Immigration and Family Policy in Continental Western Europe | South-Russian Journal of Social Sciences
Immigration and Family Policy in Continental Western Europe
PDF (Russian)
https://doi.org/10.31429/26190567-24-2-105-121
https://doi.org/10.31429/26190567-24-2-105-121

How to Cite Array

Subkhangulova K.A. (2023) Immigration and Family Policy in Continental Western Europe. South-Russian Journal of Social Sciences, 24 (2), pp. 105-121. DOI: 10.31429/26190567-24-2-105-121 (In Russian)
Submission Date 2023-08-04
Accepted Date 2023-09-24
Published Date 2023-07-31

Copyright (c) 2023 Ксения Альмировна Субхангулова

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

Current demographic concerns in European countries, resulting from a decrease in natural population growth and an increase in aging populations, are a significant focus for governments. Efficient mechanisms must be sought to resolve these issues. The article examines the impact of immigration on demographic trends. It also explores the unique characteristics and outcomes of family policies across continental Western European countries. The methodology employed in this research relies on the demographic transition theory to study population changes. It considers family policies in Western European nations from the perspective of their typology and in the context of social state models. Furthermore, the study utilizes statistical analysis methods on data obtained from international organizations. The study’s key findings are as follows: Western European nations experience severe socio-­demographic imbalances, which depend on their stage of demographic transition. While immigration increases the birth rate in the host countries, it does not even allow for the basic replacement of the population and generates negative socio-­political effects. The findings of the study make it possible to indicate the declining role of the family in the course of the European values system transformation. Besides, the results testify to the rapprochement of family policy models on the continent, as well as to the adoption of the local reproductive patterns by the migrants. The positive demographic situation in France, unlike in other states, is attributed to a unique family policy model that encourages larger families, implements pro-natal policies, and prioritizes the promotion of female employment. The experience of Western European states in developing and implementing the family policies in Russia may help improve its demographic situation.

Keywords

family policy, immigration, demographic transition, value system, conservative-­corporativist model

References

  1. Afulani, P.A., Asunka, J. (2015). Socialization, Adaptation, Transnationalism, and the Reproductive Behavior of Sub-Saharan African Migrants in France. K. Joyner, D.F. Warner. (Eds), Population Research and Policy Review, 34, 561–592. DOI: 10.1007/s11113-015-9360-2
  2. Betz, W., Simpson, N.B. (2013). The Effects of International Migration on the Well-being of Native Populations in Europe. IZA Journal of Migratio, 22(12). DOI: 10.1186/2193-9039-2-12
  3. Coleman, D. (2006). Immigration and Ethnic Change in Low-Fertility Countries: A Third Demographic Transition. Population and Development Review, 32(3), 401–446. DOI: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2006.00131.x
  4. Tsapenko, I. P. (2019). Perspektivnyye tekhnologii integratsii migrantov [Promising Practices of Migrant Integration]. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnyye otnosheniya [World Eсonomy and International Relations], 63(10), 97–108. DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2019-63-10-97-108
  5. d’Albis, H., Boubtane, E., Coulibaly, D. (2018). Immigration and Government Spending in OECD Countries. Working paper, 41. Retrieved from https://pjse.hal.science/
  6. Desiderio, R. (2020). The Impact of International Migration on Fertility: An Empirical Study. KNOMAD Paper, 36. World Bank, Washington, DC. Retrieved from https://www.knomad.org/
  7. Dutta, A. (2021). Between Openness and Restriction: German Family Law and Multicultural Challenges. N. Yassari, M.-C. Foblets (Eds), Normativity and Diversity in Family Law, 255–276. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-83106-6_11
  8. Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton University Press.
  9. Fargues, P. (2011). International Migration and the Demographic Transition: A Two-Way Interaction. International Migration Review, 45(3), 588–614. DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-7379.2011.00859.x
  10. Grishin, I.V., Sadovaya, Ye.S., Tsapenko I.P. (Eds). (2020). Sotsial’noe gosudarstvo v zerkale obshchestvennykh transformatsiy [Social State in the Mirror of Social Transformations]. M.: IMEMO, Rossiyskaya akademiya nauk.
  11. Hara, T. (2022). Demographic Sustainability. In J.F. May, J.A. Goldstone (Eds) International Handbook of Population Policies (pp. 759–780). Springer Cham. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-02040-7
  12. Hruschka, C. (2020). Hyperactive and Incoherent Legislation and Policy: Germany’s Fragmented Migration Management Within the European Framework. M.-C. Foblets, J.-Y. Carlier (Eds), Law and Migration in a Changing World, 369–407. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-99508-3_8
  13. International Migration Outlook. (2022). Paris: OECD Publishing. DOI: 10.1787/30fe16d2-en
  14. Isidro, L., Math, A. (2020). Migrants’ Access to Social Protection in France. In J.-M. Lafleur, D. Vintila (Eds.) Migration and Social Protection in Europe and Beyond, 1, 165–178. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-51241-5
  15. Kvashnin, Yu. D. (Eds). (2016). Social’noe gosudarstvo v stranakh ES: proshloe i nastoyashchee [Social State in the EU Countries: Past and Present]. M.: IMEMO, Rossiyskaya akademiya nauk.
  16. Lyubart, M. K. (2017). Migratsionnyy krizis v Yevrosoyuze 2015–2016 gg.: etnokul’turnyy aspekt. I — Frantsiya [Migration Crisis in the European Union in 2015–2016: Ethno-cultural Aspect. I — France. Research in Applied and Urgent Ethnology]. Issledovaniya po prikladnoy i neotlozhnoy etnologii [Research in Applied and Urgent Ethnology]. M.: IEA, Rossiyskaya akademiya nauk. Retrieved from https://static.iea.ras.ru/Neo_256.pdf
  17. Pennings, F. (2020). Migrants’ Access to Social Protection in the Netherlands. In J.-M. Lafleur, D. Vintila (Eds) Migration and Social Protection in Europe and Beyond, 1, 313–325. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-51241-5_21
  18. Romaniuk, A. (2017). Stationary Population, Immigration, Social Cohesion, and National Identity: What are the links and the Policy Implications? With special Attention to Canada, a Demographer’s Point of View. Canadian Studies in Population, 44 (3–4), 165–176. DOI: 10.25336/P6391D
  19. Tønnessen, M. (2017). Demographic Consequences of Migration (pp. 15–16). Reprosentralen, University of Oslo.
  20. Trzcinski, E., Camp, J.K. (2013). Family Policy in Germany. In M. Robila (Ed.) Handbook of Family Policies Across the Globe, 137–153. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-6771-7_10
  21. Van De Kaa. (1987). Europe’s Second Demographic Transition. Popul Bull.
  22. Vasin, S.M., Pleshakova, N.A. (2013). Disbalans sotsial’nogo i ekonomicheskogo razvitiya regiona: voprosy izmereniya i problema protivorechiya [Imbalance of the Social and Economic Development of the Region: Questions of Measurement and the Problem of Contradiction]. Regional’naya ekonomika: teoriya i praktika [Regional Economics: Theory and Practice], 19(298), 38–45.