Framing Memory about the Reforms of the 1990s in the Liberal Discourse in the 2000s | South-Russian Journal of Social Sciences
Framing Memory about the Reforms of the 1990s in the Liberal Discourse in the 2000s
Vol. 20 (2019) No. 3, Identity Politics
Vol. 20 (2019) No. 3
Identity Politics

Framing Memory about the Reforms of the 1990s in the Liberal Discourse in the 2000s

Malinova O.Yu.
Higher School of Economics
ORCID ID 0000-0002-2754-8055
PDF (Russian)
https://doi.org/10.31429/26190567-20-3-91-105
https://doi.org/10.31429/26190567-20-3-91-105

How to Cite Array

Malinova O.Yu. (2019) Framing Memory about the Reforms of the 1990s in the Liberal Discourse in the 2000s. South-Russian Journal of Social Sciences, 20 (3), pp. 91-105. DOI: 10.31429/26190567-20-3-91-105 (In Russian)
Submission Date 2019-08-09
Accepted Date 2019-08-28
Published Date 2019-09-27

Copyright (c) 2019 Ольга Юрьевна Малинова

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

The article is part of the research project on the construction of collective memory frames about the 1990s and the 2000s in Russian political discourse. It explores the specificity of the 1990s’ reforms representation in the discourse of the reputed “liberals”. The analysis is based on the publications of the liberal parties’ leaders in federal media in 2000–2001. The thematic coding of the texts was carried out on the basis of MAXQDA 2018 (application). The subsequent assortment of the coded fragments enabled the author to reveal the common and the distinctive patterns of representation. The mnemonic strategies of the liberals, i. e. the logic they followed while “using” the recent past for political purposes, was subjected to their struggle for the “market” and “democratic” reforms. Their desire to rehabilitate their own roles in the 1990s contributed to this strategy. As they were focused on further reforms in the sphere of economy, the leaders of both “Soyuz Pravykh Sil” and “Yabloko” parties tended to emphasize the succession between the 1990s and the 2000s. The former did so because they hoped to influence the economic policy of the new president through their representatives in the government and with the help of expert organizations. The latter were critical of both Yeltsin’s and Putin’s reforms and argued that the the policy of new government aggravates old problems. Both were concerned with Putin’s attacks on democratic freedoms. Yet, aware of the defects of the 1990s democratic practices they did not emphasize the contrast between the “new authoritarianism” and the “past freedoms”. The liberals did their best to defend the legacy of the 1990s from the newly arising criticism, but while doing so they were much more concerned with the rehabilitation of their own programs of political reforms than with constructing a general apologetic narrative. As a result, their discourse contributed to, rather than challenged the image of Yeltsin’s’ 1990s and Putin’s 2000s.

Keywords

use of the past for political purposes, mnemonic strategy, the liberals, the 1990s, the 2000s

Acknowledgements

The research was carried out through the financial support of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, grant № 17–03–00322 (Constructing frames of collective memory in the political discourse: the “hard 1990s” vs. the “stable 2000s”).

References

  1. Assman, A. (2014). Dlinnaia ten’ proshlogo: Memorial’naia kul’tura i istoricheskaia politika [The Long Shadow of the Past: Culture of Memory and Historical Politics]. Moskva: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie.
  2. Chubais, A. (2003, October 1). Missia Rossii v XXI veke [Russia’s mission in the 21st century]. Nezavisimaia gazeta [Independent Newspaper], 209, 1.
  3. Davies, M. (2013). Opposition and Ideology in News Discourse. L., etc.: Bloomsbury.
  4. Filatov, S. (2003, October 2). Eto byla smertel’naia skhvatka za vlast’ [It was a Mortal Combat for Power]. Rossia [Russia], 40, 8.
  5. Fish, S. M. (1997). The Predicament of Russian Liberalism: Evidence from the December 1995 Parliamentary Elections. Europe-Asia Studies, 49(2), 191–220.
  6. Gaidar, Ye. (2003, February 2). Ekonomicheskaia politika. Esli oboitis’ bez komplimentov [Economic Policy as It is]. Novoe vremia [The New Times], 5, 20–22.
  7. Gaidar, Ye. (2004, April 14). Liberalizm: slukhi o smerti preuvelicheny [The Rumors of the Demise of Liberalism are Terribly Exaggerated]. Vedomosti [Vedomosti], 64, 5.
  8. Gaidar, Ye. (2004, December 21). Ukraina i Rossia: chto dal’she? [Ukraine and Russia: What Next?] Itogi [Itogi], 51, 24–28.
  9. Gaidar, Ye. (2009). V nachale novoi fazy [In the Beginning of the New Stage]. Svobodnaia mysl’ [Free Thought], 5, 59–68.
  10. Gaidar, Ye. & Chubais, A. (2011). Razvilki noveishei istorii [The Crossroads of Contemporary History]. Moscow: OGI.
  11. Halbwachs, M. (1992). On Collective Memory. Chicago Il.: University of Chicago Press.
  12. Hale, H. E. (2004). Yabloko and the Challenge of Building a Liberal Party in Russia. Europe-Asia Studies, 56(7), 993–1020.
  13. Irwin-Zarecka, I. (1994). Frames of Remembrance. The Dynamics of Collective Memory. New Brunswick etc.: Transaction Publishers.
  14. Khodorkovskii, M. (2004, March 29). Krisis liberalizma v Rossii [The Crisis of Liberalism in Russia]. Vedomosti [Vedomosti], 52, 5.
  15. Khodorkovskii, M. (2005, August 1). Levyi povorot [The Turn to the Left]. Vedomosti [Vedomosti], 139, 5.
  16. Latov, Yu. V. (2018). Paradoksy vosprijatija sovremennymi rossijanami Rossii vremen L. I. Brezhneva, B. N. Yeltsina i V. V. Putina [Paradoxes of Memory of the Recent Past: USSR Under Brezhnev, Russia Under Yeltsin and Putin in Perception of the Current Generation of Russians]. Polis. Politicheskie issledovanija [Polis. Political Studies], 5, 116–133. DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2018.05.20
  17. Levinson, A. (2007). 1990-ie i 1990-j: Sotsiologicheskie materialy [The 1990s and 1990: Sociological Materials]. Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie [Russian Studies in Literature], 2, 489–503.
  18. Malinova, O. Yu. (2017). Konstruirovanie “liberalizma” v postsovetskoi Rossii: Nasledie 1990-kh v ideologicheskikh bitvakh 2000-kh [Constructing “Liberalism” in Post-Soviet Russia: the Legacy of the 1990s in the Ideological Battles of the 2000s]. Politia [Politeia], 1(84), 6–28.
  19. Malinova, O. Yu (2018). Obosnovanie politiki 2000-kh godov v diskurse V. V. Putina i formirovanie mifa o “likhikh devianostykh” [Justification of Policy of the 2000s in V. V. Putin’s Discourse and Constructing the Myth About “the Hard 1990s”]. Politicheskaia nauka [Political Science], 3, 45–69. DOI: 10.31249/poln/2018.03.03
  20. Müller, J. -W. (2004) Introduction: the power of memory, the memory of power and the power over memory. In J.-W. Müller (Ed.) Memory and Power in Post-War Europe. Studies in the Presence of the Past (pp. 1–35). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  21. Nemtsov, B. (2000, November 11). Gosudarstvo — eto my [We are the State]. Moskovskie novosti [Moscow News], 5.
  22. Nemtsov, B. (2003, March 15). Strategiia Rossii. Svoboda, sobstvennost’, effectivnoe gosudarstvo [The Strategy of Russia: Freedom, Property, Effective State]. Nezavisimaia gazeta [Independent Newspaper], 58(2891), 1.
  23. Nemtsov, B. & Kara-Murza V. (jr) (2003, May 23). Putinskii kurs — proryv ili tupik? Razmyshleniia posle triokh let pravleniia vtorogo prezidenta [Is Putin’s course a breakthrough or a deadlock? Thoughts on the Three Years of the Second President’s Rule]. Nezavisimaia gazeta [Independent Newspaper], 100, 1.
  24. Olick, J. (1999). Collective Memory: Two Cultures. Sociological Theory, 17(3): 333–348.
  25. Olick, J. (2007). The Politics of Regret. On Collective Memory and Historical Responsibility. L., N.Y.: Routledge.
  26. Ryzhkov, V. (2004, April 5). Osmyslenie: aprel’skie tezisy o liberalizme [Comprehending April Propositions on Liberalism]. Vedomosti [Vedomosti.], 57, 5.
  27. Sheinis, V. (2003, October 7). Oktiabr’1993-go: konetc perekhodnoi epokhi [October of 1993: The End of the Transition Epoch]. Nezavisimaia gazeta [Independent Newspaper], 214, 11.
  28. Vuorinen, M., Kotilainen, N. & Huhtinen, A.-M. (Eds.) (2014). Binaries in Battle: Representations of Division and Conflict. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  29. Wertsch, J. V. (2002). Voices of Collective Remembering. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  30. White, D. (2007). Victims of a Managed Democracy? Explaining the Electoral Decline of the Yabloko Party. Demokratizatsiya, 15(2), 209–229.
  31. Yeltsin, B. N. (1993, March 23). Obrashchenie presidenta Rossiiskoi Federatsii B. N. Yeltsina k grazhdanam Rossii [The Address of the President of the Russian Federation Boris Yeltsin to the Citizens of Russia]. Krasnaia Zvezda [Krasnaia Zvezda], 65, 1.
  32. Yavlinskii, G. (2000, August 26) Ne vsio sbylos’ kak zadumyvalos’ [Frustrated Hopes]. Economika i zhizn’ [Economy and Life], 34, 1.
  33. Yavlinskii, G. (2000, November 11). Inaia reforma. Vozmozhna drugaia strategiia perekhodnogo perioda [A Different Reform. Another Strategy of Transition is Possible]. Nezavisimaia gazeta [Independent Newspaper], 213(2275), 9.
  34. Yavlinskii, G. (2001, June 19). Novyi kurs [The New Course]. Moskovskie novosti [Moscow News], 25, 10.
  35. Yavlinskii, G. (2001, June 28). Liberalizm dlia vsekh [Liberalism for everybody]. Obshchaia gazeta [Obshchaia Gazeta], 26, 7.
  36. Yavlinskii, G. (2001, August 20). Demokratija dlia tolstykh [Democracy for the Fat]. Novaia gazeta [Novaya Gazeta], 59, 1.
  37. Yavlinskii, G. (2002, December 11). “Dobryi tsar’” kak factor riska [The” good tsar” as a factor of risk]. Moskovskie novosti [Moscow News], 44, 8.
  38. Yavlinskii, G. (2003, May 13). Periferijnyj capitalism [A Periphery Capitalism]. Moskovskie novosti [The Moscow News], 18, 10.
  39. Yavlinskii, G. (2005, June 15) Den’ nezavisimosti ot bolshevizma [The Day of Independence: Freedom from Bolshevism]. Izvestia [Izvestia], 4.