Potential of Political Protest of Youth in Russian Megapolises through the Prism of Communication Analysis in Vkontakte | South-Russian Journal of Social Sciences
Potential of Political Protest of Youth in Russian Megapolises through the Prism of Communication Analysis in Vkontakte
Vol. 21 (2020) No. 4, Public Politics
Vol. 21 (2020) No. 4
Public Politics

Potential of Political Protest of Youth in Russian Megapolises through the Prism of Communication Analysis in Vkontakte

Popova O.V.
St. Petersburg State University
ORCID ID 0000-0002-0701-7767
PDF (Russian)
https://doi.org/10.31429/26190567-21-4-6-23
https://doi.org/10.31429/26190567-21-4-6-23

How to Cite Array

Popova O.V. (2020) Potential of Political Protest of Youth in Russian Megapolises through the Prism of Communication Analysis in Vkontakte. South-Russian Journal of Social Sciences, 21 (4), pp. 6-23. DOI: 10.31429/26190567-21-4-6-23 (In Russian)
Submission Date 2020-11-15
Accepted Date 2020-12-15
Published Date 2021-06-22

Copyright (c) 2021 Ольга Валентиновна Попова

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

The article highlights the results of an empirical study of 2021 on the assessment of the impact of political online communication of youth living in Russian megametropolises on political online participation and protest political actions offline. A combination of the methods used to collect information is of interest: online questionnaire of young people from Russian million-plus cities (1700 respondents, quota sampling, unrelated to the control of gender, age, level of education and city of residence) and analysis of discursive practices of politically oriented unformed communities in VKontakte, which are dominated by participants belonging to the youth of megacities (network analysis based on Big data). Research has led to the identification of 17 sustainable clusters actively discussing political issues. Each of the clusters in turn includes from several tens to hundreds of groups. Representatives of left-wing views, nationalist orientations and feminist beliefs are currently as active as possible from the point of view of online communication. At the same time, there are several separate large clusters of both left and nationalist groups that do not communicate with bearers of views. Communities with liberal views are also represented on VKontakte, their participants are more integrated into groups, the chains of connections are denser (as with carriers of feminist sentiments) than with representatives of left-wing views. Loyalists-­minded groups discuss a narrower range of problems than youth communities of the opposition-­protest constitution. An online survey of youth of megametropolises showed relatively low parameters of real protest online and offline political activity. The highest protest potential is currently observed among youth in St. Petersburg, Yekaterinburg and Kazan. This indicator of mass political sentiment of Moscow youth is slightly lower due to the quantitative balance of groups that differ in the criterion of “loyalism-­oppositionism”. At the same time, the political activation of protest-­minded youth in the next few months is highly likely.

Keywords

youth, megametropolis, political behavior, political protest potential, unauthorized public political actions, online political mobilization channels

Acknowledgements

The reported study was funded by RFBR and EISR, project number 20–011–31753 “Youth of Metropolis as a Social Basis for Public Protest: Prerequisites, Technologies, Forms, Risks and Effects of Political Online Mobilization”.

References

  1. Blommaert, J. (2017). Ludic Membership and Orthopractic Mobilization: On Slacktivism and All That. Tilburg Papers in Culture Studies, Paper 193. Retrieved from https://www.tilburguniversity.edu/sites/tiu/files/download/TPCS_193_Blommaert_2.pdf.
  2. Bode, L., Vraga, E. K., Borah, P. et al. (2014). A New Space for Political Behavior: Political Social Networking and Its Democratic Consequences. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19, 414–429.
  3. Earl, J., Maher, T., Elliott, T. (2017). Youth, Activism, and Social Movements. Sociology Compass, 11(4), 1–14.
  4. Franz, V. A. (2020) Osobennosti rasprostraneniya protestnykh nastroyeniy v srede rossiyskoy molodezhi v usloviyakh informatsionnogo obshchestva (na primere Yekaterinburga) [Features of the Spread of Protest Sentiments among Russian Youth in the Information Society (the Case of Yekaterinburg)]. Filosofiya i gumanitarnyye nauki v informatsionnom obshchestve [Philosophy and Humanities in the Information Society], 3(29), 61–80.
  5. Gladun, A., Klepikova, O. (2020) Absenteizm kak model’ elektoral’nogo povedeniya molodezhi [Absenteeism as a Model of Electoral Behavior of Young People]. Vybory: teoriya i praktika [Elections: Theory and Practice], 2(54), 18–22.
  6. González-Bailón, S., Borge-Holthoefer, J., Rivero, A. et al. (2011) The Dynamics of Protest Recruitment through an Online Network. Scientific Reports, 197, 1(1–7). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep00197.
  7. Green, S. A., Robertson, G. B. (2016) Sposobnost’ k protestu sokhranyayetsya [The Ability to Protest is Preserved]. Kontrapunkt [Counterpoint], 3, 1–16.
  8. Grekov, I.A. (2020) Faktory i osobennosti politicheskoy aktivnosti rossiyskoy molodezhi [Factors and Peculiarities of Political Activity of Russian Youth]. In N. V. Kefner, Yu. V. Popov (Ed.) Razvitiye politicheskikh institutov i protsessov: zarubezhnyy i otechestvennyy opyt [Development of Political Institutions and Processes: Foreign and Domestic Experience] (pp. 538–545). Omsk: Publishing House of Omsk State University named after F. M. Dostoevsky.
  9. Jost, J. T., Barbera, P., Bonneau, R. et al. (2018). How Social Media Facilitates Political Protest: Information, Motivation, and Social Networks. Advanced in Political Psychology, 39, S1, 85–118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12478.
  10. Jost, J. T., Barbera, P., Bonneau, R. et al. (2018). How Social Media Facilitates Political Protest: Information, Motivation, and Social Networks. Advanced in Political Psychology, 39, S1, 85–118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12478.
  11. Kaun, A., Uldam, J. (2017). Digital Activism — After the Hype. New Media & Society, 20, 2099–2106.
  12. Keen, A. (2012). Digital Vertigo: How Today’s Online Social Revolution Is Dividing, Diminishing, and Disorienting Us. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
  13. Larson, J. M., Nagler, J., Ronen, J., Tucker, J. A. (2019). Social Networks and Protest Participation: Evidence from 130 Million Twitter Users. American Journal of Political Science, 63(3), 690–705. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12436.
  14. Lievrouw, L. (2011). Alternative and Activist New Media, Polity, Cambridge. The Digital Divide: Arguments for and Against Facebook, Google, Texting, and the Age of Social Networking. New York: Tarcher.
  15. Murphy, M. T. (2018). Youth in Front: Supporting Youth-Led Social Action. Social Education, 5, 82, 255–259.
  16. Pyrma, R. V. (2019) Elektoral’naya aktivnost’ molodezhi v SSHA, Velikobritanii, Frantsii, Germanii i Rossii (sravnitel’noye issledovaniye) [Electoral Participation of Youth in the USA, Great Britain, France, Germany, and Russia. Comparative Study]. Politia [Politia], 4(95), 188–204. DOI: 10.30570/2078–5089–2019–95–4–188–204
  17. Robertson, G. (2013). Protesting Putinism: The Election Protests of 2011–12 in Broader Perspective. Problems of Post-Communism, 60(2), 11–23. DOI: 10.2753/PPC1075–8216600202.
  18. Romero, D. M., Meeder, B., Kleinberg, J. M. (2011). Differences in the Mechanics of Information Diffusion Across Topics: Idioms, Political Hashtags, and Complex Contagion on Twitter. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW 2011, 695–704. New York: ACM. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1963405.1963503.
  19. Samsonova, T. N., Naumova, E. S. (2020) Rol’ SMI v politicheskoy sotsializatsii sovremennoy rossiyskoy molodezhi [The Role of the Media in the Political Socialization of Modern Russian Youth]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta [Moscow University Bulletin], 26(1), 166–187. DOI: 10.24290 / 1029-3736-2020-26-1-166-187.
  20. Savenkov, R.V., Shcheglova, D. V. (2018). Teorii kollektivnogo povedeniya i mobilizatsii resursov: razvitiye kontseptsiy analiza politicheskogo protesta [Collective Behavior and Resource Mobilization Theories: Developing Concepts for Analyzing Political Protest]. Vestnik RUDN [RUDN Bulletin], 4, 555–563.
  21. Siegel, D. A. (2009). Social Networks and Collective Action. American Journal of Political Science, 53(1), 122–138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00361.x.
  22. Steinert-Threlkeld, Z. C. (2017). Spontaneous Collective Action: Peripheral Mobilization During the Arab Spring. American Political Science Review, 111(2), 379–403. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055416000769.
  23. Steinert-Threlkeld, Z. C., Mocanu, D., Vespignani, A., Fowler, J. (2015). Online Social Networks and Offline Protest. EPJ Data Science, 4(1), 1–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688–015–0056-y.
  24. Theocharis, Y. (2015). The Conceptualization of Digitally Networked Participation. Social Media+Society, 2, 1–14.
  25. Tsai, W.-H. S., Men, R. L. (2018). Social Messengers as the New Frontier of Organization-Public Engagement: A WeChat study. Public Relations Review, 44(3), 419–429.
  26. Tufekci, Z., Wilson, C. (2012) Social Media and the Decision to Participate in Political Protest: Observations from Tahrir Square. Journal of Communication, 62(2), 363–379. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01629.x.
  27. Wolfsfeld, G., Yarchi, M., Samuel-Arzan, T. (2016). Political Information Repertoires and Political Participation. New Media & Society, 18, 2096–2115.
  28. Won, D., Steinert-Threlkeld, Z. C., Joo, J. (2017). Protest Activity Detection and Perceived Violence Estimation from Social Media Images. Proceedings of the 25th ACM International Conference on Multimedia. Association for Computing Machinery, 786–794. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3123266.3123282.
  29. Xiong Cho, B. (2018). Hashtag Activism and Message Frames among Social Movement Organizations: Semantic Network Analysis and thematic Analysis of Twitter During the #MeToo movement. Public Relations Review, 45(1), 10–23.