Abstract
Large-scale qualitative changes in youth’s socialization processes bring about internal differentiation in terms of norms and values among the younger generation. It paves the way for the dynamic change within the set of young people’s practices of social and political participation, in the context of digital socialization and network society. The article contains the results of the theoretical analysis of and the empirical research into practices of social and political participation of urban youth. It is shown that a comprehensive study of this phenomenon in a network society requires the development of conceptual and operational models, as well as analytical and methodological tools that integrate the capabilities of socio-cultural, activity-based and identity approaches in the study of non-institutional aspects of political reality. A comprehensive research methodology is described, which integrates classical methods of data collection (focus group method) and special socio-psychological methods adapted to the research objectives. On the basis of the materials of an empirical study carried out by the method of focus group discussions in four cities of the Krasnodar Territory (Armavir, Sochi, Novorossiysk and Krasnodar), the authors classified the types of constructive socio-political practices of young people by the latter’s location in the public online and offline space of the city. Youth’s information consumption, creation and transformation practices and mixed practices have been identified and described by subjectivity criterion. In terms of the content of constructive social and political activity in the urban public space, the diversity of constructive public practices in the offline public urban space has been systematized; educational, “helping” (volunteer), event memorable and symbolic urban practices, environmental actions and projects, as well as practices of public participation in the local governments and city development projects, have been described described.
Keywords
Acknowledgements
The research was carried out through the financial support of the RFBR and the Administration of Krasnodar Region grant No. 19-411-235002 “Local Identity as a Resource of Engaging Young People of a Large City into Constructive social and Political Practices (based on materials from Krasnodar Territory)”.References
- Abdrakhmanova, G. I., Gokhberg, L. M., Dem'yanenko, A. V. et al. Tsifrovaya ekonomika: 2020: kratkiy statisticheskiy sbornik [Digital Economy: 2020: Concise Statistical collection] (2020). M.: NIU VSHE.
- Akhmetova, M. Kh., Magsumov T. A. (2018). Formirovanie ekologicheskoy kompetentnosti uchashcheysya molodezhi v sotsial'no-aktivnoy deyatel'nosti [Formation of Ecological Competence of The Studying Youth of Social Vigorous Activity]. Baltiyskiy gumanitarnyy zhurnal [Baltic Humanitarian Journal], 2(23), 196–200.
- Ali, M. A., Alam, K., Taylor, B., Rafiq, S. (2020). Does Digital Inclusion Affect Quality of Life? Evidence from Australian Household Panel Data. Telematics and Informatics, 51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101405.
- Brodovskaya, E. V., Dombrovskaya, A. Yu., Pyrma, R. V., Azarov, A. A. (2019). Grazhdanskie i politicheskie onlain-praktiki v otsenkakh rossiyskoy molodezhi (2018) [Civil and Political Online Practices in the Evaluations of Russian Youth (2018)]. Politicheskaya nauka [Political Science], 2, 180–197.
- Brodovskaya, E. V., Dombrovskaya, A. Yu., Pyrma, R. V., Sinyakov, A. V., Azarov, A. A. (2019). Vzaimosvyaz' tsennostnogo i kompetentnostnogo vybora molodezhi v usloviyakh tsifrovizatsii: rezul'taty vserossiyskogo issledovaniya (2018 g.) [Interrelation of Value and Competence Choice of Youth in The Digitalization Conditions: Results of All-Russian Research (2018)]. Tsennosti i smysly [Values and Meanings], 2(60), 76–104.
- Gukova, I. N. (2015). Perspektivnye formy razvitiya obshchestvenno-politicheskoy aktivnosti molodezhi v Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Promising Forms of Youth's Socio-Political Activity Development in The Russian Federation]. Teoriya i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiya [Theory and Practice of Social Development], 21, 156–159.
- Gundar', E. S., Pal'tsev, I. M. (2017). Novye formy molodezhnoy politicheskoy aktivnosti v Rossiyskoy Federatsii (na primere Yuga Rossii) [New Forms of Youth Political Activity in the Russian Federation (on the Example of the South of Russia)]. Sovremennaya nauka i innovatsii [Modern Science and Innovation], 4(20), 235–239.
- Howe, N.; Strauss, W. (2000). Millennials Rising: The Next Great Generation. Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group.
- Kaaze, M. (1993). Partisipatsiya [Participation]. In G. I. Ivanov (Ed.) Politologiya. Kratkiy tematicheskiy slovar' [Political Science. Concise Thematic Dictionary] (pp. 43–44). Moscow: Feniks.
- Kastells, M. (2004). Galaktika Internet: razmyshleniya ob Internete, biznese i obshchestve [The Internet Galaxy: Reflections on the Internet, Business, and Society]. Ekaterinburg: U-Faktoriya.
- Komarova, M. S. (2016). Mekhanizmy formirovaniya i realizatsii obshchestvenno-politicheskogo potentsiala rossiyskoy molodezhi: problemy i integrativnye usloviya [Mechanisms of Formation and Realization of Political Potential of the Russian Youth: Problems and Integrative Conditions]. Upravlencheskoe konsul'tirovanie [Administrative Consulting], 5, 226–231.
- Makarova, O. A. (2014). Sovremennye tendentsii politicheskogo uchastiya molodezhi [Modern Trends in Political Participation of Youth]. Vlast' [Vlast’], 12, 39–42.
- Martynova, T. N., Yanitskiy, M. S., Zelenin, A. A., Pfettser, S. A. (2019). Dobrovol'cheskaya deyatel'nost' kak forma sotsial'noy i grazhdanskoy aktivnosti studencheskoy molodezhi [Voluntary Activity as a Form of Social and Civil Activity of Student Youth]. Professional'noe obrazovanie v Rossii i za rubezhom [Professional Education in Russia and Abroad], 1(33), 160–167.
- Mel'nikov, A. V. (2015). Formirovanie obshchestvenno-politicheskogo potentsiala rossiyskoy molodezhi v protsesse politicheskoy sotsializatsii [Formation of Political Potential of The Russian Youth in The Course of Political Socialization]. Srednerusskiy vestnik obshchestvennykh nauk [Central Russian Journal of Social Sciences], 10(5), 105–109.
- Morozova, E. V., Lomaeva, A. K. (2019). Bar'ery elektronnogo politicheskogo uchastiya studencheskoy molodezhi v Rossii [Barriers to E-Political Participation of Students in the Russian Federation]. Sotsial'no-politicheskie issledovaniya [Social and Political Researches], 2. Retrieved from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/bariery-elektronnogo-politicheskogo-uchastiya-studencheskoy-molodezhi-v-rossiyskoy-federatsii
- Nigmatullina, T. A. (2013). Tekhnologiya dobrovol'chestva kak instrument sotsializatsii molodezhi [Technology of Volunteering as an Instrument of Youth Socialization]. Evraziyskiy soyuz: Voprosy mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniy [Eurasian Union: Issues of International Relations], 3–4(4–5),120–129.
- Parry G. (Ed.) (1992). Participation in Politics. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
- Patnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling Along: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. N.Y.: Simon & Schuster.
- Plotichkina, N. V., Morozova, E. V., Miroshnichenko, I. V. (2020). TSifrovye tekhnologii: politika rasshireniya dostupnosti i razvitiya navykov ispol'zovaniya v Evrope i Rossii [Digital Technologies: Policy for Improving Accessibility and Usage Skills Development in Europe and Russia]. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya [World Economy and International Relations], 64(4), 78–83.
- Popova, S. Yu. (Ed.) (2019). Gosudarstvennaya molodezhnaya politika v Rossii: Sotsial'no-psikhologicheskie osnovaniya i tekhnologii realizatsii [State Youth Policy in Russia: Socio-Psychological Foundations and Implementation Technologies]. Retrieved from http://psychlib.ru/inc/absid.php?absid=388247
- Prensky, M. (2001). On the Horizon. MCB University Press, 9(5), 1–6.
- Pye L., Verba S. (Ed.) (1965). Political Culture and Political Development. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Samokhvalov, N. A. (2016). Modeli molodezhnogo predstavitel'stva kak forma povysheniya uchastiya molodezhi v obshchestvenno politicheskoy zhizni rossiyskogo gosudarstva [Models of The Youth Representation as The Form of Intensification of The Youth Involvement in Socio-Political Life of The Russian State]. Aktual'nye problemy sovremennosti: nauka i obshchestvo [Actual Issues of Modern Science and Society], 2(11), 22–26.
- Selivanova, A. O. (2017). Formy politicheskogo uchastiya: problema tipologizatsii. Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta [Forms of Political Participation: The Problem of Typology]. Novaya seriya. Seriya Sotsiologiya. Politologiya [Izvestia of Saratov University. New Series. Series: Sociology. Politology], 17(3), 354–357.
- Soldatova, G. U. (2018). Tsifrovaya sotsializatsiya v kul'turno-istoricheskoy paradigme: izmenyayushchiysya rebenok v izmenyayushchemsya mire [Digital Socialization in the Cultural-Historical Paradigm: a Changing Child in a Changing World]. Sotsial'naya psikhologiya i obshchestvo [Social Psychology and Society], 9(3),71–80.
- Stagneeva, A. V. (2013). Razvitie molodezhnogo volonterstva: sotsial'no-tekhnologicheskiy podkhod [The Development of Youth Volunteer’s Activity: A Socio-Technological Approach]. Gumanitarnye, sotsial'no-ekonomicheskie i obshchestvennye nauki [Humanities, Social-Economic and Social Sciences], 2, 51–54.
- Tarkhanova, I. Yu. (2017). Sotsializatsiya molodezhi sredstvami internet-kommunikatsiy [Socialisation of Youth by Means of Internet Communications]. Pedagogika. Psikhologiya. Sotsiokinetika [Pedagogy. Psychology. Sociokinetics], 4, 169–171.
- Zakharova, V. A. (2019). Rol' molodezhi v preodolenii ekologicheskikh riskov i razvitii ekologicheskoy kul'tury [The Role of Youth in Overcoming Environmental Risks and Developing Ecological Culture]. Gumanitariy Yuga Rossii [Humanities of The South of Russia], 8(6), 201–210.