The Rural Local Community in Development Policies in Europe: Discourse and Agency | South-Russian Journal of Social Sciences
The Rural Local Community in Development Policies in Europe: Discourse and Agency
Vol. 20 (2019) No. 3, Political Institutions and Processes
Vol. 20 (2019) No. 3
Political Institutions and Processes

The Rural Local Community in Development Policies in Europe: Discourse and Agency

Semenenko I.S.
Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences
ORCID ID 0000-0003-2529-9283
PDF (Russian)
https://doi.org/10.31429/26190567-20-3-6-27
https://doi.org/10.31429/26190567-20-3-6-27

How to Cite Array

Semenenko I.S. (2019) The Rural Local Community in Development Policies in Europe: Discourse and Agency. South-Russian Journal of Social Sciences, 20 (3), pp. 6-27. DOI: 10.31429/26190567-20-3-6-27 (In Russian)
Submission Date 2019-08-05
Accepted Date 2019-08-26
Published Date 2019-09-27

Copyright (c) 2019 Ирина Станиславовна Семененко

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

The paper presents an overview of the main theoretical and methodological approaches to rural studies in contemporary social research. This is an interdisciplinary field which incorporates agricultural economics and history, social and economic geography, social and cultural anthropology and cultural studies, sociolinguistics, social psychology, sociology and politics, and analyses the trends of non-­urban development and governance. The author discusses interpretations of “the rural” and “rurality” in academic discourse and outlines the relevant research agenda for studying the rural in Russia and in a broader European context with regard to resources that can be potential drivers for rural development and for consolidating rural communities. The study is based on the analysis of academic and public discourse concerning the priorities and strategies of rural development policies in the EU countries and reveals a direct impact of the rural studies research agenda and discourse on decision-­making in local rural development policies. An important factor influencing public policy in this sphere is also, as the study shows, an adequate institutional framework for accommodating rural interests at various levels of decision-­making. Different resources can be relevant for promoting motivated and innovative identities and contributing to rural development, including values-­oriented identity politics that see the rural community both as a pillar of tradition and a source of innovation in environment sustainability, heritage promotion and local good governance. These issues are an integral part of the responsible development agenda — a conceptual framework for promoting innovative change at all levels of social life, one that can stimulate economic agents and individuals to pursue development issues and to hold responsibilities for the choices they make and for the policies they advocate. This is especially important for promoting agency in rural communities and for stimulating their interaction with other agents of social change — government and local authorities, business, NGOs, experts and academia. The latter can contribute to a relevant public discussion on rural development issues, to a closer cooperation between experts and rural communities and to further advancing their active involvement and the inclusion of rural interests into a broader development agenda. Such an input is all the more important for the Russian political research agenda where rural studies have so far been a marginal research area. It can also further stimulate empirical research on “good practices” and their implementation in public policy.

Keywords

rural studies, peasant studies, rural local community, social cleavages, local identity, rural identity, urban way of life, space, territory, natural/cultural landscape, rural development discourses, resources of development, development policies, community involvement, responsible development

Acknowledgements

The research was carried out through the financial support of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, grant № 19–011–31356 (Development of Rural Local Com­mu­nities: The Potential of Identity Policy under Heterogeneous Socio-­Economic and Socio-­Cultural Regional Space of the Region).

References

  1. Albertazzi, D., Giovannini, A. & Seddone, A. (2018). ‘No Regionalism Please, we are Leghisti!’ The Transformation of the Italian Lega Nord under the Leadership of Matteo Salvini. Regional and Federal Studies, 28(5), 645–671.
  2. Apple-producing Family Farms in South Tyrol: An Agricultural Innovation Case Study. (2014). In J. de Meyer (Ed.) Occasional Papers on Innovation in Family Farming. FAO. Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/3/a-i3789e.pdf
  3. Askins, K. (2009). Crossing Divides: Ethnicity and Rurality. Journal of Rural Studies, 25(4) 365–375.
  4. Averkieva, K. V. (2018). Seminar-konferentsiia Souchastvuiushchee razvitie gorodov i selskikh territorii [Seminar-Conference “Participatory Development of Cities and Rural Areas]. Krestianovedenie [Russian Peasant Studies], 3, 196–204.
  5. Babashkin, V. V. (Ed.) (2015). Sovremennoe krestianovedenie i agrarnaia istoriia Rossii v XX veke [Modern Peasant Studies and Agrarian History of Russia in the XX Century]. M.: Izdatelstvo ROSSPEN.
  6. Beel, D. E., Wallace, C., Webster, G., Nguyen, H., Tait, E., Macleod, M., Mellish, Ch. (2017). Cultural Resilience: The Production of Rural Community Heritage, Digital Archives and the Role of Volunteers. Journal of Rural Studies, 54, 459–468. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0743016715000479
  7. Bell, M. (2007). The Two-Ness of Rural Life and the Ends of Rural Scholarship. Journal of Rural Studies, 23(4), 402–415.
  8. Berger, S., Dicks, B., Fontaine, M. (2019). “Community”: A Useful Concept in Heritage Studies? International Journal of Heritage Studies. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/39714038/Community_a_useful_concept_in_heritage_studies?email_work_card=view-paper
  9. Cloke, P., Marsden, T. & Mooney, P. (Eds.) (2006). Handbook of Rural Studies. London: Sage Pub.
  10. Cruickshank, J., Lysgård, H. K., Magnussen, M.-L. (2009). The Logic of the Construction of Rural Politics: Political Discourses on Rurality in Norway. Geografiska Annaler. Series B. Human Geography, 91(1), 73–89.
  11. Dymitrow, M. (2018). Rural / Urban: Laying Bare the Controversy. Geographia Polonica, 91(4), 375–397.
  12. Edensor, T. (2006). Performing Rurality. In Cloke P., Marsden T. and Mooney P. (Eds.) Handbook of Rural Studies (pp. 484–495). London: Sage.
  13. Fedotova, V. G. (2005). Khoroshee obshchestvo [Good Society]. M.: Progress-Traditsiia.
  14. Galbraith, J. K. (1996). The Good Society: The Humane Agenda. Boston, New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.
  15. Garland, J., Chakraborti, N. (2006). ’Race’, Space and Place. Examining Identity and Cultures of Exclusion in Rural England. Ethnicities, 6(2), 159–177.
  16. Gromyko, M. M. (1991). Mir russkoi derevni [The World of Russian Village]. M.: Molodaia gvardiia.
  17. Guelke, A. (2012). Politics in Deeply Divided Societies. Cambridge, Malden MA: Polity Press.
  18. Halfacree, K. H. (1993). Locality and Social Representation: Space, Discourse and Alternative Definitions of the Rural. Journal of Rural Studies, 9(1), 23–37.
  19. Hawley, L.R., Koziol, N.A., Bovaird, J., McCormick, C.M, Welch, G.W., Arthur, A.M., Bash, K. (2016). Defining and Describing Rural: Implications for Rural Special Education Research and Policy. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 35(3), 3–11.
  20. Holloway, L. (2004). Showing and Telling Farming: Agricultural Shows and Re-Imagining British Agriculture. Journal of Rural Studies, 20(3), 319–330.
  21. Horton, J. (2008). Producing Postman Pat: The Popular Cultural Construction of Idyllic Rurality. Journal of Rural Studies, 24(4), 389–398.
  22. Kietäväinen, A. (2014). Narrated Agency and Identity of Settlement Farmers in the Changing Circumstances of Modern Society. Sociologia Ruralis, 54(1), 57–70.
  23. Kolosov, V. A. (2018). Rossiiskoe pogranich’e: vyzovy sosedstva [Russian Border: Challenges of Neighborhood]. M.: IP Matushkina I. I.
  24. Kopoteva, I. V. (2016). Grazhdanskoe obshchestvo i grazhdanskaia aktivnost sel’skoi Rossii [Civil Society and Civic Engagement in Rural Russia]. Krestianovedenie [Russian Peasant Studies], 1, 142–166.
  25. Lee, J., Arnason, A., Nightingale, A., and Schucksmith, M. (2005). Networking: Social Capital and Identities in European Rural Development. Sociologia Ruralis, 45(4), 269–283.
  26. Lijphart, A. (1977). Democracy in Plural Societies: A Comparative Exploration. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
  27. Lipset, S. M., Rokkan, S. (Eds.) (1967). Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives. New York: Free Press.
  28. Lowe, Ph., Philipson, J., Proctor, A., Gkartzios, M. (2019). Expertise in Rural Development: A Conceptual and Empirical Analysis. World Development, 116, 28–37. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305750X18304339
  29. Lundgren, A. S., Johansson, A. (2017). Digital Rurality: Producing the Countryside in Online Struggles for Rural Survival. Journal of Rural Studies, 51(1), 73–82. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0743016717300980
  30. Mayes, R. (2010). Doing Cultural Work: Local Postcard Production and Place Identity in a Rural Shire. Journal of Rural Studies, 26, 1–11.
  31. Morozova, E. V. (2018). Sel’skaia identichnost’: politicheskii rakurs [Rural Identity: A Political Dimension]. In O. V. Gaman-Golutvina, L. V. Smorgunov, L. N. Timofeeva (Eds.) Politika razvitiia gosudarstvo i mirovoi poriadok: Materialy VIII Vserossiiskogo kongressa politologov Moskva 6–8 dekabria 2018 g. [Development Policy, State and World Order: VIII Russian Congress of Political Science Development Policy, State and World Order]. M.: Aspekt Press
  32. Neumeier, S. (2012). Why do Social Innovations Matter and Should They be Considered More Seriously in Rural Development Research? — Proposal for a Stronger Focus on Social Innovations in Rural Development Research. Sociologia Ruralis, 32(1), 48–69.
  33. Nikulin, A., Trotsuk, I. (2018). Pitirim Sorokin’s Contribution to Rural Sociology: Russian, European and American Milestones of a Scientific Career. Journal of Peasant Studies, 45(7), 1203–1220.
  34. Nikulin, A., Trotsuk, I., Wegren, S. (2018). Ideology and Philosophy of the Successful Regional Development in Contemporary Russia: The Belgorod Case. Journal of Rural Studies, 3(1), 99–116.
  35. Nilsson, B., Lundgren, A. S. (2015). Logics of Rurality: Political Rhetoric about the Swedish North. Journal of Rural Studies, 37(1), 85–95. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/270344722_Logics_of_rurality_Political_rhetoric_about_the_Swedish_North
  36. Nilsson, B., Lundgren, A. S. (2018). For a “Living Countryside: Political Rhetoric about Swedish Rural Areas. European Urban and Regional Studies, 25(1), 72–84.
  37. OECD. The New Rural Paradigm: Policies and Governance. (2006). OECD: Paris.
  38. Olson, M. (1965). The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  39. Panov, P. V., Sulimova, K. A., Fadeeva, L. A. (Eds.) (2009). Soobshchestva kak politicheskii fenomen [Communities as a Political Phenomenon]. M.: ROSSPEN.
  40. Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
  41. Quality of Life in Urban and Rural Areas. (2014). Cornell University ILR School. Eurofound. Dublin. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://www.google.com/&httpsredir=1&article=1420&context=intl
  42. Radaev, V. V. (2019). Gorodskie i selskie milllenaly: neodnorodnost’ novogo pokoleniia [Urban and Rural Millennials: Heterogeneity of the Young Adult Generation]. Voprosy ekonomiki [Voprosy Ekonomiki], 7, 5–28.
  43. Rijnks, R. H., Strijker, D. (2013). Spatial Effects on the Image and Identity of a Rural Area. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 36, 103–111.
  44. Rokkan, S., Urvin, D. (2003). Politika territorial’noi identichnosti Issledovaniia po evropeiskomu regionalizmu [The Policy of Territorial Identity. Studies on European Regionalism]. Logos [The Logos Journal], 6(40), 117–132.
  45. Sadykov, R. M. (2016). Lichnoe podsobnoe khoziaistvo v obespechenii prodovolstvennoi bezopasnosti regiona [Private Subsidiary Farming in Ensuring Food Security in the Region]. Regionalnaia ekonomika teoriia i praktika [Regional Economics: Theory and Practice], 1, 134–143.
  46. Schusmith, M., Brown, D. L. (Eds.) (2016). Routledge International Handbook of Rural Studies. London and New York: Routledge.
  47. Seale, E., Mallison Ch. (Eds.) (2018). Rural Voices. Language, Identity and Social Change across Place. Lexington Books: Lanham, MD.
  48. Semenenko, I. S. (2019). Gorizonty otvetstvennogo razvitiia ot nauchnogo diskursa k politicheskomu upravleniiu [Horizons of Responsible Development: from Discourse to Governance]. Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniia [Polis. Political Studies], 3, 7–26.
  49. Semenenko, I. S. (Ed.) (2017). Identichnost’: Lichnost’, obshchestvo, politika. Entsiklopedicheskoye izdaniye [Identity: Personality, Society, Politics. Encyclopedic ed.]. Moscow: Ves’ mir.
  50. Shanin, T. (1990). Defining Peasants: Essays Concerning Rural Societies, Expolary Economies, and Learning from Them in the Contemporary World. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
  51. Shanin, T. (1992). Velikii neznakomets. Krestiane i fermery v sovremennom mire. Khrestomatiia [The Great Stranger: Peasants and Farmers in the Modern World. The Anthology]. M.: Progress-Akademiia.
  52. Shanin, T. (Ed.) (1971). Peasants and Peasant Societies. Penguin: Harmondsworth, England.
  53. Shanin, T., Nikulin, A., Danilov, V. (Eds.) (2002). Refleksivnoe krestianovedenie: Desiatiletie issledovanii selskoi Rossii [Reflexive Peasant Studies: a Decade of Research in Rural Russia]. M.: MVSHSEN; ROSSPEN.
  54. Shucksmith, M. (2018). Re-Imagining the Rural: from Rural Idyll to Good Countryside. Journal of Rural Studies, 59, 163–172.
  55. Siptits, S. O. (2015). Agrarnaia politika sovremennoi Rossii nauchno-metodologicheskie aspekty i strategiia realizatsii [Agrarian Policy of Modern Russia: Scientific and Methodological Aspects and Implementation Strategy]. M.: VIAPI imeni A A Nikonova: Entsiklopediia rossiiskikh dereven’.
  56. Sorokin, P. A. & Zimmermann, C. C. (1929). Principles of Rural-Urban Sociology. New York: Henry Holt.
  57. Souchastvuiushchee razvitie gorodskikh i selskikh territorii [Combined Efforts in Urban and Rural Development] (2018). Materialy seminara v Institute geografii RAN [Materials of the Seminar at the Institute of Geography of the Russian Academy of Sciences]. Retrieved from http://igras.ru/news/1827
  58. Svendsen, G. (2004). The Right to Development: Construction of a Non-Agriculturalist Discourse of Rurality in Denmark. Journal of Rural Studies, 20(1),79–94.
  59. Toshchenko, Zh. T. (2017). Chto predstavliaet soboi sovremennoe rossiiskoe selo [What is a Modern Russian Village?]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniia [Sociological Studies], 12, 89–98.
  60. Toshchenko, Zh. T. (2018). Osobennosti zhiznennogo mira selskikh zhitelei Rossii [Features of the Life World of Rural Residents in Russia]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniia [Sociological Studies], 2, 71–81.
  61. Treivish, A. (2016), Sel’sko-gorodskoi kontinuum sudba predstavleniia i ego sviazei s prostranstvennoi mobilnostiu naseleniia [The Rural-Urban Continuum: The Destiny of the Notion and Its Link to the Spatial Mobility of Population]. Demograficheskoe obozrenie [Demographic Review], 3(1), 52–70.
  62. Trotsuk, I. V. (2018). Biologicheskoe sotsialnoe i moralnoe v obieiasnenii logiki istorii ili Stoit li iskat krestianina v sovremennom mire [Biological, Social and Moral in the Logic of History, or Whether or not there is Peasantry in the Contemporary World]. Krestianovedenie [Russian Peasant Studies], 3(2), 155–178.
  63. Vinogradsky V. G. (2019). Sel’skie miry: opyt sotsiologicheskoi rekonstruktsii [Rural Universes: a Sociological Reconstruction]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniia [Sociological Studies], 5, 3–13.
  64. Vinogradsky, V. G. (2017). Golosa snizu diskursy selskoi povsednevnosti [“Voices from Below”: Discourses of Rural Everyday Life]. M.: Izdatelskii dom “Delo” RANKHiGS.
  65. Woods, M. (2011). Rural. New York: Routledge.
  66. Woods, M. (2003). Deconstructing Rural Protest: The Emergence of a New Social Movement. Journal of Rural Studies, 19, 309–325.
  67. Woods, M. (2008). Social Movements and Rural Politics. Journal of Rural Studies, 24, 129–137.