Section
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31429/26190567-23-3-20-32How to Cite
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2023 Денис Сергеевич Мартьянов
Abstract
This study focuses on the specifics of the discourse of the Russian virtual public sphere as exemplified by the politicized virtual communities of the Vkontakte social network and the Telegram messenger. The relevance of the topic is linked with the special military operation as a factor exerting a substantial influence upon the transformation of both a political discourse and the communicative practices in the cyberspace. The novelty of the research is determined by the accent on the developments that occur in the Russian communicative space under the conditions of the SMO. The objective of this paper is to reveal the specificity of the virtual public sphere functioning in conditions of the Special Military Operation, while also considering the platform features of the Vkontakte social network as well as of the Telegram messenger. The analysis of the discourse of virtual communities was the main method of research. The analysis of the virtual communities discourse was used as the main research method. 105 communities on the Vk.com and Telegram were analyzed, where 100 comments were considered in the two most popular posts. The article makes it possible both to draw conclusions about the specific nature of communication under conditions of the Special Military Operation and also to characterize the state of the virtual public sphere. The author identifies a fundamental impact of the SWO factor on political communication in the Russian- speaking Internet. The virtual public sphere is described as a reasonably segmented area, incorporating many communities that tend toward homogeneous communications of the “echo-chamber»” type. This is conditioned by consolidation of the Russian society with regard to the Special Military Operation. The evidence of this is the fact that the prevailing discourse in the context of SMO in the Russian virtual public sphere is that of discourse of patriotism, while the most prevalent group identity is that of civic identity. In addition, the author makes a number of conclusions concerning inter-platform specifics of political communication.
Keywords
Funding information
The research was conducted under the project № 122101100040-8 ”Features of modern political discourse and interaction mechanisms in virtual communities VKontakte and Telegram”, carried out at RAS Institute of Scientific Information on Social Sciences, as a result of the selection of research projects funded by the Russian Ministry of Science and Higher Education and the Expert Institute for Social Research.
References
Антюхова, Е.А., Блохин, В.Ф. (2022). Трансформация публичной сферы в годы Первой мировой войны: Отношение к войне и миру. Вестник Волгоградского государственного университета. Серия 4: История. Регионоведение. Международные отношения, 27(1), 6–19.
Кастельс, М. (2016). Власть коммуникации. М.: Изд. дом Высшей школы экономики.
Мартьянов, Д.С. (2012). Трансформация концептуальной схемы «Политика и Интернет» в постглобальном контексте. Политическая экспертиза: ПОЛИТЭКС, 8(3), 160–169.
Мартьянов, Д.С. (2014). Сетевая идентичность: Трансформация феномена и подходов к изучению. Политическая экспертиза: ПОЛИТЭКС, 10(4), 142–160.
Мартьянов, Д.С. (ред.) (2019). Управляемость и дискурс виртуальных сообществ в условиях политики постправды. СПб.: ЭлекСис.
Мартьянов, Д.С., Лукьянова, Г.В. (2021). Эмоциональная публичная сфера: поляризация паралингвистического интернет-дискурса. Вестник Московского университета. Серия 10. Журналистика, 2, 25–48.
Мартьянов, Д.С., Мартьянова, Н.А. (2019). Управляемость виртуальных сообществ: сравнительный анализ политизированных групп Вконтакте. Журнал политических исследований, 3(3), 79–93.
Семенов, Е.Е. (2017). Транснациональная публичная сфера: эффекты глобализации. Контекст и рефлексия: философия о мире и человеке, 6(6А), 166–173.
Туманова, А.С. (2012). Организация помощи фронту и жертвам войны как результат совместных усилий власти и гражданского общества в годы Первой мировой войны: институциональный и правовой аспекты. Гражданское общество в России и за рубежом, 4, 34–40.
Al-Saggaf, Y. (2006). The Online Public Sphere in the Arab World: The War in Iraq on the Al Arabiya Website. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(1), 311–334. DOI: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00327.x
Asen, R., Brouwer, D. (Eds) (2001). Counterpublics and the State. New York: State University of New York.
Dahlberg, L. (2001). Computer-mediated Communication and the Public Sphere: A Critical Analysis. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 7(1). Retrieved from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol7/issue1/dahlbergold.html
Gibson, A. (2019). Free Speech and Safe Spaces: How Moderation Policies Shape Online Discussion Spaces. Social Media + Society, 5(1). Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2056305119832588
Habermas, J. (1989). The Public Sphere. In S. Seidman (Ed.) Jurgen Habermas on Society and Politics: A Reader (pp. 231–236). Boston: Beacon Press.
Foot, K.A., Schneider, S.M. (2002). Online Action in Campaign 2000: An Exploratory Analysis of the U.S. Political Web Sphere. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 42(2), 222–244.
Fraser, N. (1990). Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy. Social Text, 26, 56–80. DOI: 10.2307/466240
Negt, O., Kluge, A. (1993). Public Sphere and Experience: Toward an Analysis of the Bourgeois and Proletarian Public Sphere. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Poor, N. (2005). Mechanisms of an Online Public Sphere: The Website Slashdot. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(2). DOI: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00241.x
Sunstein, C.R. (2009). Republic.com 2.0. Princeton: Princeton University Press.