Supranational Format and National Specifics of the Migration Policy of the EU Countries
PDF (Russian)
HTML (Russian)
PDF (Russian)
HTML (Russian)
JATS XML

Section

Political Institutions and Processes

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31429/26190567-20-1-6-23

How to Cite

Trofimova, O.E., Chetverikova, A.S. (2019). Supranational Format and National Specifics of the Migration Policy of the EU Countries. South-Russian Journal of Social Sciences, 20(1), 6-23. DOI: 10.31429/26190567-20-1-6-23
Submission Date November 24, 2018
Accepted Date January 17, 2019
Published Date March 23, 2019
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2019 Ольга Ефимовна Трофимова, Анна Сергеевна Четверикова

Abstract

The article analyzes the specifics of the formation of Pan-­European migration policy — a vulnerable point in the process of European integration due to different approaches, systems of values, guiding lines and historical paths in the development of old and new EU member-­states. The research is aimed at detecting the specificity of competences in the sphere of migration both in the EU and in its member-­states, as well as of the balance between supra-­national initiatives and national migration policies. Shift from long-­term strategic decisions to pursuing short-­term goals and saving solidarity and cohesion in the situation of increasing contradictions between the EU countries have become the main priorities in the Pan-­European migration policy. A new point in the research is defining the impact the migration challenges exercise on the transformation processes in the sphere of integration in Europe and the shaping crisis of its most important principle of solidarity. The authors analyze the specificity of different approaches to the problems of migration and conclude that the coordination of the main directions of European migration policy can smooth out the situation with the enforced refugees and will lessen the risks of the EU disintegration. Basically an economic factor, migration has developed into political and became the challenge for the EU because of the involvement of a great number of European countries and the specificity of the present flows of refugees who are mainly the Muslims, and it is a threat to national identity of the European states. The analysis of the supranational and national formats of the attitude to migrants has shown that current policy is characterized by general transition from the restrictive to the selective policy and to illegal migration control; at the same time, the regional approach has gained priority while the state remains the the main instrument of migration control.

Keywords

supranational format migration policy solidarity principle migration crisis migrants’ integration identity

Funding information

This article is a result of the study supported by Russian Foundation for Basic Research, project № 17-07-00040 “Structural transformation of the integration process in the EU under the influence of globalized migration flows”.

References

Арбатова, Н.К., Кокеева, А.М. (2016). ЕС перед вызовом миграционного кризиса. Позиция европейских стран. Москва: ИМЭМО РАН. DOI: 10.205442/978-5-9535-0462-1

Биссон, Л. (2017). Миграционный кризис в ЕС два года спустя. Что дальше? РСМД. Режим доступа http://russiancouncil.ru/analytics-and-comments/analytics/migratsionnyy-krizis-v-es-dva-goda-spustya-chto-dalshe/

Вимон, П. (2017). Миграция в Европе: преодоление кризиса солидарности. Режим доступа http://carnegieendowment.org/files/CP_Vimon_2017_web_Rus.pdf

Войников, В.В. (2017). Европейское пространство свободы, безопасности и правосудия и миграционный кризис в Европе. Современная Европа, 2, 43–54. DOI: 10.15211/soveurope220174354

Гладкий, Ю.Н., Гладкий, И.Ю., Эйдемиллер, К.Ю. (2017). Исламская «диффузия» в странах Балтийского региона: плоды европейского мультикультурализма. Балтийский регион, 9 (3), 43–62. DOI: 10.5922/2074–9848–2017–3–3

Гутник, А.В. (2017). Новые контуры миграционной политики Великобритании. В Квашнин Ю.Д, Тоганова Н.В. (ред.) Большой Ближний Восток в мировой экономике и политике. Мировое развитие, 18, 137–144.

Европейская Комиссия (2017) Совместное заявление для Европейского парламента и Совета. Элементы стратегии ЕС в отношении Сирии. Режим доступа http://eeas.europa.eu/sites/eeas/files/ru_joint_communication_syria_strategy_ru

Квашнин, Ю.Д., Кузнецов, А.В., Трофимова, О.Е., Четверикова, А.С. (2017). Миграционный кризис в ЕС: национальные ответы на общий вызов. Мировая экономика и международные отношения, 1, 97–107. DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2017-61-1-97-107

Клаус, В., Вейгл, И. (2017). ООО «Переселение народов». Москва: Из-во Института Гайдара.

Миграционная политика Великобритании после выхода из ЕС. (2016, сентябрь 13). Angliya.today, Режим доступа http://www.angliya.today/immigracija/migracionnaja-politika-velikobritanii-posle-vyxoda-iz-es

Потемкина, О.Ю. (2016). Вишеградская группа и «гибкая солидарность». Современная Европа, 6, 43–52. DOI: 10.15211/soveurope620164352

Потемкина, О.Ю. (2015). «Европейская повестка дня по миграции» — новый поворот в иммиграционной политике ЕС? Современная Европа, 4, 28–40. DOI: 10.15211/soveurope420152840

Пресс-релиз Правительства Эстонии. (2018, 22 января). https://www.valitsus.ee/en/news/ratas-and-pope-francis-discussed-how-help-people-suffering-conflicts

Пресс-релиз Совета министров Республики Болгария. (2018, 9 февраля). Режим доступа http://www.government.bg/en/Press-center/News/BOYKO-BORISSOV-WITHIN-THE-EU-WE-COULD-FIND-A-PRAGMATIC-SOLUTION-TO-THE-MIGRATION-ISSUE

Сейткалиев, Р.М. (2017). Ближневосточные мигранты в Германии. В Квашнин Ю.Д, Тоганова Н.В. (ред.) Большой Ближний Восток в мировой экономике и политике. Мировое развитие, 18, 131–136. Москва: ИМЭМО РАН. DOI: 10.20542/978-5-9535-0520-8

European Commission. (2017). Progress Report on the European Agenda on Migration. Retrieved from http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP‑17–4484_en.htm

European migration network. (2016). Annual National Report on Migration and Asylum. Part 2. Bulgaria. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/sites/homeaffairs/files/03a_bulgaria_apr_part2_final_en.pdf

Faure, P., Gavas, M., Knoll, A. (2015). Challenges to a Comprehensive EU Migration and Asylum Policy. Retrieved from https://www.odi.org/sites/odi.org.uk/files/odi-assets/publications-opinion-files/10166.pdf

Guibernau, M. (2001). Governing European Diversity. London: Sage publications.

Koenig, N. (2017). The EU`s External Migration Policy: Towards Win-win-win Partnerships. Policy Paper, 190, 1–21. Retrieved from https://www.delorsinstitut.de/2015/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/20170406_ExternalMigrationPolicy-NKoenig.pdf

National Contact Point of the European Migration Network for the Slovak Republic. (2017). Annual Report on Migration and Asylum Policies. Slovak Republic 2016. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/sites/homeaffairs/files/24a_apr2016_part2_en.pdf

Office of Citizenship and Migration Affairs Republic of Latvia. (2017). Policy report on migration and asylum in Latvia. Reference year 2016. Retrieved from http://www.emn.lv/wp-content/uploads/APR_2016_part2_LATVIA_EN.pdf

Sebe, M. (2016). Romania’s Stance in the Issue of the Refugees Crisis. Preliminary Observation. Bucharest: IED.

Winslow, A.M. (2016). Shifting Immigration Policies in Response to the Syrian Refugee Crisis Across the European Union: A Case Analysis of Germany, Hungary, and Lithuania. Claremont-UC Undergraduate Research Conference on the European Union, 9, 99–113. DOI: 10.5642/urceu.201601.09

Downloads

Empty statistics