Alternatives and Trajectories of Political Development in the Contemporary World (Examples from The EU and BRICS Countries)
PDF (Russian)
HTML (Russian)
PDF (Russian)
HTML (Russian)
JATS XML

Section

Political Institutions and Processes

UDC

327

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31429/26190567-27-1-6-21

How to Cite

Pantin, V. (2025). Alternatives and Trajectories of Political Development in the Contemporary World (Examples from The EU and BRICS Countries). South-Russian Journal of Social Sciences, 27(1), 6-21. DOI: 10.31429/26190567-27-1-6-21
Submission Date December 20, 2025
Accepted Date February 14, 2026
Published Date March 31, 2025
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 Пантин В.И.

Abstract

This article examines alternative trajectories of political development in contemporary societies through a comparative analysis of selected European Union (EU) and BRICS countries against the backdrop of growing global instability, multiple crises, and escalating international conflicts. The findings demonstrate that the ongoing transformation of the world order in the first half of the twenty-­first century has brought several fundamental alternatives to the forefront of both domestic and international political development. These include political and cultural unification versus diversity, dependent versus sovereign development, the nation-­state versus the civilization-­state as the dominant model of political organization, and monocentrism (unipolarity) versus polycentrism (multipolarity). The study argues that political development in several EU member states has been characterized by increasing political integration accompanied by a partial erosion of national sovereignty. By contrast, despite persistent social challenges and structural imbalances, most BRICS countries prioritize sovereign and autonomous political development, typically grounded in the consolidation of the civilization-­state model. The article further demonstrates that while traditional socio-­political cleavages and the associated developmental alternatives — such as left versus right, socialism versus capitalism, liberalism versus conservatism, globalism versus regionalism, and democracy versus authoritarianism — remain analytically relevant, the increasing complexity of contemporary political systems and the transformation of the international order have generated new configurations and intersections among these paradigms. This process has contributed to the emergence of hybrid political regimes, evolving party systems, and flexible domestic and international coalitions that increasingly shape both the trajectories of individual states and the broader transition toward a new world order.

Keywords

political development alternatives sovereignty unification EU countries BRICS countries hybrid political regimes political coalitions world order

References

Акаев, А.А. (2014). Перспективы развития стран БРИКС в контексте мировой динамики. Партнерство цивилизаций, 3, 12–27.

Барановский, В.Г., Кобринская, И.Я. (2017). Реструктуризация политического ландшафта европейских государств. Москва: ИМЭМО РАН.

Гринин, Л.Е. (2016). Мировой порядок в прошлом, настоящем и будущем. История и современность, 1, 20–63.

Князева, Е.Н., Курдюмов, С.П. (2014). Основания синергетики: Синергетическое мировидение. Москва: ЛИБРОКОМ.

Кузьмина, Е.А. (2017). Гибридизация современных политических режимов. Вестник Поволжского института управления, 17(2), 99–104.

Ломанов, А.В. (2023). Инновация и традиция в трактовке демократии в современной идеологии КПК. Полис. Политические исследования, 5, 88–105. DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2023.05.06

Мосяков, Д.В. (2024). Уникальность роли БРИКС в новой геополитической реальности. Проблемы национальной стратегии, 5, 182–197.

Наумкин, В.В. (2020). Модель не-Запада: существует ли государство-цивилизация? Полис. Политические исследования, 4, 78–93. DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2020.04.06

Пантин, В.И., Лапкин, В.В. (2024). Основные сценарии дестабилизации и изменения мирового порядка. История и современность, 1, 27–57. DOI: 10.30884/iis/2024.01.02

Семененко, И.С. (2019). Горизонты ответственного развития: от научного дискурса к политическому управлению. Полис. Политические исследования, 3, 7–26. DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2019.03.02

Семененко, И.С., Хайнацкая, Т.И. (2024). «Общественное развитие» в лабиринтах научного дискурса и в приоритетах политической повестки. Полис. Политические исследования, 6, 54–74. DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2024.06.05

Соколов, А.П. (2024). Проблемы антикризисного реагирования франко-германского тандема после 2022 г. Сравнительная политика, 15(2), 76–91. DOI: 10. 46272/2221-3279-2024-2-15-4

Юрлова, Е.С. (2024). Касты в социально-политическом устройстве Индии. Историческая психология и социология истории, 1, 158–169. DOI: 10.30884/ipsi/2024.01.06

Acharya, A. (2014). The End of American World Order. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Akaev, A., Pantin, V. (2014). Technological Innovations and Future Shifts in International Politics. International Studies Quarterly, 58(4), 867–872.

Bunce, V.J. (2000). Comparative Democratization: Big and Bounded Generalizations. Comparative Political Studies, 6(7), 703–734.

Chiaramonte, A. (2023). Italy at the Polls. Four Lessons to Learn from the 2022 General Election. Contemporary Italian Politics, 15(1), 75–87. DOI: 10.1080/23248823.2023.2163453

Coker, C. (2019). The Rise of the Civilizational State. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Dalio, R. (2021). Principles for Dealing with the Changing World Order: Why Nations Succeed and Fail. New York: Simon & Schuster.

Diamond, L. (2002). Thinking About Hybrid Regimes. Journal of Democracy, 13(2), 21–35.

Hewlett, N., Kahn R. (2022). Reflections on the 2022 Elections in France. Modern & Contemporary France, 30(4), 393–409. DOI: 10.1080/09639489.2022.2134325

Huntington, S.P. (1996). The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. New York: Simon & Schuster.

Layne, Ch. (2012). This Time Its Real: The End of Unipolarity and The Pax Americana. International Studies Quarterly, 56(1), 203–213. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468‑2478.2011.00704.x

Modelski, G., Thompson, W.R. (1996). Leading Sectors and World Powers: The Coevolution of Global Economics and Politics. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.

Monteiro, N.P. (2012). Unrest Assured: Why Unipolarity is not Peaceful. International Security, 36(3), 9–40. DOI: 10.1162/ISEC_a_00064

O’Neil, J. (2011). The Growth Map: Economic Opportunity in the Brics and Beyond. London: Penguin.

Robertson, R. (1992). Globalization: Social Theory and Global Culture. London: Sage Publications.

Roy, R. (2005). Democracy in India. Form and Substance. New Delhi: Shipra Publication.

Soares, M. (2014). Inequality and Development Challenges: BRICS National Systems of Innovation. New Delhi: Routledge.

Stunkel, O. (2015). The BRICS and the Future Global Order. London: Lexington Books.

Weiwei, Z. (2012). The China Wave: Rise of Civilizational State. Hackensack, NJ: World Century Publishing Corporation.

Downloads

Empty statistics