Abstract
The study of modern motherhood is of particular relevance if the perspective shifts from purely medical and psychological topics towards socio-political analysis. To see a mother not only as a reproductive unit or a subject of child care, but as a full-fledged participant in social relations with her own specific needs, potential and practices, means taking a step towards adequate measures to support Russian women. Turning to the concept of “state feminism” as a research optics allows us to assess the discursive content of the official, dominant position on the issue of motherhood in Russia. Specifying ways to embody the category of “motherhood” in public policy and public consciousness requires attention to three groups of markers that allow us to study the specific dynamics of this phenomenon: normative, public and scientific discourses. As a result, it was found that Russian “state feminism” is syncretic in terms of ideological patterns that determine its content. Thus, at the normative level, traditionalist orientations coexist with the problematization of gender asymmetry and social feminist trends. Public discourse reveals several variants of the “gender contract” or patterns of interaction between mothers and their children, most of which form complex social expectations that put a woman in a difficult position. Scientific discourse is more often focused on the study of the demographic aspects of mothers’ identity than on the analysis of their cultural, religious or psychological differences, including minor parameters of physicality, sexuality, and gender identity. Authors do not always strive to study the analyzed reality as complex and heterogeneous, allowing for reductionist approaches. In some cases, the theoretical materials are emphatically scholastic or speculative. It can be concluded that a universal doctrine that would express universal interests or claim to resolve all contradictions is impossible, which prompts further analysis of the real social practices of mothers as a complex characteristic of an unstable personal identity.
Keywords
Funding information
The study was funded by the Russian Science Foundation grant No. 22–28–00636 “Modern “non-maternal” practices of young mothers: repertoire, potential and public risk”.
References
Bem, S. (2004). Linzy gendera. Transformaciya vzglyadov na problem neravenstva polov [Gender lenses. Transformation of Views on the Problem of Gender Inequality]. Moskva: ROSSPEN.
Braison, V. (2001). Politicheskaya teoriya feminizma [Political theory of Feminism]. Moskva: Ideya-Press.
Chibisova, M. Yu. (2003). Fenomen materinstva i ego otrazhenie v samosoznanii sovremennoi molodoi zhenshchiny [The Phenomenon of Motherhood and Its Reflection in the Self-Consciousness of a Modern Young Woman] (Candidate’s Thesis). Moscow.
Giddens, E. (2004). Transformatsiya intimnosti. Seksual’nost’, lyubov’ i ehrotizm v sovremennykh obshchestvakh [Transformation of Intimacy. Sexuality, Love and Eroticism in Contemporary Societies]. SPb.: Piter.
Gizatullina, A. V. (2021). Diagnostika problem sotsial’noi politiki v sfere trudovykh otnoshenii rossiiskikh materei s det’mi doshkol’nogo vozrasta [Diagnosis of Social Policy Problems in the Sphere of Labor Relations between Russian Mothers and Preschool Children]. Vestnik universiteta [University Bulletin], 8, 174–179.
Gnedash, A. A. (2022). Chetvertaya volna feminizma: politicheskii diskurs i lidery mnenii v sotsial’noi seti Tvitter [The Fourth Wave of Feminism: Political Discourse and Opinion Leaders in Twitter]. Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Politologiya [RUDN Journal of Political Science], 24(1), 64–89. DOI: 10.22363/2313-1438-2022-24-1-64-89
Gofman, I. (2021). Predstavlenie sebya drugim v povsednevnoi zhizni [The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life]. SPb.: Piter.
Gritsai, L. A. (2010). Krizis traditsionnogo materinstva v sovremennoi Rossii: sotsial’no-psikhologicheskii aspekt. [Crisis of Traditional Motherhood in Modern Russia: Socio-psychological Aspect]. Zhurnal prakticheskoi psihologii i psihoanaliza [Journal of Practical Psychology and Psychoanalysis], 3. Retrieved from https://psyjournal.ru/articles/krizis-tradicionnogo-materinstva-v-sovremennoy-rossii-socialno-psihologicheskiy-aspekt
Hays, Sh. (1998). The Cultural Contradictions of Motherhood. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Isupova, O. G. (2018). Intensivnoe materinstvo v Rossii: materi, docheriisynov’ya v shkol’nom vzroslenii [Intensive Motherhood in Russia: Mothers, Daughters and Sons in School Growing up]. Neprikosnovennyi zapas [Neprikosnovennyi zapas], 3, 180–189.
Ivleva, T. A. (2023). Gendernaya politika v sovremennoi Rossii: osnovnaya problematika [Gender Policy in Modern Russia: Main Issues]. Sotsial’no-gumanitarnye znaniya [Social and Humanitarian Knowledge]. 3, 180–189.
Firestone, S. (1970). The Dialectic of Sex. New York: Bantam Books.
Khasbulatova, O. A., Smirnova, I. N. (2023). Sotsial’nyi status zhenshchin v rossiiskom obshchestve (1992–2022) [The Social Status of Women in Russian Society (1992–2022)]. Zhenshhina v rossiyskom obshhestve [Woman in Russian Society], 4, 3–19.
Kon, I. S. (2009). Menyayushchiesya muzhchiny v izmenyayushchemsya mire [Changing Men in a Changing World]. Moscow: Vremya.
Kruglova, E. L., Rodionova, M. E. (2019). Sotsial’nyi status maloletnikh materei v sovremennoi Rossii [The Social Status of Young Mothers in Modern Russia]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Psihologiya. Sociologiya [Bulletin of Perm University], 1, 124–132. DOI: 10.17072/2078-7898/2019-1-124-132
Millett, K. (2016). Sexual Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.
Pavlova, E. G. (2020). Fenomen sovremennogo materinstva kak nravstvennaya tsennost’: sotsiologicheskii aspekt [The Phenomenon of Modern Motherhood as a Moral Value: A Sociological Aspect]. Zhurnal Belorusskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Sociologiya [Journal of the Belarusian State University], 4, 80–85.
Ryabova, T. B., Ovcharova, O. G. (2016). Gendernaya politologiya v Rossii: dostizheniya, problemy i perspektivy [Gender Political Science in Russia: Achievements, Problems and Prospects]. Zhenshhina v rossijskom obshhestve [Woman in Russian Society], 1(78), 3–23.
Shvetsova, A.V., Zibrova, E. A. (2023). Diskurs rossiiskogo gosfeminizma: analiz ofitsial’nykh dokumentov, opredelyayushchikh gendernuyu povestku [The Discourse of Russian State Feminism: An Analysis of Official Documents Defining the Gender Agenda]. Zhurnal issledovanii sotsial’noi politiki [The Journal of Social Policy Studies], 21(2), 275–292. DOI: 10.17323/727-0634-2023-21-2-275-292
Simonova, I. A., Shvetsova, A. V., Krivoshchekova, M. S. (2023). “Kak za kamennoi stenoi”: vovlechennoe ottsovstvo v kontekste vozmozhnostei materinskoi samorealizatsii [“Like behind a Stone Wall”: Involved Fatherhood in the Context of Maternal Self-realization opportunities]. Sotsial’nye i gumanitarnye znaniya [Social and Humanitarian Knowledge], 9(1), 102–113.
Tronina, L. N. (2010). Ehtiko-psikhologicheskie problemy sovremennogo materinstva [Ethical and Psychological Problems of Modern Motherhood] (Candidate’s Thesis). Tula.
Uspenskaya, V. I., Kozlova, N. N. (2022). Feministskaya vneshnyaya politika: konceptualizaciya i implementaciya ponyatiya [Feminist Foreign Policy: Selected Issues of Conceptualization and Implementation]. Vestnik Rossijskogo universiteta druzhby` narodov. Seriya: Politologiya [RUDN Journal of Political Science], 24(1), 25–41. DOI: 10.22363/2313-1438-2022-24-1-25-41
Volkova, A. S., Kudaeva, M. M. (2020). Zanyatost’ zhenshchin s semeinymi obyazannostyami: diskriminatsionnye aspekty. In Sovremennye problemy ehkonomiki i menedzhmenta [Employment of Women with Family Responsibilities: Discriminatory Aspects] (pp. 53–56). Moskva: Izdatel’stvo istoki.
Voronina, O. A. (2018). “Novoe” materinstvo: filosofsko-antropologicheskii vzglyad” [“New” Motherhood: Philosophical and Anthropological View”]. Filosofskaya shkola [Philosophy School], 6, 104–109. DOI: 10.24411/2541-7673-2018-10647
Yanak, A. (2022). Faktornaya model’ ottsovskoi vovlechennosti [Factor Model of Paternal Involvement]. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsial’noi antropologii [Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology], 25(4), 140–176. DOI: 10.31119/jssa.2022.25.4.6