Abstract
The main political and socio-economic challenges against the background of non-recognition are analyzed on the basis of the survey made by experts from the Donetsk People’s Republic. The topical trends in public awareness that affect identity have been analyzed as well. To better understand socio-political processes, it is important to take into account the fact that the regional Donbass identity prevails over the national one. The public feeling is currently dominated by the fatigue from the situation of instability, the disillusionment resulting from the discrepancy between the ideas of the so-called “Russian Spring 2014” and present-day reality, and by social apathy. Besides, resentment against Russia is traced in public feeling for not having been incorporated into Russia’s territory, as was the case with the Crimea. The experts believe that under current ideological and informational confrontation the posi-tive potential of Russian identity is not used to the full, if at all. There is no unifying idea in the society; it is directly connected with the incomprehension of what exactly the political aspirations of the authorities are. Simultaneously, there exist three divergent vectors which disorient the people. Initially, it was ‘irredentism’ (restoration to Russia as a territory formerly belonging to it). Nowadays (autumn 2018), the prevailing vector is ‘Minsk Agreements’ in accordance with which the non-recognized republics remain part of the Ukraine; de facto — independent statehood. The major challenges are, above all, security problems (i. e. inviolability of borders and population safety); next come isolation due to non-recognition and the resulting economic crisis; non-transparent mechanisms of governance and distribution of powers; legal vacuum, social tensions, etc. According to experts, the society is waiting for a new political initiative from the present-day authorities which will be aimed at improving the existing economic situation of rank-and-file people and responding to the demand for social justice. The research carried out in the spring of 2018 is based on the experts’ polling, students’ questionnaire polling and on participant observation. The novelty of the research consists in the use of information from the original source. The author has used firsthand opinions of the unacknowledged Donetsk People’s Republic’s residents. It facilitates understanding the situation from within. In the process of the research, the author was guided by the data of public opinion poll centers in the Ukraine, such as Razumkov Center, Donbas Think Tank, Kyiv international institute of Sociology, Sociological Group “RATING” (Rating Group Ukraine), etc.
Keywords
Funding information
Публикация подготовлена в рамках реализации ГЗ ЮНЦ РАН на 2018 г., № госрегистрации проекта АААА-А16-116012610051-6.
References
Potseluyev, S. P., Konstantinov, M. S., Lukichev, P. N., Vnukova, L.B. and others. (2016). Igry na ideologicheskoy periferii. Pravoradikal’nyye ustanovki studencheskoy molodezhi Rostovskoy oblasti [Games on Ideological Periphery. Radical Right-Wing Guidelines of the Student Youth in Rostov Region]. Rostov-na-Donu: YUNTS RAN.
Matishov, G. G. (2014). Ukraina: geostrategicheskiy razvorot (uroki istorii ot El’by 1945 g. do Mius-fronta 2014 g.) [The Ukraine: Geostrategic U-turn (Lessons of History — from Ekba 1945 to Mius Front 2014)] Rostov-na-Donu: YUNTS RAN.
Polovyan, A. V., Lepa, R. N. (Eds.) (2018). Ekonomika Donetskoy Narodnoy Respubliki: sostoyaniye, problemy, puti resheniya [The Economy of Donetsk People’s Republic: Condition, Problems and Ways of Coping] Donetsk: GU “Institut ekonomicheskikh issledovaniy”.
Analitichniy zvit po rezul’tatakh doslidzhennya “Regional’na tolerantnist’, ksenfobiya ta prava lyudini v Ukraini u 2012 rotsi”. (17 sichnya 2013). Institut prav lyudini i zapobigannya yekstremizmu ta ksenofobii [Analytical Report on the Results of the Research “Regional Tolerance, Xenophobia and People’s Rights in the Ukraine of 2012”]. Retrieved from http://www.ihrpex.org/uk/article/4769/analitychnyj_zvit_po_rezulttah_doslidzhenja_regionalna_tolerantnist_ksenfobija_ta_prava_ljudyny_v_ukrajini_u_2012 _rotsii
Analitichniy zvit za rezul’tatami sotsiologichnogo doslidzhennya: “Osoblivosti svidomosti i identichnosti zhiteliv pidkontrol’noi ta okupovanikh teritoriy Donets’koi oblasti” [Analytical Report on the Results of Sociological Research: “Specific Features of Self-Consciousness and Identity of the People who Live on the Controlled and Occupied Territory in Donetsk Region]. (2018). Retrieved from http://www.ifak.com.ua/upload/imageOsobennosti%20soznaniya%20i%20 identichnosti%20podkontrol’nykh%20i%20nepodkontrol’nykh%20Ukraine%20territoriy%20Donetskoy%20oblasti%20_2018.compressed.pdf.
Apollonov, I. A., Berberyan, A. S. (2018). Problema sub”yektnosti cheloveka v prostranstve sotsiokul’turnykh determinant. Yuzhno-rossiyskiy zhurnal sotsial’nykh nauk [The Problem of Personal Agency Within the Space of Socio-Cultural Dominants]. Yuzhno-rossijskij zhurnal social`ny`xkh nauk [South-Russian Journal of Social Sciences], 3 (19), 142–147.
Berberyan, A. S., Naydenov, V. G. (2016). Issledovaniye vzaimosvyazi etnicheskoy identichnosti i tolerantnosti studentov [Study of Relationship Between Ethnic Identity and Tolerance in Students]. Chelovek. Soobshchestvo. Upravleniye [Human. Community. Management], 17 (3), 25-34.
Byshok, S. O., Kochetkov, A. V. (2014). Yevromaydan imeni Stepana Bandery. Ot demokratii k diktature [Euromaidan Named after Stepan Bandera. From Democracy to Dictatorship]. Moscow: Knizhnyy mir, FRIGO “Narodnaya diplomatiya”.
Cherkashin, K. (2017). Zhiteli Donetska vsyo chashche samoopredelyayutsya kak russkiye. Dinamika etnicheskoy samoidentifikatsii zhiteley Donbassa (2014–2016) [Donetsk’s Residents More and More Often Rank Themselves as Russians. Dynamics of Self-identification with Reference to Donbass’ Residents]. Retrieved from https://regnum.ru/news/2240754.html
Chi vlastivi ukraintsyam nastroi separatizmu — zagal’nonatsional’ne opituvannya [Are separatist moods characteristic of the Ukranians? – nationwide public opinion poll] (11 April 2013). Fond “Demokratichnі іnіtsіativi іmenі Іl’ka Kucherіva” [Ilk Kucheriv Democratic Initiatives Foundation]. Retrieved from https://dif.org.ua/article/chi-vlastivi-ukraintsyam-nastroi-separatizmu-zagalnonatsionalne-opituvannya
Dinamika patriotichnikh nastroiv ukraintsiv. (Serpen’ 2018). Sotsiologichna grupa REYTING [Dynamics of the Ukrainians’ Patriotic Mood (August 2018). Sociological Group “Rating”.]. Retrieved from http://ratinggroup.ua/files/ratinggroup/reg_files/rg_patriotyzm_082018.pdf
Dugin, A.G. (2014). Yevraziyskiy revansh Rossii [Russia’s Eurasian Retribution]. Moscow: Algoritm.
Gorbulina, V. P. (Ed.) (2017). Svitova gibridna viyna: ukrains’kiy front [Hybrid World War: the Ukrainian front]. Kiiv: NISD.
Gulevich, O.A. (2017) Psikhologiya mezhgruppovykh otnosheniy [Psychology of Intergroup Relations]. Moscow: Yurayt.
Kagarlitsky, B. (2016). Ukraine and Russia: Two States, One Crisis. International Critical Thought, 6 (4), 513-533. DOI: 10.1080/21598282.2016.1242087
Konstitutsiya Donetskoy Narodnoy Respubliki [The Constitution of Donetsk People’s Republic]. Retrieved from https://dnrsovet.su/konstitutsiya/
Lapkin, V. V., Pantin, V. I. (2014). Krizis ukrainskoy gosudarstvennosti: politico-pravovoy, tsennostnyy i geoekonomicheskiy aspekty [The Ukranian Statehood Crisis: Political, Legal, Value Orientation and Geo-Economical Aspects]. Polis. Politicheskiye issledovaniya [Polis: Political Studies], 5, 68–89.
Loshkariov, I. A., Sushentsov, A. A. (2016). Radicalization of Russians in Ukraine: from ‘accidental’ diaspora to rebel movement. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 16 (1), 71-90. DOI: 10.1080/14683857.2016.1149349
Matishov, G. G. (2015). Istoricheskiye i geopoliticheskiye ugrozy natsional’noy bezopasnosti. Azovo-Prichernomor’ye i Prikaspiy v XXI veke [Historical and Geopolitical Threats to National Security. Azov-Prichernomorie and the Caspian Sea in the XXI Century]. Rostov-na-Donu: YUNTS RAN.
Matishov, G. G. (2016). Opasnyye tendentsii i riski na yuzhnom flange Rossii [Dangerous Tendencies and Risks on Russia’s Southern Flank]. Rostov-na-Donu: YUNTS RAN.
Matishov, G. G. (ed.) (2017). Ukraina v istorii Rossii: soyuznik ili geopoliticheskiy satellit? [The Ukraine in the History of Russia: an Ally or a Geopolitical Satellite?] In Materialy Rasshirennogo zasedaniya Prezidiuma YUNTS RAN [Materials of the Enlarged Session of the Presidium of YUNTS RAN]. Rostov-na-Donu: YUNTS RAN.
Matveeva, A. (2016). No Moscow stooges: identity polarization and guerrilla movements in Donbass. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 16 (1), 25-50. DOI: 10.1080/14683857.2016.1148415
Onopko, O. V. (2017). Predstavleniya ob ekstremizme, terrorizme i natsional’noy loyal’nosti v politicheskom soznanii studentov-yuristov i medikov DNR [Notions about Extremism, Terrorism and National Loyalty in the Political Consciousness of Students of Law and Medical Students in DPR]. Retrieved from http://goo.gl/W5meSM
Onopko, O. V. (2018). Vneshnyaya politika Donetskoy narodnoy respubliki: interesy i ideologiya [Foreign Policy of Donetsk People’s Republic: Interests and Ideology]. Nauchnyye vedomosti Belgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Istoriya. Politologiya [Belgorod State University bulletin: History. Politology], 45 (2), 360-368.
Robinson, P. (2016). Russia’s role in the war in Donbass, and the threat to European security. European Politics and Society, 17 (4), 506-521. DOI: 10.1080/23745118.2016.1154229
Semenenko, I. S. (Ed.) (2017). Identichnost’: Lichnost’, obshchestvo, politika. Entsiklopedicheskoye izdaniye [Identity: Personality, Society, Politics. Encyclopedic ed.]. Moscow: Ves’ mir.
Shcherbak, I. N., Shishelina, L. N., Tsirenshchikov, V. S., Fiodorov, S. M., Sindeyev, A. A., Maksimychev, I.F., Krasikov, A.A., Kargalova, M.V, Kaveshnikov, N. Yu., Danilov, D. A., Bazhan, A. I., Anan’yeva, Ye.V., Mironenko, V. I., Nosov, M. G., Fiodorov, V. P. (2014). Ukrainskiy krizis: ekspertnaya otsenka [The Ukranian Crisis: Expert Evaluation]. Sovremennaya Yevropa [Present-day Europe], 3 (59), 10-34.
Shelest, H. (2015). After the Ukrainian crisis: Is there a place for Russia? Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 15 (2), 191-201. DOI: 10.1080/14683857.2015.1060019
Shestopal, Ye. B. (2016). Elity i obshchestvo kak politicheskiye aktory v postsovetskoy Rossii [The Elites and Society as Political Actors in Post-Soviet Russia]. Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya [Sociological Studies], 5, 35-43.
Sotsial’nopolitichna situatsiya v Ukraini. Prezentatsiya danikh [Socio-Political Situation in the Ukraine. Data Presentation]. (2018). Retrieved from http://kiis.com.ua/?lang=ukr&cat=news&id=784
Tuchina, O. R. (2017). Natsional’naya identichnost’ i istoricheskiy opyt lichnosti: psikhologicheskiy aspekt (na materiale issledovaniya russkoy molodezhi Kubani) [National Identity and Historical Experience of the Person: The Psychological Aspect (on the Material of the Study Young Russian Kuban)]. Chelovek. Soobshchestvo. Upravleniye [Human. Commumity. Management], 18 (1), 30-44.
Vliyaniye ukrainskogo krizisa na ekstremistskiye dvizheniya v Rossii [Influence of the Ukranian Crisis upon Extremist Movements in Russia]. (2015). Ekspertnyy doklad. Vypusk II [Expert Report. Issue II]. Moscow: FRIGO “Narodnaya diplomatiya”.
Wilson, A. (2014). Ukraine crisis: What it means for the west. New Heaven, CT: Yale University Press.
Wolff, S., Malyarenko, T. (2015, July 2). The dangerous gamble that could spark full-scale conflict in Ukraine. The Conversation. Retrieved from https://theconversation.com/the-dangerous-gamble-that-could-spark-full-scale-conflict-in-ukraine-44115
Wolff, S., Malyarenko, T. (2018, February 20). Ukraine is still on the edge, despite all efforts to stabilize it. The Conversation. Retrieved from https://theconversation.com/ukraine-is-still-on-the-edge-despite-all-efforts-to-stabilise-it-92004
Wolff, S., Malyarenko, T. Remember the Cold War? Putin has brought it back. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2018/03/19/remember-the-cold-war-putin-has-brought-it-back/
Zakharchenko, A. (2017). “My zasluzhili pravo byt’ priznannym gosudarstvom”. Ofitsial’nyy sayt Glavy DNR [“We Have Won Our Right to be Recognized as a State”/ Official Site of the Head of DPR]. Retrieved from http://av-zakharchenko.su/inner-article/Zayavleniya/Aleksandr-Zaharchenko-My-zasluzhili-pravo-byt-priznannym2/