Political and Administrative Agglomeration Management: Problems of Conceptualization | South-Russian Journal of Social Sciences
Political and Administrative Agglomeration Management: Problems of Conceptualization
PDF (Russian)
https://doi.org/10.31429/26190567-20-3-76-90
https://doi.org/10.31429/26190567-20-3-76-90

How to Cite Array

Kolba A.I. (2019) Political and Administrative Agglomeration Management: Problems of Conceptualization. South-Russian Journal of Social Sciences, 20 (3), pp. 76-90. DOI: 10.31429/26190567-20-3-76-90 (In Russian)
Submission Date 2019-06-20
Accepted Date 2019-07-27
Published Date 2019-09-27

Copyright (c) 2019 Алексей Иванович Кольба

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

The paper examines the conceptual analysis of the existing scientific views concerning political and administrative machine apparatus of urban agglomerations. It is an original approach to the problems under consideration in that it applies the approaches of political science, while in general they are regarded with within the scope of economy, urban studies, and management, etc. The aim of the research is to create a political science concept in order to analyze how to use political and administrative resources in agglomeration management on the national, sub-­national and local levels. The research methodology is based on the use of the neo-­institutional and conflictological approaches. The former embraces the theories of institutional changes and spatial development; the latter includes the institutionalization of conflicts and collaborative and critical planning. On the basis of the analysis carried out in the research the author offers to introduce the concept according to which it is possible to use political and administrative resources on three levels, viz., political and institutional, political and administrative, and political and operational. On the first level, the general parameters for the agglomeration management functioning, set up by the institutional design of the political system, are defined. Next, the optimal agglomeration management model is selected and political and administrative practices that suit its development are introduced. Finally, the interaction of the actors involved in the agglomeration development through different types of planning and negotiations are administered. The approach introduced and analyzed in the research makes it possible to consider the problems of political and administrative management in the sphere of urban agglomerations within the scope of relevant approaches used by political science.

Keywords

urban agglomeration, political and administrative management, political institu­ti­ons, agglomeration management models, collaborative planning, critical planning

Acknowledgements

The research was carried out through the financial support of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, grant No 19-411-230022, “Political and administrative resources of public administration for socio-­economic development of the Krasnodar agglomeration”).

References

  1. Booher, D. & Innes, J. (2002). Network Power in Collaborative Planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 21(3), 221–236.
  2. Fang, Ch. & Yu, D. (2017). Urban Agglomeration: An Evolving Concept of an Emerging Phenomenon. Landscape and Urban Planning, 162, 126–136.
  3. Gunton, T. & Day, J. C. (2003). The Theory and Practice of Collaborative Planning in Resource and Environmental Management. Environments, 31, 5–19.
  4. Healey, P. (1997). Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies. Vancouver: UBS Press.
  5. Kirdina-Chjendler, S. G. (2018). Zapadnye i ne-zapadnye institucional’nye modeli vo vremeni i prostranstve [Western and Non-Western Institutional Models in Time and Geographical Space]. Voprosy teoreticheskoy ekonomiki [Theoretical Economics], 1, 73–88.
  6. Kolba, A. I. (2018). Politicheskie aspekty upravlenija konfliktami v processe realizacii proektov razvitija gorodskogo prostranstva [Political aspects of conflict management in the process of the implementation of urban projects]. Social’nye i gumanitarnye znanija [Social’nye i Gumanitarnye Znanija], 4(4), 224–229.
  7. Kolomak, E. A. (2013). Gorodskie aglomeracii v Rossii: institucional’nye ogranicheniya razvitiya [Urban Agglomerations in Russia: Institutional Development Restraints]. Problemy teorii i praktiki upravlenija [International Journal of Management Theory and Practice], 8, 48–55.
  8. Kremer, D. V. (2018). Mezhdistsiplinarnyi podkhod k issledovaniiu gorodskikh aglomeratsii [Interdisciplinary Approach to the Study of Urban Agglomerations]. In Nauka IuUrGU: materialy 70-i nauchnoi konferentsii. Sektsii ekonomiki, upravleniia i prava [Science in SUrSU: Materials of the 70th Scientific Conference. Section of Economics, Management and Law] (pp. 327–333). Cheliabinsk: Izdatel’skii tcentr JuUrGU.
  9. Kriesberg, L. (1998). Constructive Conflicts. From Escalation to Resolution. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield, 1998.
  10. Kübler, D. Problems and Prospects of Metropolitan Governance in Sydney: Towards ‘Old’ or ‘New’ Regionalism? Kensington: City Futures Research Centre, 2005.
  11. Kuznecov, Ju. G. (2018). Upravlenie gorodskimi aglomeratsiiami: metodicheskie podkhody, organizatsionno-pravovye formy i praktika [Managing Urban Agglomerations: Methodological Approaches, Legal Forms and Practices]. In Sovremennyi gorod: vlast’, upravlenie, ekonomika. Sotsial’no-ekonomicheskie i politicheskie protsessy v gorodskikh aglomeratsiiakh: novye podkhody k aktual’noi probleme: Sbornik nauchnykh statei [Modern City: Power, Management, Economics. Socio-Economic and Political Processes in Urban Agglomerations: New Approaches to Urgent Problems] (pp. 26–40). Vypusk VIII. Perm’: Izdatel’stvo PNIPU.
  12. Lekcin, V. N. (2011). Gorodskie aglomeratsii i sistema rasseleniia: nadezhdy i opaseniia [Urban Agglomerations and the Resettlement System: Hopes and Fears]. M.: Infra-M.
  13. Loginov, D. & Karanina, T. The Participation of the Municipalities in the Creation of Urban Agglomerations. MATEC Web of Conferences. Retrieved from https://www.matec-conferences.org/articles/matecconf/pdf/2017/20/matecconf_spbw2017_08012.pdf
  14. Loibl, W., Etminan, Gh., Gebetsroither-Geringer, E., Neumann, H.-M. & Sanchez-Guzman, S. (2018). Characteristics of Urban Agglomerations in Different Continents: History, Patterns, Dynamics, Drivers and Trends. Retrieved from https://www.intechopen.com/books/urban-agglomeration/characteristics-of-urban-agglomerations-in-different-continents-history-patterns-dynamics-drivers-an
  15. McAuliffe, C. & Rogers, D. (2019). The Politics of Value in Urban Development: Valuing Conflict in Agonistic Pluralism. Planning Theory, 18(3), 300–318.
  16. Medvedev, I. R. (2017). Razreshenie gorodskikh konfliktov [Resolving Urban Conflicts]. M.: Infotropik.
  17. Mironov, N. M. (2009). Gorodskie aglomeracii: zarubezhnyj opyt [Metropolitan Areas: Foreign Experience]. Mestnoe pravo [Local Law], 5–6, 53–80.
  18. Musinova, N. N., Popadiuk, N. K. (2018). Organizacija upravlenija gorodskoj aglomeraciej: poisk reshenij [The Organization of the Government of Urban Agglomeration: the Search for Solutions]. Vestnik Universiteta [Vestnik Universiteta], 7, 12–15.
  19. Norris, D. F. (2015). Metropolitan Governance in America. L.: Routledge.
  20. North, D. (2004). Funktsionirovanie ekonomiki vo vremeni [The Functioning of the Economy Over Time]. Otechestvennye zapiski [Notes of the Fatherland], 6(21), 88–103.
  21. Oktay, T. (2016). Metropol Kent Yönetimi Yaklaşımları ve Uygulama Modelleri. Strategic Public Management Journal, 4, 49–71. (In Turkish).
  22. Pavlov, Ju. V. (2011). Modeli upravleniia gorodskoi aglomeratsiei [Management Models of Urban Agglomeration]. Vestnik Samarskogo gosudarstvennogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta [Vestnik of Samara State University of Economics], 4(78), 66–70.
  23. Pavlov, Ju. V. (2018). Sovershenstvovanie pravovogo regulirovanija razvitija gorodskih aglomeracij [Improvement of Legal Regulation of Urban Agglomerations Development]. Ars Administrandi (Iskusstvo upravlenija) [Ars Administrandi Scientific Journal]. 13(10), 466–488.
  24. Pavlov, Ju. V. (2019). Budushchee municipalitetov v aglomeracii: evolyuciya vzglyadov na metropolitenskoe upravlenie [The Future of Municipalities in Metropolitan Areas: Evolution of views on Metropolitan Governance]. Jekonomicheskaja politika [Economic Policy], 1(14), 126–153.
  25. Pavlov, Ju. V., Koroljova, E. N., Labzin, A. V. (2018). Organy upravleniia gorodskoi aglomeratsiei proektirovanie sostava i sposobov formirovaniia [Metropolitan Area Governance Body: Composition and Methods of Formation]. Vestnik SPbGU. Menedzhment [Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Management], 4(17), 576–610.
  26. Petukhov, R. V., Lutsenko, E. V. (2017). Pravovoe regulirovanie aglomeratsii teoreticheskie podkhody i zarubezhnye praktiki [Legal Regulation of Agglomerations: Theoretical Approaches and Foreign Practices]. Mestnoe pravo [Local Law], 6, 93–102.
  27. Romainville, C. (2015). Dynamics of Belgian Plurinational Federalism: A Small State Under Pressure. Retrieved from http://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/iclr/vol38/iss2/3
  28. Ruble, B. (2013). Mirovoi opyt v epokhu gorodskikh aglomeratsii uroki dlia upravleniia Moskvoi [Lessons from around the World for Moscow Governance in a Global Metropolitan Age]. Logos [Logos], 4, 264–287.
  29. Shlihter, A. A. (2015). Sotsial’nye uslugi v sisteme amerikanskogo federalizma [Social Services in the System of American Federalism]. M.: IMJeMO RAN.
  30. Shvetsov, A. N. (2018). Upravlenie gorodskimi aglomeratsiiami organizatsionno pravovye varianty [Managing Urban Agglomerations: Organizational and Legal Variations]. Regionalistika [Regionalistics], 1(5), 18–30.
  31. Slack, E. (2007). Managing the Coordination of Service Delivery in Metropolitan Cities: The Role of Metropolitan Governance. Policy Research Working Paper 4317, The World Bank.
  32. Stroev, P. V., Kan, M. I. (2016). Institutsionalnyi mekhanizm i instrumenty upravleniia aglomeratsiiami v Brazilii [Institutional Mechanisms and Management Tools to Administer Agglomerations in Brazil]. Vestnik Finansovogo universiteta [Bulletin of The Financial University], 4, 130–136.
  33. Tewdwr-Jones, M. & Allmendinger, P. (1998). Deconstructing Communicative Rationality: A Critique of Habermasian Collaborative Planning. Environment and Planning, 30(11), 1975–1989.
  34. Tomаs, M. (2017). Explaining Metropolitan Governance. The Case of Spain. Raumforschung und Raumordnung. Spatial Research and Planning, 3(75), 243–252.
  35. Tortajada, C. (2006). Water Management for a Megacity: Mexico City Metropolitan Area. Water Resources Development, 22(2), 353–376.
  36. Van der Heiden, N. (2010). Metropolitan Governance in Switzerland: Finally Some New Regionalism? In 32nd Conference of the European Group for Public Administration (EGPA). Toulouse, 2010, September, 8–10. Retrieved from https://www.zora.uzh.ch/id/eprint/43769/1/Paper_EGPA_NicovanderHeiden-1.pdf
  37. Van Wynsberghe, C., Poirier, J., Sinardet, D. & Tulkens, F. (2009). Citizens’ Forum of Brussels. The Political and Institutional Development of the Brussels Metropolitan Zone: Observations and Prospects. Brussels Studies. Retrieved from http://journals.openedition.org/brussels/966
  38. Volchkova, I. V., Minaev, N. I. (2013). Modeli upravleniya aglomeraciyami: mezhdunarodnyj opyt i rossijskaya praktika [Agglomeration Management Models: International and Russian Practice]. Ekonomika i upravlenie [Economics and Management], 11 (108), 53–57.
  39. Widmer, C. (2012). The Impact of Federal Agglomeration Policy on Swiss Federalism: Governance Change in Swiss Metropolitan Areas. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/5d02/1cea1b5f465e937a147fdd205dbe7ef0b534.pdf
  40. Wu, A. M., Lin, Ye & Hui, Li (2019). The Impact of Fiscal Decentralization on Urban Agglomeration: Evidence from China. Journal of Urban Affairs, 41(2), 170–188.
  41. Zubarevich, N. V. (2014). Regional’noe razvitie i regional’naya politika v Rossii [Regional Development and Regional Policy in Russia]. EKO: vserossijskij ekonomicheskij zhurnal [ECO: All-Russian Economic Journal], 44(4), 6–27.