Abstract
The article examines the practices of transmitting local historical heritage and socio-cultural experience through oral tradition, implemented in the public policy system, aimed at forming local identity and collective memory, based on the materials of the village of KatoÒhi (Municipality of Messalonghi) in western Greece. The research methodology included a qualitative sociological survey (in-depth interviews), as well as an analysis of media data, official websites, and statistics. It was determined that the subjects of public memory policy at the local level are municipal authorities and their institutions, civil society actors, representatives of the media, public organizations and movements, and independent activists. Oral tradition as a way of transmitting historical knowledge is spread both within the family, among relatives and acquaintances, and in educational institutions, through local media (mainly newspapers, television, or the Internet), during municipal events, church or official holidays. The objectives of the public memory policy are to attract the attention of local society to the local culture and traditions, strengthen the historical and cultural memory of local residents, protect local interests, increase political loyalty, social solidarity and cohesion of the population, develop civic activity in the field of preserving the historical and cultural heritage. It was revealed that the events of ancient mythology, the period of struggle against Turkish rule, and the acquisition of national independence play a major role in the local historical memory. The study determined that the local oral tradition corresponds to the values and symbols of national Greek identity such as ancient heritage, the struggle for independence from Turkish rule, and Orthodoxy. Oral tradition contributes to the development of public practices of preserving historical memory. The main practice of neotradition in the Messalonghi area is symbolically associated with the tragic event of the “exodus from Messalonghi” during the struggle against Turkish rule.
Keywords
References
Беляева, Н.Ю. (2007). Публичная политика в России: сопротивление среды. Полис. Политические исследования, 1, 22–31. DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2007.01.03
Малинова, О.Ю., Миллер, А.И. (2021). Символические аспекты политики памяти в современной России и Восточной Европе. В В.В. Лапин, А.И. Миллер (ред.) Введение. Символическая политика и политика памяти (с. 7–37). СПб.: Изд-во Европ. ун-та в СПб.
Мирошниченко, И.В. (2015). Публичная политика как сложносоставной концепт политической науки. В Л.В. Сморгунов, Е.В. Морозова, А.И. Кольба (ред.) Современная политическая реальность и государство: сложные методы исследования (с. 31–49) Краснодар: Кубанский госуниверситет.
Мирошниченко, И.В., Морозова Е.В. (2022). Публичная политика как пространство конвертации нематериальных ресурсов в факторы развития территорий. Политическая наука, 3, 144–163. DOI: 10.31249/poln/2022.03.07
Никовская, Л.И., Якимец, В.Н. (2007). Публичная политика в современной России: между корпоративно-бюрократическим и гражданско-модернизаторским выбором. Полития, 1, 30–51.
Хальбвакс, М. (2005). Коллективная и историческая память. Неприкосновенный запас, 2, 40–41.
Хобсбаум, Э. (2000). Изобретение традиций. Вестник Евразии, 1, 47–62.
Comstock, J.L. (1829). History of the Greek Revolution. New York: W.W. Reed & co. Retrieved from https://archive.org/details/historyofgreekre00coms/page/n9/mode/2up
Hobsbawm, E.J., Ranger, Т. (Eds.), (1983). The Invention of Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kokosalakis, N., Psimmenos, I. (1996). Modern Greece: A Profile of Identity and Nationalism. In B. Strath and A. Triandafyllidou (Eds) Representations of Europe and the Nation in Current and Prospective Member-States: Media, Elites and Civil Society (pp.127–165). Brussels: European Commission. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/3010427/Representations_of_Europe_and_the_Nation_in_Current_and_Prospective_Member_States_Media_Elites_and_Civil_Society
Koumandaraki, A. (2002). The Evolution of Greek National Identity. Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism, 2(2), 39–53. DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9469.2002.tb00026.x
Koutras, N. (2015). The Affiliation between State and Churches: The Case Study of Greece. Annales UMCS, Politologia, 21, 85–95. DOI: 10.2478/curie‑2013-0006
Legg, K., Roberts, J. (1997). Modern Greece: A Civilization on the Periphery. New York. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780429034787
Nora, P. (1989). Between Memory and History: Les Lieux de Mémoire. Representations, 26, 7–24.
Papanikos, G.T. (2024). The national identity of Ancient and Modern Greeks. Athens Journal of Mediterranean Studies, 10, 63–80. DOI: 10.30958/ajms.10-1-4
Tsoukalas, C. (1999). European modernity and Greek national identity. Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans, 1(1), 7–14. DOI: 10.1080/14613199908413983
Vansina, J. (1990). Oral Tradition and Its Methodology. In J. Ki-Zerbo (Еd.). General History of Africa: Methodology and African Prehistory (pp. 142–165). California: Heinemann Publishers, UNESCO. Retrieved from https://repository.out.ac.tz/403/1/Vol_1._Methodology_%26_African_Prehistory_editor_J.KI-ZERBO%28FILEminimizer%29.pdf

