Abstract
We consider psychological predictors of activation of regulatory and emotional-value spheres of personality in difficult conditions of life activity, determined by the challenges of the global system crisis, which limits the possibility of self-realization of personality in the main aspects of being for an unpredictably long period of time. Diagnostics of mental states, coping behavior, value sphere, resilience, and processes of voluntary self-regulation were carried out. The total sample (112 respondents) consisted of subjects of two types of activity: civil aviation pilots senior students, and undergraduates. The detailed professional and demographic composition of the first group showed that it is dominated by males (66.2%), and by the leading activity – the subjects of technonomic professions (62.4%). According to the diagnostics of anxiety and depression, the sample was divided into two groups: “stable” (85 people; 75.9%) and “unbalanced” (27 people; 24.1%). Preservation of mental stability in difficult conditions of life activity is provided by an active role of the developed resources of existential-value sphere and self-regulation that is confirmed by the allocated loadings in five factors: activation of regulatory, existential-resource spheres (1); activation of value, existential-resource spheres (2); existential-cognitive coping (3); mutual influence of value sphere and equilibrium mental states (4); positive revaluation (5). The emotional-value and regulatory spheres of a personality subjected to non-equilibrium mental states are represented in equal proportions by males and females. The subjects of educational and professional activity – students and undergraduates — are more susceptible to these conditions. In the data of factor analysis, the most pronounced load was detected in three factors. The first one indicates the predictive role of reduced resilience resources (“Emotionally Activated Reduced Resilience Factor”). The second factor reflects the deficit of constructive coping strategies of taking responsibility, planning problem solving and reduced self-regulation resources (“Factor of deficit of constructive coping strategies and regulatory processes”). The low level of formation of the programming mechanism and regulatory flexibility connected with the egocentric values of the personality (“stimulation”, “hedonism”) form the basis of factor‑3 – “The factor of insufficient skills of programming of actions, regulatory flexibility”. Thus, at unstable mental “answer” of a person experiencing crisis phenomena, the role of a trigger in counteracting difficulties is played mainly by resources of the emotional sphere. It is inferred that it is possible to consider the results of the analysis to determine the routes of psychological counseling support of the person in conditions of life activity hampered by a systemic crisis.
Keywords
References
Битюцкая, Е.В. (2020). Структура и динамика образа трудной жизненной ситуации. Вопросы психологии, 66(3), 116–131.
Водопьянова, Н.Е. (2009). Психодиагностика стресса. СПб: Питер.
Карандашев, В.Н. (2004). Методика Шварца для изучения ценностей личности: концепция и методическое руководство. СПб.: Речь.
Карпинский, К.В. (2008). Опросник смысложизненного кризиса: монография<. Гродно: ГрГУ.
Леонтьев, Д.А. (2020). Виражи и миражи пандемического сознания: доклад. Психологическая газета. Режим доступа https://psy.su/feed/8337/
Леонтьев, Д.А., Рассказова, Е.И. (2006). Тест жизнестойкости. Москва: Смысл.
Моросанова, В.И. (2004). Опросник «Стиль саморегуляции поведения» (ССПМ): Руководство. Москва: Когито-Центр.
Моросанова, В.И., Аронова, К.А. (2007). Самосознание и саморегуляция поведения. Москва: Изд-во «Институт психологии РАН».
Осухова, Н.Г. (2012). Психологическая помощь в трудных и экстремальных ситуациях. Москва: Издательский центр «Академия».
Прохоров, А.О. (2004). Практикум по психологии состояний. СПб: Речь.
Прохоров, А.О. (2009). Смысловая регуляция психических состояний. Москва: Изд-во «Институт психологии РАН».
Франкл, В. (1990). Человек в поисках смысла. Москва: Прогресс.
Ярощук, И.В. (2020). Психология жизнестойкости: обзор теоретических концепций, эмпирических исследований и методик диагностики. Ученые записки СПбГИПСР, 1(33), 50–60.
Ясько, Б.А., Покуль, В.О., Бабичкова, Е.С. (2021). Личность в глобальном VUCA-вызове периода пандемии. Южно-российский журнал социальных наук, 22(3), 85–98.
Edwards, J.R. (1988). The Determinants and Consequences of Coping with Stress. In C.L. Cooper, R. Payne (Eds) Causes, Coping and Consequences of Stress at Work (p. 233–263). Chichester: Wiley.
Kobasa, S.C. (2011). Stressful Life Events, Personality, and Health — Inquiry into Hardiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(1), 1–11.
Lazarus, R.S. Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, Appraisal and Coping. New York: Springer Publishing Cоmpany.
Maddi, S.R. (2006). Hardiness: The Courage to Grow from Stresses. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 1(3), 160–168
Maddi, S.R. (2004). The Role of Hardiness and Religiosity in Depress and Anger. International Journal of Existential Psychology & Psychotherapy, 1(1), 38–49

