The Experience of Reforming the Administrative Division at the Localities’ Level in Modern Russia | South-Russian Journal of Social Sciences
The Experience of Reforming the Administrative Division at the Localities’ Level in Modern Russia
PDF (Russian)
https://doi.org/10.31429/26190567-19-3-177-196
https://doi.org/10.31429/26190567-19-3-177-196

How to Cite Array

Trudolyubov A.S., Ekba M.A. (2018) The Experience of Reforming the Administrative Division at the Localities’ Level in Modern Russia. South-Russian Journal of Social Sciences, 19 (3), pp. 177-196. DOI: 10.31429/26190567-19-3-177-196 (In Russian)
Submission Date 2018-08-09
Accepted Date 2018-09-03
Published Date 2018-09-27

Copyright (c) 2018 Александр Сергеевич Трудолюбов, Марина Аслановна Экба

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

The article examines the dynamics of the sub-regional administrative and territorial divisions (since 1987 to 1995) and municipal and territorial divisions in Russia (after Federal Law № 131 came into force), with special attention to the localities’ level of local selfgovernment. The authors detect common trends in the reform of the regional territorial organizations, to group regions in accordance with the changes in the AD, and to correlate the trends with those of other countries. The key method of research is cluster analysis of the dynamics of changes, first in the administrative and later in the municipal divisions of the Russian Federation regions. After the collapse of the Soviet Union, Russia has inherited the former territorial system of the “soviets”, coherent in conformity with the Soviet models of population distribution and territorial economic structure which were no longer actual. The Russian Federation regions faced the necessity to bring their administrative division into line with socioeconomic reality. On the basis of statistical data, the authors assert that the reforms of the territorial structure of local selfgovernment in some regions of the Russian Federation are unsystematic, or that there is no significant development. Different regions in the different periods made decisions to annul small rural localities settlements or to deprive some settlements of their city status. The only viable federal trend that can be traced over the period under research has been the elimination of urban-type settlements.

Keywords

local selfgovernment, administrative division, territorial reforms, localities

Acknowledgements

The research was carried out through the financial support of The Russian Foundation for Basic Research: research project № 17-03-00566 “Settlement-level municipalities in Russia: political position and problems of development”.

References

  1. Charbit, C., & Michalun, M. (2009). Mind the gaps: Managing Mutual Dependence in Relations among Levels of Government. OECD Working Papers on Public Governance, 14, OECD Publishing. DOI:10.1787/221253707200
  2. Chirkin, V. E. (2014). Publichnoe upravlenie “na mestakh”: nekotorye voprosy rossijskogo i zarubezhnogo opyta [Local Public Governance: Some Aspects of the Russian and Foreign Experience]. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava [Journal of Russian Law], 10, 39–48. DOI: 10.12737/5773.
  3. Chislennost’ naseleniya Rossijskoj Federacii po municipal’nym obrazovaniyam. Federalnaya sluzhba gosudarstvennoj statistiki. (2018). [Population numbers of the Russian Federation in Municipal Localities. Government Statistics Office]. Retrieved from http://www.gks.ru/wps/wcm/connect/rosstat_main/rosstat/ru/statistics/publications/catalog/afc8ea004d56a39ab251f2bafc3a6fce
  4. Dergachev V., & Makutina, M. Gosduma v uskorennom rezhime rassmotrit popravki o likvidacii poselenij [The State Duma will Expeditiously Review the Amendments on the Liquidation of Localities]. (2017, March 10). RBK. Retrieved from http://www.rbc.ru/politics/10/03/2017/58c29f429a7947596181c66d
  5. Drobotenko, I. I. (2010). Zarubezhnye modeli mestnogo samoupravleniya: opyt dlya Rossii [Foreign models of Local Selfgovernment: Experience for Russia]. Vlast’ [Power], 1, 119–122.
  6. Eksperty KGI sravnili praktiku municipal’nyh territorial’nyh preobrazovanij v Rossii i Evrope [Committee of Civil Initiatives experts’ Report on Comparative Experiences of Territorial Reforms in Russia and Europe]. Retrieved from https://komitetgi.ru/news/news/3452/
  7. Klejmenov, S. P. (2012). Administrativnyj i ehkonomicheskij faktory prostranstvennogo razvitiya Pskovskoj oblasti: istoriya i sovremennost [Administrative and Economic Factors of Pskov Region Spatial Development: The Past and The Present]. Pskovskij regionologicheskij zhurnal [Pskov Regional Studies Magazine], 14, 187–200.
  8. Markvart, Eh., & Johen, F. (2017). Territorialnoe reformirovanie mestnogo samoupravleniya v Germanii i Rossii na sovremennom etape [Present-day territorial reforms of local selfgovernment in Germany and Russia]. Prostranstvennaya ehkonomika [Territorial economy], 3, 40–61. DOI: 10.14530/se.2017.3.040–061.
  9. Multi-level Governance: overview of OECD Country experience. (2017). OECD Multi-level Governance Studies. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264272866-en
  10. Parishes Names and Codes in England and Wales (2016). Office for National Statistics. Retrieved from http://geoportal.statistics.gov.uk/datasets/parishes-december-2016-names-and-codes-in-england-and-wales
  11. Population by the 2017 administrative reform (2017). Statistics Estonia. Retrieved from http://www.stat.ee/sdb-update?db_update_id=20303
  12. Postanovlenie CK VKP (b) o likvidacii okrugov ot 15 iyulya 1930 g. (1930). [Resolution of the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party (Bolsheviks) on the Annulment of Districts as of July 15, 1930]. Retrieved from http://istmat.info/node/48987
  13. Tarkhov, S. A. (2005). Izmenenie administrativno-territorial’nogo deleniya Rossii v XIII–XX vv. Prostranstvennaya organizaciya hozyajstva: TPK ili klastery? [Russian Administrative Division Development in the XII–XX c. Structure of Territorial Economy: Commercial and Industrial Complex or Clusters]. Moscow: IG RAN.
  14. Tranin, A. A. (1984). O ponyatii administrativno-territorial’noj organizacii kapitalisticheskogo gosudarstva [About the Definition of the Administrative Division of a Capitalist State]. In G. V. Barabashev (Ed.) Administrativno-territorialnaya organizaciya kapitalisticheskogo gosudarstva [Administrative Division in a Capitalist State]. (pp. 8–14). Moscow: Nauka.
  15. Turovskij, R. F. (2006). Centr i regiony: problemy politicheskih otnoshenij [Center and the Regions: Problems of Political Relations]. Moscow: HSE Publishing House.
  16. Zakon Rossijskoj Federacii “Ob obshchih principah organizacii mestnogo samoupravleniya v Rossijskoj Federacii” ot 28.08.1995 № 154-FZ. (1995). [Law of the Russian Federation “On Common Principles of the Structure of Local Government in the Russian Federation from 28.08.1995 № 154-FZ”]. Retrieved from http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_7642/
  17. Zakon Rossijskoj Federacii “Ob obshchih principah organizacii mestnogo samoupravleniya v Rossijskoj Federacii” ot 06.10.2003 № 131-FZ. (2003). [Law of the Russian Federation “On Common Principles of the Structure of Local Government in the Russian Federation” from 06.10.2003 № 131-FZ]. Retrieved from http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_44571/
  18. Zakon Rossijskoj Federacii “Zakon o mestnom samoupravlenii v Rossijskoj federacii” ot 06.07.1991 № 1550-1. (1991). [Law of the Russian Federation “Law on Local Government in the Russian Federation” from 06.07.1991 № 1550–1]. Retrieved from http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_105/
  19. Zakon SSSR “Ob obshchikh nachalakh mestnogo samoupravleniya i mestnogo hozyajstva v SSSR” ot 09.04.1990 № N1418-1. (1990). [USSR Law “On Common Principles of Local Government and Local Economy in the USSR” from 09.04.1990 № N1418–1]. Retrieved from http://www.zaki.ru/pagesnew.php?id=1687