Аннотация
В статье раскрывается проблема операционализации понятия «интероцептивное осознавание», рассматриваются отечественные и зарубежные подходы к психологической диагностике данного феномена. Интероцептивное осознавание представлено как процесс, имеющий сложную психобиологическую природу и выполняющий важную роль в целостной регуляции психической деятельности в условиях здорового и патологического функционирования. Подчеркивается необходимость субъектного подхода к анализу процесса интероцептивного осознавания с акцентом на его адаптивные и неадаптивные аспекты. Показано отличие подхода к телесному осознаванию, связанного с изучением интероцептивных процессов, от подходов, в основе которых лежит анализ ментальных образов телесности. Цель данной статьи — выявить потенциал психодиагностического инструментария, разработанного для исследований в данной области как в России, так и за рубежом. В статье проанализированы экспериментальные и психодиагностические методы, используемые в настоящее время для диагностики интероцептивного осознавания, среди них: метод биологической обратной связи (БОС), методика «Выбор дескрипторов интроцептивных ощущений», разработанная А.Ш.Тхостовым, а также ряд зарубежных опросников (BCQ, BIS, BAM, BAQ, MAIA). Анализу были подвергнуты также косвенные методы исследования интероцептивного осознавания, в том числе опросники для изучения переживания «образа тела», известные и авторские проективные и полупроективные методики. Было выявлено, что методики, применяемые в отечественных исследованиях, либо недостаточно нацелены на изучение процесса интероцептивного осознавания, либо неудобны для практического использования в силу громоздкости, либо излишне биологизируют изучаемый процесс. Показан диагностический потенциал опросника «Многомерная оценка интероцептивного осознавания» (MAIA). Сделан вывод о необходимости адаптации данной методики к русскоязычной среде.
Ключевые слова
Библиографические ссылки
Anderson, R. (2006). Body Intelligence Scale: Defining and Measuring the Intelligence of the Body. The Humanist Psychologist, 34, 357–367. DOI: 10.1207/s15473333thp3404_5
Belogay, K. N., Morozova, I. S. (2018). Psikhologiya telesnosti: problemy stanovleniya, napravleniya issledovaniy, tekhnologii psikhologicheskoy pomoshchi [Psychology of Corporeality: Problems of Formation, Directions of Research, Technology of Psychological Assistance]. Kemerovo: KemGU.
Belugina, E. V. (2003). Osobennosti otnosheniya k svoemu vneshnemu obliku v period serediny zhizni [Characteristics of the Treatment of One’s Appearance During the Midlife Period] (Cand. Dissertation), Rostov-on-Don.
Burenkova, Ye. V. (2008). Metaforicheskiy analiz telesnosti: statisticheskiy i dinamicheskiy aspekty [Metaphorical Analysis of Corporality: Statistical and Dynamic Aspects]. In L. I. Doroshina (Ed.) Psikhologiya telesnosti: teoreticheskiye i prakticheskiye issledovaniya. Materialy mezhdunarodnoy zaochnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. Penza, 25 marta 2008 g. [Psychology of the Body: Theoretical and Practical Studies.] Materials of the International Correspondence Scientific and Practical Conference] (pp. 28–33). Penza: Izd-vo PGPU im. V. G. Belinskogo.
Cameron, O. (2001). Interoception: The Inside Story — A Model for Psychosomatic Processes. Psychosomatic Medicine, 63, 697–710. DOI: 10.1097/00006842-200109000-00001
Cameron, O. (2002). Visceral Sensory Neuroscience. Interoception. New York (NY): Oxford University Press.
Cioffi, D. (1991). Beyond Attentional Strategies: Cognitive-Perceptual Model Ofsomatic Interpretation. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 25–41. DOI: 10.1037/0033–2909.109.1.25
Craig, A. D. (2002). How do you Feel? Interoception: The Sense of the Physiological Condition of the Body. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 655–666. DOI: 10.1038/nrn894
Damasio, A. (1999). The Feeling of What Happens. Body and Emotion in the Making of Consciousness. San Diego: Harcourt.
Dunn, B. D., Galton, H. C., Morgan, R., Evans, D., Oliver, C., Meyer M., Cusack Rh., Lawrence, A. D., Dalgleish T. (2011). Listening to your Heart. How Interoception Shapes Emotion Experience and Intuitive Decision Making. Psychological Science, 21, 1835–1844. DOI: 10.1177/0956797610389191
Flink, I. K., Nicholas, M. K., Boersma, K., Linton, S. J. (2009). Reducing the Threat Value of Chronic Pain: A Preliminary Replicated Single-Case Study of Interoceptive Exposure Versus Distraction in Six Individuals with Chronic Back Pain. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 47, 721–728. DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2009.05.003
Goryachev, V. V. (2008). O metodologicheskikh problemakh issledovaniya telesnogo soznaniya shkol'nikov [Methodological Problems of Studying the Body Consciousness of Schoolchildren]. Psikhologicheskaya diagnostika: Nauchno-metodicheskiy i prakticheskiy zhurnal [Psychological Diagnosis: Scientific, Methodological and Practical Journal], 3, 64–66.
Grönlund, E., Oganesyan, N. Yu. (2004). Tanceval’naya terapiya. Teoriya, metodika, practika [Dance Therapy. Theory, Methodology, Practice]. Saint- Petersburg: Rech.
Herbert, B. M., Pollatos, O. (2012). The Body in the Mind: On the Relationship Between Interoception and Embodiment. Topics in Cognitive Science, 4(4), 692–704. DOI: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2012.01189.x
James, W. (2000). Psikhologiya [Psychology]. In D. Ya. Raygorodskiy (Ed.) Psikhologiya samosoznaniya [Psychology of Self-Consciousness] (pp. 7–34). Samara: Bachrach-M.
Khalsa, S. S., Rudrauf, D., Damasio, A. R., Davidson, R.J., Lutz, A., Tranel, D. (2008). Interoceptive Awareness in Experienced Meditators. Psychophysiology, 45(4), 671–677. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2008.00666.x
Kirk, U., Downar, J., Montague, P. R. (2011). Interoception Drives Increased Rational Decision-Making in Meditators Playing the Ultimatum Game. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 5, 49. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2011.00049.
Lavrova, O. V. (2001). Glubinnaya topologicheskaya psikhoterapiya: idei o transformatsii. Vvedeniye v filosofskuyu psikhologiyu [Deep Topological Psychotherapy: Ideas about Transformation. Introduction to Philosophical Psychology]. SPb.: “Izdatel'stvo DNK”.
Leont'yev, A. N. (1975). Deyatel’nost’. Soznaniye. Lichnost’ [Activity. Consciousness. Personality]. M.: Politizdat.
Levi, T. S. (2004). Psikhologiya telesnosti v rakurse lichnostnogo razvitiya [The Psychology of the Body from the Perspective of Personal Development]. In V. P. Zinchenko, T. S. Levi (Eds.) Mezhdistsiplinarnyye problemy psikhologii telesnosti [Interdisciplinary Problems of Bodily Psychology] (pp. 288–309). M.: MTSI.
Lybko, I. V. (2008). Metodika “Diagnostika telesnogo YA”. [The Methodology of “Diagnosis of the Body Self”]. Psikhologicheskaya diagnostika: Nauchno-metodicheskiy i prakticheskiy zhurnal [Scientific, Methodological and Practical Journal], 3, 5–21.
Machover, K. (2019). Proyektivnyy risunok cheloveka [Human Projective Drawing]. M.: Smysl.
Mehling, W. E., Gopisetty, V., Daubenmier, J., Price, C. J., Hecht, F. M., Stewart, A. (2009). Body Awareness: Construct and Self-Report Measures. PLoS ONE, 4(5): e5614. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005614
Mehling, W. E., Price, C., Daubenmier, J. J., Acree, M., Bartmess, E., Stewart, A. (2012). The Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA). PLoS ONE, 7(11): e48230. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0048230
Milkovskaya, l. A. (2008). Test “avtoportret — telesnoye sostoyaniye”. rezul'taty psikhodiagnostiki v nevrologicheskom otdelenii detskoy bol'nitsy [Test “Self-Portrait — Body Condition”. Results of Psycho-Diagnostics in the Neurological Department of a Children’s Hospital]. In L. I. Doroshina (Ed.) Psikhologiya telesnosti: teoreticheskiye i prakticheskiye issledovaniya. Materialy mezhdunarodnoy zaochnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. Penza, 25 marta 2008 g. [Psychology of the Body: Theoretical and Practical Research. Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Correspondence Conference. 25 March 2008] (pp. 139–142). Penza: PGPU.
Miller, L. C., Murphy, R., Buss, A. H. (1981). Consciousness of Body: Private and Public. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 397–406. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.41.2.397.
Morozova, I. S., Belogay, K. N. (2017). Problematika obraza tela v kontekste psikhologii razvitiya [Problems of the Body Image in the Context of Developmental Psychology]. Obschestvo: sotsiologiya, psikhologiya, pedagogika [Society: Sociology, Psychology, Pedagogics], 8, 43–46.DOI: 10.24158/spp.2017.8.8.
Nikitin, V. N. (2007). Chelovecheskaya telesnost’: ontognoseologicheskiy analiz [Human Corporeality: an Ontognoseological analysis] (Doctoral Dissertation), Moscow.
Philippova, L. V., Nozdrachev, A. D. (2007). Interotseptsiya i neyroimunnye vzaimodeystviya [Interception and Neuroimmune Interactions]. Saint-Petersburg: Nauka.
Price, C. J., Thompson, E. A. (2007). Measuring Dimensions of Body Connection: Body Awareness and Bodily Dissociation. The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 13, 945–954. DOI: 10.1089/acm.2007.0537.
Price, C., Krycka, K., Breitenbucher, T., Brown, N. (2011). Perceived Helpfulness and Unfolding Processes in Body-Oriented Therapy Practice. Indo-Pacific Journal of Phenomenology, 11(2), 1–5. DOI: 10.2989/IPJP.2011.11.2.5.1164.
Pyatnitskaya, E. V. (2008). Osobennosti formirovaniya obraza tela podrostkov, imeyushchikh psikhotravmiruyushchiy opyt [Features of the Image of the Bodies of Adolescents with Traumatic Experiences]. In L. I. Doroshina (Ed.) Psikhologiya telesnosti: teoreticheskiye i prakticheskiye issledovaniya. Materialy mezhdunarodnoy zaochnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. Penza, 25 marta 2008 g. [Psychology of the Body: Theoretical and Practical Research. Materials of the International Correspondence Scientific and Practical Conference. March 28, 2008] (pp. 13–18). Penza: PGPU.
Rebeko, T. A. (2015). Telesnyy opyt v strukture individual'nogo znaniya [Body Experience in the Structure of Individual Knowledge]. M.: IP RAN.
Ryabus, M. V., Kolosova, O. A., Veyn, A. M. (1999). Lecheniye razlichnykh form golovnoy boli napryazheniya metodom biologicheskoy obratnoy svyazi [Biofeedback Treatment of Various Forms of Tension Headache]. Zhurnal nevropatologii i psikhiatrii im. S. S. Korsakovaa [S. S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry], 99(12), 35–38.
Shields, S. A., Mallory, M. A., Simon, A. (1989). The Body Awareness Questionnaire: Reliability and Validity. Journal of Personality Assessment, 53, 802–815. DOI: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5304_16.
Shishkovskaya, A. V. (2011). Definitsii “YA-telesnogo” v psikhologicheskikh issledovaniyakh [The Definitions of “Body Image” in a Psychological Studies]. Psikhologiya telesnosti: teoreticheskiye i prakticheskiye issledovaniya [The Psychology of Corporeality: Theoretical and Practical Research. Portal of Russian Psychological Publications PsyJournals.ru]. Retrieved from http://psyjournals.ru/psytel2009/issue/40806_full.shtml.
Skugarevskiy, O. A., Sivucha, S. V. (2006). Obraz sobstvennogo tela: razrabotka instrumenta dlya otsenki [Body Image: Developing an Assessment Tool]. Psikchologicheskiy Zhurnal [Psychological Journal], 2, 40–48.
Sokolova, E. T. (1989). Samosoznaniye i samootsenka pri anomaliyakh lichnosti [Self-Consciousness and Self-Esteem in The Case of Personality Anomalies]. M.: MGU.
Soroka, S. I., Trubachev, V. V. (2010). Neyrofiziologicheskiye i psikhofiziologicheskiye osnovy adaptivnogo bioupravleniya [Neurophysiological and Psychophysiological Foundations of Adaptive Biomanagement]. Saint- Petersburg: Politechnika-servis.
Stoletniy, A. S. (2015). Psikhologicheskiye prediktory proizvol'noy regulyatsii v usloviyakh EEG-BOS treninga [Psychological Predictors of Arbitrary Regulation in Neurofeedback Session]. Severo-Kavkazskiy psikhologicheskiy vestnik [North Caucasian Psychological Bulletin], 13(3), 27–33.
Stolin, V. V., Pantileev, S. R. (1988). Oprosnik samootnosheniya [Self-attitude Questionnaire]. In S. R. Pantileev (Ed.) Praktikum po psikhodiagnostike: Psikhodiagnosticheskiye materialy [Practicum on Psychodiagnostics: Psychodiagnostic Materials] (pp. 123–130). M.: MGU.
Tataurova, S. S. (2009). Aktual'nyye problemy issledovaniya obraza tela [Actual Problems of Body Image Research]. Psikhologicheskiy vestnik Ural'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Psychological Bulletin of the South Ural State Universitety], 8, 142–154.
Tataurova, S. S. (2012). Sravnitel'noye kross-kul'tural'noye issledovaniye obraza tela kak kognitivnoy struktury samosoznaniya [Comparative Cross-Cultural Study of the Body Imageas a Cognitive Structure of Self-Consciousness]. Vestnik YuUrGU, Seriya “Psikhologiya” [Bulletin of the South Ural State University, Series: Psychology], 31(290), 18–24.
Tkhostov, A. Sh. (2002). Psikhologiya telesnosti [Psychology of Corporeality]. M.: Smysl.
Zhuravl’ev, I. V. (2004). Telo drugogo: kommunikatsiya i nepreryvnoct' [The Body of The Other: Communication and Continuity]. Vestnik VGU, Seriya: Lingvistika i mezhkul’turnaya kommunikatsiya [Proceedings of VSU, Series: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication], 1, 17–23.