The System of Goal-Setting in the State Policy of Electoral Innovation Management: the Aspect of Ensuring Electoral Sovereignty of the State | South-Russian Journal of Social Sciences
The System of Goal-Setting in the State Policy of Electoral Innovation Management: the Aspect of Ensuring Electoral Sovereignty of the State
PDF (Russian)
https://doi.org/10.31429/26190567-25-3-83-97
https://doi.org/10.31429/26190567-25-3-83-97

How to Cite Array

Antyushin N.A. (2024) The System of Goal-Setting in the State Policy of Electoral Innovation Management: the Aspect of Ensuring Electoral Sovereignty of the State. South-Russian Journal of Social Sciences, 25 (3), pp. 83-97. DOI: 10.31429/26190567-25-3-83-97 (In Russian)
Submission Date 2024-06-18
Accepted Date 2024-08-15
Published Date 2024-09-30

Copyright (c) 2024 Николай Андреевич Антюшин

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

The process of innovation management is of major importance for the realization of political modernization and development goals. The ability of a sovereign State to implement the policy of managing innovations in the electoral sphere, as well as to implement the principle of electoral sovereignty, which is an integral part of state and national sovereignty, determines the legitimacy of political power and political regime, and the trust of civil society and a wide range of external actors (first and foremost, other sovereign States and international organizations) in the political system. The disruption to interstate communication between Russia and Western countries, including the issues of electoral cooperation, as well as the drive to reinforce Russia’s electoral autonomy, has led to a significant requirement for academic research and expert-­analytical support in the domain of innovation management. The purpose of the article is to identify and systematize the reasons (innovation goals) that the sovereign state faces when carrying out innovation activities in the electoral space, and the conformity of such activities with the category of ‘electoral sovereignty’. The research methodology is based on the theory of political development and modernization, the theory of diffusion of innovation, and the legal theory of sovereignty. As one of the results of the study, an explicative model of innovation activity in the electoral space is proposed, according to which innovations can be divided into three orders of goals. These goals are complementary and oriented not only towards the modernization and development of the electoral system, but also towards the implementation of the principle of electoral sovereignty. The author notes that an innovation is not necessarily a newly created or imported institution or technology; rather, it can also be a recreated process that was previously institutionalized in its entirety, or fragmented, in the electoral history of a state. The author suggests reformulating Russia’s electoral traditions to make them relevant and innovative. This would strengthen the domestic electoral sovereignty.

Keywords

electoral process, electoral innovations, electoral management, innovation management policy, state electoral policy, electoral traditions

Acknowledgements

The study was carried out at St. Petersburg State University with the financial support of the Russian Science Foundation within the framework of scientific project No. 24-28-01061 “Innovation Management in State Electoral Policy”

References

  1. Baranov, N. A. (2021). Vybory kak institut doveriya osobennosti funkcionirovaniya v usloviyah pandemii COVID‑19 [Elections as an Institution of Trust: Features of Functioning in the Context of the COVID‑19 Pandemic]. Upravlencheskoe konsul’tirovanie [Management Consulting], 10, 10–21. DOI: 10.22394/1726-1139-2021-10-10-21
  2. Borisov, I. B. (2010). Elektoral’nyy suverenitet [Electoral Sovereignty]. M.: ROIIP.
  3. Borisov, I. B. (2024). Obespechenie elektoral’nogo suvereniteta vo vneshnih otnosheniyah [Ensuring Electoral Sovereignty in External Relations]. Grazhdanin. Vybory. Vlast’ [Citizen. Elections. Authority]. 2(32), 88–103.
  4. Chimarov, N. V. (2020). Aktual’nye voprosy normativno-­pravovogo zakrepleniya novoy tekhnologii golosovaniya na platforme “blockchain” [Current Issues of Legal Consolidation of New Voting Technology on the “Blockchain” Platform]. In V. I. Skryabin (Ed.) Gosudarstvo, pravo i obshchestvo: voprosy teorii i praktiki. Materialy vtoroy vserossiyskoy nauchno-­prakticheskoy konferentsii [State, Law and Society: Issues of Theory and Practice. Materials of the Second All-­Russian Scientific and Practical Conference]. (pp. 503–508). Rostov-na-Donu: IP Nefedov.
  5. Davydova, N. S. (2023). Determinanty razvitiya innovatsionnoy politicheskoy sistemy: teoreticheskiye osnovaniya i praktika [Determinants of The Development of the Political Innovation System: Theoretical Foundations and Practice]. Gosudarstvennoye i munitsipal’noye upravleniye. Uchenyye zapiski [State and Municipal Administration. Scientific Notes], 2, 303–308. DOI: 10.22394/2079-1690-2023-1-2-303-308
  6. Eliseeva, G. V. (2022). Vliyanie pandemii COVID‑19 na izbiratel’nye prava i svobody [The Impact of the COVID‑19 Pandemic on Electoral Rights and Freedoms]. In S. K. Buryakov (Ed.) Realizatsiya Konstitutsii Rossiyskoy Federatsii: sostoyanie i perspektivy. Materialy VI mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii [Implementation of the Constitution of the Russian Federation: Status and Prospects. Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference] (pp. 20–21). Omsk.
  7. Global overview of Covid‑19: Impact on elections (2020, May 27). International IDEA. Retrieved from https://www.idea.int/data-tools/tools/global-­overview-covid‑19‑impact-­elections
  8. Grishin, N. V. (2019). Izucheniye gosudarstvennoy elektoral’noy politiki: kak formiruyetsya issledovatel’skaya povestka dnya [Studying State Electoral Politics: How the Research Agenda is Formed]. Politicheskaya ekspertiza: POLITEKS [Political Expertise: POLITEX], 15(2), 261–274. DOI: 10.21638/11701/spbu23.2019.207
  9. Grishin, N. V. (2024). Izucheniye innovatsiy gosudarstvennoy elektoral’noy politiki: obzor nauchnoy literatury [Studying Innovations in Electoral Governance: A Scientific Literature Review]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Politologiya [Bulletin of Perm University. Political Science], 18(2), 149–159. DOI: 10.17072/2218-1067-2024-2-149-159
  10. Hong, S., Kim, S. H., Kwon, M. (2022). Determinants of Digital Innovation in the Public Sector. Government Information Quarterly, 39(4). DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2022.101723
  11. Karpova, N. V. (2021). Elektoral’naya kul’tura rossiyskogo obshchestva v fokuse parlamentskih vyborov 2021 g [The Electoral Culture of Russian Society in The Context of the 2021 Parliamentary Elections]. Teoriya i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiya [Theory and Practice of Social Development], 12, 35–40.
  12. Kolyushin, Ye. I. (2019). Pravovyye problemy elektronizatsii (tsifrovizatsii) vyborov [Legal Problems of Electronic (Digital) Elections]. Vestnik Universiteta imeni O. Ye. Kutafina [Courier of The Kutafin Moscow State Law University], 9, 103–113. DOI: 10.17803/2311-5998.2019.61.9.103-113
  13. Mazur, O. G. (2024). Evolyutsiya elektoral’nyh politicheskih praktik v Rossii [Mediatory Practices in The Political Sphere: Institutional Aspect]. Izvestiya TulGU. Gumanitarnyye nauki [Izvestiya Tula State University], 1, 47–64.
  14. Morozova, O. S. (2021). Politicheskaya modernizatsiya i elektoral’nye protsessy v tsifrovom obshchestve [Political modernization and electoral processes in a digital society]. In A. V. Sokolov, A. A. Frolov (Eds) Vozmozhnosti i ugrozy tsifrovogo obshhestva. Materialy Vserossiiskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii [Opportunities and Threats of the Digital Society. Proceedings of the All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference] (pp.179–183). Jaroslavl’.
  15. Osipov, M. Ju. (2021). Novelly i innovatsii v prave: poniatie i sootnoshenie [Novelties and Innovations in Law: Concept and Correlation]. Pravo i politika [Law and Politics], 2, 1–14. DOI: 10.7256/2454-0706.2021.2.35031
  16. Plotnikov, N. V. (2009). Sotsial’naya innovatsiya: spetsifika sotsiologicheskogo analiza kategorii [Social Innovation: The Specific Nature of The Sociological Analysis of The Category]. Vestnik Rossiyskogo Universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: sotsiologiya [RUDN Journal of Sociology] 4, 51–55.
  17. Riwanto, A., Suryaningsih, S., Firmandiaz, V. (2024). Preventing Electoral Fraud in Indonesia: Protecting the Social Security of Election Management Personnel. Jurnal Media Hukum, 31(1), 95–114. DOI: 10.18196/jmh.v31i1.19361
  18. Shidlovskiy, A. V., Suhoparov, V. P. (2024). Yedinyy den’ golosovaniya: novatsii izbiratel’nogo zakonodatel’stva i pravovaya ohrana provedeniya vyborov deputatov [The Single Voting Day: Innovations of Electoral Legislation and Legal Protection of Organisation of Deputies Elections]. Zhurnal Belorusskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Pravo [Journal of the Belarusian State University. Law], 1, 46–51.
  19. Shumpeter, Y. A. (2008). Teoriya jekonomicheskogo razvitiya. Kapitalizm, sotsializm i demokratiya [Theory of Economic Development. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy]. M.: Eksmo.
  20. Starostin, A. M., Ponedelkov, A. V., Tovanchova, Ye. N. (2023). Innovatsionnyye aspekty v elektoral’noy politike sovremennoy Rossii [Innovative Aspects in The Electoral Politics of Modern Russia]. Nauka i obrazovaniye: hozyaystvo i ekonomika; predprinimatel’stvo; pravo i upravleniye [Science and Education: Economy and Economics; Entrepreneurship; law and Management], 5(156), 132–137.
  21. Trykanova, S. A. (2021). Napravleniya razvitiya organizatsionno-­pravovyh usloviy distantsionnogo golosovaniya v Rossii [Directions for the Development of the Organizational and Legal Conditions for Digital Distance Voting in Russia]. Obrazovaniye. Nauka. Nauchnyye kadry [Education. Science. Scientific Personnel], 1, 85–87. DOI: 10.24411/2073-3305-2021-1-85-87