The Construct of the Conspirativist Mentality: A Theoretical Model | South-Russian Journal of Social Sciences
The Construct of the Conspirativist Mentality: A Theoretical Model
Vol. 23 (2022) No. 4, Social Psychology
Vol. 23 (2022) No. 4
Social Psychology

The Construct of the Conspirativist Mentality: A Theoretical Model

Pishik V.I.
Don State Technical University
ORCID ID 0000-0002-3909-3895
PDF (Russian)
https://doi.org/10.31429/26190567-23-4-27-44
https://doi.org/10.31429/26190567-23-4-27-44

How to Cite Array

Pishik V.I. (2022) The Construct of the Conspirativist Mentality: A Theoretical Model. South-Russian Journal of Social Sciences, 23 (4), pp. 27-44. DOI: 10.31429/26190567-23-4-27-44 (In Russian)
Submission Date 2022-12-02
Accepted Date 2022-12-25
Published Date 2023-03-31

Copyright (c) 2023 Влада Игоревна Пищик

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

The construct of conspirativist mentality has not yet been sufficiently developed in psychology. The aim of the article is to describe theoretical foundations for building a construct of generational conspirativist mentality and form its theoretical model. The central category of the theory is defined as faith; the key concepts are belief in conspiracies, persuasions, and conspirativist attitudes. Various points of view regarding the notion of «belief in conspiracy» — those of historians, culture experts, linguists, and psychologists — were compared and juxtaposed. The attributes defining the concept were revealed. They are: narrowed worldview, irrationality, randomness, secretiveness, mythicity, plasticity, a socially constructed phenomenon, prejudice, and an explanatory pattern. Related concepts, such as conspiratorial attitudes, beliefs, thinking, interpretations, worldview, and culture, were correlated on the level of meaning. Time, situation, and personal characteristics are factors that scholars have relied upon in constructing models of conspirativist thinking, beliefs, and conspiracy beliefs. Available patterns of conspirativist thinking, as well as those of beliefs and conspiracy beliefs were analyzed. Hypothetically, four stages were determined for the perception of reality faith concerning information about a conspiracy: perception, emotional evaluation, acceptance / rejection, and assessment of the consequences. On the basis of the stages of accepting conspiracy information as true, we synthesized four varieties of conspirativist /mentality: willing — willing to accept the conspiracy; steady — rejecting belief in conspiracies; seeking — striving to identify the true reality of the conspiracy; and resultant — baffled by the consequences of conspiracy in the paradigm of belief or disbelief in conspiracies. The preliminary empirical testing of the construct, using the author’s new methodology for measuring conspirativist mentality among 423 respondents (students of Rostov-on-­Don higher educational institutions) allowed us to determine the two-factor model of conspirativist mentality and identify the possibility of the existence of mixed types of conspirativist mentality. The first factor integrated the steady and willing types, and the second factor combined the resultant and seeking types. In the future there are plans to carry out a follow-up empirical testing of the theoretical model.

Keywords

conspirativist mentality, belief in conspiracies, conspirativist beliefs, traditional/innovative mentality, types of conspirativist mentality, two-factor model

Acknowledgements

The research was funded under the Russian Science Foundation (RSF) as part of research project #22-28-00520 “Transforming Conspiratorial Mindset of Youth in Generations Y and Z.”

References

  1. Arteyev, S. P. (2022). Pandemiya COVID: Konspirologiya i antikonspirologiya [COVID Pandemic: Conspiracy and Anti-conspiracy]. Vlast [Power], 30(1), 58–63.
  2. Beemster, T., Bijleveld, N., Treur, J. (2021). On Becoming a Conspiracy Thinker: A Second-Order Adaptive Network Model. Procedia Computer Science, 190, 51–63, DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2021.06.007
  3. Boltanski, I. (2012). Énigmeset complots: Uneenquête à propos ď enquêtes. P.: Gallimard.
  4. Brotherton, R., French, C. C., & Pickering, A. D. (2013). Measuring Belief in Conspiracy Theories: The Generic Conspiracist Beliefs Scale. Frontiers in Personality Science and Individual Differences, 4, 279. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00279.
  5. Bruder, M., Haffke, P., Neave, N., Nouripanah, N., & Imhoff, R. (2013). Measuring Individual Differences in Generic Beliefs in Conspiracy Theories Across Cultures: Conspiracy Mentality Questionnaire. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 225.
  6. Dentith, M. R. X. (2016). When Inferring to a Conspiracy Might be the best Explanation. Social Epistemology, 30(5–6), 572–591. DOI: 10.1080/ 02691728.2016.1172362
  7. Dmitriyeva, O. A., Vanyushina, N. A. (2021) APF&PL [APF&PL]. Tematicheskiy vypusk: Lichnost i obshchestvo v sovremennom tsivilizatsionnom prostranstve: yazyk i politika [Thematic Issue: Personality and Society in the Modern Civilizational Space: Language and Politics], 4, 123–133.
  8. Douglas, K. M., & Sutton, R. M. (2023). What Are Conspiracy Theories? A Definitional Approach to Their Correlates, Consequences, and Communication. Annual Review of Psychology, 74(1). DOI: 10.1146/annurev-psych-032420-031329
  9. Douglas, K. M., Uscinski, J. E., Sutton, R. M., Cichocka, A., Nefes, T., Ang, C.S. and Deravi, F. (2019). Understanding Conspiracy Theories. Political Psychology, 40, 3–35. DOI: 10.1111/pops.12568
  10. Dugin, A. G. (2005). Konspirologiya (nauka o zagovorakh. sekretnykh obshchestvakh i taynoy voyne) [Conspiracy Theory (The Science of Conspiracies, Secret Societies and Secret Warfare)]. Moskva: Eurasia.
  11. Dyrendal, A., Kennair, L. E., & Bendixen, M. (2021). Predictors of Belief in Conspiracy Theory: The role of Individual Differences in Schizotypal Traits, Paranormal Beliefs, Social Dominance Orientation, Right Wing Authoritarianism and Conspiracy Mentality. Personality and Individual Differences, 173, 110645.
  12. fon Bibershtayn, I. R. (2010). Mif o zagovore. Filosofy, masony, evrei, liberaly i sotsialisty v roli zagovorshchikov [The Myth of the Conspiracy. Philosophers, Freemasons, Jews, Liberals and Socialists in the Role of Conspirators]. SPb.: Izd-vo im. N. I. Novikova.
  13. Franks, B, Bangerter, A, Bauer, M. W., Hall, M, Noort, M. C. (2017). Beyond “Monologicality”? Exploring Conspiracist Worldviews. Front. Psychol., 8, 861. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00861
  14. Goertzel, T. (1994). Belief in Conspiracy Theories. Political Psychology, 15, 731–42. DOI: 10.2307/3791630
  15. Goryachev, V. A. (2012). Klassifikatsiya tipov very [Classification of Types of Faith]. Sotsialno-ekonomicheskiye yavleniya i protsessy [Socio-economic Phenomena and Processes], 3(37), 166–169.
  16. Green, R, Douglas, K. M. (2018). Anxious Attachment and Belief in Conspiracy Theories. Pers. Indiv. Differ., 125, 30–37. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2017.12.023
  17. Heider, F. (1958). The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. New York: Wiley.
  18. Homans, G. C. (1964). Bringing man back in. American Sociological Review, 29(5), 809–818.
  19. Kadurina, N. V. (2013). Konspirologicheskiye podkhody k reprezentatsii politicheskikh protsessov [Conspiracy Approaches to the Representation of Political Processes]. Sovremennyye issledovaniya sotsialnykh problem [Modern Research of Social Problems], 6(26).
  20. Kay, C. S. (2021). The Targets of all Treachery: Delusional Ideation, Paranoia, and the Need for Uniqueness as Mediators between Two Forms of Narcissism and Conspiracy Beliefs. Journal of Research in Personality, 93, 104128. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrp.2021.104128
  21. Kazakevich, I., Sinko. T. V., Pishchik, V. I. (2022). Model konstrukta otnosheniya pedagogov razlichnykh pokoleniy k neopredelennosti [The Model of Teachers’ Attitude to Uncertainty Construct: With the Main Focus on Different Generations of Educators]. Science for Education Today [Science for Education Today], 12(3), 31–47.
  22. Kazun, A. D. (2022). Konspirologicheskoye myshleniye: ponyatiye. izmereniye i factory [Conspiracy Thinking: Concept, Measurement and Factors]. Ekonomicheskaya sotsiologiya [Economic Sociology], 23(2), 91–117.
  23. Kazun, A. D., Porshnev, A. V. (2021). Kto verit v teorii zagovora? Faktory sklonnosti k konspirologicheskomu myshleniyu v Rossii. Kazakhstane i Ukraine [Who Believes in Conspiracy Theories? Factors of Propensity to Conspiracy Thinking in Russia, Kazakhstan and Ukraine]. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskiye i sotsialnyye peremeny [Public Opinion Monitoring: Economic and Social Changes], 6, 549–565.
  24. Kelley, H. H. (1967). Attribution Theory in Social Psychology. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 15, 192–238.
  25. Kormina, Zh. (2015). Drozhzhi-ubiytsy: gastronomicheskaya konspirologiya i kultura nedoveriya v sovremennoy Rossii [Killer Yeast: The Gastronomic Conspiracy and Culture of Distrust in Contemporary Russia]. Antropologicheskiy forum [Forum for Anthropology and Culture], 27, 142–175.
  26. Krüppel, J., Yoon, D., Mokros, A. (2023). Clarifying the Link between Anxiety and Conspiracy Beliefs: A Cross-sectional Study on the Role of Coping with Stressors. Personality and Individual Differences, 202, 111966, DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2022.111966
  27. Melnikova, E. A. (2004). Eskhatologicheskiye ozhidaniya rubezha XIX–XX vekov: kontsa sveta ne budet? [Eschatological Expectations of the Turn of the XIX–XX Centuries: Will There be no End of the World?]. Antropologicheskiy forum [Anthropological Forum], 1, 250–266.
  28. Moscovici, S. (1987). The Conspiracy Mentality. In Changing Conceptions of Conspiracy (pp. 151–169). New York: Springer.
  29. Panchenko, A. (2021). Lyuk Boltanski. Tayny i zagovory. Po sledam rassledovaniy [Luke Boltanski. Secrets and Conspiracies. In the Wake of Investigations]. Laboratorium: zhurnal sotsialnykh issledovaniy [Laboratorium: Russian Review of Social Research], 13(1), 161–168.
  30. Pierre, J. M. (2020). Mistrust and Misinformation: A Two-Component, Socio-epistemic Model of Belief in Conspiracy Theories. J. Soc. Polit. Psychol., 8, 617–641. DOI: 10.5964/jspp.v8i2.1362
  31. Pishchik, V. I. (2019). Mentalnost pokoleniy v tekuchey sovremennosti (nauchnaya monografiya) [The Mentality of Generations in the Fluid Modernity (Scientific Monograph)]. Moscow: INFRA-M.
  32. Pishchik, V. I. (2021). Nartsissizm i uroven trevozhnosti Azerbaydzhanskikh i Rossiyskikh studentov s razlichnymi otsenkami autostereotipov povedeniya [Narcissism and Anxiety Level of Azerbaijani and Russian Students with Different Assessments of Autostereotypes of Behavior]. Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal [Psychological Journal], 42, 24–36.
  33. Pishchik, V.I. (2023). Izmerenie konspirativistskoj mental`nosti: pervichnaya psixometricheskaya proverka diagnosticheskoj metodiki [Measurement of conspirativistic mentality: primary psychometric verification of diagnostic methodology.]. Rossijskij psixologicheskij zhurnal [Russian Psychological Journal], 20(1), 218–234. DOI: 10.21702/rpj.2023.1.14
  34. Pishchik, V. I., Lobacheva, A. O. (2022). Osobennosti religioznosti i very predstaviteley “Informatsionnogo” i “Novogo” pokoleniy [Features of religiosity and faith of representatives of the “Informational” and “New” generations]. Sotsialnaya psikhologiya i obshchestvo [Social Psychology and Society], 13(1), 70–86.
  35. Poon, K-T., Chen, Z., Wong, W-Y. (2020). Beliefs in Conspiracy Theories Following Ostracism. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull., 46, 1234–1246. DOI: 10.1177/0146167219898944
  36. Postnikova, M. I., Miklyayeva, A. V., Sivrikova, N. V., Regush, L. A. (2022). Izmeneniya zhiznestoykosti predstaviteley raznykh pokoleniy rossiyan v nachale XXI veka [Changes in the Hardiness of Generationsʼ Representatives of Russians at the Beginning of the XXI Century]. Sotsialnaya psikhologiya i obshchestvo [Social Psychology and Society], 13(1), 87–103.
  37. Simmons, W. P., & Parsons, S. (2005). Beliefs in Conspiracy Theories among African Americans: A Comparison of Elites and Masses. Social Science Quarterly, 86, 582–598. DOI: 10.1111/j.0038-4941.2005.00319.x
  38. Sternisko, A., Cichocka, A., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2020). The dark side of social movements: social identity, non-conformity, and the lure of conspiracy theories. Curr. Opin. Psychol., 35, 1–6. DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.02.007
  39. Subbotsky, E. V. (2000). Phenomenalistic Perception and Rational Understanding in the Mind of an Individual: The Fight Foe Dominance. In K. Rosengren, C. Johnson, P. Harris (Eds) Imagining the Impossible: The Development of Magical, Scientific and Religious Thinking in Children. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511571381
  40. Sutton, R. M., & Douglas, K. M. (2020). Conspiracy Theories and the Conspiracy Mindset: Implications for Political Ideology. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 34, 118–122. DOI: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.02.015
  41. Swami, V., Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. (2010). Unanswered Questions: A Preliminary Investigation of Personality and Individual Difference Predictors of 9/11 Conspiracist Beliefs. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24(6), 749–761. DOI: 10.1002/acp.1583
  42. Swami, V., Coles, R., Stieger, S., Pietschnig, J., Furnham, A., Rehim, S., & Voracek, M. (2011). Conspiracist Ideation in Britain and Austria: Evidence of a Monological Belief System and Associations between Individual Psychological Differences and Real-world and Fictitious Conspiracy Theories. British Journal of Psychology, 102, 443–463. DOI: 10.1111/J.2044-8295.2010.02004.X
  43. Swami, V., Furnham, A., Smyth, N., Weis, L., Lay, A., & Clow, A. (2016). Putting the Stress on conspiracy Theories: Examining Associations between Psychological Stress, Anxiety, and Belief in Conspiracy Theories. Personality and Individual Differences, 99, 72–76. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.084
  44. Thresher-Andrews, C. (2013). An Introduction into the World of Conspiracy. The British Psychological Society, 88, 5.
  45. Twenge, J., Campbell, W. K. (2009). The Narcissism Epidemic: Living in the Age of Entitlement. New York: Free Press.
  46. van der Linden, S., Panagopoulos, C., Azevedo, F., and Jost, J. T. (2021). The Paranoid Style in American Politics Revisited: An Ideological Asymmetry in Conspiratorial Thinking. Polit. Psychol., 42, 23–51. DOI: 10.1111/pops.12681
  47. van Prooijen, J.W., Ligthart, J., Rosema, S., & Xu, Y. (2022). The Entertainment Value of Conspiracy Theories. British Journal of Psychology, 113(1), 25–48. DOI: 10.1111/bjop.12522
  48. van Prooijen, J-W. (2017). Why Education Predicts Decreased Belief in Conspiracy Theories. Appl. Cognit. Psychol., 31, 50–58. DOI: 10.1002/acp.3301
  49. Ward, C., & Voas, D. (2011). The Emergence of Conspirituality. Journal of Contemporary Religion, 26(1), 103–121. DOI: 10.1080/13537903.2011.539846
  50. Wood, M. J., & Douglas, K. M. (2015). Online Communication as a Window to Conspiracist Worldviews. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 836. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00836
  51. Yablokov, I. A. (2013). Teorii zagovora v sovremennykh politicheskikh ideologiyakh Rossii i SShA: naskolko marginalen yazyk konspirologii? [Conspiracy Theories in Contemporary Political Ideologies of Russia and The United States: How Marginal is The Language of Conspiracy?]. Politicheskaya nauka [Political Science], 4,175–191.
  52. Yasko, B. A., Omelchenko, N. V., Babikova, E. S. (2022). Aktivizatsiya emotsionalno-tsennostnoy i regulyatornoy sfer lichnosti v usloviyakh sistemnogo zhiznennogo krizisa [Activation of the Emotional-value and Regulatory Spheres of Personality in the Conditions of a Systemic Life Crisis]. Yuzhno-rossiyskiy zhurnal sotsialnykh nauk [South Russian Journal of Social Sciences], 23(1), 96–113.
  53. Zajenkowski, M., Górniak, J., Wojnarowski, K., Sobol, M., Jonason, P. K. (2022). I Need some Answers, Now!: Present Time Perspective is Associated with Holding Conspiracy Beliefs. Personality and Individual Differences, 196, 111723, DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2022.111723
  54. Zhizhek, S., Milbank, D. (2020). Monstruoznost Khrista [The Monstrosity of Christ]. Publisher: Ripol-Classic.
  55. Zinovyev, A. A. (2014). Russkaya tragediya (gibel utopii) [Russian Tragedy (the Death of Utopia)]. Moskva: Izdatel’stvo Algoritm.