Empirical Verification of Admiminstrative Intellect as a Marker of a Leader’s Personal Maturity | South-Russian Journal of Social Sciences
Empirical Verification of Admiminstrative Intellect as a Marker of a Leader’s Personal Maturity
Vol. 20 (2019) No. 2, Psychology of Personality
Vol. 20 (2019) No. 2
Psychology of Personality

Empirical Verification of Admiminstrative Intellect as a Marker of a Leader’s Personal Maturity

Ostroushko M.G.
Regional Clinical Hospital No 2
ORCID ID 0000-0002-2783-8407
PDF (Russian)
https://doi.org/10.31429/26190567-20-2-136-151
https://doi.org/10.31429/26190567-20-2-136-151

How to Cite Array

Ostroushko M.G. (2019) Empirical Verification of Admiminstrative Intellect as a Marker of a Leader’s Personal Maturity. South-Russian Journal of Social Sciences, 20 (2), pp. 136-151. DOI: 10.31429/26190567-20-2-136-151 (In Russian)
Submission Date 2019-03-22
Accepted Date 2019-04-24
Published Date 2019-06-24

Copyright (c) 2019 Марина Геннадиевна Остроушко

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

The article presents the results of the research singling out three types of administrative intellect (AI) among the leaders of the public health organization. Indexes of the reflexive abilities of the leaders were used as criteria in the assessment of AI and the style of management decision-­making (MDM). It has been shown that two types of AI, characteristic of 42% of the managers with an authoritarian and liberal MDM are assessed as insufficient level of AI formation. They denote a low level of a leader’s maturity. The authoritarian style is characterized by weekly developed introspection of activities, a pronounced drive for reaching high indexes of personal goals and basically, the internal locus of subjective control. The liberal orientation in MDM has a low level of reflexive abilities in communication and interaction with other people, detachment toward the subordinate personnel and a lower level of achievement drive. The persons with well-­developed reflexive abilities for communication and interaction and possessing an integral style of attribution — active psychological resources for successful development of a leader’s mature personality — combine the liberal attitude towards their subordinates with the anticipation of problem situations. This style of leadership can be considered as effective managerial intellect. The AI which is based on situational decision-­making and is oriented at participative management is typical for a mature leader with well-­developed reflectivity, internal locus of control and a drive for self-­development and self-­perfection. In accordance with the variables included into the general structure of diagnostic indexes of the respondents, this type of AI is defined as highly developed, or as AI of high level of formation.

Keywords

personality maturity, managerial intelligence, leader, style of management decision-­making, reflectivity, locus of subjective control, drive for achievement

References

  1. Andreeva, G. M. (2000). Psikhologiia sotsial’nogo poznaniia [Psychology of Social Cognition]. Moskva: Aspekt Press.
  2. Balick, A. (2012). TMI in the Transference LOL: Psychoanalytic Reflections on Google, Social Networking, and Virtual Impingement. Psychoanalysis. Culture and Society, 17 (2), 120–136.
  3. Balick, A. (2013). The Real Motivation Behind Social Networking. Therapeutic Innovations in Light of Technology, 3 (2). Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/2494977/The_Real_Motivation_Behind_Social_Networking._Therapeutic_Innovations_in_Light_of_Technology_Volume_3_Issue_2_
  4. Bogomolova, E. I. (2014). Narastaiushchaia virtualizatsiia bytiia i osobennosti lichnosti, iavliaiushcheisia pol’zovatelem sotsial’noi seti [The Growing Virtualization of Objective Reality and the Specificity of an Individual Social Network User]. In Z. I. Riabikina, V. V. Znakova Lichnostnaia identichnost’: vyzovy sovremennosti: materialy Vseros. psikhol. nauch.-prakt. konf. [Personality Identification: Modern Challenges. Materials of the All-Russian Psychological Scientific and Practical Conference] (pp. 180–182). Krasnodar: Kubanskii gos. un-t, Maikop: Adygeiskii gos. un-t; M.: Institut psikhologii RAN.
  5. Buffardi, L., Campbell W. (2008). Narcissism and Social Networking Web Sites. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1303–1314.
  6. Burns, M. (2012) The State of Customer Experience. Retrieved from http://www.lithium.com/resources/analyst-reports/the-state-of-customer-experience-2012
  7. Deineka, O. S. (2000). Ekonomicheskaia psikhologiia [Economic Psychology]. Sankt-Peterburg: izd-vo S.-Peterb. un-ta.
  8. Dolgov, Yu. N., Kopovoi, A. S., Malyuchenko, G. N., Smirnov, V. M. (2009). Razvitie kul’tury mediapotrebleniia: sotsial’no psikhologicheskii podkhod [Development of Media Consumption Culture: Socio-Psychological Approach]. Saratov: Izdatel’stvo Saratovskogo universiteta.
  9. Gushchina, E. G., Vital’eva, E. M. (2012). Modeli potrebitel’skogo povedeniya individa s tochki zreniya razlichnyh nauk [Models of Consumer Behavior of an Individual in Terms of Different Sciences]. Vestnik AGTU. Seriya: Ekonomika [Vestnik of Astrakhan State Technical University. Series Economics], 2, 136–142.
  10. Hay, K. (2013) The Age of Narcissism and Homogenization with Instagram. Adore Noir, 12, 20–26.
  11. Hoffman, D. L., Novak, T. P. (1996). Marketing in Hypermedia Computer-Mediated Environments: Conceptual foundations. Journal of Marketing, 60 (3). 50–68.
  12. Karpenko, L. A. (Comp.), Petrovskii, A. V., Iaroshevskii, M. G. (Eds.) (1998). Kratkii psikhologicheskii slovar’ [Concise Dictionary of Psychology]. Rostov-on-don: FENIKS.
  13. Kemp S. (2018). Digital in 2018. Essential Insights into Internet, Social Media, Mobile, and Ecommerce Use Around the World. Retrieved from http://digitalreport. wearesocial.com/
  14. Kruglanski, A., Higgins, E. T. (Eds.) (2007) Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles, New York, NY: Guilford
  15. Maliuchenko, G. N., Kopovoi, A. S. (2011). Teoriia i praktika diagnostiki v mediapsikhologii i mediapedagogike [Theory and Practice of Diagnostics in Media Psychology and Media Pedagogy]. Saratov: Izd-vo Sarat. un-ta.
  16. Mann, I., Pominova, N. (2014). Tochki kontakta onlain [Points of Contact Online]. Moskva: SilaUma-Pablisher.
  17. Muntinga, D., Moorman, M. (2011). Introducing COBRAs. International Journal of Advertising, 30 (1), 13–46. DOI: 10.2501/IJA-30-1-013-046
  18. Okorokova, O. V. (2006). Analiz determinant potrebitel’skogo povedeniya v social’no-ekonomicheskih issledovaniyah [Analysis of Determinants of Consumer Behavior in Socio-Economic Studies]. Nauchnaya mysl’ Kavkaza [Scientific Thought of Caucasus], Extra Issue, 38–49.
  19. Pokul V. O, Voronina L. A, Malkova E. M. (2018). Content Generation in Social Media Based on Consumer Behavior. European Research Studies Journal, 9 (2), 923–935.
  20. Pokul, V. (2012). The Role of Psychological Aspects of Motivation in Social Media for Integrated Marketing Communications. In Materials of XX International Conference “Management — New Challenges” (pp. 112–116). Lublin.
  21. Pokul, V. O. (2013). Analiz sushchnosti i struktury sotsial’nykh media kak innovatsionnoi sredy v marketinge [Analysis of the Essence and Structure of Social Media as an Innovative Environment in Marketing]. In V Organizatsionnaia sreda XXI veka: stat’i i doklady IV Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii [Organizational Environment of the XXI century: Articles and Reports of the IV International Scientific-Practical Conference]. Moskva: MESI.
  22. Pokul, V. O. (2013). Motivacionno-lichnostnye determinanty povedeniya potrebitelei v social’nyh media [Motivational and Personal Determinants of Consumer Behavior in Social Media]. Vestnik Adygeiskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 3: Pedagogika i psihologiya [The Bulletin of Adyghe State University. Series 3: Pedagogy and Psychology], 4 (129), 143–150.
  23. Pokul, V. O. (2018). Povedenie potrebitelei kak ob”ekt mezhdisciplinarnyh issledovanii: obzor nauchnyh vzglyadov i koncepcii [Consumer Behavior as an Object of Interdisciplinary Research: a Review of Scientific Views and Concepts]. Chelovek. Soobshchestvo. Upravlenie [Human. Community. Management], 1, 117–127.
  24. Posypanova, O. S. (2012). Ekonomicheskaya psihologiya: psihologicheskie aspekty povedeniya potrebitelei [Economic Psychology: Psychological Aspects of Consumer Behavior]. Kaluga: Izd-vo KGU im. K. E. Ciolkovskogo
  25. Richie, S., Martin, P. (2004). Upravlenie motivatsiei [Motivation management]. Moscow: YUNITI-DANA.
  26. Schaefer, C. (2008). Motivations and Usage Patterns on Social Network Sites. In Proceedings of the 16th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS). Galway, Ireland.
  27. Shiri, D. Vivek, Sharon E. Beatty, Robert M. Morgan. (2012). Customer Engagement: Exploring Customer Relationships Beyond Purchase. The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 20 (2), 127–145.
  28. Shu-Chuan Chu, Kim Y. (2011) Determinants of Consumer Engagement in Electronic Word-of-Mouth (eWOM) in Social Networking Sites. International Journal of Advertising, 30 (1), 47–75
  29. Sivrikova, N. V., Zherebkina, V. F., Postnikova, M. I. (2017). Vzaimosvyaz’ proyavlenii vnutrilichnostnogo konflikta i stilya mediapotrebleniya studentov [The Association Between Manifestations of Intrapersonal Conflict and the Style of Media Consumption Among Students]. Rossiiskii psihologicheskii zhurnal [Russian Psychological Journal], 3, 70–87.
  30. Verhovin, V. I. (2015). Ekonomicheskoe povedenie: uchebnoe posobie [Behavior in Economics: Tutorial]. Moskva: RUDN.
  31. Znakov, V. V., Ryabikina, Z. I. (2017). Psikhologiia chelovecheskogo bytiia [Psychology of Human Existence]. Moskva: Smysl.