Section
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31429/26190567-21-4-44-59How to Cite
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2021 Александр Альбертович Фролов, Светлана Владимировна Миронова, Алексей Александрович Беляков, Снежана Владимировна Симонова
Abstract
The article reveals the characteristics and the specifics of broadcasting protest agendas in social networks, as well as substantiates the importance of social networks in the life of modern society and emphasizes the role of realizing the citizens’ protest activity. A study using political science tools (viz., event analysis, content analysis, case study and comparative analysis) was conducted to determine the transformation characteristics of protest agendas as one of the mechanisms for demobilization of the movements). The authors selected seven of the largest and best-known protest cases implemented in Russia between 2017 and 2021 and a number of protest communities in the social network “Vkontakte” and messenger “Telegram”, on the respective cases. In the course of data collection and analysis in the communities, the main characteristics in social networks were quantified: total number of posts in the target group, number of posts for the main and each supplementary agenda, and number of information, mobilization and reporting posts. The article presents a unique classification of ways of formulating protest agendas. There are two main types of summons: abstract and specific. On the basis of calculations and expert interviews, an abstract coefficient has been created which reflects the dynamics of placement of posts and the transformation of specific publications into abstract ones. As a result, the basic theses and patterns applicable to the subsequent study of the protesting communities were formulated.
Keywords
Funding information
The reported study was funded by RFBR and EISR, project number 20-011-31346 “The specifics of the formation and dynamics of network protest communities agendas` transformation in modern Russia”.
References
Abramov, R. N. (2006). Mobil’nyy kommunikatsionnyye tekhnologii i povsednevnost’ Reygol’d G. Umnaya tolpa: novaya sotsial’naya revolyutsiya. M.: Fair-press, 2006–416 s. [Mobile Communicative Technology and Everyday Life: Howard Jieingold’s “Smart Mobs”]. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsial’noy antropologii [The Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology], 9(4), 185–192.
Artamonova, Yu. D., Demchuk, A. L. (2020). Konnektivnaya identichnost’ v sovremennom mire [“Connective Identity” In the Contemporary World]. Voprosy filosofii [Voprosy Filosofii], 4, 69–79.
Dawson A., Innes, M. (2019). How Russia’s Internet Research Agency Built its Disinformation Campaign. The Political Quarterly, 90(2), 245–256.
Harrison, T., Dumas, C., DePaula, N. et al. (2017). E-petitioning and Online Media: The Case of #BringBackOurGirls. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference of the Digital Government Society (pp. 11–20). NY: Staten Island.
Heiss, R., Schmuck, D. & Matthes, J. (2019). What Drives Interaction in Political Actors’ Facebook Posts? Profile and Content Predictors of User Engagement and Political Actors’ Reactions. Information, Communication & Society, 22(10), 1497–1513.
Kastel’s, M. (2016). Vlast’ kommunikatsii [Communication Power]. Moskva: Izd. Dom Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki.
Keane, Dzh. (2015). Demokratiya i dekadans media [Democracy and Media Decadence]. M.: Izd. dom Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki.
Korshunov, I. L. (2019). Regulirovaniye v Internete: zashchita lichnosti ili ogranicheniye svobody [Regulation on The Internet: Protection of The Personality or Limitation of Freedom]. Izvestiya SPbGU [Izvestiya SPbGU], 4(118), 119–125.
Laklau, E. O. (2009). O populizme [On Populist Reason]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Ser. 12. Politicheskiye nauki [Moscow University Bulletin. Series 12. Political Science], 3, 54–68.
Maykl, B., Hartvell, K., Nureyev, B. “Myagkaya sila” — palka o dvuh kontsah? [Is Soft Power a Double-Edged Sword?]. Retrieved from https://bricsmagazine.com/ru/articles/myagkaya-sila-palka-o-dvuh-kontsah/.
Savenkov, R. V., Shcheglova, D. V. (2018). Teorii kollektivnogo povedeniya i mobilizatsii resursov: razvitiye kontseptsiy analiza politicheskogo protesta [Theories of Collective Behavior and Resource Mobilization: Elaboration on the Concept of Political Protest]. Vestnik RUDN. Seriya: Politologiya [RUDN Journal of Political Science], 4, 555–563.
Sokolov, A. V., Palagicheva, A. V. (2020). Mobilizatsiya i demobilizatsiya v setevom politicheskom proteste [Mobilization and Demobilization in a Network Political Protest]. Politicheskaya nauka [Political Science], 3, 266–297.
Volodenkov, S. V., Romashkina A. B. (2020). Tekhnologii Internet-kommunikatsii kak instrument vliyaniya na funktsionirovaniye sovremennyh institutov vlasti: aktual’nyye vyzovy [Internet Communication Technologies as a Tool of Affecting Modern Governmental Institutions: Current Challenges]. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Seriya: Istoriya i politicheskiye nauki [Bulletin of The Msru. Series: History and Political Sciences], 1, 33–40.