The Deixis of Homeland in State Identity Policy on TV Channel “Russia 1” | South-Russian Journal of Social Sciences
The Deixis of Homeland in State Identity Policy on TV Channel “Russia 1”
PDF (Russian)
https://doi.org/10.31429/26190567-23-4-116-135
https://doi.org/10.31429/26190567-23-4-116-135

How to Cite Array

Sursanova I.V. (2022) The Deixis of Homeland in State Identity Policy on TV Channel “Russia 1”. South-Russian Journal of Social Sciences, 23 (4), pp. 116-135. DOI: 10.31429/26190567-23-4-116-135 (In Russian)
Submission Date 2022-11-23
Accepted Date 2022-12-20
Published Date 2023-03-31

Copyright (c) 2023 Юлия Валерьевна Сурсанова

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

The most important words of state identity policy are often the smallest: “we,” “this,” and “here,” i. e., words of the linguistic “deixis”. Deixis (Greek Deiktikos – indication) is the use of linguistic expressions and other signs that can only be interpreted by referring to the physical coordinates of the communicative act – its participants, its place and time. The contextual nature of deictic expressions that include the personal pronoun “we” has been studied by linguists, but only recently has it attracted sociologists and political scientists. Researchers believe that deixis allows one to see how the “center of the interpretive universe” works, whose potential appears not to have been completely disclosed. Thus, the purpose of the research presented in this article is to test deixis as a tool to analyze representations of state identity policy in media and assess the impact of the use of the deixis of Homeland in the construction of state identity policy, through the example of the TV channel “Russia 1”. The methodological basis of the research is the concept of identity policy, as suggested by one of the key experts in the sphere of identity studies, I. S. Semenenko, a Corresponding Member of RAS. Identity policy is defined within this concept as a targeted program for building a political community’s identity. I. S. Semenenko qualifies identity policy in both theoretical and empirical dimension with reference to historical policy, museum practices, etc. As a chronological framework, the period between 2011 and 2012, characterized in Russia by an active surge of comprehension and reinterpretation of the Russian identity, was chosen. 106 reports for December 2011 and December 2012 on Vesti Nedeli (News of the Week) on Rossiya 1 TV channel served as an empirical base of the research. This research is based on Frame Analysis and the Theory of Banal Nationalism. As an empirical technique, we used content analysis of video materials, which identified 32 cases of the use of deictic expressions of state identity policy, broadcast by the tools of the television channel “Russia 1”. The novelty of the research consists in testing the linguistic tool of deixis with regard to a political topic of the study; namely, state identity policy through the medium of news stories. The analysis of deixis made it possible to assume parameters for the spatial and temporal model of Russian political identity, demonstrating the way in which the answer to the question “where are we?” in terms of time and space affects the question “who are we?” It also emphasized the role of deixis in shaping state identity policy, which gave researchers the possibility to define it from the perspective of the center of the world and the source of civilization.

Keywords

identity, identity policy, state identity policy, deixis, “Russia 1” TV channel

References

  1. Alibegilov, Sh. A., Volkov, V. A. (2016). Tsivilizatsionnaya identichnost’ kak vektor sovremennoy gosudarstvennoy politiki [Civilizational Identity as a Vector of Modern State Policy]. Upravlencheskoye konsul’tirovaniye [Management Consulting], 5, 19–24.
  2. Billig, M. (1995). Banal Nationalism. London: SAGE Publications.
  3. Bushuev, V.V., Titov, V.V. (2011). atsional’no-gosudarstvennaya identichnost’ v sovremennom mire i rol’ istoricheskoy politiki v yeye formirovanii (teoretiko-metodologicheskiy analiz) [National and State Identity in The Modern World and The Role of Historical Policy in its Formation (Theory-Methodological Analysis)]. Vestnik MGTU im. M. A. Sholokhova. Politologiya [Bulletin of MSTU im. M. A. Sholokhov. Political Science], 4, 77–93.
  4. Couldry, N., Hepp, A., (2017). The Mediated Construction of Reality. UK: Polity Press.
  5. Elias, N. (1978). The History of Manners. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
  6. Fowler, R. (1991). Language in the news. London: Routledge.
  7. Hartley, J. (1992). Teleology: Studies in Television. Routledge: London.
  8. Jonson, D.M. (1994). Who is We?: Constructing Communities in US-Mexico Border Discourse. Discourse and Society, 5, 207–232.
  9. Krivenko, G. A. (2010). Rol’ deykticheskikh slov v referentsii avtora khudozhestvennogo teksta [The Role of Deictic Words in the Reference of the Author of a Literary Text]. Filologicheskiye nauki. Yazyk, rech’, rechevaya kommunikatsiya [The Role of Deictic Words in the Author’s Reference in a Literary Text], 7. Retrieved from https://www.rusnauka.com/2_ANR_2010/Philologia/7_57418.doc.htm
  10. Kymlicka, W. (2002). Western Political Theory and Ethnic Relations in Eastern Europe. In W. Kymlicka & M. Opalski (Eds) Can Liberal Pluralism be Exported? Western Political Theory and Ethnic Relations in Eastern Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  11. Maitland, K. Wilson, J. (1987). Pronominal Selection and Ideological Conflict. Journal of Pragmatics, 11, 495–512.
  12. Malinova, O. Yu. (2012). Simvolicheskoye yedinstvo natsii? Reprezentatsiya makropoliticheskogo soobshchestva v predvybornoy ritorike Vladimira Putina [Symbolic Unity of the Nation? Representation of the Macropolitical Community in Vladimir Putin’s Election Rhetoric]. Pro et Contra [Pro et Contra], 3, 76–93.
  13. Malinova, O. Yu. (2013). Konstruirovanie smyslov: issledovanie simvolicheskoy politiki v sovremennoy Rossii [Designing Meanings: A Study of Symbolic Politics in Contemporary Russia]. Moskva: RAN. INION Tsentr sotsial’nykh nauch. inform. issled. otdel polit. nauki.
  14. Obidina, Yu. S. (2021) Pravoslavie kak osnova russkoy identichnosti: proshloye i budushchee rossiyskoy tsivilizatsii In Vostok i Zapad v dukhovnoy kul’ture Rossii: dialog i protivostoyanie (ot Aleksandra Nevskogo do nashikh dney), sbornik statey po materialam vserossiyskoy nauchnoy konferentsii [Orthodoxy as the Basis of Russian Identity: The Past and the Future of Russian Civilization. East and West in the Spiritual Culture of Russia: Dialogue and Confrontation (from Alexander Nevsky to the Present Day)] (pp. 358–366). Nizhniy Novgorod: Nizhegorodskaya dukhovnaya seminariya Nizhegorodskoy Yeparkhii Russkoy Pravoslavnoy Tserkvi.
  15. Pakholkova, L. M. (2012). Nekotorye osobennosti pragmatiki personal’nogo deyksisa v institutsional’nom politicheskom diskurse (na materiale rechey rukovoditeley FRG, RF i SSHA pri vstuplenii v dolzhnost’) [Some Characteristics of Personal Deixis Pragmatics in Institutional Political Discourse (on the Speeches of German, Russian and American Leaders at their Inauguration)]. Vestnik Cherepovetskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Bulletin of Cherepovets State University], 3, 119–122.
  16. Petersoo, P. (2007). What Does ‘We’ Mean? National Deixis in the Media. Journal of Language and Politics, 6, 419–436.
  17. Popova, O. V. (2019 Gosudarstvennaya politika identichnosti kak teoreticheskiy konstrukt i real’naya praktika: opyt ekspertnykh otsenok rossiyskikh issledovateley [Identity Policy at National Level as a Theoretical Construct and Real Practice: Expert Assessments Attempt]. Uzhno-rossiyskiy zhurnal sotsial’nykh nauk [South-Russian Journal of Social Sciences], 4, 74–91.
  18. Putin, V. V. (2012, February 13). Stroitel’stvo spravedlivosti. Sotsial’naya politika dlya Rossii [Building Justice. Social Policy for Russia]. Komsomol’skaya Pravda [Komsomol’skaya Pravda]. Retrieved from https://www.kp.ru/daily/25833/2807793/
  19. Putin, V. V. (2012, February 20). Byt’ sil’nym: Garantii natsional’noy bezopasnosti Rossii [Being Strong: National Security Guarantees]. Rossiyskaya gazeta [Rossiyskaya gazeta], 1–2. Retrieved from https://rg.ru/2012/02/20/putin-armiya.html
  20. Putin, V. V. (2012, February 27). Rossiya i menyayushchiysya mir [Russia and the Changing World]. Moskovskiye Novosti [Moskovskiye Novosti], 225. Retrieved from https://www.mn.ru/politics/78738
  21. Putin, V. V. (2012, February 6). Demokratiya i kachestvo gosudarstva [Democracy and the Quality of the State]. Kommersant [Kommersant], 20/P(4805). Retrieved from https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/1866753
  22. Putin, V. V. (2012, January 16). Rossiya sosredotachivayetsya — vyzovy, na kotoryye my dolzhny otvetit’ [Russia is Focusing – Challenges We Must Meet]. Izvestiya [Izvestiya]. Retrieved from https://iz.ru/news/511884
  23. Putin, V. V. (2012, January 23). Rossiya: natsional’nyy vopros [Russia: The National Question]. Nezavisimaya gazeta [Nezavisimaya gazeta]. Retrieved from https://www.ng.ru/politics/2012-01-23/1_national.html
  24. Putin, V. V. (2012, January 30). Nam nuzhna novaya ekonomika [We Need a New Economy]. Vedomosti [Vedomosti], 15(3029). Retrieved from https://www.vedomosti.ru/politics/articles/2012/01/30/o_nashih_ekonomicheskih_zadachah
  25. Rae, J., Drury, J. (1993). Reification and Evidence in Rhetoric on Economic Recession: Some Methods Used in the UK Press, Final Quarter 1990. Discourse and Society, 4, 357–394.
  26. Semenenko, I. S. (2011) Politicheskaya identichnost’ v kontekste politiki identichnosti [Political Identity and Identity Politics]. POLITE`KS [POLITEX], 2, 5–24.
  27. Semenenko, I. S. (Ed.). (2011). Politicheskaya identichnost’ i politika identichnosti, v 2 t., T.1: Identichnost’ kak kategoriya politicheskoy nauki: slovar’ terminov i ponyatiy [Political Identity and Identity Politics, in 2 Volumes, v.1: Identity as a Category of Political Science: a Dictionary of Terms and Concepts]. Moskva: Rossiyskaya politicheskaya entsiklopediya.
  28. Semenenko, I. S., Malinova, O. Yu. (Eds) (2017). Simvolicheskaya politika i identichnost’: teoreticheskiye i metodologicheskiye problemy [Symbolic Politics and Identity: Theoretical and Methodological Problems]. Moskva: RAN. INION. Tsentr sotsial. nauch.-inform. issled.; Otd. polit. nauki.
  29. Shmitt, K. (2021). Ponyatie politicheskogo [The Concept of The Political]. Kiev: Izd. “KNT”.
  30. Shotter, J. (1993). The Cultural Politics of Everyday Life. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
  31. Shtompka, P. (2007). Vizual`naya sociologiya. Fotografiya kak metod issledovaniya [Visual Sociology. Photography as a Research Method]. Moskva.: Logos.
  32. Sidenko, O. (2019) K voprosu o natsional’nom stroitel’stve v postsovetskoy Possii v kontekste “otlozhennogo” tranzita [On the Issue of National Construction in Post-Soviet Russia in the Context of “Delayed” Transit]. Vostok Evropy` [East of Europe], 5, 145–164.
  33. Slavtcheva-Petkova, V. (2014). Rethinking Banal Nationalism: Banal Americanism, Europeanism and the Missing Link between Identities and Media Representations. International Journal of Communication.
  34. Snou, D. A., Berk, R. E`., Vode`n, S. K., Benford, R. D. (2013). Protsessy soglasovaniya freyma, mikromobilizatsiya i uchastiye v obshchestvennom dvizhenii [Frame Alignment Processes, Micromobilization and Social Movement Participation]. Sotsiologiya vlasti [Sociology of Power], 4, 187–224.
  35. Solov`ev, S. M. (2022) Simvolicheskaya resovetizatsiya i nizovoi patriotizm [Symbolic re-Sovietization and Grassroots Patriotism]. Rossiya v global’noy politike [Russia in Global Politics], 5, 121–135.
  36. Verkhovskiy, A. (2011). Sovremennoye diskursivnoye protivostoyaniye russkikh natsionalistov i federal’nykh vlastey [Contemporary Discoursive Confrontation of Russian Nationalists and Federal Authorities]. Vestnik obshhestvennogo mneniya [Bulletin of Public Opinion], 4(110), 5–18.
  37. Williams, N. (2019). Deixis; Deixis and Indexicals. Preprint, Universität Potsdam.
  38. Wilson, J. (1990). Politically Speaking. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.