Section
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31429/26190567-21-3-125-137How to Cite
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2020 Оксана Роальдовна Тучина
Abstract
The aim of the article is to substantiate the applicability of the subject-existential approach in assumptions about the future as the methodological basis of the research, as well as to empirically investigate the career orientations of young people in the context of future visions. The subject-existential approach is the continuation and development of the subject approach. The ability to design the future in this approach is an important determinant of personal resilience; the problem of career guidance in the context of attitudes to the future is seen as the expansion of the personality; the image of the future is the living space of the individual in which it continues to exist. Research procedure and methods. The authors have empirically revealed the types of young people’s ideas about the future and studied the characteristics of youth career orientations paying special attention to career orientations of young engineers-specialists and to those who study to be an engineer. The study involved 97 young engineers and 92 engineering students. Based on the results of the study, the authors have identified four types of personality attitudes to the future: ”optimistic”, “conservative”, “uncertain”, and “dangerous”. In accordance with this typology of ideas for the future, the peculiarities of the career orientations of young people have been revealed. The study of career orientations among engineers-specialists and engineering students has revealed the same trends as in the General sample; yet, the future seemed mainly optimistic for the former and uncertain for the latter. Accordingly, the dynamics of professionalization is linked to the change towards greater certainty and positivity in the future. The results of the study could be used for social and economic forecasting of the development of the region for it is necessary to know how young people view their future and how their life plans are related to the future of the region and the country at large.
Keywords
Funding information
The research was financed by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (research project No. 19-413-235002 “Self-understanding of the professional identity of young people in the context of their ideas about the future (as exemplified by engineering profession)”.
References
Abulhanova, K. A., Berezina, T. N. (2007). Vremya lichnosti i vremya zhizni [Time of Person and Time of Life] SPb.: Izd-vo “Altejya”.
Angelo, R. P., Chambel M. J. (2015). The Reciprocal Relationship between Work Characteristics and Employee Burnout and Engagement: A Longitudinal Study of Firefighters. Stress Health, 31, 106–114.
Apollonov, I. A., Tuchina, O. R. (2019). Regional'naya identichnost' kak faktor psikhologicheskoy bezopasnosti [Regional Identity as a Factor of Psychological Security]. Gumanizatsiya obrazovaniya [Humanization of Education], 5, 166–179. DOI: 10.24411/1029-3388-2019-10061
Arapova, P. I. (2015). Obraz budushchego i vybor zhiznennogo puti v yunosheskom vozraste. [Vision of the Future and Choice of Life in Adolescence]. Vestnik Pravoslavnogo Svyato-Tikhonovskogo gumanitarnogo universiteta [St. Tikhon’s University Review], 1(36), 122–129. DOI: 10.15382/sturIV201536.122-129
Beck, U. (2002). The Cosmopolitan Society and its Enemies. Theory, Culture and Society, 19 (1–2), 17–44.
Bocharova, E. E. (2014) Vremennaya perspektiva lichnosti studenta s raznym urovnem adaptatsionnoy gotovnosti [Temporal Perspective in Students with Different Levels of Adaptational Readiness]. Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta [Izvestiya of Saratov University. New Series. Series: Educational Acmeology. Developmental Psychology], 1, 57–63.
Boniwell, I., Osin, E., Sircova, A. (2014). Introducing Time Perspective Coaching: A New Approach to Improve Time Management and Enhance Well-Being. International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching & Mentoring, 12(2), 24–40.
Bühler, Ch. (1962). Genetic Aspects of the Self. In Fundamentals of Psychology of the Self. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, v. 96, art. 3.
Feather, N. T., Bond, M. J. (1994). Structure and Purpose in the Use of Time. In Psychology of Future Orientation (pp. 121–140). Lublin: Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL.
Ginzburg, M. R. (1988). Lichnostnoye samoopredeleniye kak psikhologicheskaya problema [Personal Self-Determination as a Psychological Problem]. Voprosy psikhologii [Voprosy Psychologii], 2, 19–26.
Golovakha, Ye. I. (2009). Zhiznennaya perspektiva i tsennostnyye oriyentatsii lichnosti [Life Perspective and Value Orientations of the Individual]. In L. V. Kulikov Psikhologiya lichnosti v trudakh otechestvennykh psikhologov: khrestomatiya [Personality Psychology in the Writings of Domestic Psychologists: Anthology]. SPb.: Izd-vo “Piter”.
Kanishcheva, M. A., Karnaukhov, V. A. (2016). Osobennosti organizovannosti obraza budushchego studentov s raznym urovnem sub'yektivnogo kontrolya [Features of the Organization of the Image of Future Students with Different Levels of Subjective Control]. Nauchnyye vedomosti Belgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Belgorod State University Scientific Bulletin], 14(235),131–135.
Lennings, C. J. (1996). Self-Efficacy and Temporal Orientation as Predictors of Treatment Outcome in Severely Dependent Alcoholics. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterl, 14, 71–79.
Leont'yev, D. A., Shelobanova, Ye. V. (2001). Professional'noye samoopredeleniye kak postroyeniye obrazov vozmozhnogo budushchego [Vocational Choice as Anticipation of Images of Possible Future]. Voprosy psikhologii [Voprosy Psychologii], 1, 57–65.
Levin, K. (2010). Resolving Social Conflicts and Field Theory in Social Science. Washington: American Psychological Association.
McKenna, F. P. (1993). It Won’t Happen to Me: Unrealistic Optimism or Illusion of Control? Brit. J. Psychol., 84, 39–50.
Nestik, T. A., Shapovalova, O. S., Pluzhnik, S. A. (2019). Sotsial'naya identichnost' i vremennaya perspektiva lichnosti kak predposylki otnosheniya k kollektivnomu proshlomu, nastoyashchemu i budushchemu [Person's Social Identity and Time Perspective as Predictors of Attitudes Toward Common Past, Present, and Future]. Sotsial'naya i ekonomicheskaya psikhologiya [Social and Economic Psychology], 4(16), 102–126.
Nyutten, Zh. (2004). Motivatsiya, deystviye, perspektiva budushchego [Motivation, Action, Perspective]. Moscow: “Smysl”.
Prusova, E. V. (2006). Problema vzaimosvyazi obraza budushchego lichnosti s udovletvorennost'yu professional'nym vyborom v yunosheskom vozraste [The Problem of the Relationship between the Image of the Future and the Satisfaction of Professional Choices of Young People] (Candidate Dissertation). Krasnodar.
Sapogova, E. E. (2014). Zhiznennyy i ekzistentsial'nyy opyt v avtobiograficheskikh narrativakh lichnosti [Existential and Life Experience in Autobiographical Narratives]. Voprosy psikhologii [Voprosy Psychologii], 1, 68–79.
Slobodchikov, V. I. (2017). Problemy razvitiya i vospitaniya lichnosti v studencheskom vozraste [Problems of Personality Development and Upbringing at Student's Age]. Sotsial'noye vospitaniye [Social Education], 2, 4–10.
Tonna, B., Hemrick, A., Conrad, F. (2006). Cognitive Representations of the Future: Survey Results. Futures, 38, 810–829.
Tsaritsentseva, O. P. (2010). Kar'yernyye oriyentatsii sovremennoy molodezhi [Career Orientations of Modern Youth]. Mezhdunarodnyy zhurnal prikladnykh i fundamental'nykh issledovaniy [International Journal of Applied and Fundamental Research], 6, 73–74.
Vasilenko, T. D. (Ed.) (2011). Zhiznennyy put' lichnosti: vremya i smysl chelovecheskogo bytiya v norme i pri somaticheskoy patologii [Personal Life Path: Time and Meaning of Human Existence in Normal Health Conditions and under Conditions of Somatic Pathology]. Kursk: Izd-vo Kurskogo gos. med. un-ta.
Vorob'yeva, K. I. (2012). Vremennaya transpektiva kak modelirovaniye zhiznennogo puti [Time Transspective as Modeling of The Way of Life]. Sotsial'nyye i gumanitarnyye nauki na Dal'nem Vostoke [The Humanities and Social Studies in the Far East], 2(34), 23–25.
Wakslak, Ch. J., Nussbaum, Sh., Liberman, N., Trope, Y. (2008). Representations of the Self in the Near and Distant Future. J. Person. and Soc. Psychol., 95(4), 757–773.
You, X., Huang, J., Wang, Y., Bao, X. (2015). Relationships between Individual-Level Factors and Burnout: A Meta-Analysis of Chinese Participants. Personality and Individual Differences, 74, 139–145.
Yudkowsky, E. (2008). Cognitive Biases Potentially Affecting Judgment of Global Risks. In N. Bostrom, M. M. Ćirković (Eds). Global Catastrophic Risks (pp. 91–119). N.Y.: Oxford Univ. Press.
Zaleski, Z. (1994). Towards a Psychology of the Personal Future. In Psychology of Future Orientation (pp. 10–20). Lublin: Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL.
Zhang, J. W., Howell, R. T., Stolarski, M. (2013). Comparing Three Methods to Measure a Balanced Time Perspective: The Relationship between a Balanced Time Perspective and Subjective Well-Being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14(1), 169–184.
Zimbardo, Ph., Boyd, J. (2008). The Time Paradox: The New Psychology of Time That will Change Your Life. N.Y.: Free Press.
Znakov, V. V., Ryabikina, Z. I. (2017). Psikhologiya chelovecheskogo bytiya [The Psychology of Human Existence]. Moscow: “Smysl”.