Abstract
The article discusses the relevant issue of the interaction between humans and cities in modern society, as well as the influence of the city’s cultural space on urban identity. According to the subjective approach, the category “cultural space of the city” is seen as a semantic sphere embodied in the urban landscape. The purpose of this article is to provide a theoretical basis and empirical research on the influence of the city’s cultural space on the local identity of respondents. Research methods. The ‘City Identity Questionnaire’ (C. A. Litvin, O. I. Muravyova) was used to investigate urban identity. An author-designed questionnaire was developed to investigate the urban cultural space. The questionnaire identifies the following factors that influence the urban cultural space: recreational effect, positive emotional involvement effect, and creative effect. The questionnaire to analyze the main trends and value dominants of the art space of Krasnodar was compiled on the basis of interview materials with art historians, cultural historians, and cultural workers. Empirical basis of the study: 354 respondents who permanently reside in Krasnodar. The analysis of urban identity characteristics using the mean method showed a high level of expression for all aspects of urban identity in the studied groups. No significant differences were found between the two age groups. The most important factor influencing all aspects of urban identity for both groups is feeling proud of their city and fellow citizens. The recreational effect was a significant factor influencing urban identity in the older age group. In the younger age group, it only affected emotional attachment to the city and the evaluation of personal contribution to its development. The influence of the creative effect in the studied groups was found to be insignificant. The study results showed that the main visual dominants of the urban space in the examined groups were the feeling of pride when seeing urban sculptures, as well as the recreational effect of walking in the central part of the city, parks, and green areas of Krasnodar. Inter-generational differences have been identified in the effect of certain objects in urban cultural spaces. For the older generation, the emotional impression of creative outdoor advertising, whimsical trees and original floral compositions, as well as the opportunity to participate in urban cultural events, were significant factors. The negative factor was the impression of art objects and modern urban sculpture in Krasnodar. After analyzing the author’s questionnaire, two main tendencies in the perception of Krasnodar’s cultural space have been identified, corresponding to different age groups: traditional (aiming to preserve Krasnodar’s historical appearance and characteristics while making it more convenient for residents) and innovative (aiming to change the city in accordance with the latest urban trends, making it modern and functional).
Keywords
Funding information
The study was financially supported by the Russian Science Foundation and the Kuban Science Foundation (Project No. 22–28–20292 “Works of Fine Arts in the Urban Cultural Space as a Factor in the Formation of Local Identity”).
References
Аполлонов, И.А. (2017). Идентичность личности: этнокультурные основания бытия человека в глобализирующемся мире. Краснодар: КубГТУ.
Дробышева, Т.В., Емельянова Т.П. (2020). Жизнеспособность горожан: содержание понятия, теоретические и эмпирические возможности его применения. Известия Саратовского университета, 3(35), 232–240.
Дробышева, Т.В., Журавлёв, А.Л. (2017). К истории становления отечественной социальной психологии города: основные этапы и направления исследований. В Фундаментальные и прикладные исследования современной психологии. Результаты и перспективы развития (c. 1934–1942). Москва: Смысл.
Зачесова, И.А. (2019, Май). Повседневный городской дискурс: интенциональный аспект. Евразийское научное объединение, 5–7(51), 459–462.
Знаков, В.В., Рябикина, З.И. (2017). Психология человеческого бытия. Москва: Смысл.
Муравьева, О.И., Литвина, С.А., Кружкова, О.В., Богомаз С.А. (2017). Особенности структуры идентичностис городом молодежи российских городов. Вестник Новосибирского государственного педагогического университета, 1, 63–80. DOI: 10.15293/2226-3365.1701.05
Озерина, А.А., Тимофеева, Т.С. (2019). Обзор современных зарубежных исследований феномена «Городская идентичность». LogosetPraxis, 4, 142–152. DOI: 10.15688/lp.jvolsu.2019.4.17
Покатиловская, Е.Н., Шибаева, Л.В. (2019, Февраль). Образ города проживания в представлениях жителей с разной городской идентичностью. Институт психологии Российской академии наук. Социальная и экономическая психология, 2(14), 192–209.
Дробышева, Т.В., Журавлев, А.Л. (ред.). (2016). Социально-психологические исследования города. Москва: Институт психологии, Российская академия наук.
Тучина, О.Р., Аполлонов, И.А., Посметюха, Л.А. (2022). Городское культурное пространство как фактор формирования локальной идентичности (на материале исследования молодежи Краснодара). Герценовские чтения: психологические исследования в образовании, 5, 439–444. DOI: 10.33910/herzenpsyconf-2022-5-56
Тучина, О.Р., Аполлонов, И.А. (2021, Май). Исторический опыт и коммеморативные практики в контексте национальной и локальной идентичности: кроссрегиональный анализ. Гуманизация образования, 5, 45–59.
Шмелина, О.С., Цыганкова, О.Е. (2016). Образы «города-мечты» и реального города в представлении жителей крупного и малого городов. В Т.В. Дробышева, А.Л. Журавлев (ред.) Социально-психологические исследования города (с. 27–49). Москва: Институт психологии, Российская академия наук.
Belanche, D., Casaló, L.V., Flavián, C. (2017). Understanding the Cognitive, Affective and Evaluative Components of Social Urban Identity: Determinants, Measurement, and Practical Consequences. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 50, 138–153. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.02.004
Berman, M.G., Jonides, J., & Kaplan, S. (2008). The Cognitive Benefits of Interacting with Nature. Psychological Science, 19(12), 1207–1212. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02225
Certeau, de M. (1998). Ghosts in the City. In The Practice of Everyday Life. Vol. 2. Living and cooking. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, рp. 133–144.
Galindo, M.P.& Hidalgo, M.C. (2005). Aesthetic preferences and the attribution of meaning: Environmental categorization processes in the evaluation of urban scenes. International Journal of Psychology, 40(1), 19–27. DOI: 10.1080/00207590444000104
Heath, S.C., Rabinovich, A., & Barreto, (2017). Putting Identity into the Community: Exploring the Social Dynamics of Urban Regeneration. European Journal of Social Psychology, 47(7), 855–866. DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.2296
Hidalgo, M.C., Berto, R., Galindo, M.P., &Getrevi, A. (2006). Identifying Attractive and Unattractive Urban Places: Categories, Restorativeness and Aesthetic Attributes. Medio Ambiente y Comportamiento Humano, 7(2), 115–133.
Jones, C., Svejenova, S. (2017). The architecture of city identities: A multimodal study of Barcelona and Boston. Multimodality, Meaning, and Institutions, 54B, 203–234, DOI: 10.1108/S0733-558X2017000054B007
Lalli, M. (1992). Urban-related Identity: Theory, Measurement, and Empirical Findings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 4, 285–303. DOI: 10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80078-7
Lindal, P.J. & Hartig, T. (2013). Architectural Variation, Building Height, and the Restorative Quality of Urban Residential Streetscapes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 33, 26–36. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.09.003
Lindberg, M., Johansson, K., Karlberg, H & Balogh, J. (2019). Place Innovative Synergies for City Center Attractiveness: A Matter of Experiencing Retail and Retailing Experiences. Urban Planning, 4(01), 91–105. DOI: 10.17645/up.v4i1.1640
Rouquette, M.L., Sautkina, E., Castro, P., Félonneau, M.-L., & Guillou-Michel, E. (2005). Social Representations: Theory and Environmental Studies. Designing Social Innovation: Planning, Building, Evaluating, 1, 107–115.
Ujang, N., & Zakariya, K. (2015). The Notion of place, Place Meaning and Identity in urban Regeneration. Procedia-social and Behavioral Sciences, 170, 709–717. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.073
White, M., Smith, A., Humphryes, K., Pahl, S., Snelling, D., & Depledge, M. (2010). Blue Space: The Importance of Water for Preference, Affect, and Restorativeness Ratings of Natural and built Scenes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(4), 482–493. DOI: 10.1016/J.JENVP.2010.04.004
Yang, Z., & Ziqiang, X. (2016). Community Identity Increases Urban Residents’ Ingroup Emergency Helping Intention. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 26(6), 467–480. DOI: 10.1002/casp.2274

