Section
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31429/26190567-23-1-114-132How to Cite
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2022 Виктория Владимировна Шиповская, Александр Шамильевич Гусейнов
Abstract
One of the pivotal issues of modern psychology is why a person’s level of existence decreases or increases over the course of their life, and in what way these fluctuations affect the personality. Traditionally, this topic is addressed through the theme of the heterogeneity of the life course, related to different tendencies of individual behavior and different modes of its functioning. S. L. Rubinstein enunciated it as the problem of the formation and change of the subject in the system of their interactions with the world. Awareness of a person’s being as a creative product of a concrete person and the embodiment of their mental projects leads to the concept of subjectivity fluctuations. This topic manifests itself in a new and deeper quality within the framework of the subject-being approach, which identifies the sources of personal change and highlights a number of criteria differences between true and conditional existence, and true and false subjectivity. Despite the closeness of researchers’ positions with regard to descriptive characteristics of forms of subjectivity, the underlying mechanisms of subjectivity “fluctuations” and the ontological content of inter-transitions from one modus of beingness to another have not yet been studied. The paper examines different ways of organizing subjective activity as a valuable contribution to the phenomenon of fluctuations. The questions addressed in this paper are related to the problem of constructing a particular form of subjectivity and to the possibility of changing the mode of existence under conditions of contradictory daily life, as well as to the consequences that create qualitative shifts of subjectivity. The paper analyzes a number of empirical studies where the causes and psychological mechanisms that cause such fluctuations (namely, the types of reflection and the specificity of the time continuum) are identified. It is demonstrated that fluctuations of subjectivity, causing mutual transitions of modes of being, are not always positive; they are associated with the subject positioning and the resolution of value and meaning contradictions. A change in the level of existence may be brought about by subjective activity through the mechanism of “false”/”true” subjectivity. It is significant to study the fluctuations of the subjectivity of the individual under the conditions of everyday life in terms of the pole of subjective activity.
Keywords
References
Abakumova, I. V., Ryadinskaya, E. N., Golubova, V. M. (2017). Sistemno-strukturnyy analiz teoriy psikhologicheskikh transformatsiy lichnosti [Systemic and Structural Analysis of Theories of Psychological Transformations of Personality]. Rossiyskiy psikhologicheskiy zhurnal [Russian Psychological Journal], 14(1), 10–24.
Bodalev, A. A. (1988). Psikhologiya o lichnosti [Psychology about Personality] M.: Izd-vo Mosk. un-ta.
Brushlinskiy A. V. (2003). Psihologiya sub’’ekta. [Psychology of the Subject]. SPb.: Aleteiya.
Chang, E. C., Sanna, L. J. (2007). Affectivity and Psychological Adjustment across Two Adult Generations: Does Pessimistic Explanatory Style Still Matter? Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 1149–1159.
Fomenko, G. Yu., Ryabikina, Z. I. (2018). Psihologiya bezopasnosti lichnosti: sub''ektno-bytijnyj podhod [Psychology of Safety of a Person: The Subjective Approach: Monograph]. Krasnodar: KubGU.
Fomenko, G. Yu. (2006). Lichnost’ v ekstremal’nyh usloviyakh: Dva modusa bytiya [Personality in Extreme Conditions: Two Modes of Being]. Krasnodar: KubGU.
Fomenko, G. Yu. (2008). Paradoksy lichnostnoy organizatsii vremeni pri ekstremal’nom moduse bytiya [Paradoxes of the Personal Organization of Time in the Extreme Modus Vivendi]. In Lichnost’ i bytie: sub’’ektnyy podhod. Materialy nauchnoy konferentsii, posvyashchyonnoy 75-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya chlena-korrespondenta RAN A. V. Brushlinskogo [Personality and Being: A Subjective Approach. Materials of the Scientific Conference Dedicated to the 75th Anniversary of the Corresponding Member of RAS A. V. Brushlinsky] (pp. 216–220). M.: Izd-vo “Institut psihologii RAN”.
Fomenko, G. Yu. (2010). Modusy bytiya lichnosti v kontekste sub’’ektno-bytijnogo podhoda [The Modes of Being of a Person in the Context of the Subject-being Approach]. In Psihologiya sub»ekta i psihologiya chelovecheskogo bytiya [Psychology of the Subject and Psychology of Human Being] (pp. 158–174). Krasnodar: KubGU.
Frankl, V. (1990). Chelovek v poiskah smysla [Man’s Search for Meaning]. M.: Progress.
Grishina, N. V. (2011). Zhiznennye scenarii: normativnost’ i individualizaciya. [Life Scripts: Normativity and Individualization]. Psihologicheskie issledovaniya [Psychological Research], 3(17), 6.
Grishina, N. V. (2018). “Samoizmeneniya” lichnosti: vozmozhnoe i neobhodimoe [«Self-changes» of personality: possible and necessary]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Psikhologiya i pedagogika [Bulletin of St. Petersburg University, Psychology and Pedagogy], 8(2), 126–138.
Grishina, N. V. (2019). Izmenyaetsya li chelovek v izmenyayushchemsya mire? [Does a Person Change in a Changing World?]. In Sed’maya Vserossiyskaya nauchno-prakticheskaya konferenciya po ekzistencial’noy psikhologii: materialy soobshcheniy. [The Seventh All-Russian Scientific-Practical Conference on Existential Psychology: Materials of Messages] (pp. 10–16). M.: Smysl.
Gusel’ceva, M. S. (2018). Metamodernizm v psikhologii: novyye metodologicheskiye strategii i izmeneniya sub’’yektivnosti [Metamodernism in Psychology: New Methodological Strategies and Changes in Subjectivity]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Psikhologiya [Bulletin of St. Petersburg University. Psychology], 8(4), 327–340.
Guseynov, A. Sh. (2013). Iskazheniye sub’’yektnosti v nekotorykh vidakh protestnoy aktivnosti [Distortion of Subjectivity in Some Types of Protest Activity]. In Lichnost’ i bytiye: sub’’yektnyy podkhod (k 80-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya A. V. Brushlinskogo). Materialy VI Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii (s inostrannym uchastiyem) (273–275) [Personality and Being: A Subjective Approach (to the 80th Anniversary of the Birth of A. V. Brushlinsky). Materials of the VI All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference (with Foreign Participation)]. Krasnodar: KubGU.
Guseynov, A. Sh., Shipovskaya, V. V. (2019). Refleksivnost’ kak sub’’yektnyy resurs preodoleniya slozhnykh situatsiy v sportivnoy deyatel’nosti [Reflexivity as a Subject Resource of Overcoming Complex Situations in Sports Activity]. Fizicheskaya kul’tura, sport—nauka i praktika [Physical Culture, Sports—Science and Practice], 2, 85–90.
Heatherton, T. F., Weinberger, J. L. (eds) (1994). Can Personality Change? Washington: American Psychological Association.
Henry, P. S. (2005). Life Stress, Explanatory Style, Hopelessness, and Occupation Stress. International journal of Stress Management, 12, 241–256.
Leont’ev, D. A. (2010). Chto daet psikhologii ponyatie sub’’ekta: sub’’ektnost’ kak izmerenie lichnosti [What Gives Psychology the Concept of the Subject: Subjectivity as a Dimension of Personality]. Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki [Epistemology and Philosophy of Science], 25(3), 136–153.
Leont’ev, D. A. (2010). Lichnost’ v nepredskazuemom mire [Personality in an Unpredictable world]. Metodologiya i istoriya psihologii [Methodology and History of Psychology], 5(3), 120–140.
Leont’ev, D. A. (2011). Novye orientiry v psihologii: ot neobhodimogo k vozmozhnomu [New Guidelines in Psychology: From Necessary to Possible]. Voprosy psihologii [Voprosy Psihologii], 1, 3–43.
Leont’ev, D. A. (2019). Chelovek i zhiznennyy mir: ot ontologii k fenomenologii [Human Being and Lifeworld: From Ontology to Phenomenology]. Kul’turno-istoricheskaya psihologiya [Cultural and Historical Psychology], 15(1), 25–34.
Leont’ev, D. A., Shil’manskaya, A. E. (2019). Chelovek i zhiznennyy mir: ot ontologii k fenomenologii [The Life Position of the Individual: From Theory to Operationalization]. Voprosy psihologii [Questions of Psychology], 1, 90–100.
Mamardashvili, M. (1996). Neobhodimost’ sebya. Vvedenie v filosofiyu [The Necessity of Self. Introduction to Philosophy]. In Doklady, stat’i, filosofskie zametki [Reports, Articles, Philosophical Notes]. M.: Labirint.
Olport, G. (2002). Stanovlenie lichnosti: izbrannye trudy. [Personality Formation: Selected Works]. Moskva.: Smysl.
Podd’yakov, A. N. (2009). Tipy sootnosheniy integratsii i differentsiatsii v razvivayushchikhsya sistemakh [Types of Relations of Integration and Differentiation in Developing Systems]. In Teoriya razvitiya: differentsionno-integratsionnaya paradigma [Development Theory: Differential-integration Paradigm] (pp. 91–102). M.: Yazyki slavyanskih kul’tur.
Rubinshteyn S. L. (1973). Problemy obshchey psikhologii [Problems of General Psychology]. M.: Pedagogika.
Rubinshteyn, S. L. (2000). Osnovy obshchey psikhologii [Fundamentals of General Psychology]. SPb: Piter.
Rubinshteyn, S. L. (2003). Bytie i soznanie. Chelovek i mir [Being and Consciousness. Man and the World]. M.: Piter.
Rueger, S. Y., George, R. (2016). Indirect Effects of Attributional Style for Positive Events on Depressive Symptoms through Self-Esteem in Early Adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence. DOI: 10.1007/s10964-016-0530-2
Rueger, S. Y., Malecki, C. K. (2011). Effects of Stress, Attributional Style and Perceived Parental Support on Depressive Symptoms in Early Adolescence: A Prospective Analysis. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 40, 347–359.
Ryabikina, Z. I., Fomenko, G. Yu. (2010). Lichnost’ v professii: teoretiko-empiricheskaya interpretatsiya v kontekste sub’’yektnogo i sobytiynogo podkhodov [Personality in Profession: Theoretical and Empirical Interpretation in the Context of Subjective and Event Approaches]. In Sotsial’naya psikhologiya truda teoriya i praktika (pp. 82–101) [Social Psychology of Labor Theory and Practice]. Moskva: IP RAN.
Ryabikina, Z. I., Znakov, V. V. (Eds) (2016). Lichnost’ i bytiye: chelovek kak sub’’yekt sotsiokul’turnoy real’nosti [Personality and Being: Man as a Subject of Socio-Cultural Reality]. Krasnodar: Kubanskiy gos. un-t.
Ryabikina, Z. I. (2005). Lichnost’ kak sub’’yekt formirovaniya bytiynykh prostranstv [Personality as a Subject of the Formation of Living Spaces]. In Sub’’ekt, lichnost’ i psihologiya chelovecheskogo bytiya [Subject, Personality and Psychology of Human Being] (pp. 45–57). Moskva: IPRAN.
Shipovskaya, V. V., Guseynov, A. Sh. (2018). Lichnostnaya bespomoshchnost’ kak faktor viktimizatsii sub’’yekta [Personal Helplessness as a Factor in Victimization of an Actor]. Obshchestvo: sotsiologiya, psikhologiya, pedagogika [Society: Sociology, Psychology, Pedagogy], 12, 137–140.
Shipovskaya, V. V., Guseynov, A. Sh. (2020). Predstavleniye o vremennoy perspektive kak ekzistentsial’nom resurse lichnosti pri preodolenii protivorechiy povsednevnosti [The Notion of Time Perspective as an Existential Resource for the Individual in Overcoming the Contradictions of Everyday Life]. In Sposobnosti i mental’nyye resursy cheloveka v mire global’nykh peremen [Human Abilities and Mental Resources in the World of Global Changes] (pp. 1000–1009). Moskva: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”.
Yaspers K. (1991). Smysl i naznachenie istorii [Meaning and Purpose of History]. M.: Politizdat.
Zhuravlev, A. L., Barabanshchikov, V. A., M. I. Volovikova, M. I. (Eds) (2009). Psikhologiya cheloveka v sovremennom mire. Tom 1. Kompleksnyy i sistemnyy podkhody v issledovaniyakh psikhologii cheloveka. Lichnost’ kak sub’’yekt zhiznennogo puti [Psychology of Man in the Modern World. Vol. 1. Complex and Systemic Approaches in the Study of Human Psychology. Personality as a Subject of Life Path]. In Materialy Vserossiyskoy yubileynoy nauchnoy konferentsii, posvyashchennoy 120-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya S. L. Rubinshteyna, 15–16 oktyabrya 2009 g. [Proceedings of the All-Russian Jubilee Scientific Conference Dedicated to the 120th Anniversary of S. L. Rubinstein] Moskva: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”.
Zhuravlev, A. L., Sergiyenko Ye. A. (2018). Razrabotka ponyatiy sovremennoy psikhologii [Development of Concepts of Modern Psychology]. Moskva: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”.
Zhuravlev, A. L., Yurevich, A. V. (Eds) (2018). Psikhologicheskoye znaniye: sovremennoye sostoyaniye i perspektivy razvitiya [Psychological Knowledge: Current State and Development Prospects]. Moskva: IPRAN.
Znakov, V. V. (1989). Ponimaniye voinami-internatsionalistami situatsiy nasiliya i unizheniya chelovecheskogo dostoinstva [Internationalist Soldiers’ Understanding of Situations of Violence and Humiliation of Human Dignity]. Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal [Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal], 10(4), 113–124.
Znakov, V. V. (2017). Novyy etap razvitiya psikhologicheskikh issledovaniy sub’’yekta [A New Stage in Psychological Research Of The Subject]. Voprosy psihologii [Questions of Psychology], 2, 3–16.
Znakov, V. V. (2020). Psihologiya vozmozhnogo [Psychology of the possible]. M.: Kogito-Centr.
Znakov, V. V., Ryabikina, Z. I. (2017). Psihologiya chelovecheskogo bytiya [Psychology of Human Existence]. Moskva: Smysl.