Characteristic Features of Collective Actions Movement in Modern Russia and the Authorities’ Reaction to Their Activity | South-Russian Journal of Social Sciences
Characteristic Features of Collective Actions Movement in Modern Russia and the Authorities’ Reaction to Their Activity
Vol. 20 (2019) No. 2, Public Politics
Vol. 20 (2019) No. 2
Public Politics

Characteristic Features of Collective Actions Movement in Modern Russia and the Authorities’ Reaction to Their Activity

Sokolov A.V.
Demidov Yaroslavl’ State University
ORCID ID 0000-0002-7325-8374
PDF (Russian)
https://doi.org/10.31429/26190567-20-2-45-59
https://doi.org/10.31429/26190567-20-2-45-59

How to Cite Array

Sokolov A.V. (2019) Characteristic Features of Collective Actions Movement in Modern Russia and the Authorities’ Reaction to Their Activity. South-Russian Journal of Social Sciences, 20 (2), pp. 45-59. DOI: 10.31429/26190567-20-2-45-59 (In Russian)
Submission Date 2018-10-06
Accepted Date 2018-11-11
Published Date 2019-06-24

Copyright (c) 2019 Александр Владимирович Соколов

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

The activization of the citizen’s collective actions has become a trend spanning various parts of the world. Russia is no exception. The Internet contributes to the growth of collective actions, in that it facilitates intercommunication and coordination of joint actions. To analyze how collective actions are organized in modern Russia and to emphasize their specifics, the article presents the results of the original research based on a series of polls held in different regions of the Russian federation. The 2014 research covered 21 regions, in 2015, 14 regions were covered, and the 2017 research included data from 16 regions. The results of the research have revealed that the most active part in the social and political life of the regions belongs to coalitions of public associations and civic activists. However, they unite no more than two to three partners. At the same time, the most important principle that lies at the basis of their functioning is “common interest in civic activity”, “voluntary participation”, and “openness, and the development of external relations.” The research has enabled the author to detect the increase of collective actions in the Internet, as well as the decline of their effectiveness. At the same time, it has been revealed that the growth of protest activity in the regions is destabilizing their social and political life mare and more. Special attention has been paid to the authorities’ reaction to collective actions. It has been observed that the role of the state in regulating the Internet environment in Russia is increasing. Yet it is emphasized that the state did not essentially influence the content of the citizens’ collective actions. State authorities in the regions and on the federal level are monitoring events and actions of civic activists and initiative groups. At the same time, the state is more lenient towards the citizens’ activity in the Internet than towards their off-­line civic activity. The authorities in different subjects of the Russian federation react to their citizens’ off-­line non-­protest collective actions differently. But most often they either “support them to a very little degree” or “support them with a lot of enthusiasm proceeding from the positive results of their activity”; either “feel apprehensive and render the minimum of assistance to them” or “counteract them”.

Keywords

collective actions, Internet, social networks, authorities, communication

Acknowledgements

This article is a result of the study supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, research project No. 17-03-00132-ОГН: “Citizens’ collective actions on the protection and implementation of legal rights and interests in modern Russia”.

References

  1. Boulianne, S. (2009). Does Internet Use Affect Engagement? A Meta-Analysis of Research. Political Communication, 26 (2), 193–211.
  2. Brady, H., Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L. (1995). Beyond Ses: A Resource Model of Political Participation. American Political Science Review, 89 (2), 271-294.
  3. Cho, J., Shah, D. V., McLeod, J. M., McLeod, D. M., Scholl, R. M., Gotlieb, M. R. (2009). Campaigns, Reflection, and Deliberation: Advancing an O-S-R-O-R Model of Communication Effects. Communication Theory, 19 (1), 66-88.
  4. Cohen, C., Kahne, J. (2012). Participatory Politics: New Media and Youth Political Action. Chicago: MacArthur Research Network on Youth and Participatory Politics.
  5. Curran, J. (2005) Mediations of Democracy. In Curran, J., Gurevitch, M. (eds.) Mass Media and Society (pp. 122–149). New York: Oxford University Press.
  6. Della Porta, D. (2014). Comment on Organizing in the Crowd. Information, Communication & Society, 17 (2). 269–271.
  7. Diani, M. (2000). Social Movement Networks Virtual and Real. Information, Communication and Society, 3, 386–401.
  8. Earl, J., Kimport, К. (2011). Digitally Enabled Social Change. Cambridge and London: The MIT Press.
  9. Filatova, O. G. (2000). Metodika i tekhnika sotsiologicheskogo issledovaniya: Konspekt lektsiy [Methods and Techniques of Sociological Research: Summary of the Lectures]. SPb: Izdatel’stvo Mikhaylova V. A.
  10. Friedman, D., McAdam, D. (1992). Collective Identity and Activism. Networks, Choices and the Life of a Social Movement. In A. D. Morris, C. M. Mueller (eds.) Frontiers in Social Movement Theory (pp. 156–172). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  11. Horrigan, J., Garrett, K., Resnick, P. (2004). The Internet and Democratic Debate. Pew Internet and American Life Project.
  12. Kavada, A. (2009). Email Lists and the Construction of an Open and Multifaceted Identity. Information, Communication and Society, 12, 817–839.
  13. Kupryashin, G. L., et al. (1996). Vvedenie v politologiyu: slovar’-spravochnik [Introduction into Political Science: a Reference Book]. M.: Aspekt Press.
  14. Maksimova, Ye. N. (2013). Politicheskiy protest kak faktor nestabil’nosti politicheskoy sistemy [Political Protest as Political System Instability Factor]. Istoricheskiye, filosofskiye, politicheskiye i yuridicheskiye nauki, kul’turologiya i iskusstvovedeniye. Voprosy teorii i praktiki [Historical, Philosophical, Political and Legal Sciences, Cultural Studies and Art History. Questions of Theory and Practice], 3 (29), 105–108.
  15. McAdam, D., McCarthy J. D., Zald, M. N. (1996). Comparative Perspectives and Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framing. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  16. McCurdy, P. (2012). Social Movements, Protest and Mainstream Media. Sociology Compass Blackwell Publishing, 6 (3), 244–255.
  17. Medina, L. F. (2007). A Unified Theory of Collective Action and Social Change, Analytical Perspectives on Politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  18. Palfrey, J., Gasser, U. (2008). Born Digital: Understanding the First Generation of Digital Natives. New York: Basic Books.
  19. Pustoshinskaya, O. S. (2014). Kategoriya “politicheskiy protest”: osmysleniye s pozitsii dialektiki i skvoz’ prizmu kontseptualizatsii [“Political Protest” Category: Comprehension From Dialectics Position and in the Light of Conceptualization]. Istoricheskiye, filosofskiye, politicheskiye i yuridicheskiye nauki, kul’turologiya i iskusstvovedeniye. Voprosy teorii i praktiki [Historical, Philosophical, Political and Legal Sciences, Cultural Studies and Art History. Questions of Theory and Practice], 1 (39), 185–188.
  20. Shirky, C. (2008). Here Comes Everybody: The Power of Organizing Without Organizations. New York: Penguin Press.
  21. Stekelenburg van, J., Klandermans, B. (2010). Individuals in Movements: A Social Psychology of Contention. In B. Klandermans and C. Roggeband (eds.) Handbook of Social Movements Across Disciplines (pp. 157–205). New York: Springer.
  22. Tufekfi, Z. (2014). Capabilities of Movements and Affordances of Digital Media: Paradoxes of Empowerment. Retrieved from http://dmlcentral.net/blog/zeynep-tufekci/capabilities-movements-and-affordances-digital-media-paradoxes-empowerment.