UDC
794:355:327DOI
https://doi.org/10.31429/26190567-25-4-80-91How to Cite
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Рябов Д.О., Колпакова М.М.
Abstract
In geopolitical discourse, subjectivation is typically understood as the process in which individuals internalize and adopt the role of the subject, as a result of external imposition and internalization. A subject of this nature needs to constantly take initiative and demonstrate the capacity for autonomous decision-making, as well as the ability to function independently. Meanwhile, board games, particularly war games, are often left out of analyses. However, children’s war games are also one source of the ‘domestication’ of geopolitics. The process of “domestication” of geopolitics is characterized by the integration of children, elements and relations that are associated with geopolitics. This amalgamation gives rise to a blending of domestic and geopolitical spaces. The process of combining components that do not inherently possess a hierarchical relationship with each other can be designated as ‘assemblage”. The present study draws upon Ernesto Laclau’s theory of political discourse and Nico Carpentier’s discursive-material approach to analyze a selection of modern Russian children’s board war games. The games selected for analysis are Fantasy Battles, Armored Infantry, Zverobots Battle, and Robogear. Several types of text are used in games. These include booklets which explain to players the rules of the game’s imaginary space, the mechanics of the game and ‘fluff’, that is to say, texts on in-game objects such as ‘magic cards’ and inscriptions on packs which explain, in aggregate, winning strategies and stipulate the influence of luck. The integration of visual elements, such as images, within the game’s design facilitates the player’s imagination of the game’s virtual environment. Moreover, it enables the player to develop a conceptual understanding of the game’s various components, including the appearance of painted figures and landscapes, as well as the mechanics of gameplay. The material objects in the game are comprised of soldier figurines, weaponry and military equipment, and landscape elements.
Keywords
References
Андреева, И.В. (2015). «Игрушки, о которых мечтают наши дети»: Оборонная игрушка в СССР в 1930‑е годы (По материалам журнала «Советская игрушка»). В Гороховские чтения: сборник материалов шестой региональной музейной конференции (с. 399–406). Челябинск: Челябинский государственный краеведческий музей.
Батлер, Дж. (2020). Психика власти: теории субъекции. СПб: Алетейя.
Бунтовский, С.Ю., Каримова, Х.И. (2016). Патриотическая игрушка как инструмент патриотического воспитания подрастающего поколения. Научный журнал Кубанского государственного аграрного университета, 124, 509–526.
Голенков, С.И. (2007). Понятие субъективации Мишеля Фуко. Вестник Самарской гуманитарной академии. Серия: Философия. Филология, 1, 54–66.
Грэбер Д. (2023). Утопия правил. О технологиях, глупости и тайном обаянии бюрократии. М.: Ad Marginem,
Кайуа Р. (2022). Игры и люди. М.: АСТ.
Морозов, В.Е. (2009). Россия и другие: Идентичность и границы политического сообщества. М.: Новое литературное обозрение.
Рябов О.В. и др. (2023). «Враг номер один» в символической политике кинематографий СССР и США периода холодной войны. М.: Аспект Пресс.
Хёйзинга, Й. (2011). Homo ludens. Человек играющий. СПб.: Изд-во Ивана Лимбаха.
Alexandratos, J. (2017). Articulating the Action Figure: Essays on the Toys and Their Messages. McFarland.
Ambrosio, T., & Ross, J. (2023). Performing the Cold War through the ‘The Best Board Game on the Planet’: The Ludic Geopolitics of Twilight Struggle. Geopolitics, 28(2), 846–878.
Bainbridge, J. (2010). Fully Articulated: The Rise of the Action Figure and the Changing Face of ‘Children’s’ Entertainment. Continuum, 24(6), 829–842. DOI: 10.1080/10304312.2010.510592
Billig, M. (1995). Banal Nationalism. London: SAGE.
Brown, K.D. (1990). Modelling for war? Toy Soldiers in late Victorian and Edwardian Britain. Journal of Social History, 237–254.
Carpentier, N. (2017). The Discursive-Material Knot: Cyprus in Conflict and Community Media. NY: Peter Lang.
Carter, S., Kirby, P., & Woodyer, T. (2017). Ludic — or Playful — Geopolitics. In Children, Young People and Critical Geopolitics. Routledge.
Dalby, S. (1991). Critical Geopolitics: Discourse, difference, and dissent. Environment and Planning. D: Society and Space, 9(3), 261–283. DOI: 10.1068/d090261
Dittmer, J. (2015). Playing Geopolitics: Utopian Simulations and Subversions of International Relations. GeoJournal, 80(6), 909–923. DOI: 10.1007/s10708-015-9655-1
Dittmer, J., & Bos, D. (2019). Popular Culture, Geopolitics, and Identity. Rowman & Littlefield.
Dittmer, J., & Dodds, K. (2008). Popular Geopolitics Past and Future: Fandom, Identities and Audiences. Geopolitics, 13(3), 437–457. DOI: 10.1080/14650040802203687
Flower, C. (2023). The Exemplary Game: Going to War with H.G. Wells’s Toy Soldiers. Children’s Literature, 51(1), 24–50.
Fox, J.E., Miller-Idriss, C. (2008). Everyday Nationhood. Ethnicities, 8(4), 536–563.
Global Market Insights. (2023). Board Games Market Size. Global Market Insights Inc. Retrieved from https://www.gminsights.com/industry-analysis/board-games-market
Hall, K.J. (2004). A Soldier’s Body: GI Joe, Hasbro’s Great American Hero, and the Symptoms of Empire. Journal of Popular Culture, 38(1), 34–54.
Hansen, L. (2017). Reading Comics for the Field of International Relations: Theory, Method and the Bosnian War. European Journal of International Relations, 23(3), 581–608. DOI: 10.1177/1354066116656763
Heller, K.J. (1996). Power, Subjectification and Resistance in Foucault. SubStance, 25(1), 78. DOI: 10.2307/3685230
Kelly, J. (2012). Popular Culture, Sport and the ‘Hero’-fication of British Militarism. Sociology, 47(4), 722–738. DOI: 10.1177/0038038512453795
Kriz, W.C. (2020). Gaming in the Time of COVID‑19. Simulation & Gaming, 51(4), 403–410.DOI: 10.1177/1046878120931602
Laclau, E., & Mouffe C. (1985). Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso.
Laclau, E. (1990). New Reflections on the Revolution of our time. Verso Trade.
Loponen, M., & Montola, M. (2004). A Semiotic View on Diegesis Construction. In M. Montola, & J. Stenros (Eds) Beyond Role and Play – Tools, Toys and Theory for Harnessing the Imagination (pp. 39–51). Ropecon ry.
Machin, D., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2009). Toys as Discourse: Children’s War Toys and the War on Terror. Critical Discourse Studies, 6(1), 51–63. DOI: 10.1080/17405900802560082
Marttila, T. (2016). Post-foundational Discourse Analysis. Palgrave Macmillan UK. DOI: 10.1057/9781137538406
Morozov, V.E. (2015). Russia’s Postcolonial Identity: A Subaltern Empire in a Eurocentric World. UK: Springer.
Peterson, J. (2012). Playing at the World: A History of Simulating Wars, People and Fantastic Adventures, from Chess to Role-playing games. UK: Unreason Press.
Sharp, J.P. (1993). Publishing American identity: Popular geopolitics, myth and The Reader’s Digest. Political Geography, 12(6), 491–503. DOI: 10.1016/0962-6298(93)90001‑n
Tuathail, G.Ó. (1996). Critical Geopolitics: The Politics of Writing Global Space. University of Minnesota Press.
Wells, H.G. (2004). Little Wars. Skirmisher Publishing.
Woodyer, T. (2012). Ludic Geographies: Not Merely Child’s Play. eography Compass, 6(6), 313–326. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-8198.2012.00477.x
Woodyer, T., & Carter, S. (2018). Domesticating the Geopolitical: Rethinking Popular Geopolitics through Play. Geopolitics, 25(5), 1050–74. DOI: 10.1080/14650045.2018.1527769
Woodyer, T., Martin, D., & Carter, S. (2015). Ludic Geographies. In B. Evans, J. Horton, T. Skelton (Eds) Play and Recreation, Health and Wellbeing. Geographies of Children and Young People, 9. Singapore: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-4585-51-4_1