Abstract
This article explores new forms of transnational mobility brought about by digitalization, treating them as a socio political phenomenon. These forms not only reflect changes in the behavior of mobile individuals but also entail a redefinition of citizen state relations within the social contract framework. The spread of remote employment and cross border mobility practices, the article argues, blurs classical migration categories and calls for more refined analytical tools. The study aims at a comprehensive analysis of neonomadism as a multidimensional phenomenon: identifying mobile subject types, examining their motivations and movement strategies, and assessing the institutional repercussions for the state alongside the transformation of civic state relations in an era of global mobility and digital technologies. Methodologically, the research adopts an interdisciplinary approach that combines institutional theory with the concept of social contract. A multilevel analytical model (micro, meso, and macro) enables integration of individuals’ endogenous motivational drivers with exogenous territorial factors. The analysis focuses on structural features of neonomadism, its typology, and consequences for contemporary migration policy and citizenship institutions. The findings indicate that neonomadism constitutes a form of temporary and selective inclusion of individuals into different states’ institutional regimes, whereby legal citizenship and actual residence no longer coincide. This mismatch triggers a redistribution of tax and social obligations, transforms the mechanisms of civic belonging, and fosters elements of post territorialization in socio political relations. The theoretical and methodological framework developed here – particularly the migrant typology and the decision making model accounting for internal motivation and exogenous territorial factors – can serve as a foundation for further research on global migration. The article thus broadens our understanding of diverse mobility forms as an object of socio political analysis and sheds light on how these forms shape public policy.
Keywords
References
Атанесян, А.В., Морозова, Е.В., Мхитарян, С.А., Заславская, М.И. (2025). Реформа местного самоуправления в восприятии жителей укрупнённых общин Армении. Южно-российский журнал социальных наук, 26(2), 6–22. DOI: 10.31429/26190567‑26‑2‑6‑22
Зорин, В.Ю., Аствацатурова, М.А., Бурда, М.А. (2025). Миграционные процессы в современной России: актуальные реакции политики и управления. Российский социально-гуманитарный журнал, 4, 110–126. DOI: 10.18384/2224‑0209‑2025‑4‑1678
Мищук, С.Н. (2022). Факторы немиграции как элемент управления миграционными процессами. Society and Security Insights, 5(3), 103–117. DOI: 10.14258/ssi(2022)3‑07
Мухаметов, Д.Р. (2023). «Умное государство» между глобализацией и деглобализацией: особенности электронных резидентов и цифровых кочевников. Власть, 31(5), 146–152. DOI: 10.31171/vlast.v31i5.9812
Таишева, В.В. (2022). Цифровые номады и миграционные процессы в российской IT-сфере: политологический анализ. Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Политология, 24(3), 460–479. DOI: 10.22363/2313‑1438‑2022‑24‑3‑460‑479
Цапенко, И.П., Гришин, И.В. (2022). Виртуализация трансграничной трудовой миграции. Вестник российской академии наук, 92(9), 849–859. DOI: 10.31857/S0869587322090109
Baldwin, R. (2019). The Globotics Upheaval: Globalisation, Robotics and the Future of Work. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Carling, J., Talleraas, C. (2016). Root Causes and Drivers of Migration: Implications for humanitarian efforts and development cooperation. Peace Research Institute Oslo (PRIO). Retrieved from https://www.prio.org/publications/9229
Cohen, S. (2010). Re-conceptualising Lifestyle Travellers: Contemporary ‘drifters’. In Hannam, K. & Diekmann A. (Eds.) Beyond Backpacker Tourism: Mobilities and Experiences (pp. 64–84). Bristol: Channel View Publications.
Cohen, S.A. (2011). Lifestyle Travellers: Backpacking as a way of life. Annals of Tourism Research, 38(4), 1535–1555. DOI: 10.1016/j.annals.2011.02.002
Cook, D. (2020). The freedom Trap: Digital Nomads and the Use of Disciplining Practices to Manage Work/Leisure Boundaries. Information Technology & Tourism, 22, 355–390. DOI: 10.1007/s40558‑020‑00172‑4
Cook, D. (2022). Breaking the Contract: Digital Nomads and the State. Critique of Anthropology, 42(3), 304–323. DOI: 10.1177/0308275X221120172
Cranston, S., Duplan, K. (2023). Infrastructures of Migration and the Ordering of Privilege in Mobility. Migration Studies, 11(2), 330–348. DOI: 10.1093/migration/mnad001
De Haas, H., Vezzoli, S. (2018). European Migrations: Dynamics, Drivers, and the Role of Policies. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. DOI: 10.2760/371793
Doherty, N., Richardson, J., Thorn, K. (2013). Self-initiated Expatriation and Self-initiated Expatriates: Clarification of the research stream. Career Development International, 18(1), 97–112. DOI: 10.1108/13620431311305971
Dreher, N., Triandafyllidou, A. (2025). Understanding Digital Nomadism: A Three-Level Framework for Migration Studies. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 51(19), 4801–4820. DOI: 10.1080/1369183X.2025.2517353
Ferriss, T. (2009). The 4‑hour Workweek: Escape 9–5, live Anywhere, and Join the New Rich. New York: Crown Publishers.
Hampton, M. (2013). Backpacker Tourism and Economic Development: Perspectives from the Less Developed World (Contemporary Geographies of Leisure, Tourism and Mobility). London: Routledge.
Hannonen, O. (2020). In Search of a Digital Nomad: Defining the Phenomenon. Information Technology & Tourism, 22(3), 335–353. DOI: 10.1007/s40558‑020‑00177‑z
Hayes, M. (2014). ‘We Gained a Lot over What We Would Have Had’: The Geographic Arbitrage of North American Lifestyle Migrants to Cuenca, Ecuador. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 40(12), 1953–1971. DOI: 10.1080/1369183X.2014.880335
Kuhn, J. (2019). Literature Review: Drivers of Migration. Why Do People Leave Their Homes? A Structured Overview of Migratory Determinants. Bonn: German Development Institute (DIE). Retrieved from https://www.idos-research.de/uploads/media/DP_9.2019.pdf
Lacárcel, F.J.S. (2025). Digital Technologies, Sustainable Lifestyle, and Tourism: How Digital Nomads Navigate Global Mobility. Sustainable Technology and Entrepreneurship, 4(2), 100096. DOI: 10.1016/j.stae.2025.100096
Lee, E. (1966). A Theory of Migration. Demography, 3(1), 47–57.
Mancinelli, F., & Salazar, N. (2023). Introduction: Understanding Neo-nomadic Mobilities beyond Self-actualisation. Mobility Humanities, 2(2), 1–6. DOI: 10.23090/MH.2023.07.2.2.001
Miller, I. (2025). Digital Nomads as Political Factor and a Hypothetical Political Actor. Journal of Sociology: Bulletin of Yerevan University, 16(2(42)), 54–71. DOI: 10.46991/BYSU.F/2025.16.2.054
Schwab, K., Malleret, T. (2020). COVID‑19: The Great Reset. Geneva: Forum Publishing.
Selmer, J., Shaffer, M., Jooss, S., Reiche, B. (2025). A Typology of Long-term Expatriates: Conceptualization, Consequences and Future Research. Human Resource Management Review, 35(2), 101074. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2024.101074
Thompson, B.Y. (2018). Digital Nomads Employment in the Online Gig Economy. Glocalism: Journal of Culture, Politics and Innovation, 1, 1–26. DOI: 10.12893/gjcpi.2018.1.11
Ullah, A., Hassan, H., Mohamad, S., Chattoraj, D. (2021). Privileged Migrants & Their Sense of Belonging: Insider or Outsider? Asian Journal of Social Science, 49(3). 161–169. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajss.2021.03.004

