The Role of Information and Communication Technologies in the Development of Civic Activism | South-Russian Journal of Social Sciences
The Role of Information and Communication Technologies in the Development of Civic Activism
Vol. 22 (2021) No. 1, Political Institutions and Processes
Vol. 22 (2021) No. 1
Political Institutions and Processes

The Role of Information and Communication Technologies in the Development of Civic Activism

Sokolov A.V.
P. G. Demidov Yaroslavl State University
ORCID ID 0000-0002-7325-8374
Belyakov A.A.
P. G. Demidov Yaroslavl State University
ORCID ID 0000-0002-2586-3975
Mironova S.V.
P. G. Demidov Yaroslavl State University
ORCID ID 0000-0002-6817-6294
PDF (Russian)
https://doi.org/10.31429/26190567-22-1-47-69
https://doi.org/10.31429/26190567-22-1-47-69

How to Cite Array

Sokolov A.V., Belyakov A.A., Mironova S.V. (2021) The Role of Information and Communication Technologies in the Development of Civic Activism. South-Russian Journal of Social Sciences, 22 (1), pp. 47-69. DOI: 10.31429/26190567-22-1-47-69 (In Russian)
Submission Date 2020-12-14
Accepted Date 2021-01-21
Published Date 2021-08-09

Copyright (c) 2021 Александр Владимирович Соколов, Алексей Александрович Беляков, Светлана Владимировна Миронова

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

The article is devoted to the study of features of civil activity in Yaroslavl region. The study focuses on the transformation of civic activity under the influence of information and communications technologies. The current state of civil activism is described. The role of information and communications technologies in public and political communication is being considered. Examples are given of the impact of information technology on the formation, recruitment and mobilization of civic activists. In order to determine the characteristics of the development of civic activity in Yaroslavl oblast, a study was carried out which included in-depth interviews with experts representing the academic community, State and municipal authorities, Media, civic activists and non-profit activists. Twenty-one experts participated in the interview. In order to review civic activitsm in Yaroslavl region in the most detailed and in-depth manner, the expert survey was divided into a number of thematic clusters. One focused on the transformation of civic engagement in the context of ICT development. Under this cluster, experts were asked to assess the current level of civic activity in the region, as well as to determine the role of ICT in the development of civic activism to current levels. Further interest in the survey focused on the development of civic activism as well as the threats that it may face as a result of the massive introduction of ICT products into social and political relations. The experts were asked to give a forecast for the near future concerning the forthcoming transformation of civic activity as well as the role of the State in the process. On the basis of the results of the interview the main theses were formulated and a picture of the state of civic activity in Yaroslavl region to date was presented, as well as the image of forthcoming changes in this sphere.

Keywords

civic activism, ICT, protest, social and political relations, online activism/activity, transformation

Acknowledgements

The study was carried out with the financial support of RFBR within the framework of the research project № 19–011–00268 “Transformation of civil activity in conditions of the development of information and communications technologies (using Yaroslavl oblast as an example).”

References

  1. Balchugov, A. V., Fomenkov, A. A. (2019). Politizirovannyy provlastnyy bloging v Rossii: razvitiye politicheskikh idey i minimum bezogovorochnoy podderzhki [Politicized Pro-Government Blogging in Russia: More Criticism Than Servility]. Ogarev-onlain [Ogarev-online]. 4, 1–7.
  2. Brodovskaya, Ye. V., Dombrovskaya, A. Yu., Karzubov, D. N. (2017). Bazovyye onlaynovyye strategii politicheskogo i grazhdanskogo uchastiya rossiyskikh pol’zovateley [Key Online Profiles of Political and Civic Participation of Russian Users]. Sotsial’no-gumanitarnyye znaniya [Social and Humanitarian Knowledge], 8, 28–41.
  3. Bronnikov, I. A. (2019). Grazhdanskiy aktivizm kak resurs “myagkoy sily” Rossii [Civil Activism as a Resource of “Soft Power” in Russia]. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta (elektronnyy zhurnal) [Bulletin of the Moscow State Regional University (Electronic Journal)], 1, 3–15.
  4. Frolov, A. A., Agurova, A. A. (2019). Indeksnyy analiz grazhdanskoy aktivnosti v sotsial’nykh setyakh [Index Analysis of Active Citizenship in Social Networks]. Izvestiya Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya Politologiya. Religiovedeniye [The Bulletin of Irkutsk State University. Series Political Science. Religious Studies], 29, 28–43.
  5. Ivanova, L. V. (2020). K voprosu o krizise kriticheskogo myshleniya v diskurse politicheskoy blogosfery [To the Question of the Crisis of Critical Thinking in the Discourse of the Political Blogosphere]. Znak: problemnoye pole mediaobrazovaniya [Sign: The Problem Field of Mediaeducation], 1(35), 102–111.
  6. Khimichuk, Ye. V. (2018). Blog: predposylki i perspektivy razvitiya novogo instrumenta virtual’noy demokratii [Blog: Prerequisites and Prospect of Development of the new Instrument of Virtual Democracy]. Politika i obshchestvo [Politics and Society], 2, 32–38.
  7. McAdam, D., McCarthy, J. D., Zald, M. N. (1988), Social Movements. In N. J. Smelser (Ed.) Handbook of Sociology. Beverely Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
  8. Miroshnichenko, I. V. (2013). Setevoy podkhod v politicheskikh issledovaniyakh: soderzhaniye i napravleniya razvitiya [Network Approach in Political Studies: Content and Trends]. Chelovek. Soobshchestvo. Upravlenie [Human. Community. Management], 3, 68–86.
  9. Miroshnichenko, I. V., Ryabchenko, N. A., Yachmennik, K. V. (2017). “Novyye” setevyye aktory razvitiya lokal’noy politiki v usloviyakh sovremennoy Rossii [“New” Network Actors of Local Policy in Contemporary Russia]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Seriya: Politologiya [Bulletin of Perm University. Series: Political Science], 1, 150–163.
  10. Nabatchi, T., Sancino, A., Sicilia, M. (2017). Varieties of Participation in Public Services: The Who, When, and What of Coproduction. Public Administration Review, 77(5), 766–776.
  11. Nesterenok, Yu. I. (2013). Vlast’ i politicheskiye blogi: problemy vzaimodeystviya [State Power and Political Blogs. The Problem of Cooperation]. Gosudarstvennoye i munitsipal’noye upravleniye. Uchenyye zapiski [State and Municipal Administration. Scholarly Notes], 3, 200–206.
  12. Popov, K. N. (2017). Internet i formirovaniye mestnykh soobshchestv [The Internet and the Creation of local communities]. Trudy instituta sistemnogo analiza Rossiyskoy akademii nauk [Proceedings of the Institute for System Analysis of the Russian Academy of Sciences], 2, 79–90.
  13. Popova, O. V., Suslov, S. I. (2021). Setevoy analiz politicheskikh internet-soobshchestv: ot formalizovannykh k “nenablyudayemym” gruppam [Network Analysis of Political Internet Communities: From Formalized to “Unobserved” Groups]. Politicheskaya nauka [Political Science], 1, 160–182. DOI: http://www.doi.org/10.31249/poln/2021.01.07.
  14. Rheingold, H. (2003). Smart Mobs. Cambridge: Perseus Publishing.
  15. Rodionov, M. A., Volkova, T. A. (2019). Dinamika kommunikatsionnykh protsessov politicheskikh elit v usloviyakh krizisa, svyazannogo s pandemiyey COVID-19 [Dynamics of Communication Processes of Political Elites in the Context of the Crisis Associated with the COVID-19 Pandemic]. Kommunikologiya: elektronnyy nauchnyy zhurnal [Communicology: Online Scientific Journal], 4, 8–20.
  16. Semilet, T. A., Vitvinchuk, V. V., Fotiyeva, I. V. Lukashevich, Ye. V. (2019) Sotsial’nyye seti kak kul’turnyye matritsy internetkommunikatsii [Social Media as Cultural Matrices of Internet Communication]. Kul’tura i tekst [Culture and Text], 3(38), 226–242.
  17. Shcherbakova, V. A. (2018). Institutsializatsiya sotsial’nykh setey [Institutionalization of Social Networks]. Kommunikologiya: elektronnyy nauchnyy zhurnal [Communicology: Electronic Scientific Journal], 3, 93–99.
  18. Smorgunov, L. V. (2019). Institutsionalizatsiya upravlyayemosti i problema kontrolya v prostranstve tsifrovykh kommunikatsiy [Institutionalization of Governability and The Problem of Veillance in The Space of Digital Communications]. Yuzhno-rossiyskiy zhurnal sotsial’nykh nauk [South Russian Journal of Social Sciences], 3, 62–75.
  19. Sokolov, A. V. Maklashin, I. S. (2013). Setevaya grazhdanskaya aktivnost’ v sovremennoy Rossii [Civic Engagement Network in Modern Russia]. Vestnik KGU [Bulletin of KSU], 6, 159–161.
  20. Tilly, C. (1978). From Mobilization to Revolution. Reading MA: Addison-Wesley.
  21. Ushkin, S. G. (2015). Teoretiko-metodologicheskiye podkhody k izucheniyu setevoy protestnoy aktivnosti: ot “Umnoy tolpy” k slaktivizmu [Methodological Approaches Towards Studying Network Protest Activity: From Smart Mobs Towards Slacktivism]. Monitoring [Monitoring], 3, 3–12.
  22. Volodenkov, S. V. (2019). Vliyaniye tekhnologiy internet-kommunikatsiy na sovremennyye obshchestvenno-politicheskiye protsessy: stsenarii, vyzovy i aktory [Influence of Internet Communication Technologies on Contemporary Social and Political Processes: Scenarios, Challenges, And Actors]. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: Ekonomicheskiye i sotsial’nyye peremeny [Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes], 5, 341–364.
  23. Volodenkov, S. V. (2018) Digital-tekhnologii v sisteme traditsionnykh institutov vlasti: politicheskiy potentsial i sovremennyye vyzovy [Digital-Technologies in The System of Traditional Institutions of Power: Political Potential and Contemporary Challenges]. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta (elektronnyy zhurnal) [Bulletin of the Moscow State Regional University], 2, 39–48.
  24. Volpi, F., Clark, J. A. (2019). Activism in the Middle East and North Africa in times of upheaval: social networks’ actions and interactions, Social Movement Studies, 18, 1–16, DOI: 10.1080/14742837.2018.1538876.
  25. Zelenko, B. I., Shimanskaya, E.S. (2020) O spetsifike politicheskogo v rossiyskom tsifrosetevom prostranstve [On the specifics of the Political in the Russian Digital Network Space]. Vlast’ [Power], 3, 24–30.