Abstract
The dialectics of confrontation and cooperation between the world of art/culture and the world of politics has always been a relevant and controversial issue. But for the first time, modern digitization of everyday life has enabled an incredibly extensive debate about the attitudes and activities of celebrities from the world of culture, while simultaneously considerably expanding their influence on public opinion. Owing to new informational technologies, private “kitchen conversations” transformed themselves into interviews, personal video blogs, and reports, leaving their private space and becoming accessible for Internet users. Incidentally, the producers and consumers of information have remained geographically located in the same proverbial “intellectual kitchens”. Hence, the increasing opposition of creative elites, as well as emerging communication technologies necessitate their analysis as a new challenge to current political realities. In most cases, views of critically-minded people from the creative spheres are transmitted through social networks, because they are denied access to television, even to entertainment channels. This article is aimed at exploring both the motivations and modalities / forms of politicization of the creative elite. Approximately one hundred interviews with celebrities from the spheres of culture, art and show business, posted on YouTube channels, served as a source of the empirical data. The analysis of the narrative patterns and the politico-cultural discussion codes of the personal experience of the politicization of creative intellectuals is an important contribution to understanding the specificity of modern public deliberations and of the ways of constructing a dialogue between the public and the power.
Keywords
Funding information
The research was carried out with the financial support of the RFBR within the framework of the scientific project “Dissent and politicization of the Creative intelligentsia in modern Russia: the meaning and potential of discourses and discussions in the digital public space” No. 21-011-32221.
References
Андерсен, П. (2011). Истоки постмодерна. М.: Территория будущего.
Байрау, Д. (1994). Интеллигенция и власть: советский опыт. Отечественная история, 2, 91–110.
Белоусов, А.Б., Давыдов, Д.А., Кочухова, Е.С. (2020). В постматериалистическом тренде: мотивация участников протеста в сквере у Театра драмы в Екатеринбурге. Мониторинг общественного мнения: экономические и социальные перемены, 6, 53–72. DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2020.6.1694
Володенков, С.В. (2019). Влияние технологий интернет-коммуникаций на современные общественно-политические процессы: сценарии, вызовы и акторы. Мониторинг общественного мнения: экономические и социальные перемены, 5, 341–364. DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2019.5.16
Гаджиев, Х.А. (2020). Цифровое пространство как поле политического противостояния власти и оппозиции. Политическая наука, 3, 147–171. DOI: 10.31249/poln/2020.03.07
Давыдов, Д.А. (2021). От «власти достойных» к «власти популярных»: блеск и нищета меритократии в новую технологическую эпоху. Полития: Анализ. Хроника. Прогноз (Журнал политической философии и социологии политики), 4, 100–114. DOI: 10.30570/2078-5089-2021-103-4-100-114
Кислицын, С.А., Нектаревская, Ю.Б. (2019). Политические практики функционирования элиты, контрэлиты и фронды в истории России. Наука и образование: хозяйство и экономика; предпринимательство; право и управление, 6, 137–141.
Логунова, О.С. (2021). Digital-селебрити: трансформация теоретических подходов. Мониторинг общественного мнения: экономические и социальные перемены, 5, 12–31. DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2021.5.1992
Ольденбург, Р. (2014). Третье место: кафе, кофейни, книжные магазины, бары, салоны красоты и другие места «тусовок» как фундамент сообщества. М.: Новое литературное обозрение.
Фадеева, Л.А. (2017). Национализм vs. Глобализм в интеллектуальном дискурсе. Вестник Удмуртского университета. Социология. Политология. Международные отношения, 3, 302–308.
Фадеева, Л.А. (2007). Ответственность интеллектуалов: краеугольный камень или камень преткновения интеллектуального сообщества? Вестник Пермского университета. Серия Политология, 2, 11–18.
Alexander, J.C. (2012). Performative Revolution in Egypt: An Essay in Cultural Power. L.: Bloomsbury Academic.
Budabin, A., Richey, L. (2021). Celebrity, Disruption and Neoliberal Development. In Batman Saves the Congo: How Celebrities Disrupt the Politics of Development (pp. 1–28). Minneapolis; London: University of Minnesota Press.
Castells, M. (2012). Networks of Outrage and Hope: Social Movements in the Internet. Cambridge: Polity.
Colleoni, E., Rozza, A., Arvidsson, A. (2014). Echo Chamber or Public Sphere? Predicting Political Orientation and Measuring Political Homophily in Twitter Using Big Data. Journal of Communication, 2, 317–332.
Dahl, R. (1971). Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Hartle, J.F. (2020). Art Contra Politics: Liberal Spectacle, Fascist Resurgence. In S. Gandesha (Ed.) Spectres of Fascism: Historical, Theoretical and International Perspectives (pp. 241–260). DOI: 10.2307/j.ctvxrpzqv
Karlsen, R. (2015). Followers are Opinion Leaders: The Role of People in the Flow of Political Communication on and beyond Social Networking Sites. European Journal of Communication, 30(3), 301–318.
Nozick, R. (1998). Why Do Intellectuals Oppose Capitalism? Cato Policy Report. Retrieved from http://www.kyoolee.net/Why_Do_Intellectuals_Oppose_Capitalism_-_Robert_Nozick.pdf
Olazabal, M., Neumann, M.B., Foudi, S., & Chiabai, A. (2018). Transparency and Reproducibility in Participatory Systems Modelling: The Case of Fuzzy Cognitive Mapping. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 6, 791–810. DOI: 10.1002/sres.2519
Rheingold, H. (1993). The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Shirky, С. (2011). Cognitive Surplus: How Technology Makes Consumers into Collaborators. L.: Penguin Books.
Sunstein, C.R. (2004). Democracy and Filtering. Communications of the ACM, 12, 57–59.
Wang, M., Wu, B., Kirschner, P.A., & Michael Spector, J. (2018). Using Cognitive Mapping to Foster Deeper Learning with Complex Problems in a Computer-based Environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 87, 450–458. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2018.01.024

