What Changes to the Institution of Elections are Acceptable During a Pandemic? A Review of the 2020–2021 Studies | South-Russian Journal of Social Sciences
What Changes to the Institution of Elections are Acceptable During a Pandemic? A Review of the 2020–2021 Studies
Vol. 22 (2021) No. 4, Political Institutions and Processes
Vol. 22 (2021) No. 4
Political Institutions and Processes

What Changes to the Institution of Elections are Acceptable During a Pandemic? A Review of the 2020–2021 Studies

Grishin N.V.
St. Petersburg State University
ORCID ID 0000-0002-2581-2975
Leenders A.M.
Moscow State Institute of International Relations (MGIMO University) under the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation
ORCID ID 0000-0001-7356-1456
PDF (Russian)
https://doi.org/10.31429/26190567-22-4-81-97
https://doi.org/10.31429/26190567-22-4-81-97

How to Cite Array

Grishin N.V., Leenders A.M. (2021) What Changes to the Institution of Elections are Acceptable During a Pandemic? A Review of the 2020–2021 Studies. South-Russian Journal of Social Sciences, 22 (4), pp. 81-97. DOI: 10.31429/26190567-22-4-81-97 (In Russian)
Submission Date 2021-11-15
Accepted Date 2021-12-22
Published Date 2022-07-14

Copyright (c) 2022 Николай Владимирович Гришин, Анна Мария Линдерс

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

This article presents a review of research on the transformation of the institution of elections during the COVID‑19 pandemic. The review covers the academic and expert literature from 2020–2021. The main research centers studying the impact of a pandemic on the electoral process are characterized. The main directions, the most important arguments, and the results of the debate on the permissibility of postponement of elections during a pandemic are identified. It was found that during 2020, the majority of researchers justified the expediency of postponing the election before the alternative of distorting the procedures of the election campaign. There is an exceptionally high degree of solidarity among researchers that decisions about elections during a pandemic must be made on the basis of broad political consensus. Consideration is given to the introduction and dissemination of new voting procedures during a pandemic. Differences between American and European experts were found in their attitudes toward the prospects and acceptability of the proliferation of alternative voting procedures. In the period under review, no stable trends in the understanding and interpretation of the electoral changes that have taken place have emerged. Existing methodological attitudes, in particular the unpopularity of traditional institutionalism, prevent a comprehensive study of the transformation of electoral institutions in modern science. For the first time in several decades of consideration of electoral institutions in English-­language science, the dominance of liberal ideological values has been cut short. At the current stage of development of ideas about the organization of elections, values and legal guidelines give way to a pragmatic approach. The pandemic may halt the further development of electoral standards.

Keywords

elections, electoral management, electoral politics, pandemic, electoral reform, remote electronic voting, multi-day voting

Acknowledgements

The study was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research — EISR within the framework of the scientific project No. 21-011-31777 “Transformation of the institution of elections during the COVID‑19 pandemic: from temporary measures to promising innovations”.

References

  1. Atkinson, V., Applegate, M., Aaberg, R. (2020). Inclusion and Meaningful Political Participation. IFES. Retrieved from https://www.ifes.org/publications/ifes-covid-19-briefing-series-inclusion-and-meaningful-political-participation
  2. Baccini, L., Brodeur, A., Weymouth, S. (2021). The COVID-19 Pandemic and the 2020 US Presidential Election. Journal of Population Economics, 34(2), 739–767. DOI: 10.1007/s00148-020-00820-3
  3. Baranov, N. A. (2021). Vybory kak institut doveriya ili nedoveriya v postpandemiynom mire [Elections as an Institution of Trust or Distrust in a Post-pandemic World]. In O. V. Gaman-Golutvina, L. V. Smorgunov, L. N. Timofeeva (Ed.). Rossiia i politicheskiy poryadok v menyayushchemsya mire: tsennosti, instituty, perspektivy [Russia and the Political Order in a Changing World: Values, Institutions, Prospects] (pp. 58–59). Moscow: Aspekt-press.
  4. Baranov, N. A. (2022). Sotrudnichestvo stran v adaptatsii elektoral’nyh praktik k usloviyam pandemii: mezhdunarodnyy opyt i nacional’nye osobennosti [Country Cooperation in Adapting Electoral Practices to Pandemic Conditions: International Experience and National Peculiarities]. In V. I. Gerasimov (Ed.) Bol’shaya Evraziya: Razvitie, bezopasnost’, sotrudnichestvo [Greater Eurasia: Development, Security, Cooperation] (pp.363–367). Moscow: INION RAS.
  5. Buril, F., Darnolf, S., Aseresa, M. (2020). Safeguarding Health and Elections. IFES. Retrieved from https://www.ifes.org/sites/default/files/ifes_covid-19_briefing_series_safeguarding_health_and_elections_may_2020.pdf
  6. Birch, S., et al. (2021). How to Hold Elections Safely and Democratically During the COVID-19 Pandemic. London: The British Academy.
  7. Dulani, B., Harris, A., Lust, E., Karen, K., Kao, K., Jansson, C., Metheney, E. A. (2021). Elections in the Time of COVID-19: The Triple Crises around Malawi’s 2020 Presidential Elections. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 31, 56–68. DOI: 10.1080/17457289.2021.1924745
  8. Ellena, K. (2020). Legal Considerations When Delaying or Adapting Elections. IFES. Retrieved from https://www.ifes.org/sites/default/files/ifes_covid-19_briefing_series_legal_considerations_when_delaying_or_adapting_elections_june_2020.pdf
  9. Europarliament (2020). Coronavirus and Elections in Selected Member States. Retrieved from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2020/651969/EPRS_BRI(2020)651969_EN.pdf
  10. Grishin, N. V., Leenders, A. M. (2020). Detsentralizatsiya sistemy upravleniya vyborami [Decentralization of Electoral Governance]. Politiya: Analiz. Khronika. Prognoz (Zhurnal politicheskoy filosofii i sotsiologii politiki) [Politia: Analysis. Chronicle. Forecast (Journal of Political Philosophy and Sociology of Politics)], 3, 99–115. DOI: 10.30570/2078-5089-2020-98-3-99-115
  11. Grishin, N. V., Leenders, A. M. (2021). Pandemiya COVID-19 kak katalizator dolgosrochnykh izmenenii instituta vyborov [The COVID-19 Pandemic as a Catalyst for Long-Term Changes in the Institution of Elections]. In O. V. Gaman-Golutvina, L. V. Smorgunov, L. N. Timofeeva (Ed.) Rossiya i politicheskiy poryadok v menyayushchemsya mire: tsennosti, instituty, perspektivy [Russia and the Political Order in a Changing World: Values, Institutions, Prospects] (pp. 144–145). Moscow: Aspekt-press.
  12. IFES (2020). Elections Postponed Due to COVID-19. Retrieved from https://www.ifes.org/sites/default/files/elections_postponed_due_to_covid-19.pdf
  13. IFES (2020). Featured elections held and mitigating measures taken during COVID-19. Retrieved from https://www.ifes.org/sites/default/files/elections_held_and_mitigating_measures_taken_during_covid-19.pdf
  14. IFES (2020). Guidelines and Recommendations for Electoral Activities During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Retrieved from https://www.electionguide.org/digest/post/17592/
  15. International IDEA (2020). Elections and COVID-19: Technical Paper. Stockholm: International IDEA.
  16. International IDEA. (2020). Managing Elections during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Considerations for Decision-Makers. Stockholm: International IDEA.
  17. James, T. S., Alihodzic, S. (2020). When is it Democratic to Postpone an Election? Elections during Natural Disasters, COVID-19 and Emergency Situations. Election Law Journal, 19(3), 344–362. DOI: 10.1089/elj.2020.0642
  18. James, T.S. (2021). New Development: Running Elections during a Pandemic. Public Money & Management, 44(1), 65–68. DOI: 10.1080/09540962.2020.1783084.
  19. Kousser, T., Hill, S., Lockhart, M., Merolla, J. L., Romero, M. (2021). How do Americans Want Elections to Be Run during The COVID-19 Crisis? Research & Politics. DOI: 10.1177/20531680211012228
  20. Krimmer, R., Duenas-Cid, D., & Krivonosova, I. (2020). Debate: Safeguarding Democracy during Pandemics. Social Distancing, Postal, or Internet Voting — the Good, the Bad or the Ugly? Public Money & Management, 41(1), 8–10.
  21. Krivonosova, I. (2020). Electoral Events in Russia during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Remote Electronic Voting, Outdoor Voting and Other Innovations. Stockholm: International IDEA.
  22. Landman, T., Splendore, L. D. G. (2020). Pandemic Democracy: Elections and COVID-19. Journal of Risk Research, 23(7–8): 1–7. DOI: 10.1080/13669877.2020.1765003
  23. Leenders, A. M. (2021). Vliyanie pandemii COVID-19 na dolgosrochnye izmeneniya gosudarstvennoy elektoral’noy politiki [The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Long-term Changes in State Electoral Politics]. In R. V. Yevstifeyev (ed.). Rossiyskaya gosudarstvennost’ na puti v budushcheye: traditsii i trayektorii politiko-pravovykh reform [Russian Statehood on the Way to the Future: Traditions and Trajectories of Political and Legal Reforms] (pp. 169–173). Vladimir: Vladimir branch of RANEPA.
  24. Macdonald, R., Molony, T. (2021). Holding Elections during Future Pandemics and Other Emergencies: Evidence-Based Recommendations. London: Westminster Foundation for Democracy.
  25. Matlosa, K. (2021). Pouring Salt into the Wound: The Crisis of International Election Observation and COVID-19 in Africa. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 56(8), 1967–1981. DOI: 10.1177/0021909621999402
  26. Morozova, O. S. (2021). Vlianie pandemii na vnedrenie v praktiku vyborov osobyh sposobov organizatsii golosovaniya [The Impact of the Pandemic on the Introduction of Special Voting Arrangements into Electoral Practice]. In O. V. Gaman-Golutvina, L. V. Smorgunov, L. N. Timofeeva (Ed.) Rossiya i politicheskiy poryadok v menyayushchemsya mire: tsennosti, instituty, perspektivy [Russia and the Political Order in a Changing World: Values, Institutions, Prospects] (pp. 343–344). Moscow: Aspekt-press.
  27. Pal, M. (2021). A Pandemic Federal Election. SSRN Electronic Journal. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3828002
  28. Petrov, J. (2020). The COVID-19 Emergency in the Age of Executive Aggrandizement: What Role for Legislative and Judicial Checks. The Theory and Practice of Legislation, 8(1–2), 1–22. DOI: 10.1080/20508840.2020.1788232
  29. Rambaud, R. (2020). Holding or Postponing Elections During a COVID-19 Outbreak: Constitutional, Legal and Political Challenges in France. International IDEA.
  30. Reppell, L., Martin-Rozumiłowicz, B., Mohan, V. (2020). Preserving Electoral Integrity during an Infodemic. IFES.
  31. Slim, H. (2020). Electoral Process in Africa: The Impact of COVID-19 and Challenges for the EU. European View, 19(2), 212–221. DOI: 10.1177/1781685820971223
  32. Stewart, I. (2020, September 5). UK Government to Fund International Covid-19 Studies in Scotland. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/news/uk-government-to-fund-international-covid-19-studies-in-scotland
  33. Tarouco, G. (2021). COVID-19 and the Brazilian 2020 Municipal Elections. Stockholm: International IDEA.
  34. Venice Commission (2020). Respect for Democracy, Human Rights and the Rule of Law During States of Emergency — Reflections. CDL-PI(2020)005rev
  35. Youde, J. (2021). America’s Pandemic Election. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 75(2), 121–128. DOI: 10.1080/10357718.2021.1875985
  36. Zakuskin, A. A. (2020). Budut li novye perenosy dat golosovaniya? [Will There be New Postponements of Voting Dates?]. Evraziyskiy soyuz uchenykh [Eurasian Union of Scientists], 9–7(78), 51–53.