Azerbaijan’s Symbolic Policy: Transformation in The Contex to Contemporary Challenges
PDF (Russian)
HTML (Russian)
PDF (Russian)
HTML (Russian)
JATS XML

Section

Public Politics

UDC

323(479.24)

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31429/26190567-27-1-35-48

How to Cite

Kudryashova, E. (2025). Azerbaijan’s Symbolic Policy: Transformation in The Contex to Contemporary Challenges. South-Russian Journal of Social Sciences, 27(1), 35-48. DOI: 10.31429/26190567-27-1-35-48
Submission Date October 14, 2024
Accepted Date December 11, 2025
Published Date March 31, 2025
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 Кудряшова Е.В.

Abstract

In the context of contemporary global challenges and internal transformations, the symbolic dimensions of politics are gaining increasing importance for social consolidation and the legitimation of political power. This study provides a comprehensive analysis of the mechanisms and actors of symbolic politics in the Republic of Azerbaijan, aimed at constructing national identity and shaping historical memory. The theoretical and methodological framework of the research is based on classical and contemporary concepts of political symbolism developed in the works of M. Edelman, A. F. Losev, Yu. M. Lotman, R. Cobb, and C. Elder, as well as scholars such as O. Yu. Malinova and A. V. Babaytsev. In this article, a political symbol is defined as a complex and multidimensional phenomenon that exerts a significant influence on the emotional and value-­oriented sphere and functions as a mediator between the individual and socio-­political reality. The empirical basis of the study relies on a mixed-­method approach combining quantitative and qualitative research strategies. The results demonstrate a high degree of personalization within Azerbaijan’s political space. Qualitative analysis reveals the predominance of civic identity (“citizen of Azerbaijan”) over ethnic, religious, and territorial forms of identification, which indicates the effectiveness of state policy in the field of nation-­building. Based on the empirical findings, the article proposes a three-­level model of actors involved in symbolic politics: (1) political and intellectual elites who define the main interpretative frameworks of reality; (2) professionals in the fields of culture, media, and education who act as intermediaries and co-creators of symbols; and (3) social audiences who not only consume but actively reinterpret the proposed symbolic constructs. The study concludes that symbolic politics in Azerbaijan represents a dynamic and multifaceted process that successfully combines references to historical heritage with projections onto contemporary realities. The formation of a stable civic identity and the emphasis on the image of the people as a central symbolic element enable the country to respond effectively to the challenges of globalization, ensuring internal stability and the continuity of national development.

Keywords

symbolic politics symbol political symbol national identity Azerbaijan Republic

Funding information

The study was carried out by a grant from the Russian Science Foundation No. 22-18-00301 “The process of constructing new identities in the Caspian macroregion in the context of societal security”.

References

Бабайцев, А.В. (2014). Подходы к определению понятия «Политический символ». Символическая политика, 2, 18–23.

Бедерсон, В.Д. (2016). Политика идентичности регионов современной России: сравнительные характеристики персоналистских идентификаторов. Научный ежегодник Института философии и права Уральского отделения Российской академии наук, 16(1), 33–99.

Березняков, Д.В., Козлов, С.В. (2015). Символическая политика постсоветской Украины: между «советским прошлым» и «европейским будущим». В О.Ю. Малинова (ред.) Символическая политика (сс. 171–191). Москва: Политические функции мифов.

Ефремова, В.Н. (2014). Государственные праздники как инструменты символической политики в современной России (кандидатская диссертация). Москва.

Ефремова, В.Н. (2015). О некоторых теоретических особенностях исследования символической политики. В О.Ю. Малинова (ред.) Символическая политика (сс. 50–65). Москва: Политические функции мифов.

Кобб, Р. (2009). Использование символов в политике. Политическая лингвистика, 29, 131–145.

Кудряшова, Е.В. (2024). Конструирование новых идентичностей в контексте символической политики стран Каспийского региона. Caspium Securitatis: Journal of Caspian Safety&Security, 4(2), 29–34.

Лосев, А.Ф. (1991). Философия. Мифология. Культура. Москва: Политиздат.

Лотман, Ю.М. (2010). Семиосфера. Санкт-Петербург: Искусство-СП Б.

Малинова, О.Ю. (2010). Символическая политика и конструирование макрополитической идентичности в постсоветской России. Полис, 2, 90–105.

Карабущенко, П.Л. (2024). Политическая культура. Санкт-Петербург: Лань.

Соловей, Т.Г. (2013). Политическая символика как способ политической коммуникации. В Европа: актуальные проблемы этнокультуры (с. 108–109). Минск: БГПУ.

Edelman, M. (1964). The Symbolic Uses of Politics. Urbana: Univ. of Illinois press.

Edelman, M. (1971). Politics as Symbolic Action. Chicago: Markham Pub.

Gill, G.J. (2013). Symbolism and Regime Change in Russia. Cambridge: Cambridge univ. press.

Sperber, D. (1975). Rethinking Symbolism. London: Cambridge University Press.

Downloads

Empty statistics