Mechanisms of Control over the Media “According to Asiastcom”: Comparative Analysis on the Example of Uzbekistan and Tajikistan | South-Russian Journal of Social Sciences
Mechanisms of Control over the Media “According to Asiastcom”: Comparative Analysis on the Example of Uzbekistan and Tajikistan
PDF (Russian)
https://doi.org/10.31429/26190567-23-4-136-153
https://doi.org/10.31429/26190567-23-4-136-153

How to Cite Array

Salimov D.M. (2022) Mechanisms of Control over the Media “According to Asiastcom”: Comparative Analysis on the Example of Uzbekistan and Tajikistan. South-Russian Journal of Social Sciences, 23 (4), pp. 136-153. DOI: 10.31429/26190567-23-4-136-153 (In Russian)
Submission Date 2022-11-10
Accepted Date 2022-12-20
Published Date 2023-03-31

Copyright (c) 2023 Диловар Мирзомуддинович Салимов

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

The article discusses the mechanisms and institutions for the implementation of the political regime of censorship and control over the media in the information field of Tajikistan and Uzbekistan. It is noted that the political regime of censorship and control over the media formed by them significantly reduces the flow of information attacks in them and thereby creates a media space in which all the rules are dictated by the authorities. The functioning of the media within the framework of this strategy is the key to the stability of both the foreign and domestic policies of nation states. This aspect is considered in a comparative manner, taking into account the analysis of media publications and regulations relating to the political life of both states. The mechanisms for the implementation of the political regime of censorship and control over various types of media are determined, depending on their position in relation to the current regimes. Both legal and extra-­legal mechanisms of the political regime of censorship and control over the media are identified. One of the key findings is that the political dynamics of Tajikistan and Uzbekistan are largely determined by the organization of mass media flows, which are considered a key tool in the context of legitimizing the actions of local authorities. The methods they propose for solving existing problems demonstrate a different combination of democratic principles and mechanisms of imperative coordination, pushing these states towards the style of intentional and unintentional authoritarianism. The political regime of censorship and control over the media developed by them is the key to information security in the conditions of political and ideological confrontation, both between the authorities and the opposition in these states, and geopolitical players in the region. The conceptual basis of the study is also the scientific idea that in nation states the validity of the policy of regimes becomes an important factor, whose stability is suggested by the presence of mechanisms for the information impact of power on society and models of political positioning of the media, which is the political regime of censorship and control.

Keywords

political regime, political censorship, mass media, government, state, legitimate order, personifications of the political regime, authoritarian regime, information security

References

  1. Alimov, B. S. (2019). Novyy mediaoblik Uzbekistana [New Media Image of Uzbekistan]. Inostrannye yazyki v Uzbekistane [Foreign languages in Uzbekistan], 1(24), 150–162.
  2. Alimov, B.S. (2016). Znachenie sotsialnykh setey v formirovanii imidzha Respubliki Uzbekistan [The Importance of Social Networks in The Formation of Uzbekistan’s Image]. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Chelyabinsk State University], 4(386), 14–19.
  3. Avsar, Z. (2022). An Overview of Media History in Uzbekistan. Communication and Diplomacy, 8, 59–73. DOI: 10.54722/iletisimvediplomasi.1120313
  4. Bazyleva, S. P. (2017). Elitnaya borba i stabilnost politicheskogo rezhima v Uzbekistane [Elite Struggle and Stability of the Political Regime in Uzbekistan]. Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Politologiya [Bulletin of the Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia. Series: Political Science], 1(19), 77–82.DOI: 10.22363/2313-1438-2017-19-1-77-82
  5. Cook, Ph., Heilmann, С. (2012). Censorship and two types of selfcensorship. Social and Political Philosophy, 3, 2–25. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1575662
  6. Driscoll, J. (2012). Commitment Problems or Bidding Wars? Rebel Fragmentation as Peace-Building. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 1, 118–149. DOI: 10.1177/0022002711429696
  7. Freedman, E., Kurambayev, B. (2019). Ethics and Journalism in Central Asia: A Comparative Study of Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan. Journal of Media Ethics, 35, 31–44. DOI: 10.1080/23736992.2019.1700119
  8. Gafurova, P. A. (2021). Informatsionno-analiticheskie programmy televideniya uzbekistana: istoriya, osobennosti, printsipy organizatsii (na primere programm “Akhborot 24” (telekanal “Uzbekistan 24”) i “UzReport Nyus” (telekanal “UzReport TV”) [Information and Analytical Programs of Television of Uzbekistan: History, Features, Principles of Organization (On the Example of the Programs “Akhborot 24” (TV channel “Uzbekistan 24”) and “UzReport News” (TV channel “UzReport TV”)]. Moskva: Rossiyskiy universitet druzhby narodov.
  9. Goryaeva, T. M. (2009). Politicheskaya tsenzura v SSSR. 1917–1991 gg [Political Censorship in the USSR. 1917–1991]. Moskva: ROSSPEN.
  10. Hegel, G. W. F. (1978). Politicheskie proizvedeniya [Political Works]. Moskva: Nauka.
  11. Horton, J. (2011). Self-Censorship. Res Publica, 17(1), 91–106. DOI: 10.1007/s11158–011–91453
  12. Irnazarov, Sh. K. (2018). Voprosy evolyutsii SMI Uzbekistana v perekhodnyy period [Issues of the Evolution of the Media in Uzbekistan in the Transition Period]. In Mirovaya zhurnalistika: edinstvo mnogoobraziya [World Journalism: The Unity of Diversity]. Moskva: RUDN.
  13. Jansen, S. C. (1988). Censorship: The Knot That Binds Power and Knowledge. UK: Oxford University Press.
  14. Karpov, S. (Eds) (2013). Navstrechu svobodnoy presse Tsentralnoy Azii: 20 let spustya [Towards a Free Press in Central Asia: 20 Years Later]. Almaty: Unesco.
  15. Khasanov, M. B. (2016). Aktualnye voprosy vzaimodeystviya sredstv massovoy informatsii i institutov grazhdanskogo obshchestva v Uzbekistane [Topical Issues of Interaction between the Media and Civil Society Institutions in Uzbekistan]. Lokus: lyudi, obshchestvo, kultury, smysly [Locus: People, Society, Cultures, Meanings], 3, 103–109.
  16. Matts, U. (1992). Ideologii kak determinanta politiki v epokhu moderna [Ideologies as Determinant of Modem Politics]. Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya [Polis. Political Studies], 1(2), 130–142.
  17. Matyakubov, A. D. (2012). Vliyanie internet-zhurnalistiki na preobrazovanie SMI Uzbekistana [The Influence of Online Journalism on the Transformation of the Media in Uzbekistan]. Zhurnalistskiy ezhegodnik [Journalistic Yearbook], 1, 99–102.
  18. Merrett, C. (2007). State Censorship and the Academic Process in South Africa. Illinois: The University of Illinois.
  19. Muhammadiev, Zh. U. (2018). ol svobody slova i informatsii v postroenii grazhdanskogo obshchestva i problemy obespecheniya informatsionnoy bezopasnosti [The Role of Freedom of Speech and Information in Building a Civil Society and the Problems of Ensuring Information Security]. Gosudarstvo i pravo [State and Law], 11, 130–134. DOI: 10.31857/S013207690002189–9.
  20. Mukimov, M. (2016). Multimediynaya zhurnalistika v Tadzhikistane [Multimedia journalism in Tajikistan]. Vestnik Tadzhikskogo natsionalnogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Tajik National University], 4(195), 262–269.
  21. Mukimov, M. A. (2019). Novye media i propaganda [New Media and Propaganda]. Vestnik Tadzhikskogo natsionalnogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Tajik National University], 1, 291–297.
  22. Muratova, N. F. (2019). Internet-SMI Uzbekistana: stanovlenie i sovremennoe sostoyanie [Internet Media of Uzbekistan: Formation and Current State]. Aktualnye problemy mediaissledovaniy [Actual Problems of Media Research]. Moscow: Moscow State University.
  23. Obidov, M. D. (2017). Negosudarstvennye elektronnye SMI: partner ili konkurent? [Non-state Electronic Media: Partner or Competitor?]. Vek informatsii [Age of Information], 2, 233–235.
  24. Osman, W. (2019). Between the White House and the Kremlin: a Comparative Analysis of Afghan and Tajik Media. International journal of communication, 13, 619–641. DOI: 1932–8036/2019FEA0002
  25. Potseluev, S. R., Kurbatov, A. V., Manik A. S. (2021). Politicheskaya korrektnost kak politicheskaya tsenzura: k ironii odnogo kontsepta [Political Correctness as Political Censorship: to the Irony of One Concept]. Gosudarstvennoe i munitsipalnoe upravlenie. Uchenye zapiski [State and Municipal Administration. Scientific Notes], 1, 214–223. DOI: 10.22394/2079-1690-2021-1-1-214-223
  26. Roche, S. (2019). Faceless Terrorist: A Study of Critical Events in Tajikistan. Cham: Springer.
  27. Rollberg, P., Laruelle, M. (2015) The Media Landscape in Central Asia: Introduction to the Special Issue. Demokratizatsiya: The journal of Post-Soviet democratization, 23, 227–232.
  28. Salimov, D. M (2023). SMI i politika: Tadzhikistan v poiskakh soglasiya [Mass Media and Politics: Tajikistan in Search of Consent]. SPb: SPbGEU.
  29. Salimov, D. M. (2018). Vlast ili SMI: kto v dome khozyain? [Power or the Media: Who is the Boss in the House?] In Media i vlast: vlast media [Media and Power: Media Power]. Kazan: KFU.
  30. Sharifzoda, K. (2009). Problemy svobody slova [Problems of Freedom of Speech]. Dushanbe: Devashtich.
  31. Sharifzoda, K. (2014). Svoboda i otvetstvennost slova [Freedom and Responsibility of Speech]. Dushanbe: Irfon.
  32. Shaymergenov, T. T., Abisheva, M. A. (2017). Tsentralnaya Aziya 2027: menyayushchiysya strategicheskiy landshaft. Veroyatnye stsenarii na 10 let vpered [Central Asia 2027: A Changing Strategic Landscape. Possible Scenarios for 10 years Ahead]. Astana: Elbasy.