Рубрика
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31429/26190567-23-4-27-44Как цитировать
Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Всемирная.
Copyright (c) 2023 Влада Игоревна Пищик
Аннотация
В психологии еще в недостаточной степени разработан конструкт конспиративистской ментальности. Цель статьи — описать теоретические основания построения конструкта конспиративистской ментальности поколений и сформировать ее теоретическую модель. Определена центральная категория теории — вера; основные понятия — вера в заговоры, убеждения, конспиративистские установки. Сопоставлены различные точки зрения на понятие «вера в заговоры» историков, культурологов, лингвистов, психологов. Выявлены признаки, определяющие понятие: суженность образа мира, иррациональность, несистемность, секретность, мифичность, пластичность, социально конструируемое, предубежденность, объяснительная схема. Соотнесены по смыслу смежные понятия: конспиративистские установки, убеждения, мышление, интерпретации, мировоззрение, культура. Время, ситуация, личностные характеристики — это факторы, на которые опирались ученые, строя модели конспиративистского мышления, убеждений, веры в заговоры. Проанализированы имеющиеся модели конспиративистского мышления, убеждений, веры в заговоры. Гипотетически определены 4 шага принятия на веру информации о заговоре: восприятие, эмоциональная оценка, принятие / отторжение, оценка последствий. Исходя из этапов принятия на веру информации о заговоре, синтезированы 4 вида конспиративистской ментальности: готовый — установка принять заговор; устойчивый — отклоняющий веру в заговоры; ищущий — стремящийся определить истинную реальность заговора; результативный — озадаченный последствиями заговора в парадигме веры или неверия в заговоры. Предварительная эмпирическая проработка конструкта, с применением новой авторской методики измерения конспиративистской ментальности на 423 респондентах — студентах ростовских вузов, позволила определить двухфакторную модель конспиративистской ментальности и выявить возможность наличия смешанных типов конспиративистской ментальности. Первый фактор объединил устойчивый и готовый виды, а второй фактор — результативный и ищущий. Планируется в дальнейшем провести эмпирическую проверку теоретической модели.
Ключевые слова
Информация о финансировании
Исследование выполнено при финансовой поддержке Российского научного фонда (РНФ) в рамках научного проекта №22-28-00520 «Трансформация конспиративистской ментальности молодежи поколения Y и Z».
Библиографические ссылки
Arteyev, S. P. (2022). Pandemiya COVID: Konspirologiya i antikonspirologiya [COVID Pandemic: Conspiracy and Anti-conspiracy]. Vlast [Power], 30(1), 58–63.
Beemster, T., Bijleveld, N., Treur, J. (2021). On Becoming a Conspiracy Thinker: A Second-Order Adaptive Network Model. Procedia Computer Science, 190, 51–63, DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2021.06.007
Boltanski, I. (2012). Énigmeset complots: Uneenquête à propos ď enquêtes. P.: Gallimard.
Brotherton, R., French, C. C., & Pickering, A. D. (2013). Measuring Belief in Conspiracy Theories: The Generic Conspiracist Beliefs Scale. Frontiers in Personality Science and Individual Differences, 4, 279. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00279.
Bruder, M., Haffke, P., Neave, N., Nouripanah, N., & Imhoff, R. (2013). Measuring Individual Differences in Generic Beliefs in Conspiracy Theories Across Cultures: Conspiracy Mentality Questionnaire. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 225.
Dentith, M. R. X. (2016). When Inferring to a Conspiracy Might be the best Explanation. Social Epistemology, 30(5–6), 572–591. DOI: 10.1080/ 02691728.2016.1172362
Dmitriyeva, O. A., Vanyushina, N. A. (2021) APF&PL [APF&PL]. Tematicheskiy vypusk: Lichnost i obshchestvo v sovremennom tsivilizatsionnom prostranstve: yazyk i politika [Thematic Issue: Personality and Society in the Modern Civilizational Space: Language and Politics], 4, 123–133.
Douglas, K. M., & Sutton, R. M. (2023). What Are Conspiracy Theories? A Definitional Approach to Their Correlates, Consequences, and Communication. Annual Review of Psychology, 74(1). DOI: 10.1146/annurev-psych-032420-031329
Douglas, K. M., Uscinski, J. E., Sutton, R. M., Cichocka, A., Nefes, T., Ang, C.S. and Deravi, F. (2019). Understanding Conspiracy Theories. Political Psychology, 40, 3–35. DOI: 10.1111/pops.12568
Dugin, A. G. (2005). Konspirologiya (nauka o zagovorakh. sekretnykh obshchestvakh i taynoy voyne) [Conspiracy Theory (The Science of Conspiracies, Secret Societies and Secret Warfare)]. Moskva: Eurasia.
Dyrendal, A., Kennair, L. E., & Bendixen, M. (2021). Predictors of Belief in Conspiracy Theory: The role of Individual Differences in Schizotypal Traits, Paranormal Beliefs, Social Dominance Orientation, Right Wing Authoritarianism and Conspiracy Mentality. Personality and Individual Differences, 173, 110645.
fon Bibershtayn, I. R. (2010). Mif o zagovore. Filosofy, masony, evrei, liberaly i sotsialisty v roli zagovorshchikov [The Myth of the Conspiracy. Philosophers, Freemasons, Jews, Liberals and Socialists in the Role of Conspirators]. SPb.: Izd-vo im. N. I. Novikova.
Franks, B, Bangerter, A, Bauer, M. W., Hall, M, Noort, M. C. (2017). Beyond “Monologicality”? Exploring Conspiracist Worldviews. Front. Psychol., 8, 861. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00861
Goertzel, T. (1994). Belief in Conspiracy Theories. Political Psychology, 15, 731–42. DOI: 10.2307/3791630
Goryachev, V. A. (2012). Klassifikatsiya tipov very [Classification of Types of Faith]. Sotsialno-ekonomicheskiye yavleniya i protsessy [Socio-economic Phenomena and Processes], 3(37), 166–169.
Green, R, Douglas, K. M. (2018). Anxious Attachment and Belief in Conspiracy Theories. Pers. Indiv. Differ., 125, 30–37. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2017.12.023
Heider, F. (1958). The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. New York: Wiley.
Homans, G. C. (1964). Bringing man back in. American Sociological Review, 29(5), 809–818.
Kadurina, N. V. (2013). Konspirologicheskiye podkhody k reprezentatsii politicheskikh protsessov [Conspiracy Approaches to the Representation of Political Processes]. Sovremennyye issledovaniya sotsialnykh problem [Modern Research of Social Problems], 6(26).
Kay, C. S. (2021). The Targets of all Treachery: Delusional Ideation, Paranoia, and the Need for Uniqueness as Mediators between Two Forms of Narcissism and Conspiracy Beliefs. Journal of Research in Personality, 93, 104128. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrp.2021.104128
Kazakevich, I., Sinko. T. V., Pishchik, V. I. (2022). Model konstrukta otnosheniya pedagogov razlichnykh pokoleniy k neopredelennosti [The Model of Teachers’ Attitude to Uncertainty Construct: With the Main Focus on Different Generations of Educators]. Science for Education Today [Science for Education Today], 12(3), 31–47.
Kazun, A. D. (2022). Konspirologicheskoye myshleniye: ponyatiye. izmereniye i factory [Conspiracy Thinking: Concept, Measurement and Factors]. Ekonomicheskaya sotsiologiya [Economic Sociology], 23(2), 91–117.
Kazun, A. D., Porshnev, A. V. (2021). Kto verit v teorii zagovora? Faktory sklonnosti k konspirologicheskomu myshleniyu v Rossii. Kazakhstane i Ukraine [Who Believes in Conspiracy Theories? Factors of Propensity to Conspiracy Thinking in Russia, Kazakhstan and Ukraine]. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskiye i sotsialnyye peremeny [Public Opinion Monitoring: Economic and Social Changes], 6, 549–565.
Kelley, H. H. (1967). Attribution Theory in Social Psychology. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 15, 192–238.
Kormina, Zh. (2015). Drozhzhi-ubiytsy: gastronomicheskaya konspirologiya i kultura nedoveriya v sovremennoy Rossii [Killer Yeast: The Gastronomic Conspiracy and Culture of Distrust in Contemporary Russia]. Antropologicheskiy forum [Forum for Anthropology and Culture], 27, 142–175.
Krüppel, J., Yoon, D., Mokros, A. (2023). Clarifying the Link between Anxiety and Conspiracy Beliefs: A Cross-sectional Study on the Role of Coping with Stressors. Personality and Individual Differences, 202, 111966, DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2022.111966
Melnikova, E. A. (2004). Eskhatologicheskiye ozhidaniya rubezha XIX–XX vekov: kontsa sveta ne budet? [Eschatological Expectations of the Turn of the XIX–XX Centuries: Will There be no End of the World?]. Antropologicheskiy forum [Anthropological Forum], 1, 250–266.
Moscovici, S. (1987). The Conspiracy Mentality. In Changing Conceptions of Conspiracy (pp. 151–169). New York: Springer.
Panchenko, A. (2021). Lyuk Boltanski. Tayny i zagovory. Po sledam rassledovaniy [Luke Boltanski. Secrets and Conspiracies. In the Wake of Investigations]. Laboratorium: zhurnal sotsialnykh issledovaniy [Laboratorium: Russian Review of Social Research], 13(1), 161–168.
Pierre, J. M. (2020). Mistrust and Misinformation: A Two-Component, Socio-epistemic Model of Belief in Conspiracy Theories. J. Soc. Polit. Psychol., 8, 617–641. DOI: 10.5964/jspp.v8i2.1362
Pishchik, V. I. (2019). Mentalnost pokoleniy v tekuchey sovremennosti (nauchnaya monografiya) [The Mentality of Generations in the Fluid Modernity (Scientific Monograph)]. Moscow: INFRA-M.
Pishchik, V. I. (2021). Nartsissizm i uroven trevozhnosti Azerbaydzhanskikh i Rossiyskikh studentov s razlichnymi otsenkami autostereotipov povedeniya [Narcissism and Anxiety Level of Azerbaijani and Russian Students with Different Assessments of Autostereotypes of Behavior]. Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal [Psychological Journal], 42, 24–36.
Pishchik, V.I. (2023). Izmerenie konspirativistskoj mental`nosti: pervichnaya psixometricheskaya proverka diagnosticheskoj metodiki [Measurement of conspirativistic mentality: primary psychometric verification of diagnostic methodology.]. Rossijskij psixologicheskij zhurnal [Russian Psychological Journal], 20(1), 218–234. DOI: 10.21702/rpj.2023.1.14
Pishchik, V. I., Lobacheva, A. O. (2022). Osobennosti religioznosti i very predstaviteley “Informatsionnogo” i “Novogo” pokoleniy [Features of religiosity and faith of representatives of the “Informational” and “New” generations]. Sotsialnaya psikhologiya i obshchestvo [Social Psychology and Society], 13(1), 70–86.
Poon, K-T., Chen, Z., Wong, W-Y. (2020). Beliefs in Conspiracy Theories Following Ostracism. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull., 46, 1234–1246. DOI: 10.1177/0146167219898944
Postnikova, M. I., Miklyayeva, A. V., Sivrikova, N. V., Regush, L. A. (2022). Izmeneniya zhiznestoykosti predstaviteley raznykh pokoleniy rossiyan v nachale XXI veka [Changes in the Hardiness of Generationsʼ Representatives of Russians at the Beginning of the XXI Century]. Sotsialnaya psikhologiya i obshchestvo [Social Psychology and Society], 13(1), 87–103.
Simmons, W. P., & Parsons, S. (2005). Beliefs in Conspiracy Theories among African Americans: A Comparison of Elites and Masses. Social Science Quarterly, 86, 582–598. DOI: 10.1111/j.0038-4941.2005.00319.x
Sternisko, A., Cichocka, A., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2020). The dark side of social movements: social identity, non-conformity, and the lure of conspiracy theories. Curr. Opin. Psychol., 35, 1–6. DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.02.007
Subbotsky, E. V. (2000). Phenomenalistic Perception and Rational Understanding in the Mind of an Individual: The Fight Foe Dominance. In K. Rosengren, C. Johnson, P. Harris (Eds) Imagining the Impossible: The Development of Magical, Scientific and Religious Thinking in Children. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511571381
Sutton, R. M., & Douglas, K. M. (2020). Conspiracy Theories and the Conspiracy Mindset: Implications for Political Ideology. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 34, 118–122. DOI: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.02.015
Swami, V., Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. (2010). Unanswered Questions: A Preliminary Investigation of Personality and Individual Difference Predictors of 9/11 Conspiracist Beliefs. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24(6), 749–761. DOI: 10.1002/acp.1583
Swami, V., Coles, R., Stieger, S., Pietschnig, J., Furnham, A., Rehim, S., & Voracek, M. (2011). Conspiracist Ideation in Britain and Austria: Evidence of a Monological Belief System and Associations between Individual Psychological Differences and Real-world and Fictitious Conspiracy Theories. British Journal of Psychology, 102, 443–463. DOI: 10.1111/J.2044-8295.2010.02004.X
Swami, V., Furnham, A., Smyth, N., Weis, L., Lay, A., & Clow, A. (2016). Putting the Stress on conspiracy Theories: Examining Associations between Psychological Stress, Anxiety, and Belief in Conspiracy Theories. Personality and Individual Differences, 99, 72–76. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.084
Thresher-Andrews, C. (2013). An Introduction into the World of Conspiracy. The British Psychological Society, 88, 5.
Twenge, J., Campbell, W. K. (2009). The Narcissism Epidemic: Living in the Age of Entitlement. New York: Free Press.
van der Linden, S., Panagopoulos, C., Azevedo, F., and Jost, J. T. (2021). The Paranoid Style in American Politics Revisited: An Ideological Asymmetry in Conspiratorial Thinking. Polit. Psychol., 42, 23–51. DOI: 10.1111/pops.12681
van Prooijen, J.W., Ligthart, J., Rosema, S., & Xu, Y. (2022). The Entertainment Value of Conspiracy Theories. British Journal of Psychology, 113(1), 25–48. DOI: 10.1111/bjop.12522
van Prooijen, J-W. (2017). Why Education Predicts Decreased Belief in Conspiracy Theories. Appl. Cognit. Psychol., 31, 50–58. DOI: 10.1002/acp.3301
Ward, C., & Voas, D. (2011). The Emergence of Conspirituality. Journal of Contemporary Religion, 26(1), 103–121. DOI: 10.1080/13537903.2011.539846
Wood, M. J., & Douglas, K. M. (2015). Online Communication as a Window to Conspiracist Worldviews. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 836. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00836
Yablokov, I. A. (2013). Teorii zagovora v sovremennykh politicheskikh ideologiyakh Rossii i SShA: naskolko marginalen yazyk konspirologii? [Conspiracy Theories in Contemporary Political Ideologies of Russia and The United States: How Marginal is The Language of Conspiracy?]. Politicheskaya nauka [Political Science], 4,175–191.
Yasko, B. A., Omelchenko, N. V., Babikova, E. S. (2022). Aktivizatsiya emotsionalno-tsennostnoy i regulyatornoy sfer lichnosti v usloviyakh sistemnogo zhiznennogo krizisa [Activation of the Emotional-value and Regulatory Spheres of Personality in the Conditions of a Systemic Life Crisis]. Yuzhno-rossiyskiy zhurnal sotsialnykh nauk [South Russian Journal of Social Sciences], 23(1), 96–113.
Zajenkowski, M., Górniak, J., Wojnarowski, K., Sobol, M., Jonason, P. K. (2022). I Need some Answers, Now!: Present Time Perspective is Associated with Holding Conspiracy Beliefs. Personality and Individual Differences, 196, 111723, DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2022.111723
Zhizhek, S., Milbank, D. (2020). Monstruoznost Khrista [The Monstrosity of Christ]. Publisher: Ripol-Classic.
Zinovyev, A. A. (2014). Russkaya tragediya (gibel utopii) [Russian Tragedy (the Death of Utopia)]. Moskva: Izdatel’stvo Algoritm.