Section
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31429/26190567-22-3-43-60How to Cite
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2022 Елена Станиславовна Студеникина, Мария Владимировна Донцова
Abstract
The purpose of the article is defined as the study of the policy of memory as a resource for the development of civil identity and positive images of the future of the country in the consciousness of the youth of the South of Russia, using the two most important geo-strategic zones – Krasnodar Territory and the Republic of Crimea. The empirical basis of the research is the results of focus group discussions held in Krasnodar Krai (2 groups) and the Republic of Crimea (2 groups), in which representatives of students and working youth participated. The results of the study demonstrate the need to implement the policy of memory as an independent State policy and not as fragments of individual normative acts. The Internet is the dominant source of information for today’s youth, which means that public policies guidance on memory should be broadcast primarily through this channel. The most powerful integration and mobilization potential is the historical theme of the Great Patriotic War. At present, the development of civic identity of today’s youth is lagging behind, including the absence of a policy of memory as a coherent system of public administration. Perceptions of Russia’s future depend on age: young people born in the 1990s see the future of our country more pessimistically than those born in the 2000s.
Keywords
Funding information
The study was carried out with the financial support of RFFR and EISR within the framework of the scientific project 21-011-31514-op “Politics of memory as a resource for the formation of civic identity and positive image of the future of the country in the consciousness of the youth of South Russia”.
References
Avanza, M. & Laferté, G. (2005). Dépasser la “Construction des identités”? Identification, image sociale, appartenance. Genèses., 61, 134–152. DOI: 10.3917/gen.061.0134
Bauman, Z., Donskis, L. (2019). Tekuchee zlo: zhizn’ v mire, gde net al’ternativ. [Fluid Evil: Life in a World Where there are no Alternatives]. SPb, Izdatel’stvo Ivana Limbaha.
Belyaev, E. V., Linchenko A. A. (2016). Gosudarstvennaya politika pamyati i tsennosti massovogo istoricheskogo soznaniya v sovremennoy Rossii: problemy i protivorechiya [State Politics of Memory and The Valuesof The Mass Historical Consciousnessin Modern Russia: Issues And Contradictions]. Studia Humanitatis. [Studia Humanitatis], 2, Retrieved from http://st-hum.ru/content/belyaev-ev-linchenko-aa-gosudarstvennaya-politika-pamyati-i-cennosti-massovogo.
Beschasnaya, A. A. (2015). Politicheskie ustanovki rozhdennykh v “post-SSSR”: politika glazami studentov [Political Orientation of Citizens Born in “Post-Soviet” Period: Politics Through the Eyes of Students]. Obshchestvo. Sreda. Razvitie. [Society. Environment. Development], 1, 60–66.
Chigrin, V. A., Harabuga V. V. (2015). Situatsiya v Krymu i formirovanie istoricheskoy pamyati obshchestva [Crimean Events and The Development of Society’s Historical Memory]. Vestnik Instituta sociologii. [Bulletin of the Institute of Sociology], 15, 23–34.
Drobizheva, L. M. (2019). Konsolidacionnyy resurs obshcherossiyskoy grazhdanskoy identichnosti [Consolidation resource of the All-Russian Civic Identity]. In G. V. Burova, L. D. Changlyan, S. A. Oreshin (Eds) Realizatsiya gosudarstvennoy natsional’noy politiki: opyt goroda Moskvy i regionov Rossii. [Implementation of the State National Policy: The Experience of the City of Moscow and the Regions of Russia] (pp. 30–40). Moscow, GBU “MDN”.
Drobizheva, L. M. (2018). Grazhdanskaya rossiyskaya identichnost’: dinamika i potencial v konsolidatsii politetnicheskogo obshchestva [Civic Russian Identity: The Dynamics and Potential for Consolidating a Multi-ethnic Society]. In V. A. Tishkov (Ed.) Etnicheskoe i religioznoe mnogoobrazie Rossii. [Ethnic and Religious diversity of Russia] (pp. 107–119). Moscow, IEA RAS.
Drobizheva, L. M. (2018). Konsolidiruyushchaya identichnost’ v obshcherossijskom, regional’nom i etnicheskom izmereniyah [All-Russian, Regional and Ethnic Dimensionsof Consolidating Identity]. Perspektivy. Elektronnyy zhurnal. [Perspectives and Prospects], 3(15), 6–21.
Fedorchenko, L. V. (2019). Politika patrioticheskogo vospitaniya studentov v SSHA i Kitae. Sravnitel’nyiy analiz [The Policy of Patriotic Education of Students in the USA and China: Comparative Analysis]. Obozrevatel’ .[The Observer], 5, 82–90.
Gorshkov, M. K. (2018) Vossoedinenie Kryma s Rossiey: social’no-istoricheskie, politicheskie i sots g, iokul’turnye predposylki [Reunification of Crimea with Russia: Socio-Historical, Politicaland Socio-Cultural Background]. Sociologicheskaya nauka i social’naya praktika. [Sociologicheskaja Nauka i Social’naia Praktika], 6(2), 7–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/snsp.2018.6.2.5853
Gorshkov, M. K., Sheregi, F. E. (2020). Molodezh’ Rossii v zerkale sotsiologii. K itogam mnogoletnikh issledovaniy. [Youth of Russia in the Mirror of Sociology. To the Results of Many Years of Research]. Moscow, FNISC RAS.
Gudkov, L. D., Dubin B. V., Zorskaya N. A. (2011). Molodezh’ Rossii. [Youth of Russia]. Moscow, Moskovskaya shkola politicheskikh issledovaniy.
Knyazeva, E. V. (2017). Struktura krymskoy identichnosti: opyt primeneniya binarnoy logisticheskoy regressii dlya postroeniya identifikatsionnykh modeley krymchan (na materialakh issledovaniya “Otkrytoe mnenie .— .— Teleskop: zhurnal sotsiologicheskikh i marketingovykh issledovaniy. [Telescope: Journal of Sociological and Marketing Research], 2, 12–16.
Kochergin, A. A. (2020). Velikaya Otechestvennaya voyna v uchebnikakh po istorii kubanskogo kazachestva [The Great Patriotic War in textbooks on the history of the Kuban Cossacks]. In G. G. Matishov (Ed.) Velikaya Otechestvennaya vojna v istorii i pamyati narodov Yuga Rossii: sobytiya, uchastniki, simvoly. Materialy Vserossijskoy nauchnoy konferentsii, posvyashchennoy 75-letiyu Pobedy v Velikoy Otechestvennoy voyne (g. Rostov-na-Donu, 10–11 sentyabrya, 2020) .[The Great Patriotic War in the History and Memory of the Peoples of the South of Russia: Events, Participants, Symbols: Materials of the All-Russian Scientific Conference dedicated to the 75th anniversary of the victory in the Great Patriotic War (Rostov-on-Don, 10–11 September 2020)] (pp. 581–582). Rostov-on-Don, YUNC RAS.
Komarovskiy, V. S. (2020). Obraz zhelaemogo budushchego Rossii: problemy formirovaniya [The Image of the Desired Future of Russia: Problems of Formation]. Vlast’. [Power], 28(1), 45–50.
Koryakovceva, O. A. (2013). Molodezh’ kak nositel’ grazhdanstvennosti i ee rol’ v sovremennoy Rossii [The Youth as Citizenship Bearer and It’s Role in Contemporary Russia]. Mezhdunarodnyy nauchno-issledovatel’skiy zhurnal. [International Research Journal], 9(16), 49–50.
Kravchenko, N. Yu. (2016). Grazhdanskaya identichnost’ sovremennoj Rossii [Civil Identity of Modern Russia]. Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. Novaya seriya. Seriya: Sociologiya. Politologiya. [News of Saratov University. A New Series. Series: Sociology. Political Science], 16(1), 5–8.
Larionov, A. E., Novichkov, A. V. (2020). Monumental Practices of Perpetuating the Memory of the Great Patriotic war in Crimea. Dialog so Vremenem [Dialogue with time]., 72, 292–309. DOI: 10.21267/AQUILO.2020.72.72.019
Nestik, T. A. (2014). Kollektivnyy obraz budushchego: social’no-psihologicheskie aspekty prognozirovaniya [The Collective Image of The Future: Social Psychological Aspects of Prognostication]. Voprosy psihologii. [Voprosy Psihologii], 1, 2–10.
Nestik, T. A., Roldugina V. N. (2018). Obraz budushchego Rossii u predstaviteley pokoleniya Z [The Image of the Future of Russia among the Representatives of Generation Z]. Chelovek i mir. [Man and the World], 2(2), 75–87.
Polak F. (1973). The Image of the Future.. Amsterdam; London: New York.
Rebrova, I.V. (2010). Svyaz’ pokoleniy: Velikaya Otechestvennaya vojna glazami «detej vojny» i ee vospriyatie sovremennoj molodezh’yu [Generational Relations: Great Patriotic War through the Eyes of “Children of War” and its Perception by Modern Youth]. In A. Yu. Rozhkov (Ed.) Vtoraya mirovaya voyna v detskikh “ramkakh pamyati”: sbornik nauchnykh statey. [World War II in Children’s “Memory Frames”: Collection of Scientific Articles] (pp. 248–264). Krasnodar, Ekoinvest.
Rikyor, P. (2008). Konflikt interpretaciy. Ocherki o germenevtike. [Conflict of Interpretations. Essays on Hermeneutics]. Moscow: Akademicheskiy Proekt.
Romanova, A., Fyodorova, M. (2020). The Generational Gap and the Historical Memory of the Digital Generation. ISTORIYA., 9(95). Retrieved from https://history.jes.su/s207987840012223-4-1. DOI: 10.18254/S207987840012223-4
Ryaguzova, E. V. (2019). Kollektivnaya pamyat’ i instancii temporal’nosti [Collective Memory and Instances of Temporality]. Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. Novaya seriya. Seriya Akmeologiya obrazovaniya. Psihologiya razvitiya. [News of Saratov University. A new series. Acmeology of Education series. Developmental Psychology], 8(2), 139–145.
Sulima, E. N. (2017). Grazhdanskaya identichnost’ kak resurs gosudarstva [Civil Identity as a Resource of the State]. Cennosti i smysly. [Values and Meanings], 3(49), 8–17.
Taradina, Yu. M. (2010). Vremennye orientacii kak faktor otnosheniya studentov k strategicheskoy politike Rossii [Time Orientations as a Factor of Students’ Attitude to the Strategic Policy of Russia]. Izvestiya Rossijskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. A. I. Gercena .[Proceedings of the A. I. Herzen Russian State Pedagogical University], 125, 98–103.
Ustinkin, S. V., Morozova N. M., Kukonkov P. I. (2020). Pamyat’ uchashcheisya molodezhi o Velikoy Otechestvennoy voyne: obshchee i osobennoe [Memory of the Great Patriotic War: General and Special]. In M. K. Gorshkov (Ed.) Rossiya reformiruyushchayasya: ezhegodnik: Vypusk 18. [Russia Reforming: Yearbook. Issue 18] (pp. 299–330). Moskva: Novyy Khronograf.
Zadorin, I. V. (2018). Regiony “rubezha”: territorial’naya identichnost’ i vospriyatie “osobosti” [Regions of the “Frontier”: Territorial Identity and Perception of “specialness”]. Politiya, 2(89), 102–136.