UDC
159.9.01DOI
https://doi.org/10.31429/26190567-25-2-63-76How to Cite
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2024 Виктор Владимирович Знаков
Abstract
The twentieth century witnessed a transformation in scientific ideas about determinism, which in turn gave rise to novel perspectives in the field of psychological science. The unknowable causes of many events and situations in the human world that appeared to be random are now regarded as natural. After the works of I. Prigozhin, M. N. Epstein and other scientists, it is evident that there are at least two types of laws in the human world, including Nature. Some aim to provide an explanation of what is necessary, that which cannot be otherwise. Others seek to elucidate what is possible, that which may or may not be actualized in reality. The uncertainty of the human world can be divided into two categories: those quantities that exist but are unknown to the cognizing subject, and those that do not yet exist but are possible. In the paper, based on the scientific findings of Д. Bohm, W. Heisenberg and other prominent scientists, the view is developed that the objective randomness and uncertainty in the world reflect the latent order existing in nature and human psyche. Its manifestation is unobservable, implicit in behavior and psyche The psychological studies of people’s understanding of invisible threat under traumatic stress or life-threatening disease, implicit dangers as components of large systems, latent psychosemantic factors of multidimensional consciousness, inexpressible experience as a psychological basis for understanding the impossible, incomprehensible and unthinkable are all considered as manifestations of the hidden order.
Keywords
References
Aseev, V.G. (1978). O dialektike determinatsii psikhicheskogo razvitiya [On the Dialectics of Determination of Mental Development]. In Printsip razvitiya v psikhologii [The Principle of Development in Psychology] (p. 21–38). M.: Nauka.
Bykhovets, U.V. (2023). K voprosu o kontseptualizatsii ponyatiya “perezhivanie nevidimoy ugrozy” [On Conceptualization of the Notion of “Experiencing an Invisible Threat”]. In Chelovek, sub’’ekt, lichnost’: perspektivy psikhologicheskikh issledovaniy: materialy Vserossiyskoy nauchnoy konferentsii, posvyashchennoy 90‑letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya A.V. Brushlinskogo i 300‑letiyu osnovaniya Rossiyskoy akademii nauk [The Individual, the Subject, and Personality: Prospects for Psychological Research: Materials of the All-Russian Scientific Conference on the 90th Anniversary of the Birth of A.V. Brushlinsky and the 300th Anniversary of the Founding of the Russian Academy of Sciences] (pp. 160–164). M.: Institut psikhologii RAN
Bohm, D. (1980). Wholeness and the Implicate Order. London: Routledge.
Bohm, D. (1992). Razvertyvayushcheyesya znacheniye. Tri dnya dialogov s Devidom Bomom [Unfolding Meaning: A Weekend of Dialogue with David Bohm.] Retrieved from https://vladivostok.com/speaking_in_tongues/bohm/bohm.htm
Bohm, D. (2010). Prichinnost’ i sluchaynost’ v sovremennoy fizike [Causality and Chance in Modern Physics]. M.: KRASAND.
Epshteyn, M.N. (2001). Filosofiya vozmozhnogo. Modal’nosti v myshlenii i kul’ture [A Philosophy of the Possible: Modalities in Thought and Culture]. SPb.: Aleteyya.
Geyzenberg, V. (1989). Fizika i filosofiya. Chast’ i tseloye [Physics and Philosophy. Part and Whole]. M.: Nauka.
Gurevich, I.I., Feygenberg, I.M. (1977). Kakiye veroyatnosti rabotayut v psikhologii? [What Probabilities Work in Psychology?]. In Veroyatnostnoye prognozirovaniye v deyatel’nosti cheloveka [Probabilistic Forecasting of Human Activity] (p. 9–21). M.: Nauka.
Kimberg, A.N., Ul’ko, E.V. (2020). Bol’shie sistemy i neyavnye opasnosti: problema posrednikov [Large Systems and Implicit Hazards: The Problem of Intermediaries]. In Psikhologiya bezopasnosti i psikhologicheskaya bezopasnost’: problemy vzaimodeystviya teoretikov i praktikov: materialy X Vserossiyskoy nauchnoy konferentsii [Psychology of Security and Psychological Safety: Problems of Interaction between Theorists and Practitioners]. (p. 49–57). M.: Mir nauki.
Kornilova, T. V. (2018). Predstavleniya o “kauzal’nom inkrementalizme” i psikhologicheskoy neopredelennosti kak o perspektivakh razvitiya obyasneniya v psikhologii [Perceptions of “Causal Incrementalism” and of Psychological Indeterminacy as Prospects for the Development of Explanation in Psychology]. In Psikhologicheskoe znanie: sovremennoe sostoyanie i perspektivy razvitiya [Psychological Knowledge: Current State and Development Prospects]. (p. 368–384) M.: Institut psikhologii RAN.
Kozellek, R. (1994). Sluchaynost’ kak posledneye pribezhishche istoriografii [Randomness as the Last Refuge of Historiography]. THESIS [THESIS], 5, 171–184.
Lobanov, A.P., Pevneva, A.N. (2023). Implitsitnyy i eksplitsitnyy podkhody k issledovaniyu kognitivnykh stiley [Implicit and Explicit Approaches to the Study of Cognitive Styles]. Voprosy psikhologii [Voprosy Psychologii], 4, 75–85.
Mamchur, E.A. (2017). Nenablyudayemyye sushchnosti sovremennoy fiziki: sotsial’nyye konstrukty ili real’nyye obyekty? [Unobserved Essences of Modern Physics: Social Constructs or Real Objects?]. Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki [Epistemology and Philosophy of Science], 51(1), 106–123.
Petrenko, V. F. (2010). Mnogomernoye soznaniye: psikhosemanticheskaya paradigm [Multidimensional Consciousness: The Psychosemantic Paradigm]. M.: Novyy khronograf.
Prigozhin, I., Stengers, I. (1994). Vremya, khaos, kvant: k resheniyu paradoksa vremeni [Time, Chaos and the Quantum Towards the Resolution of the Time Paradox]. M.: Progress.
Prigozhin, I., Stengers. I. (2014). Poryadok iz khaosa: novyy dialog cheloveka s prirodoy [Order Out of Chaos: Man’s New Dialogue with Nature]. M.: Yeditorial URSS.
Prokhorov, A. O. (1998). Psikhologiya neravnovesnykh sostoyaniy [Psychology of Nonequilibrium States]. M.: Institut psikhologii RAN.
Rozanov, V. V. (1995). Sochineniya. O ponimanii: Opyt issledovaniya prirody, granits i vnutrennego stroyeniya nauki kak tsel’nogo znaniya [On Understanding: the Experience of Studying nature, Boundaries and Internal Structure of Science as Integral Knowledge]. M.: Tanais.
Rubinshteyn, S.L. (1959). O meste psikhicheskogo vo vseobshchey vzaimosvyazi yavleniy material’nogo mira [On the Place of the Psychic in the General Interconnection of the Phenomena of the Material World]. In Printsipy i puti razvitiya psikhologii [The Principles and the Ways of Development of Psychology]. (pp. 7–22) M.: APN SSSR.
Sergiyenko, E. A. (2017). Realizatsiya printsipa razvitiya v issledovaniyakh psikhologii sub’’ekta [Implementation of the Development Principle in Stidies of Subject Psychology]. Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal [Psychological journal], 2, 5–18.
Stepin, V.S. (2000). Teoreticheskoye znaniye. Struktura, istoricheskaya evolyutsiya [Theoretical Knowledge. Structure, Historical Evolution]. M.: Progress-Traditsiya.
Surov, I.A. (2023). Kvantovaya kontseptsiya svobody vybora [Quantum Concept of Free Choice]. Uchenyye zapiski Instituta psikhologii Rossiyskoy akademii nauk [Proceedings of the Institute of Psychology of Russian Academy of Sciences], 3(4), 68–82.
Tokareva, G.V., Dorfman L.Y. (2014). Implitsitnyye protsessy i ikh issledovaniye v zapadnoy psikhologii [Investigations of Implicit Processes in Western Psychology]. Vestnik YUUrGU. Seriya “Psikhologiya” [Bulletin of SUSU. Series “Psychology”], 7(1), 17–27.
Veyne, P. (2003). Kak pishut istoriyu. Opyt epistemologii [Writing History: Essay on Epistemology]. M.: Nauchnyy mir.
Znakov, V.V. (2016). Psikhologiya ponimaniya mira cheloveka [Psychology of Understanding of the Multidimensional World of Man]. M.: Institut psikhologii RAN.
Znakov, V.V. (2022). Nevyrazimyy ekzistentsial’nyy opyt — psikhologicheskoye osnovaniye ponimaniya nemyslimogo [Inexpressible Existential Experience — Psychological Basis for Understanding the Unthinkable]. Teoreticheskaya i eksperimental’naya psikhologiya [Theoretical and experimental psychology], 15(1), 5–23.
Zolotarev, A.V. (2020). Vasiliy Rozanov i Verner Geyzenberg o ponimanii prirody [Vasily Rosanov’s and Werner Heisenberg’s Views on Understanding of Nature]. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Seriya: Filosofskiye nauki [Bulletin of Moscow State Regional University. Series: Philosophical Sciences], 4, 46–54.