DOI
https://doi.org/10.31429/26190567-22-4-61-80How to Cite
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2022 Оксана Геннадьевна Харитонова
Abstract
The events of the “Arab Spring” and the ensuing protracted armed conflicts in a number of Middle Eastern countries have once again drawn the attention of researchers to those multi-ethnic and multi-confessional societies in which the use of consociational mechanisms allows the maintenance of the state framework despite the high level of conflict between segments. The article attempts to systematize the root concept of consociation, to determine the logic of the use of adjectives with this concept, and to analyze modern consociations in (the) Lebanon and Iraq along these lines. The article attempts to systematize the root concept of consociation, to determine the logic of the use of adjectives with this concept, and to analyze modern consociations in (the) Lebanon and Iraq along these lines. The main analytical tool and simultaneously the subject of analysis is the theory of consociationalism (consociative democracy). Due to the elasticity of the key features of consociation, its conceptualization is based on the principle of “family resemblance”. To determine the basic (necessary and sufficient) elements of an ideal-typical consociation, we take the entire set of formal institutional mechanisms identified by A. Lijphart, if the democracy attribute is excluded. The analysis of the application of institutional mechanisms of consociation in the Middle Eastern political and cultural context showed that Lebanon is an ethno-confessional consociation, where formally democratic institutions at the national level coexist with authoritarian segments. Iraq, on the other hand, is a non-democratic partial consociation dominated by the Shiite segment. In the case of Lebanon, the attributes refine the concept of consociation, giving it new facets; in the case of Iraq, they stretch the concept, blurring the notion of consociation. Examining Middle Eastern consociations through the lens of a behavioral approach revealed that neither sectoral nor imposed consociations contributed to the "spirit of consociation”. It is concluded that consociations in the West and in the East differ significantly at the institutional and behavioral level, so that even the use of adjectives cannot avoid serious assumptions in assigning them to the class of consociations.Keywords
Funding information
The reported study was funded by the Russian Foundation of Basic Research (RFBR) according to the research project № 20-011-00922 А.
References
Aboultaif, E. W. (2015). The Limitations of the Consociational Arrangements in Iraq. Ethnopolitics Papers, 38, 1–22. Retrieved from https://www.psa.ac.uk/psa-communities/specialist-groups/ethnopolitics/blog
al-Shadeedi, H., van Veen, E. (2020). Iraq’s Adolescent Democracy. Where To Go from Here. In CRU report (pp. 13–44). Hague: Netherlands Institute of International Relations.
Andeweg, R. B., De Winter, L. & Müller, W.C. (2008). Parliamentary Opposition in Post-Consociational Democracies: Austria, Belgium and the Netherlands. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 14 (1–2), 77–112. DOI: 10.1080/13572330801921034
Bogaards, M. (2019). Consociationalism and Centripetalism: Friends or Foes? Swiss Political Science Review, 25(4), 519–537. DOI: 10.1111/spsr.12371
Bogaards, M. (2021). Iraq’s Constitution of 2005: The Case against Consociationalism ‘Light’. Ethnopolitics, 20(2), 186–202. DOI: 10.1080/17449057.2019.1654200
Byman, D. (2014). Sectarianism Afflicts the New Middle East. Survival: Global Politics and Strategy, 56(1), 79–100, DOI: 10.1080/00396338.2014.882157
Calfat, N. N. (2018). The Frailties of Lebanese Democracy: Outcomes and Limits of the Confessional Framework. Contexto Internacional, 40(2), 269–293. DOI: 10.1590/s0102-8529.2018400200002
Collier, D. & Mahon J. E. Jr. (1993). Conceptual “Stretching” Revisited: Adapting Categories in Comparative Analysis. The American Political Science Review, 87(4), 845–855. DOI: 10.2307/2938818
Dix, R. H. (1980). Consociational Democracy: The Case of Colombia. Comparative Politics, 12(3), 303–321. DOI: 10.2307/421928
Dixon, P. (2011). Is Consociational Theory the Answer to Global Conflict? From the Netherlands to Northern Ireland and Iraq. Political Studies Review, 9, 309–322. DOI: 10.1111/j.1478-9302.2011.00235.x
Dodge, T. (2020). The Failure of Peacebuilding in Iraq: The Role of Consociationalism and Political Settlements. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 15(4), 459–475. DOI: 10.1080/17502977.2020.1850036
Dodge, T., Mansour, R. (2020). Sectarianization and De-sectarianization in the Struggle for Iraq’s Political Field. The Review of Faith and International Affairs, 18(1), 58–69, DOI: 10.1080/15570274.2020.172
Haddad, F. (2020). Sectarian Identity and National Identity in the Middle East. Nations and Nationalism, 26(1), 123–137. DOI: 10.1111/nana.12578
Halpern, S. M. (1986). The Disorderly Universe of Consociational Democracy. West European Politics, 9(2), 181–197. DOI: 10.1080/01402388608424573
Horowitz, D. L. (2000). Constitutional Design: An Oxymoron? In Shapiro, I., Macedo, C. (eds.) Designing Democratic Institutions (pp. 253–284). N.Y. L.: New York Univ. Press.
Horowitz, D. L (2002). Explaining the Northern Ireland Agreement: The Sources of an Unlikely Constitutional Consensus. British Journal of Political Science, 32(2), 193–220. DOI: 10.1017/S000712340200008X
Iraq’s Constitution 2005. Retrieved from https://www.constituteproject.org/constitution/Iraq_2005.pdf?lang=en
Kerimov, A. A. (2021). Konsocional’naya demokratiya v Livane: sovremennye vyzovy i perspektivy razvitiya [Consociational Democracy in Lebanon: Modern Challenges and Development Prospects]. Vestnik RUDN. Seriya: Politologiya [RUDN Journal of Political Science], 23(3), 364–378. DOI: 10.22363/2313-1438-2021-23-3-364-378
Konstitutsiya Livana [Lebanon’s Constitution]. Retrieved from https://worldconstitutions.ru/?p=90
Kudryashova I. V., Kozintsev A. S. (2021). Institutsionalnyie resheniya etnokonfessionalnykh konfliktov na Blizhnem Voostooke v kontekste imperskogo opyta [Institutional Solutions for Sectarian Conflicts in the Middle East in the Context of Imperial Legacy]. Politicheskaya nauka [Political Science], 2, 140–164. DOI: 10.31249/poln/2021.02.05
Kudryashova, I. V., Kharitonova, O. G. (Eds.) (2020). Metamorfozy razdelennykh obshchestv [Metamorphoses of Divided Societies]. M.: MGIMO.
Kudryashova, I.V. (2016). Kak obustroit’ razdelennye obshchestva [How to Accomplish Stability
in Divided Societies]. Politicheskaya nauka [Political Science], 1, 15–33.
Lijphart, A. (1968). Typologies of Democratic Systems. Comparative Political Studies, 1(1), 3–44. DOI: 10.1177/001041406800100101
Lijphart, A. (1968). Typologies of Democratic Systems. Comparative Political Studies, 1(1), 3–44. DOI: 10.1177/001041406800100101
Lijphart, A. (1969). Consociational Democracy. World Politics, 21(2), 207–225. DOI: 10.2307/2009820
Lijphart, A. (1981). Consociational Theory: Problems and Prospects. A Reply. Comparative Politics, 13(3), 355–360. DOI: 10.2307/421902
Lijphart, A. (1996). The Puzzle of Indian Democracy: A Consociational Interpretation. The American Political Science Review, 90(2), 258–268, DOI: 10.2307/2082883
Lijphart, A. (1999). Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Democracy in 36 Countries. New Haven, L.: Yale Univ. Press.
Lijphart, A. (2004). Constitutional Design for Divided Societies. Journal of Democracy, 15(2), 96–109. DOI: 10.1353/jod.2004.0029
McCulloch, A. (2014). Consociational Settlements in Deeply Divided Societies: The Liberal-Corporate Distinction. Democratization, 21(3), 501–518, DOI: 10.1080/13510347.2012.748039
McGarry, J. & O’Leary, B. (2007). Iraq’s Constitution of 2005: Liberal Consociation as Political Prescription. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 5(4), 670–698. DOI: 10.1093/icon/mom026
Norden, D. L. (1998). Party Relations and Democracy in Latin America. Party Politics, 4(4), 423–443. DOI: 10.1177/1354068898004004002
O’Leary, B. (2010). Iraq as a New Multinational State: A Cautious defence. In Breen, K. , O’Neill, S. (eds.) After the Nation? Critical Reflections on Nationalism and Postnationalism (pp. 60–83) Palgrave Macmillan: Basingstoke, NY.
Prezident Livana na fone krizisa prizval sdelat’ gosudarstvo svetskim [Lebanon’s President, Amid Crisis, Calls for a Secular State] (2020). RIA Novosty [RIA News]. Retrieved from https//ria.ru/20200830/livan-1576500565.html
Przeworski, A. (2013). Politicheskiy institut i politicheskiy poryadok [The Political Institution and the Political Order]. In Demokratiya v rossiyskom zerkale [Democracy in the Russian Mirror] (pp. 398–428). М.: MGIMIO.
Salem, P. (2011). Lebanon. In Lust, E. (ed.) The Middle East (pp. 530–550). Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.
Sarabiev, А. V. (2019). Livan: obyknovennaya “konsotsionnalnaya demoktatiya” v regioonalnom kontekste. [Lebanon: An Ordinary “Consociational Democracy” in the Regional Context]. Vestnik MGIMO [MGIMO Review of International Relations], 12(4), 89–112. DOI: 10.24833/2071-8160-2019-4-67-89-112
Stepan, A., Linz, J. Yadav, Y. (2011). Crafting State-nations. India and Other Multinational Democracies. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Taylor, R. (2009). The Promise of Consociational Theory. In Taylor, R. (ed.) Consociational Theory: McGarry and O’Leary and the Northern Ireland Conflict (pp. 1–12). London: Routledge.