Балканы: разделенные или разделившиеся? Анализ нарративов балканской идентичности на постъюгославском пространстве | Южно-российский журнал социальных наук
Балканы: разделенные или разделившиеся? Анализ нарративов балканской идентичности на постъюгославском пространстве
PDF
https://doi.org/10.31429/26190567-24-4-6-22
https://doi.org/10.31429/26190567-24-4-6-22

Как цитировать Array

Попадьева Т.И. Балканы: разделенные или разделившиеся? Анализ нарративов балканской идентичности на постъюгославском пространстве // Южно-российский журнал социальных наук. 2023. Т. 24, №4. С. 6-22. DOI: 10.31429/26190567-24-4-6-22
Дата поступления 2023-10-31
Дата принятия 2023-10-12
Дата публикации 2023-12-29

Copyright (c) 2024 Татьяна Игоревна Попадьева

Лицензия Creative Commons

Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Всемирная.

Аннотация

Государства бывшей Югославии, и шире — Балканы, на сегодняшний день остаются одной из реперных точек мировой политики. Во многом Балканский полуостров до сих пор считается «пороховой бочкой Европы» в связи с политической разделенностью населяющих его сообществ. Однако устоявшийся инструментарий анализа политических процессов в регионе часто обнаруживает свою прогностическую несостоятельность. Одним из решений в построении траекторий политического развития Балкан может стать идентитарная призма исследования. В контексте обострения этнополитических конфликтов после дезинтеграции СФРЮ, конкуренции национальных проектов и дискурсов развития новообразованных политий, вой­н памяти и борьбы исторических нарративов, экономических кризисов и глобального переустройства мира в данной статье представлена классификация постъюгославских государств по характеру политизации социальных размежеваний, сопутствующих идентификационным процессам в регионе.

Ключевые слова

Балканы, постъюгославское пространство, разделенные общества, идентичность, фронтир

Библиографические ссылки

  1. Anderson, B. (2001). Voobrazhayemyye soobshchestva. Razmyshleniye ob istokakh i rasprostranenii natsionalizma [Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism]. Moskva: KANON-Press-­TS; Kuchkovo pole.
  2. Andjelić, N. (2003). Bosnia-­Herzegovina. The End of a Legacy. London: Frank Cass Publishers.
  3. Bajagić, M. (2012). Vodič kroz snove [Guide to Dreams]. Beograd: Večernje Novosti.
  4. Balašević, D. (2006). Reqiuem. Retrieved from: https://tekstovi.net/2,128,15885.html
  5. Biserko, S. (2021). Gegemonistskiye natsionalisticheskiye matritsy proshlogo i budushcheye Balkan. [Hegemonic Nationalist Matrices of the Past and the Future of the Balkans]. Aktual’nyye problemy Yevropy [Current Problems of Europe], 110(2), 84–100. DOI: 10.31249/ape/2021.02.04
  6. Brankov Arsenoviћ, A. (2008). Obredne pesme drevnih Srba iz Indiјi [Ritual Songs of Ancient Serbs from India]. Beograd: Miroslav.
  7. Direkcije za evropske integracije [European Integration Directorates] (2022). Stavovi građana o članstvu u Evropskoj uniji i procesu integracija u EU [Citizens’ Views on Membership in the European Union and the EU Integration Process]. (Istraživanje javnog mnijenja [Public Opinion Survey]). Retrieved from https://www.dei.gov.ba/uploads/documents/ijm‑2022_1664197423.pdf
  8. Drobizheva, L. M. (2008). Natsional’no-grazhdanskaya i etnicheskaya identichnost’: problemy pozitivnoy sovmestimosti. [National-­Civil and Ethnic Identity: Problems of Positive Compatibility]. Rossiya reformiruyushchayasya [Reforming Russia], 7, 214–227.
  9. Dvorniković, V. (1939). Karakterologija Jugoslovena [Characterology of Yugoslavs]. Beograd: Kosmos.
  10. Džino, D. (2014). Constructing Illyrians: Prehistoric Inhabitants of the Balkan Peninsula in Early Modern and Modern Perceptions. Balkanistica, 27, 1–39.
  11. Entsiklopedicheskiy slovar’ Brokgauza i Yefrona [Encyclopedic Dictionary of Brockhaus and Efron] (1904), 41. Sankt-­Peterburg: F. A. Brokgauz — I. A. Yefron.
  12. Greenberg, M. L. (2010). The Illyrian Movement: A Croatian Vision of South Slavic Unity. In J. A. Fishman, O. García (Eds.) Handbook of Language and Ethnic Identity: The Success-­Failure Continuum in Language Identity Efforts, 2, (pp.364–380). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  13. Gus’kova, Ye. Yu. (2017). Serbiya: ot idei yugoslavizma k idee serbstva [Serbia: from the idea of Yugoslavism to the idea of Serbianism]. Slavyane i Rossiya [Slavs and Russia], 1, 509–524.
  14. Hudson, R., Dodovski, I. (2023). Macedonia’s Long Transition: From Independence to the Prespa Agreement and Beyond. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  15. Janjić, D. (1997). Ethnic Conflict Management: The Case of Former Yugoslavia. Ravenna: Longo Editore.
  16. Jovanović, D. (1981). Pred početak popisa stanovništva 1981: Šta ćemo sa onima koji se izjašnjavaju kao Jugosloveni? [Before the 1981 Census: What Shall We Do with Those Who Declare Themselves Yugoslavs?]. Yugopapir [Yugo-paper]. Retrieved from http://www.yugopapir.com/2017/09/pred-pocetak-­popisa-stanovnistva‑1981.html
  17. Koldobskaya, N. A. (2013). Balkanskie strany: dreyf oskolkov byvshey Yugoslavii (na primere Serbii, Makedonii, Bosnii i Gertsegoviny) [The Balkan Countries: Drifting Fragments of the Former Yugoslavia (on the Example of Serbia, Macedonia, Bosnia and Herzegovina)]. In Materialy XX Mezhdunarodnoy molodezhnoy nauchnoy konferentsii studentov, aspirantov i molodykh uchenykh “Lomonosov” [Materials of the XX International Youth Scientific Conference of Students, Postgraduates and Young Scientists “Lomonosov”]. Moskva: MGU.
  18. Konstitutsiya Sotsialisticheskoy Federativnoy Respubliki Yugoslavii (1966). [Constitution of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia]. (Prinyata Soyuznoy Narodnoy Skupshchinoy 7 aprelya 1963 g. [Adopted by the Union People’s Assembly on April 7, 1963]). Moskva: Yuridicheskaya literatura.
  19. KPSS. S’’yezd, 24‑y [XXIV Congress of the CPSU] (1971). (Stenograficheskiy otchet [Stenographic report]). T. 1. Moskva: Politizdat.
  20. Lampe, J. R. (1994). The Failure of the Yugoslav National Idea. Studies in East European Thought, 46, 69–89.
  21. Lijphart, A. (1968). The Politics of Accommodation: Pluralism and Democracy in the Netherlands. Berkley, Los Angeles: University of California Press.
  22. Lipset, S. M. (1960). Political Man: The Social Basis of Politics. Garden City, New York: Doubleday & Company.
  23. Lipset, S. M., Rokkan, S. (1967). Cleavage Structures, Party Systems and Voter Alignments: An Introduction. New York: Free Press.
  24. Luković Pjanović, O. (2014). Srbi… Narod najstariji [The Serbs… The oldest nation]. Beograd: Miroslav.
  25. Maleshevich, A. V. (2022). Zapadnyye Balkany v diskurse YeS i stran regiona s pozitsii kritiki balkanizma. [Western Balkans in the Discourse of the EU and the Balkan Countries from the Standpoint of Balkanism Critique]. Diskurs-­Pi [Discourse-­P], 19(3), 86–100. DOI: 10.17506/18179568_2022_19_3_86
  26. Mikhaylov, V. T. (2013). Balkany kak prostranstvo problemnoy nadnatsional’noy identichnosti [Balkans as a space of problematic supranational identity]. Kul’turnaya i gumanitarnaya geografiya [Cultural and Humanitarian Geography], 2(2), 140–152.
  27. Pearson S. (2015). The “national key” in Bosnia and Herzegovina: A historical perspective. Nationalities Papers, 43 (2), 213–232. DOI: 10.1080/00905992.2014.1002463
  28. Perica, V. (2002). Balkan Idols. Religion and Nationalism in Yugoslav States. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  29. Piven’, P. V. (2021). Venety Norika kak praslavyanskiy element. [Noricum Venetians as a Proto-­Slavic Element]. Izvestiya Altayskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [News of Altai State University], 5(121), 70–77. DOI: 10.14258/izvasu(2021)5-11
  30. Pivovarenko, A. A. (2022). Politizatsiya istoricheskoy pamyati Italii po voprosu Istrii (vneshnepoliticheskiy diskurs) [Politicization of the Historical Memory of Italy on the Issue of Istria (Foreign Policy Discourse)]. Slavyanovedeniye [Slavic Studies], 5, 88–102. DOI: 10.31857/S0869544X0022028-3
  31. Ponomareva, Ye. G. (2010). Novye gosudarstva na Balkanakh [New States in the Balkans]. Moskva: MGIMO-Universitet.
  32. Popad’yeva, T. I. (2021). Yazykovaya politika kak instrument formirovaniya grazhdanskoy identichnosti: na primere Bosnii i Gertsegoviny. [The Politics of Language in Constructing Civil Identity: Case of Bosnia and Herzegovina]. Vestnik MGIMO Universiteta [MGIMO Review of International Relation], 14(4), 91–106. DOI: 10.24833/2071-8160-2021-4-79-91-106
  33. Primorac, D., Marjanovic, D., Rudan, P., Villems, R., Underhill, P. (2011). Croatian Genetic Heritage: Y-chromosome Story. Croatian medical journal, 52, 225–234. DOI: 10.3325/cmj.2011.52.225
  34. Pringle, R.W. (2023). Balkanization. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved from https://www.britannica.com/topic/Balkanization
  35. Prokhorenko, I. L. (2015). Prostranstvennyy podkhod v issledovanii mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniy [Spatial Approach to the Study of International Relations]. Moskva: IMEMO RAN.
  36. Radić, R. (2018). Srbi pre Adama i posle njega [Serbs before Adam and after him]. Beograd: Evoluta.
  37. Rokkan, S. (1967). Geography, Religion and Social Class: Cross Cutting Cleavages across Norwegian Politics. In S. M. Lipset, S. Rokkan (Eds.), Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-national Perspectives (pp. 379–386). New York: Free Press.
  38. Rokkan, S. (1973). Cities, States, and Nations: A Dimensional Model for the Study of Contrasts in Development, I. In S. N. Eisenstadt, S. Rokkan (Eds.), Building States and Nations: Methods and Data Resources (pp. 73–97). Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
  39. Romanova, A. P., Yakushenkov, S. N. (2012). Frontirnaya teoriya: novyy podkhod k osmysleniyu sotsial’nopoliticheskoy i ekonomicheskoy situatsii na Yuge Rossii [Frontier theory: a new approach to understanding the socio-­political and economic situation in the South of Russia]. Innovatika i ekspertiza: nauchnyye trudy [Innovation and Expertise: Scientific Papers], 9(2), 74–80.
  40. Said, E. (2006). Oriyentalizm: Zapadnyye kontseptsii Vostoka [Orientalism: Western Conceptions of the East]. Sankt-­Peterburg: Russkiy Mir’’.
  41. Semenenko, I. S., Lapkin, V. V., Bardin, A. L., Pantin, V. I. (2017). Mezhdu gosudarstvom i natsiyey: dilemmy politiki identichnosti na postsovetskom prostranstve. [Between the State and the Nation: Dilemmas of Identity Politics in Post-­Soviet Societies]. Polis. Politicheskiye issledovaniya [Polis. Political Studies], 5, 54–78. DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2017.05.05
  42. Semenenko, I. S., Lapkin, V. V., Pantin, V. I. (2021). Sotsial’nyye razmezhevaniya i politicheskiye protivostoyaniya v nauchnom diskurse: kriterii otsenki i klassifikatsii. [Social Cleavages and Political Divides in a Theoretical Perspective: Criteria for Assessment and Classification]. Polis. Politicheskiye issledovaniya [Polis. Political Studies], 5, 56–77. DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2021.05.07
  43. Šistek, F. (2015). Narativi o identitetu [Narratives about Identity]. Podgorica: Kultura i istorija.
  44. Sokol, V. (2019). Hrvatska srednjovjekovna arheološka baština [Croatian Medieval Archaeological Heritage]. Zagreb: Meridijani.
  45. Stiks, I., Wachtel, A. (2019). Squaring the South Slavic Circle: Ethnicity, Nationhood and Citizenship in Yugoslavia. In Jasper M. Trautsch (Ed.), Civic Nationalisms in Global Perspective (pp. 54–69). London, New York: Routledge.
  46. Todorova, M. (2006). Imaginarni Balkan [Imaginary Balkans]. Beograd: Biblioteka XX vek.
  47. Tsviјiћ, Ј. (2019). Psikhichki osobine јuzhnikh slovena [Psychological Characteristics of the South Slavs]. Beograd: Taliјa izdavashtvo.
  48. Zavod za statistiku [Statistical Office] (2011). Popis stanovništva, domaćinstava i stanova u Crnoj Gori 2011 godine [Census of Population, Households and Dwellings in Montenegro 2011].
  49. Zizek, S. (1999). The Spectre of Balkan. The journal of the International institute, 6(2). Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.4750978.0006.202
  50. Zoranić, H. (2009). O Etnogenezi Bošnjana — Bošnjaka [On the Ethnogenesis of Bosnians — Bosniaks]. Sarajevo: Svetlost.