Abstract
The paper analyzes China’s present-day image formation in Russia. Its topicality is conditioned by the intensive development of the relationships between the two states. Research papers usually concentrate upon economic, cultural and foreign policy aspects in their interaction. But they have never been studied at the image formation angle. The methodology of the research is based on the statement that image making is a directional process of changing and adjusting public opinion of a target group. The aim of the research is the clarification of historical prerequisites of the modern image of China formation, as well as defining basic trends and factors of image formation. The economic development of the PRC and the promotion of the Chinese language and culture are especially notable among the latter trends and factors. Besides, the role of mass media information is touched upon. The results of the research have enabled the author to draw a conclusion about the positive developments in China’s image formation in Russia that is stipulated by favoring the model and its dynamism. The main channels in creating a favorable public opinion are Chinese Russian-speaking mass media and Russian mass media whose audiences are faced mainly with positive information concerning the inner developments in China and in Russian-Chinese relationships. At the same time, the research has revealed the Russians’ superfluous knowledge of the Chinese culture. Their sporadic images make it possible to further develop the image making component in the Russian-Chinese interaction. The results of the research might turn out useful both for a more profound study of the problem under discussion and for solving some applied problems that emerge in Russian-Chinese relationships at the present-day stage of their development.
Keywords
References
- Du Cyuan’bo (2016). Zhanrovo-stilisticheskoe svoeobrazie imidzha Kitaya v rossijskih Internet-SMI [Genre and Stylistic Peculiarities of an Image of China in the Russian Internet-Media]. Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki [Philological Sciences. Issues of Theory and Practice], 4 (58), 12-14.
- Globally, More Name U. S. Than China as World’s Leading Economic Power (2017). Pew Research Center. Режим доступа https://www.pewglobal.org/2017/07/13/more-name-u-s-than-china-as-worlds-leading-economic-power/
- Huejcin’, Zh. (2014). Obraz Kitaia v kommentariiakh k novostiam o Kitae (na materialakh portala Rambler) [The Image of China in the Comments on the News about China on Rambler Portal]. Medialingvistika [Media Linguistics], 2, 82-94.
- Interes rossiyan k Kitayu: k Azii ili k Еvrope blizhe Rossiya po svoim tradiciyam i kul’ture? [Interest of Russians to China: is Russia closer to Asia or to Europe in its Еraditions and Сulture?] (2019). Fond obshchestvennoe mneniya [Public Opinion Foundation]. Retrieved from https://fom.ru/mir/12150
- International Publics Divided on China (2018). Pew Research Center. Режим доступа https://www.pewglobal.org/2018/10/01/international-publics-divided-on-china/
- Itogi vyezdnogo turizma. Rossiia 2017 [Outbound Travel statistics. Russia 2017] Russia 2017 TourStat: Website. Retrieved from http://turstat.com/outboundtravelstatiscticsrussia2017
- Kak Vam kazhetsya, kem segodnya yavlyaetsya Kitaj dlya Rossii? [What do you Think is China Today for Russia?] (2017). Vserossijskij centr izucheniya obshchestvennoe mneniye [Russian Public Opinion Research Center]. Retrieved from https://wciom.ru/trzh/print_q.php?s_id=15&q_id=739&date=29.01.2017
- Kitaj. Predstavleniya rossiyan o kitajcah i kitajskoj kul’ture [China. Representations of Russians about the Chinese and Chinese Culture] (2018). Fond obshchestvennoe mneniya [Public Opinion Foundation]. Retrieved from https://fom.ru/Mir/14071
- Koine, O., Franz, V. A. (2017). Kinematograf kak element sistemy “myagkoj sily” gosudarstva [Cinema as an Element of a State’s Soft Power System]. Diskurs-Pi [Discourse-P], 2, 154-162.
- Kortunov, S. V. (Ed.) (2010). Mirovaia politika v usloviiakh krizisa [World politics under crisis]. M.: Asrekt-Press.
- Leontyeva E. O., Belokopytov M. S. (2019). Instituty Konfuciya kak elementy vneshnej politiki KNR [Confucius Institutes as a Tool of China’s Foreign Policy]. Regionalistica [Regionalistics], 5, 51-58.
- Matveev, V. A. (2018). Novejshie tendencii razvitiya rossijsko-kitajskogo sotrudnichestva v Bol’shoj Evrazii [The Latest Trends in the Development of Russian-Chinese Cooperation in Greater Eurasia]. Kitaj v mirovoj regional’noj politike: istoriya i sovremennost’ [China in World and Regional Politics. History and Modernity], 23 (23), 261-274.
- Monastyreva, O. V. Specifika kommunikativnoj strategii v programmah na russkom yazyke Mezhdunarodnogo radio Kitaya [The Specific Communication Strategy Features of the Programmes in Russian Broadcast by the International radio of China]. Mediascop [Mediascope]. Retrieved from http://www.mediascope.ru/node/347
- Obzor: uluchshenie natsional’nogo imidzha Kitaia i ekonomicheskoe razvitie vzaimoobuslovleny i vzaimovygodny [Review: China’s National Image Improvement and its Economic Development are Interdependent and Mutually Beneficial] (2015). Website CHINA.COM. Retrieved from http://russian.china.com/news/reports/1793/20150323/325343.html
- Rasperova, S. Yu. (2013). Instituty Konfutsiia kak kul’turnaia strategiia Kitaia v prostranstve Rossiisko-kitaiskogo vzaimodeistviia v sfere obrazovaniia [Confucius Institutes as China’s Cultural Strategy in Russian-Chinese Interaction in the Sphere of Education]. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta [Bulletin of Moscow State Linguistic University], 22 (682), 154-163.
- Rossiia: druz’ia, vragi, otnoshenie v mire. O tsennykh partnerakh Rossii, blizkikh nam narodakh i obraze nashei strany v mire [Russia: Friends, Enemies, the World’s Attitude. On Russia’s Important Partners, Close Peoples and Russia’s Image in the World] (2018). Fond obshchestvennogo mneniya [Public Opinion Foundation]. Retrieved from https://fom.ru/Mir/14025
- Rossiya-Kitaj-SSHA: otnosheniya v strategicheskom treugol’nike [Russia-China-USA: Relations in the Strategic Triangle] (2017). Vserossijskij centr izucheniya obshchestvennoe mneniye [Russian Public Opinion Research Center]. Retrieved from https://wciom.ru/index.php?id=236&uid=116055
- Samoilova, M. P, Lobanova, E. A. (2017). Pravovoe regulirovanie deyatel’nosti Institutov Konfuciya v Rossii [Legal Regulation of the Activities of Confucius Institutions in Russia]. Juvenis scientia [Juvenis Scientia], 6, 29-31.
- Sidorskaya, I. V. (2015). “Obraz” ili “imidzh” strany: chto reprezentiruyut SMI [“Image” or “Image” of the Country: What Do the Media Represent]. In V. V. Frolov Aktual’nye problemy issledovaniya kommunikacionnyh aspektov PR-deyatel’nosti i zhurnalistiki: sbornik materialov nauchnogo seminara [Actual Problems of Researching Communication Aspects of PR Activities and Journalism: Collection of Materials of a Scientific Seminar] (pp. 64-84). Pskov: Pskovskii gosudarstvennyi universitet.
- Views of China and the Global Balance of Power (2015). Pew Research Center. Режим доступа https://www.pewglobal.org/2015/06/23/2-views-of-china-and-the-global-balance-of-power/
- Vyezdnoi turizm iz Rossii v 2018. Reiting zarubezhnykh stran rossiiskikh turistov [Russia’s Foreign Travel in 2018. Foreign Countries’ Rating with Tourists from Russia]. Retrieved from http://turstat.com/russianstopforeigntravel2018
- Yu Danhong, Gu Qian (2015). K voprosu o negativnom imidzhe Kitaia v rossiiskikh [On the Issue of Negative Image of China in the Russian Media]. In O. V. Ilina (Comp.) Gumanitarnye aspekty sovremennyh massmedia: problemy, protivorechiya: materialy Mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii [Humanitarian Aspects of Modern Mass Media: Problems, Contradictions: Materials of the International Scientific and Practical Conference] (pp. 50-52), Yekaterinburg: Ural’skii federal’nyi universitet.