Effectiveness of Protest Group's Activity: Indicators and Their Testing
PDF (Russian)
HTML (Russian)
PDF (Russian)
HTML (Russian)
JATS XML

Section

Public Politics

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31429/

How to Cite

Sokolov, A.V., Levchenko, I.A. (2018). Effectiveness of Protest Group’s Activity: Indicators and Their Testing. South-Russian Journal of Social Sciences, 19(2), 79-99. DOI: 10.31429/
Submission Date December 11, 2017
Accepted Date February 2, 2018
Published Date June 7, 2018
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2018 Александр Владимирович Соколов, Илья Алексеевич Левченко

Abstract

The article is devoted to the analysis of contemporary protest in Russia. The authors attempt to identify key indicators of the effectiveness of the activities of protest groups, carrying out the operationalization of indicators that affect the success of the functioning of protest groups. The key indicators were: the number of participants, the number of protest actions, the number of media references, coverage of the conflict, duration of existence, involvement (internal and external), activity in communities in social networks, the degree of solving of the problem. Authors analyze activities in 4 protest campaigns: the public movement “For the Park Torfianka!”, “All-Russia movement of foreign currency borrowers”, protests of miners from the city of Gukovo and protest actions in support of the film “He’s not Dimon”. For the analysis we used Google Trends data and Yandex statistics, the software product Popsters for analyzing protesters` activity in social networks. The article concludes that the practice of protest campaigns in modern Russia demonstrates that the activity of citizens can be successful and bring results in solving those problems that have caused their self-organization. The analysis of protest campaigns in modern Russia has shown that each movement has its own unique tools, there is no single organizational model, each movement operates in accordance with internal resources and specifics, determining its own ways and methods of achieving the objectives. Features of the functioning and management of protest groups were demonstrated in the paper. In the process of analysis, it was possible to identify the advantages (high mobilization component, duration of protest activities, broad geography of the conflict, a large number of protest actions, high level of operational communication, etc.) and shortcomings (lack of broad support from political parties, lack of proper support from the state and local authorities, the lack of coverage of the conflict in reports on federal news channels, etc.) organization of these protest campaigns.

Keywords

protest effectiveness collective actions the Internet social networks new media power

Funding information

The study was carried out through the financial support of the Russian Fund of Fundamental Research (RFFR), project No. 17-33-01022 (a2) "Modeling and indexing of protest activity in the subjects of the Russian Federation".

References

Артюхина, В.А. (2011). Социальный протест как проявление гражданского общества. Социология в современном мире: наука, образование, творчество, 3, 251–255.

Борисяк, Д. (2015). Банки, получившие господдержку, не спешат ею пользоваться. Ведомости. Режим доступа https://www.vedomosti.ru/finance/articles/2015/12/14/620791-banki-otlozhili-subordi-dolgii-yaschik

Волынчук, А.Б., Соловченков, С.А. (2013). Социальная напряженность и протестная активность в контексте анализа социальной безопасности. Территория новых возможностей. Вестник Владивостокского государственного университета экономики и сервиса, 1, 25–36.

График частоты запросов по результату «За парк Торфянка!». Режим доступа https://trends.google.ru/trends/explore?q=%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80%D1%84%D1%8F%D0%BD%D0%BA%D0%B0

Защитники Торфянки сообщили о нападении активистов «Сорок сороков» и бездействии полиции (2016). Медиазона. Режим доступа https://zona.media/news/2016/21/07/torf-lico

К защитникам парка «Торфянка» пришли с обысками и задержали (2016). BBC News. Русская служба. Режим доступа http://www.bbc.com/russian/news‑37971505

Макаров, А. (2015). Гражданское противостояние на «Торфянке» в Москве: навигация по репортажам. livejournal: интернет-блог. Режим доступа http://arthur-msk.livejournal.com/19308.html

Митинги валютных заемщиков: итоги выходных (2015). Стройконтроль. Режим доступа http://msk.stroykontrol.info/news.php?id=4325

Никовская, Л.И. (2012). Гражданское общество и протесты: что за ними стоит? Мониторинг общественного мнения: экономические и социальные перемены, 4 (110), 5–13.

Официальная группа в социальной сети «Вконтакте»: Митинги 26 марта. Режим доступа https://vk.com/dimon_moscow

Официальная группа в социальной сети «Вконтакте»: Общественное движение за Парк Торфянка!». Режим доступа https://vk.com/park.torf2016

Приезду ростовских шахтеров на пикет в Москву помешала полиция (2016). РБК. Режим доступа http://www.rbc.ru/politics/20/12/2016/585956c69a79477526ea6c67

Статистика Google-trends по динамике запросов по словам «валютные заемщики». Режим доступа https://news.yandex.ru/yandsearch?text=%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80%D1%84%D1%8F%D0%BD%D0%BA%D0%B0&rpt=nnews2&grhow=clutop

Шахтеры голодают за зарплату (2016). Gazeta.ru. Режим доступа https://www.gazeta.ru/social/2016/08/23/10154243.shtml

Яндекс — статистика по ключевым словам «парк торфянка». Режим доступа https://news.yandex.ru/yandsearch?text=%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80%D1%84%D1%8F%D0%BD%D0%BA%D0%B0&rpt=nnews2&grhow=clutop

Яндекс — статистика по ключевым словам «шахтеры гуково». Режим доступа https://news.yandex.ru/yandsearch?text=%D1%88%D0%B0%D1%85%D1%82%D0%B5%D1%80%D1%8B%20%D0%93%D1%83%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BE&rpt=nnews2&grhow=clutop&wiz_no_news=1&rel=rel&within=777&from_day=01&from_month=01&from_year=2015&to_day=11&to_month=05&to_year=2017

Brady, H., Verba, S. & Schlozman, K.L. (1995). Beyond Ses: A Resource Model of Political Participation. American Political Science Review, 89 (2), 271–294.

Eisinger, P.K. (1973). The conditions of protest behavior in American cities. American Political Science Review, 67 (1), 11–28.

Gamson, W.A. (1992). Talking Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Le Bon, G. (2001). The Crowd: A Study of the Popular Mind. Kitchener, ONT: Batoche Books.

Opp, K-D. (2012). Collective identity, rationality and collective political action. Rationality and Society, 24 (1), 73–105.

Piven, F.F. & Cloward, R.A. (1991). Collective Protest: A Critique of Resource Mobilization Theory. International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society, 4 (4), 435–458.

Putnam, R.D. & Feldstein, L.M. (2003). Better Together: Restoring the American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.

Russell, D.J. & van Sickle, A. (2005). The Resource, Structural, and Cultural Bases of Protest. Center for the Study of Democracy (CSD) Working Papers. Retrieved from http://escholarship.org/uc/item/3jx2b911

Tarrow, S. (1994). Power in Movement: Social Movements, Collective Action and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Travaglino, G.A. (2014). Social sciences and social movements: the theoretical context. Contemporary Social Science, 1, 1–14.

Downloads

Empty statistics