Abstract
The research analyzes the VUCA challenges that determine the critical state of the modern man’s world image. The stability of the world of yesterday is confronted by the uncertainty, complexity and ambiguity of the world of today and the world of tomorrow — the world of the future in the continuing Covid‑19 pandemic. The existential question about accepting the new reality comes to the fore for many people. The research is aimed at seeking psychological indicators that define vital activity under the global VUCA challenge. The questionnaire “Pandemic in my life” developed by the authors has been used as the basic tool of analysis. The procedure is described in the research. At the first stage, a selected group of respondents who thought the period of life in a pandemic was difficult were asked to specify the difficulties in writing, and their essays were analyzed. At the second stage, the same essays were subjected to content-analysis to identify similar difficulties that the respondents pointed out with reference to life in a pandemic. Three blocks of predictors that describe difficult life situations (DLS) in a pandemic have been identified: personal (internal), environmental (external), and socio-psychological. These blocks constitute the basis of the Questionnaire. The online survey done for four age groups helped determine the DLS indicators. Personal predictors include life rhythm disorder, high anxiety, and concern for one’s own health and that of the inner circle. Environmental predictors embrace inadaptability of the habitual mode of life to prolonged quarantine and health restrictions, as well as to changes in working conditions and risks of employment prospects. Socio-psychological predictors include disruption of the normal social circle; difficulties in mastering the new form of professional activity; changes in job requirements, and material difficulties. It has been found out that the acceptance of the current life period as difficult by the persons of ontogenetic stages of “maturity” (over 25 years) is much more pronounced. As a result, the concept of “difficult life situations” is introduced. DLS are challenges of the global existential crisis as reflected in the human world. In it, an individual experiences the limitations of subjective activity and self-realization in the main aspects of being (personal, environmental and socio-psychological), for an unpredictably long term. Identifying difficult life situations in the context of existential meanings and values the authors understand that the methodologies of existential, subjective concept in the further search for psychological resources for a personality to overcome global VUCA challenges are heuristic.
Keywords
References
Климов, Е.А. (1995). Образ мира в разнотипных профессиях. М.: Изд-во Моск. ун-та.
Леонтьев, А.Н. (1975). Деятельность. Сознание. Личность. М.: Издательство политической литературы.
Леонтьев, Д.А. (2020). Виражи и миражи пандемического сознания: доклад. Психологическая газета. Режим доступа https://psy.su/feed/8337/
Леонтьев, Д.А., Рассказова, Е.И. (2006). Тест жизнестойкости. М.: Смысл.
Мир VUCA и подходы выживания в нем (2020). Режим доступа http://becmology.ru/blog/management/vuca.htm
Неустойчивый VUCA-мир: как принять, что жизнь больше не будет прежней (2020). РБК. Режим доступа https://style.rbc.ru/life/5ef1ea139a79473c5be3e750
Носкова, О.Г. (2021). Проблемы психологии деятельности и ее субъекта в творчестве Е.А. Климова (к 90‑летию со дня рождения). Психологический журнал, 2, 120–128.
Осухова, Н.Г. (2012). Психологическая помощь в трудных и экстремальных ситуациях. М.: Издательский центр «Академия».
Покуль, В.О. (2021). Трансформация подходов к изучению потребительского поведения в реалиях VUCA-мира. В Экономическое развитие России в условиях пандемии: анатомия самоизоляции, глобальный локдаун и онлайн будущее: материалы Международной научно-практической конференции. Краснодар: Кубанский гос. ун-т.
Серкин, В.П. (2006). Пять определений понятия «образ мира». Вестник МГУ. Психология, 1, 11–19.
Сорокоумова, Г.В. (2018). Психологический тренинг как эффективный метод развития навыков, необходимых в XXI веке. Издательский дом «Среда». Режим доступа https://phsreda.com/e-articles/23/Action23–21963.pdf
Столин, В.В., Наминач А.П. (1988). Психологическое строение образа мира и проблемы нового мышления. Вопросы психологии, 4, 34–46.
Johansen, R. (2012). Leaders Make the Future: Ten New Leadership Skills for an Uncertain World. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Kobasa, S. (1979). Stressful life Events, Personality and Health: An Inquiry into Hardness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1–11.
Kobasa, S. (1984). The Hardy Executive: Health under Stress. Homewood (IL): Dow Jones-Irwin.
Maddi, S. (1998). Dispositional Hardiness in Health and Effectiveness. In H.S. Friedman (Ed.) Encyclopedia of Mental Health (pp. 323–335). San Diego (CA): Academic Press.
Maddi, S., Harvey, R. (2005). Hardiness Considered Across Cultures. In P.T.P. Wong, L.C.J. Wong (Eds) Handbook of Multicultural Perspectives on Stress and Coping (pp. 403–420). New York: Springer.
Maddi, S.R. (1997). The Personal Views Survey: A Measure of Dispositional Hardiness. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.
Maddi, S.R., Kobasa, S.C. (1984). The Hardy Executive: Health Under Stress. Homewood, IL: Dow Jones-Irwin.
Nazar, J. (2020). 8 Critical Lessons Leaders Need to Emerge from the COVID‑19 Crisis (And One that Will Surprise You). Fast Company. Retrieved from https://www.fastcompany.com/90502230/8‑critical-lessons-leadersneed-to-emergefrom-the-covid‑19‑crisis-and-one-that-will-surpriseyou

