Settlement Level of Local Government in Russia: Social Functions and Financial Opportunities
PDF (Russian)
HTML (Russian)
PDF (Russian)
HTML (Russian)
JATS XML

Section

Regional and Local Policy

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31429/26190567-19-4-69-91

How to Cite

Turovsky, R.F. (2018). Settlement Level of Local Government in Russia: Social Functions and Financial Opportunities. South-Russian Journal of Social Sciences, 19(4), 69-91. DOI: 10.31429/26190567-19-4-69-91
Submission Date September 22, 2018
Accepted Date November 6, 2018
Published Date December 23, 2018
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2018 Ростислав Феликсович Туровский

Abstract

In this article the author analyzes the socially important powers of the settlement level of local self-government in Russia using statistical data of the Russia’s Ministry of Finance on the regional revenues and expenditures during the last decade both for all the settlements in Russia and for the particular regions. The main research goal was to define the really working functions (being probably different from those prescribed by law) of local self-government in the settlements. Besides it was important to study the degree of financial dependency of settlements and the volume of state support for them. The methodology is based on the theory of principal-agent relations which means that the local self-government in settlements can act as an agent of both the state and the local community. However in a centralized system it acts rather as an agent of the state dealing with the limited set of powers defined and partly sponsored by the state. The study shows rather unstable state support of the settlements and ever-changing structure of their expenditures. As a result settlements still cannot find an appropriate place in the system of multilevel government in Russia. Tiny political influence of settlements is entwined with the change of the state policy towards more pragmatism — from active state support of settlements to relative financial autonomy but with very small budget revenues. At the same time the state has moved to the policies of political business cycle recently, rising up the financial support of the settlements before the 2018 presidential elections. The study also shows that Russia’s settlements are mostly deprived of social functions while giving priority to infrastructure (housing, communal services, roads etc) and spending high shares of money on the maintenance of local administrations themselves. Finally the author reveals huge regional diversity of powers and influence of settlements which is the evidence of many regional models evolving according to the local policies of different regional governors.

Keywords

local government settlement fiscal federalism expenditure policy

Funding information

This article is a result of the study supported by Russian foundation for basic research, project № 17–03–00566 “Settlement level of local government in Russia: political status and problems of development”.

References

Архипкин, И., Караваева, И. (2011). Зарождение отечественной теории местных финансов. Вестник Института экономики Российской академии наук, 3, 273–283.

Данилова, Я.А., Лавров, А.М., Онищенко, В.В., Покатович, Е.В. (2015). Стимулирование субнациональных властей в проведении бюджетных реформ: российский опыт. Научно-исследовательский финансовый институт. Финансовый журнал, 5, 5–25.

Ильин, О.Ю., Стялова, И.К. (2012). Сущность местного самоуправления в теориях дореволюционных российских исследователей. Государственное и муниципальное управление в XXI веке: теория, методология, практика, 5, 148–154.

Кириллова, Л.Н., Чиликин, А.Ю. (2010). Особенности управления муниципальными финансами в России. Экономический журнал, 19, 116–126.

Кузнецов, А.В., Кузнецова, О.В. (2015). Региональная политика: зарубежный опыт и российские реали. Москва: ИМЭМО РАН.

Кузнецова, О.В. (2015). Региональная политика России: 20 лет реформ и новые возможности. Москва: «Книжный дом ЛИБРОКОМ».

Токвиль, А. де. (1992). Демократия в Америке. Москва: Прогресс.

Туровский, Р.Ф. (2015). Российское местное самоуправление: агент государственной власти в ловушке недофинансирования и гражданской пассивности. Полис. Политические исследования, 2, 35–51.

Чичерин, Б.Н. (1894). Курс государственной науки. Тома I–III. Москва: Типография товарищества И.Н. Кушнерев и Ко.

Boadway, R. & Shah, A. (2009). Fiscal federalism: Principles and Practice of Multiorder Governance. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Donovan, T., Smith, D.A. & Mooney, C.Z. (2013). State and Local Politics: Institutions and Reform. Boston: Wadsworth.

Farvacque-Vitkovic, C.D. & Kopanyi, M. (Eds.). (2014). Municipal Finances: A Handbook for Local Governments. Washington: World Bank Publications.

Harloe, M., Pickvance, C.G. & Urry J. (Eds.). (2006). Place, Policy and Politics: Do Localities Matter? London: Unwin Hyman.

Judge, D., Stoker, G. & Wolman, H. (Eds.). (1995). Theories of Urban Politics. London: Sage.

Laffont, J.-J. & Martimort, D. (2002). The Theory of Incentives: the Principal-Agent Model. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Lankina, T., Hudalla, A. & Wollmann, H. (2008). Local Governance in Central and Eastern Europe: Comparing Performance in the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and Russia. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

Miller, W., Dickson, M. & Stoker, G. (2000). Models of Local Governance: Public Opinion and Political Theory in Britain. London: Palgrave.

Multi-level Governance Reforms: Overview of OECD Country Experiences. (2017). Retrieved from http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/governance/multi-level-governance-reforms_9789264272866-en

Nordhaus, W.D. The Political Business Cycle. (1975). The Review of Economic Studies, 42 (2), 169–190.

Downloads

Empty statistics