Многосоставные общества между государственной и сообщественной нацией  | Южно-российский журнал социальных наук
Многосоставные общества между государственной и сообщественной нацией 
Том 19 (2018) № 3, Политические институты и процессы
Том 19 (2018) № 3
Политические институты и процессы

Многосоставные общества между государственной и сообщественной нацией 

Поцелуев С.П.
Южный федеральный университет
ORCID ID 0000-0002-8562-6541
Тимкук Д.А.
Министерство иностранных дел Нигерии
PDF
https://doi.org/10.31429/26190567-19-3-96-125
https://doi.org/10.31429/26190567-19-3-96-125

Как цитировать Array

Поцелуев С.П., Тимкук Д.А. Многосоставные общества между государственной и сообщественной нацией  // Южно-российский журнал социальных наук. 2018. Т. 19, №3. С. 96-125. DOI: 10.31429/26190567-19-3-96-125
Дата поступления 2018-07-04
Дата принятия 2018-09-04
Дата публикации 2018-09-27

Copyright (c) 2018 Поцелуев Сергей Петрович, Джулфа Аарон Тимкук

Лицензия Creative Commons

Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Всемирная.

Аннотация

Данная статья нацелена на осмысление проблем нациестроительства в многосоставных обществах. Для этого авторы прежде всего осуществляют критический разбор ключевых понятий, активно используемых российскими учеными в обсуждении упомянутой проблемы: нация, национальная идентичность, гражданская нация, российская нация и др. Авторы отвергают эссенциалистскую мистификацию (овеществление) и постмодернистскую релятивизацию данных понятий как контрпродуктивную в научном отношении и политически ангажированную. Основываясь на модернистcко-конструктивистcкой трактовке феномена нации, авторы предлагают трехчленную схему для осмысления нациестроительства в многосоставных обществах, выделяя сообщественный, государственный и собственно гражданский типы. Российский случай гипотетически относится в статье к государственому типу нациестроительства. В этой связи подвергается критике, с опорой на понятие многосоставности российского общества и соответствующие социологические данные, взгляд, согласно которому нет никакой необходимости в строительстве российской нации. Нигерийский же кейс авторы рассматривают в контекте их гипотетического концепта «сообщественной нации». В статье рисуется подробная картина многосоставной нигерийской политии, расколотой по этноконфессиональным, лингвистическим и прочим линиям. Авторы приходят к выводу, что в этой ситуации выстраивание доверительных отношений между лидерами сегментов нигерийского общества выступает ключевым моментом строительства сообщественной нации как первого этапа на пути нигерийцев к полноценной гражданской нации. В статье акцентируется важная роль в этом процессе культурно-художественных практик аккультурации и философских идей убунту.

Ключевые слова

многосоставное общество, национальная идентичность, российская нация, гражданская нация, государство-нация, сообщественная нация, нигерийская нация, доверие, убунту

Финансирование

Статья подготовлена при финансовой поддержке Российского фонда фундаментальных исследований, проект № 18-011-00906 «Когнитивно-идеологические матрицы восприятия студентами Юга России современных социально-политических кризисов».

Библиографические ссылки

  1. Abdulatipov, R. G. (2005). Rossiyskaya natsiya. Etnonatsional’naya i grazhdanskaya identichnost’ rossiyan v sovremennykh usloviyakh [The Russian Nation. Ethnic and Civil Identity of the Russians in Modern Conditions]. M.: Nauchnaya kniga. Retrieved from https://history.wikireading.ru/24534
  2. Acemoglu, D., Verdier, T., & Robinson, J. A. (2004). Kleptocracy and Divide-and-Rule: A Model of Personal Rule. Journal of the European Economic Association, 2 (2–3), 162–192.
  3. Achkasov, V. A. (2012). Politika identichnosti mul’tietnichnykh gosudarstv v kontekste resheniya problemy bezopasnosti [Politiсу of Identity in Multiethnic States in the Context of a Solution of the Problem of Security]. SPb .: Izd-vo S.-Petepb. Univ.
  4. Anwar, Z. (2012, June 3). From Ethnic to Civic Nation Building. Sharing the Nation. Retrieved from https://documents.tips/documents/ethniccivic-nation-building.html
  5. Auzan, A. (2010). Natsional’nyye tsennosti i modernizatsiya [National Values and Modernization]. M.: OGI; Polit. ru.
  6. Avksent’yev, V. A., & Aksyumov, B. V. (2010). Portfel’ identichnostey molodezhi yuga Rossii v usloviyakh tsivilizatsionnogo vybora [Portfolio of Youth Identities in the South of Russia in Terms of Civilizational Choice]. Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya [Sociological Studies], 2, 18–27.
  7. Barnes, M. L. (2013). Mobilization nation: mass movements in the People’s Republic of China. Thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty as partial fulfillment of the requirement for the Master of Arts Degree in History. The University of Toledo. Retrieved from http://utdr.utoledo.edu/cgi/viewcontent. cgi?article=1041&context=theses-dissertations
  8. Belyayeva, N. Yu. (2011). Dvoynaya natsional’no-politicheskaya identichnost’ [Double national and Political Identity]. In I. S. Semenenko (Ed.) Politicheskaya identichnost’ i politika identichnost’. V 2 t. T. 1 Identichnost’ kak kategoriya politicheskoy nauki: slovar’ terminov i ponyatiy [Political Identity and Identity Politics: in 2 Vols. Vol. 1. Identity as a Category of Political Science: a Dictionary of Terms and Concepts] (pp. 106–109). Moskva: ROSSPEN, 106–109.
  9. Bondarenko, D. M. (2016). Postkolonial’nyy mir: formirovaniye natsiy i istoricheskoye proshloye [Post-colonial World: Formation of Nations and Historical Past]. In V. A. Tishkov, Ye. I. Filippova (Eds.) Kul’turnaya slozhnost’ sovremennykh natsiy [The Cultural Complexity of Modern Nations] (pp. 224–240). M.: Politicheskaya entsiklopediya.
  10. Brubaker, R. (2011). Nationalizing States Revisited: Projects and Processes of Nationalization in Post-Soviet States. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 34 (11), 1785–1814.
  11. Conrad, D. C. (2005). Empires of medieval West Africa: Ghana, Mali, and Songhay. New York: Facts On File, Inc.
  12. Daalder, H. (1971). On Building Consociational Nations: The Cases of the Netherlands and Switzerland. International Social Science Journal, 23, 3.
  13. Daalder, H. (1971). On Building Consociational Nations: The Cases of the Netherlands and Switzerland. International Social Science Journal, 23 (3), 355–370.
  14. Daalder, H. (2011). State Formation, Parties and Democracy. Studies in Comparative European Politics. Colchester: ECPR Press.
  15. Dann, O. (2003). Natsii i natsionalizm v Germanii 1770–1990 [Nations and Nationalism in Germany 1770–1990]. S.-Peterburg: Nauka.
  16. Deneulin, S., & Rakodi, C. (2011). Revisiting Religion: Development Studies Thirty Years on. World Development, 39, 1, 45–54.
  17. Drobizheva, L. M. (2010) Identichnost’ i etnicheskiye ustanovki russkikh v svoyey i inoetnicheskoy srede [Identity and Ethnic Regulations of the Russians in Their Own and Other Ethnic Environments]. Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya [Sociological Studies], 12 (320), 49–58.
  18. Filippov V. R., Dikko, E. T. (2016). Mali na puti k natsional’nomu yedinstvu [Mali is on Its Way to National Unity]. In V. A. Tishkov, Ye. I. Filippova (Eds.) Kul’turnaya slozhnost’ sovremennykh natsiy [The Cultural Complexity of Modern Nations] (pp. 274–294). M.: Politicheskaya entsiklopediya.
  19. Filippova, Ye. I. (2016). Natsii, gosudarstva, kul’tury [Nations, States, Cultures]. In V. A. Tishkov, Ye. I. Filippova (Eds.) Kul’turnaya slozhnost’ sovremennykh natsiy [The Cultural Complexity of Modern Nations] (pp. 19–34). M.: Politicheskaya entsiklopediya,
  20. Gellner, E. (1991). Natsii i natsionalizm [Nations and nationalism]. M.: Progress.
  21. Gorodetskaya, N. (2017, March 3). Yedinstvo natsii ne vyderzhalo kritiki [The Unity of the Nation Did Not Stand Up to Criticism]. Kommersant [Businessman], Retrieved from https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/3235995
  22. Hobsbawm, E. Dzh. (2002). Printsip etnicheskoy prinadlezhnosti i natsionalizm v sovremennoy Yevrope [The Principle of Ethnic Identity and Nationalism in Modern Europe]. In Anderson B., Bauer O., Hroch M. et al. (Eds.) Natsii i natsionalizm [Nations and Nationalism] (pp. 332–346). Moskva: Praksis.
  23. Ifeanyi, M., & Enwerem, O. P. (1995). A Dangerous Awakening: The Politicization of Religion in Nigeria. Berlin: IFRA.
  24. Ivanova, S. Yu., Shul’ga M. M. (2010). “Russkaya etnicheskaya” i “Rossiyskaya” identichnost’: sootnosheniye ponyatiy [“Russian Ethnic” and “Russia’s” Identity: Correlation of Concepts]. Vestnik Yuzhnogo nauchnogo tsentra RAN [Bulletin of the Southern Scientific Center of RAS], 6 (4), 96–104.
  25. Jega, A. (2000). Identity transformation and identity politics under structural adjustment in Nigeria. Stockholm: Elanders Gotab.
  26. Kudryashova, I. V. (2017). Gibridnaya politicheskaya identichnost’ [Hybrid Political Identity]. In I. S. Semenenko (Ed.) Identichnost’: Lichnost’, obshchestvo, politika. Entsiklopedicheskoye izdaniye [Identity: Personality, Society, Politics. Encyclopedic Edition] (pp. 365–368). M.: Ves’ Mir.
  27. Kul’pin, E. S. (2009). Al’ternativy rossiyskoy modernizatsii, ili restavratsiya Meydzi po-russki [The Russian Modernization Alternatives, or Meiji Restoration in Russian]. Polis. Politicheskiye issledovaniya [Polis. Political studies], 5, 158–169.
  28. Lewis, P. (2007). Identity, Institutions and Democracy in Nigeria. African Barometer Working Paper. Cape Town: IDSA.
  29. Lijphart, A. (1969). Consociational Democracy. World Politics, 21 (2), 207–225.
  30. Lijphart, A. (1997). Demokratiya v mnogosostavnykh obshchestvakh: sravnitel’noye issledovaniye [Democracy in Plural Societies: A Comparative Exploration]. Moskva: Aspekt Press.
  31. Ljiphart, A. (1971). Comparative Politics and the Comparative Method. The American Political Science Review, 65 (3), 682–693.
  32. Lubskiy, A. V. (2015). Gosudarstvo-tsivilizatsiya i natsional’no-tsivilizatsionnaya identichnost’ v Rossii [State-civilization and National-Civilizational Identity in Russia]. Gumanitariy Yuga Rossii [Humanitarians of the South of Russia], 2, 30–45.
  33. Lubskiy, A. V., Posukhova, O. Yu. (2016). Proyekty natsiyestroitel’stva i modeli natsional’noy integratsii v Rossii [Projects of Nation-Building and National Integration in Russia]. Vlast’ [The Authority], 8, 39–47.
  34. Maier, K. (2000). This House Has Fallen: Midnight in Nigeria. New York: Public Affairs.
  35. Malakhov, V. (2002). Preodolimo li etnotsentricheskoye myshleniye? [Is Ethnocentric Thinking Surmountable?]. In V. Voronkova, O. Karpenko, A. Osipova (Eds.) Rasizm v yazyke sotsial’nykh nauk [Racism in the Language of Social Sciences] (pp. 9–22). SPb.: Aleteyya.
  36. Melucci, A. (1996). Challenging codes: collective action in the information age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  37. Miller, A. (2008). Natsiya-gosudarstvo ili gosudarstvo-natsiya? [Nation-state or State-nation?]. Rossiya v global’noy politike [Russia in Global Politics], 5. Retrieved from http://www.globalaffairs.ru/number/n_11632
  38. Miller, A. (2008). Tema natsii v rossiyskoy politike poslednikh let [“Nation” in Russian Politics in the Recent Years]. In N. Yu. Lapkina (Ed.) Dva prezidentskikh sroka V. V. Putina: dinamika peremen [Two Presidential Terms of V. Putin: Dynamics of Changes]. M.: INION RAN.
  39. Morozova, Ye. V. (2017). Slozhnosostavnaya identichnost’ [Compound Identity]. In I. S. Semenenko (Ed.) Identichnost’: Lichnost’, obshchestvo, politika. Entsiklopedicheskoye izdaniye [Identity: Personality, Society, Politics. Encyclopedic Edition] (pp. 325–334). M.: Ves’ Mir.
  40. Osaghae, E. E., Suberu, R. T. (2005, January). A History of Identities, Violence and Stability in Nigeria. Сentre for Research on Inequality, Human Security and Ethnicity. Crise Working Paper, 6. Oxford: University of Oxford.
  41. Paden, J. N. (2006). Muslim civic cultures and conflict resolution: the challenge of democratic federalism in Nigeria. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.
  42. Paden, J. N. (2008). Faith and Politics in Nigeria: Nigeria as a Pivotal State in the Muslim World. Washington DC: United States Institute of Peace.
  43. Pain, E., & Fedyunin, S. (2017). Natsiya i demokratiya: perspektivy upravleniya kul’turnym raznoobraziyem [Nation and Democracy: Perspectives on Managing Cultural Diversity]. M.: Mysl’.
  44. Peregudov, S. P. (2017). Rossiyskaya grazhdanskaya identichnost’ i politicheskaya natsiya: problemy formirovaniya i konsolidatsii [Russian Civil Identity and Political Nation: Problems of Formation and Consolidation]. In I. S. Semenenko (Ed.) Identichnost’: Lichnost’, obshchestvo, politika. Entsiklopedicheskoye izdaniye [Identity: Personality, Society, Politics. Encyclopedic Edition] (pp. 163–170). M.: Ves’ Mir.
  45. Proyekt Federal’nogo Zakona № 369190–3 “Ob osnovakh gosudarstvennoy natsional’noy politiki Rossiyskoy Federatsii” (2017). [Draft of Federal Law No. 369190–3 “On the Basis of the National State Policy of the Russian Federation” (2017)]. Zona zakona.RU [Area of the Law.RU]. Retrieved from https://www.zonazakona.ru/law/projects/217/
  46. Putin, V. V. (2012, February 5). Vstupitel’noye slovo na rabochey vstreche po voprosam mezhnatsional’nykh i mezhkonfessional’nykh otnosheniy [Opening Remarks at the Working Meeting on Interethnic and Interreligious Relations]. Retrieved from http://www.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/22349
  47. Putin, V. V. (2012, January 23). Rossiya: natsional’nyy vopros [Russia: the National Question]. Nezavisimaya gazeta. Retrieved from http://www.ng.ru/politics/2012-01-23/1_national.html
  48. Ramose, M. B. (1999). African Philosophy through Ubuntu. Harare: Mond Books.
  49. Rebouché, R., Fearon, K. (2005). Overlapping Identities: Power Sharing and Women’s Rights. In I. O’Flynn and D. Russell (Eds.) Power Sharing. New Challenges for Divided Societies (pp. 155–171). London –Ann Arbor, MI: Pluto Press.
  50. Remizov, M. (2011, September 12). Pyat’ prichin byt’ russkimi [Five Reasons to be Russian]. Russkiy obozrevatel’ [Russian columnist]. Retrieved from http://www.rus-obr.ru/ru-web/13505
  51. Rossiyskaya identichnost’ v sotsiologicheskom izmerenii. Analiticheskiy doklad. Chast’ 3. Istoricheskoye samosoznaniye i natsional’nyy mentalitet rossiyan. Sotsiokul’turnyye aspekty yevropeyskoy identichnosti rossiyan [Russian Identity in the Sociological Dimension. Analytical Report. Part 3. Historical Consciousness and National Mentality of the Russians. Sociocultural aspects of the European Identity of the Russians] (2008). Polis. Politicheskiye issledovaniya [Polis. Political studies], 3, 9–28.
  52. Rossiyskaya natsiya dolzhna sostoyat’ iz samobytnykh narodov — Medvedev [The Russian Nation Should Consist of Distinctive Peoples — Medvedev]. (2011, February 11). RIA Novosti [RIA News]. Retrieved from https://ria.ru/politics/20110211/333366199.html
  53. Ruby, R., Shah, T. S. (2007, March 21). Nigeria’s Presidential Election: The Christian-Muslim Divide. Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life. Retrieved from http://www.pewforum.org/2007/03/21/nigerias-presidential-election-the-christian-muslim-divide/
  54. Semenenko, I. S. (2017). Natsional’naya identichnost’ [National Identity]. In I. S. Semenenko (Ed.) Identichnost’: Lichnost’, obshchestvo, politika. Entsiklopedicheskoye izdaniye [Identity: Personality, Society, Politics. Encyclopedic Edition] (pp. 365–368). M.: Ves’ Mir.
  55. Shabayev, Yu. P. (2011). Etnicheskiy natsionalizm i grazhdanskaya natsiya v sovremennoy Rossii [Ethnic nationalism and civil nation in modern Russia]. In V. A. Tishkov, V. V. Stepanova (Eds.) Etnopoliticheskaya situatsiya v Rossii i sopredel’nykh gosudarstvakh v 2010 godu. Yezhegodnyy doklad [Ethno-political Situation in Russia and nNeighboring States in 2010. Annual Report] (pp. 69–83). M.: Institut etnologii i antropologii RAN.
  56. Shnirel’man, V. A. (2007). Tsivilizatsionnyy podkhod kak natsional’naya ideya [Civilizational Approach as a National Idea]. In V. A. Tishkov, V. A. Shnirelman (Eds.) Natsionalizm v mirovoy istorii [Nationalism in World History] (pp.82–104). M.: Nauka.
  57. Sigger, D. S., Polak, B. M., & Pennink, B. J. W. (2010, July). ‘Ubuntu’ or ‘humanness’ as a management concept: Based on empirical results from Tanzania. CDS Research Report, 29 (ISSN1385–9218).
  58. Smith, A. D. (1991). National Identity. London: Penguin Books.
  59. Smith, E. (2004). Natsionalizm i modernism [Nationalism and Modernism]. M.: Praksis.
  60. Smyth, M., Robinson, G. (2001). Researching Violently Divided Societies: Ethical and Methodological Issues. London: Pluto Press.
  61. Stepan, A. (2005). Ukraine: Improbable demoсratic “nation-state” but possible democratic “state-nation”? Post-Soviet affairs. Columbia, 4, 279–308.
  62. Stepan, A., Linz, J. J., & Yadav, Y. (2010). The Rise of “State-Nations”. Journal of Democracy, 21 (3), 50–68.
  63. Stepanova L. A. (Ed.). (2017). Razvitiye obshchegrazhdanskoy identichnosti v polikul’turnom prostranstve rossiyskogo obshchestva [Development of Civil Identity in the Multicultural Space of Russian Society]. Moskva: Narodnoye obrazovaniye.
  64. Tishkov, V. A. (2011). Yedinstvo v mnogoobrazii: publikatsii iz zhurnala “Etnopanorama” 1999–2011 gg [Unity in Diversity: Publications from the Journal “Ethnopanorama” 1999–2011]. Orenburg: Izdatel’skiy tsentr OGAU.
  65. Tishkov, V. A. (2013). Ponimaniye natsiyestroitel’stva v Rossii v mirovom kontekste [Understanding of Nation-building in Russia in the World Context]. In Ot Drevney Rusi k Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Istoriya rossiyskoy gosudarstvennosti (Materialy mezhdunarodnoj nauchnoj konferencii. Moskva, MGU, 28–29 sentyabrya 2012) [From Ancient Russia to the Russian Federation. The History of Russian Statehood (Materials of the International Scientific Conference. Moscow, MSU, September 28–29, 2012)] (pp. 58–67). S.-Peterburg: Aleteyya.
  66. Tishkov, V. A. (2016). Uslozhnyayushcheye raznoobraziye: kak yego ponimat’ i uporyadochit’ [Complicating Diversity: How to Understand and Organize It]. In V. A. Tishkov, Ye. I. Filippova (Eds.) Kul’turnaya slozhnost’ sovremennykh natsiy [The Cultural Complexity of Modern Nations]. Politicheskaya entsiklopediya, 7–18.
  67. Tutu, D. (1999). No Future without Forgiveness: A Personal Overview of South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission. London: Rider.
  68. Uwah, I. E. (2017). The Representation of African Traditional Religion and Culture in Nigeria Popular Films. Politics and Religion Journal, 5 (1), 81–102.