Section
UDC
364.658:316.356.4DOI
https://doi.org/10.31429/26190567-25-1-66-79How to Cite
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2024 Даниил Олегович Левченко, Даниил Евгеньевич Филиппов
Abstract
Conducting research in the area of factors of civic solidarity in Russia is determined by current processes of consolidation under conditions of exogenous geopolitical risks and threats, and common strategic course for building responsible society. The study is intended to provide a foundation for the nature and role of socio–psychological well-being of citizens in the actualization of civic solidarity of local communities. The nature of social and psychological well-being as an intangible resource for the development of local communities is defined as a subjective perception of Oneself and Others through cognitive, emotional and activity assessments, constructed under the influence of learned values of spatial and territorial identity, experience of social interaction, objective factors of the surrounding reality. The empirical part of the study is based on the results of expert interviews (N = 45) and online surveys (N = 969) of residents of three subjects of Southern Russia – Krasnodar Territory, the Republic of Adygea and the Republic of Crimea. It is revealed that citizens’ subjective perception of well-being and the possibilities of its increment has a personalistic and pragmatic character. At the same time, military-political tension, which creates significant threats and risks for communities in the South of Russia, has determined transformations in civil assessments and attitudes: a sense of belonging to the fate of fellow villagers / townspeople / fellow citizens involved in conducting a special military operation of Russia, and the direct dependence articulated by experts between individual and collective (national) well-being form the basis of mutual assistance practices.
Keywords
Funding information
The study was financially supported by the Russian Science Foundation and the Kuban Science Foundation within the framework of project No. 22-18-20059 “Policy for the development of rural areas of the Krasnodar Territory: the potential of intangible resources”.
References
Beck, U. (2000). Obshchestvo riska. Na puti k drugomu modern [Risk Society. On the Way to Another Modernity]. Moskva: Progress-Traditsiya.
Bradburn, N. (1969). The Structure of Psychological Well-being. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.
CHernysh, M. F., Yepikhina, Yu. B. (Eds). (2021). Sotsiologicheskiye podkhody k izucheniyu sotsial’nogo blagopoluchiya [Sociological Approaches to the Study of Social Well-Being]. Moskva: FNISTS RAN.
Diener, E. (1984). Subjective Well-Being. Psychological Bulletin, 3(95), 542–575.
Edmans, A. (2010). The Link between Job Satisfaction and Firm Value, with Implications for Corporate Social Responsibility. Academy of Management Perspectives, 4(26), 1–19.
Federal’naya sluzhba gosudarstvennoy statistiki [Federal State Statistics Service]. Retrieved from https://rosstat.gov.ru/
Kessler, J. B., McClellan, A., Nesbit, J., Schotter, A. (2022). Short-term Fluctuations in Incidental Happiness and Economic Decision-Making: Experimental Evidence from a Sports Bar. Experimental Economics, 1(25), 141–169.
Keyes, C. (1998). Social Well-being. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61, 121–140.
Kozyreva, P. M., Smirnov, A. I. (2020). Realizatsiya zhiznennykh tseley: sub’’yektivnyye otsenki [Realization of Life Goals: Subjective Assessments]. Rossiya reformiruyushchayasya [Russia Reforming], 18, 179–201.
Layard, R., De Neve, J.-E. (2023). Wellbeing: Science and Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Luman, N. (1994). Ponyatiye riska [Risk Concept]. THESIS, 5, 4–160.
Miroshnichenko, I. V. (2023). Nematerial’nyye resursy razvitiya [Intangible Development Resources]. In I.S. Semenenko (Ed.), Identichnost’: lichnost’, obshchestvo, politika [Identity: Personality, Society, Politics] (pp. 57–67). Moskva: Ves’ Mir.
Morozova, Ye. V. (2023). Sel’skaya identichnost’ [Rural Identity]. In I.S. Semenenko (Ed.), Identichnost’: lichnost’, obshchestvo, politika. Novyye kontury issledovatel’skogo polya [Identity: Personality, Society, Politics. New Contours of the Research Field] (pp.350–358). Moskva: Ves’ Mir.
Parsons, T. (1954). Values, Motives and Systems of Action. In Parsons T., Shils E. (Eds) Toward a General Theory of Action (p. 506). Cambridge: Harvard University Press Publ.
Rikel’, A.M., Tuniyants, A.A., Batyrova, N. (2017). Ponyatiye sub’’yektivnogo blagopoluchiya v gedonisticheskom i evdemonisticheskom podkhodakh [The Concept of Subjective Well-Being in Hedonic and Eudaimonic Approaches]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Psikhologiya [Bulletin of Moscow University. Psychology], 2(14), 64–82.
Rusiya, N.T., Rakachev, D.N. (2023). Sostoyaniye grazhdanskoy solidarnosti gorodskikh i sel’skikh territoriy Yuga Rossii [The State of Civic Solidarity in Urban and Rural Areas of the South of Russia]. Zhurnal politicheskikh issledovaniy [Journal of Political Studies], 4, 72–87. DOI: 10.12737/2587-6295-2023-7-4-72-87
Semenenko, I.S., Morozova, Ye.V. (2017). Identichnost’ v menyayushchemsya mire: oriyentiry, smysly, trayektorii dinamiki [Identity in a Changing World: Guidelines, Meanings, Dynamics Trajectories]. In I.S. Semenenko (Ed.), Identichnost’: lichnost’, obshchestvo, politika [Identity: Personality, Society, Politics] (pp. 77–88). Moskva: Ves’ Mir.
Shilova, V.A. (2020). Sub’’yektivnoye blagopoluchiye v ponimanii rossiyan: otsenki urovnya, svyaz’ s drugimi pokazatelyami, sub’’yektivnyye kharakteristiki i modeli [Subjective Well-Being as Understood by Russians: Level Assessments, Relationships with Other Indicators, Subjective Characteristics and Models]. Informatsionno-analiticheskiy byulleten’. Sub’’yektivnoye i ob’’yektivnoye blagopoluchiye v sovremennom rossiyskom obshchestve: rezul’taty empiricheskogo issledovaniya [Information and Analytical Bulletin. Subjective and Objective Well-Veing in Modern Russian Society: Results of an Empirical Study], 1, 18–38.
Tatarova, G.G., Kuchenkova, A.V. (2016). Pokazateli sub’’yektivnogo blagopoluchiya kak tipoobrazuyushchiye priznaki [Indicators of Subjective Well-Being as Type-Forming Characteristics]. Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya [Sociological Research], 10, 21–32.
Tatarova, G.G., Kuchenkova, A.V. (2020). “Udovletvorennost’ zhizn’yu” i “lichnoye schast’ye” v sotsiologicheskom izmerenii sub’’yektivnogo blagopoluchiya [“Life Satisfaction” and “Personal Happiness” in the Sociological Dimension of Subjective Well-Being]. Rossiya reformiruyushchayasya [Russia Reforming], 18, 565–589.
Tishkov, V.A. (2013). Rossiyskiy narod: istoriya i smysl natsional’nogo samosoznaniya [Russian People: History and Meaning of National Identity]. Moskva: Nauka.
Voronin, G.L., Yevgrafov, K.O., Kiseleva, I.P., Kozyreva, P.M., Kosolapov, M.S., Nizamova, A.E., Sivkova, I.V., Smirnov, A.I., Sokolova, S.B., Tonis, Ye.I. (2023). Rossiyskiye domokhozyaystva: dinamika ekonomicheskogo polozheniya (1994–2021 gg.) [Russian Households: Dynamics of Economic Situation (1994–2021)]. Vestnik Rossiyskogo monitoringa ekonomicheskogo polozheniya i zdorov’ya naseleniya NIU VSHE (RLMS-HSE) [Bulletin of the Russian Monitoring of the Economic Situation and Health of the Population of the National Research University Higher School of Economics (RLMS-HSE)], 13, 7–93.
Voz’mitel’, A. A. (2013). Kachestvo zhizni v doperestroyechnoy i poreformennoy Rossii [Quality of Life in Pre-Perestroika and Post-Reform Russia]. Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya [Sociological Research], 2, 25–32.
Zalewska, A. M. (2023). Citizenship Activity in Emerging Adults: the Role of Self-Esteem, Social Skills, and Well-Being. Current Issues in Personality Psychology, 2(11). DOI: 10.5114/cipp/156763