalmy’kov XVII i XVIII vekov [Studies on the History of the Volga Kalmyks of the XVII and XVIII Centuries]. In Ch. 1. Izd. Kalmy’czkogo oblastnogo ispolnitel`nogo komiteta [Part 1. Astrakhan’: Kalmyk Regional Executive Committee printing shop]. Astraxan’. VI.
  27. Ponomarev, M. V. (2010). Istoriya stran Evropy’ i Ameriki v Novejshee vremya [The History of European and American Countries in the Current Times]. M.: Prospekt.
  28. Revizskie skazki tatar Agry’zhanskogo Dvora [Census of the Tatars in Agryzhansk homestead]. GAAO. F.687, op.2, d.1343.
  29. Romanova, A. P. (2010). Tolerantnoe otnoshenie k “Drugomu” v molodezhnoj srede polie`tnichnogo regiona [Tolerant Attitude to the “Other” Among the Youth in a Poly-ethnic Region]. Kaspijskij region: politika, e’konomika, kul`tura [The Caspian Region: Politics, Economy, Culture], 25, 15-20.
  30. Romanova, A., Yakushenkov, S., Topchiev, M., Bicharova, M., Lebedeva, L. (2016). Religious networks in the context of cultural safety of the south of Russia. In 3rd International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on Social Sciences and Arts SGEM 2016. DOI: 10.5593/SGEMSOCIAL2016/B32/S11.107
  31. Ry’bakovskij, L. L. (2009). Transformaciya migracionny’x processov na postsovetskom prostranstve [The Transformation of Migration Processes in the Post-Soviet Space]. M., RAN. In-t socz.-polit. issledovanij.
  32. Ry’bushkin, M. S. (1841). Zapiski ob Astraxani [Writings on Astrakhan’]. M.: Tip. S. Selivanovskago.
  33. Savvinskij, I. (1900). Armyane v Astraxanskoj eparxii i otnoshenie k nim mestny’x arxipasty’rej v 18 veke [The Armenians in the Astrakhan’ Diocese, and the local Archpastors’ Attitude to Them in the 18th Century]. Astraxan’, Tipografiya V. L. Egorova, protiv Okruzhnogo Suda.
  34. Shantimirov, K. Z. (2018). O realizacii gosudarstvennoj nacional`noj politiki v regione [On the Implementation of the State National Policy in the Region]. In Doklad na zasedanii e’tnokonfessional`nogo soveta pri Gubernatore Astraxanskoj oblasti po voprosu “O realizacii gosudarstvennoj nacional`noj politiki v Astraxanskoj oblasti: itogi i perspektivy’” [Report at the Session of the Astrakhan Governor’s Ethno-confessional Committee “On the Results of Implementation of the State National Policy in Astrakan’ Region: Outcomes and Prospects”] (2018. December 25). Retrieved from https://etnokonf.astrobl.ru/press-release/doklad-kz-shantimirova-na-zasedanii-etnokonfessionalnogo-soveta-pri-gubernatore.
  35. Ternova, L. O. (2004). Globalizaciya i problema formirovaniya novy’x identichnostej. Vlast’ [Power], 4, 27-32.
  36. Topchiev, M. S., Dryagalov, V. S., Yakushenkova, O. S. (2016). Religious transgression on frontier heterotopiа. 3rd International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on Social Sciences and Arts SGEM 2016, Aug 24–31, Book 3. Vol. 2, (815–820) DOI: 10.5593/SGEMSOCIAL2016/B32/S11.108
  37. Topchiev, M. S., Dryagalov, V. S., Yakushenkova, O. S. The Problem of the Youth’s Religious Identity Formation in the Frontier Territories of the Northern Caspian Sea Region: Contemporary Aspect. Man In India, 96 (12).
  38. Topchiev, M., Romanova, A., Yakushenkov, S. Transformation of the alien image in the post-soviet space. In 3rd International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on Social Sciences and Arts SGEM 2016. Aug 24–31, Book 3. Vol. 2, (949-954). DOI: 10.5593/SGEMSOCIAL2016/B32/S11.127
  39. Ukaz kamer-kollegii o razreshenii shvedskim plenny’m zhit’ v gorodax [The Kamer-Kollegiia’s Decree on Permission for the Swedish Prisoners-of-war to Reside in the Cities]. GAAO, f. 394, op.4, l.43.
  40. Ukazy’ imperatricy Ekateriny’ II [Decrees of the Empress Catherine the II]. (1775). GAAO.F.1, op.1, d.948.
  41. Urastaeva, G. D. (2000). Astraxanskie kazaxi: istoriya i sovremennost’ [Astrakhan’ Cossacks: History and Modernity]. Astraxan’.