Subject-Activity Determination of Personal Maturity of Line Managers of the Health Organizations | South-Russian Journal of Social Sciences
Subject-Activity Determination of Personal Maturity of Line Managers of the Health Organizations
PDF (Russian)
https://doi.org/10.31429/26190567-21-1-135-156
https://doi.org/10.31429/26190567-21-1-135-156

How to Cite Array

Yasko B.A., Ostroushko M.G., Kazarin B.V. (2020) Subject-Activity Determination of Personal Maturity of Line Managers of the Health Organizations. South-Russian Journal of Social Sciences, 21 (1), pp. 135-156. DOI: 10.31429/26190567-21-1-135-156 (In Russian)
Submission Date 2019-11-23
Accepted Date 2020-01-27
Published Date 2020-03-30

Copyright (c) 2020 Бэла Аслановна Ясько, Марина Геннадиевна Остроушко, Борис Викторович Казарин

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

The search for effective management resources cannot be successful without analyzing the psychological aspects of the leader’s personality. Research in this direction is carried out in different psychological schools. Considering that at the center of the management process is a person as a subject of activity, the search for personal resources of the formation and self-realization of a manager is particularly heuristic. This approach allows to highlight psychological factors, both concomitant with success, and acting as "barriers" on this path. In their analysis, the authors rely on empirically distinguished types of personality maturity of the head of the “linear” level in healthcare organization (“High Level Formed Personal Maturity”; “Personal maturity based on the formed general and emotional intelligence, sociocentric responsibility”; “Personal maturity based on internal ego-centered orientation”;“ Personal maturity focused on the emotional perception of the world”). As subject-­activity markers of the psychological “portrait” of the head, managerial competencies with psychological content were used (Woodcock, Francis, 1991). The comparison of the qualities of subjective-­active determination with different psychological types of personality maturity showed that the most organic are the competency “profiles” among holders of high-level formed personality maturity and personality maturity based on the formed general and emotional intellects, sociocentric responsibility. The image of the Self as a subject of managerial activity of a “linear” level among holders of personality maturity on the basis of internal ego-centered orientation and personality maturity, focused on the emotional perception of the world, is marked by frustration of career expectations. It is concluded that the identified phenomena can contribute to the disclosure of meaningful recommendations for psychological counseling of “linear” managers to support professional and personal self-realization.

Keywords

head, personality maturity, types of personality maturity, managerial competencies, subject-­activity qualities, style of making managerial decisions

References

  1. Bazarov, T. Yu. (2006). Upravleniye personalom [Personnel Management]. M.: ITS “Akademiya”.
  2. Erikson, E. (1996). Identichnost': yunost' i krizis [Identity: Youth and Crisis]. M.: “Progress”.
  3. Greenberger, E., Steinberg, L. (1986). When Teenagers Work. The Psychological and Social Costs of Adolescent Employment. New York: Basic Books.
  4. Inkeles, A., Leidermn, H. (1998). An Approach to the Study of Psychosocial Maturity. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 39(1), 52–76.
  5. Karpov, A. V., Markova, Ye. V. (2003). Psikhologiya stiley upravlencheskikh resheniy [Psychology of the Styles of Managerial Decisions]. Yaroslavl': Institut “Otkrytoye obshchestvo”.
  6. Karpov, A. V. (2004). Psikhologiya refleksivnykh mekhanizmov deyatel'nosti [Psychology of Reflexive Mechanisms of Activity]. M.: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”.
  7. Kohlberg, L. (1981). Essays in Moral Development. Vol. I: The Philosophy of Moral Development. New York: Harper & Row.
  8. Kohlberg, L. (1984). Essays in Moral Development. Vol. II: The Psychology of Moral Development. New York: Harper & Row.
  9. Kohlberg, L., Levine, Ch., Hewer, A. (1983). Moral Stages: a Сurrent Formulation and Response to Critics. New York: Karger.
  10. Loevinger, J. (1993). Ego Development: Question of Method and Theory. Рsychological Inquiry, 4(1), 56–63.
  11. Loevinger, J. (1994). In Search of Grand Theory. Psychological Inquiry, 5(2), 142–144.
  12. Loevinger, J. (1997). Stages of Personality Development. In R. Hogan, J. Johnson & S. Briggs (Eds.) Handbook of Personality Psychology. San Diego: Academic Press.
  13. Marcia, J. (1980). Identity in Adolescence. In J. Adelson (Ed.) Handbook of Adolescence Psychology. New York: Wiley.
  14. Mead, G. H. (1980). The Philosophy of the Present. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
  15. Morozova, G. B. (2006). Psikhologicheskoye soprovozhdeniye organizatsii i personala [Psychological Support Organization and Personnel]. SPb.: Rech'.
  16. Oyserman, D. (2003). Self-Concept and Identity. In A. Tesser, N. Schwarz The Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology. Intraindividual Processes (pp.499–517). London: Blackwell Publishings.
  17. Prikaz Ministerstva truda i sotsial'noy zashchity RF ot 7 noyabrya 2017 g. № 768n “Ob utverzhdenii professional'nogo standarta “Spetsialist v oblasti organizatsii zdravookhraneniya i obshchestvennogo zdorov'ya” [Order of the Ministry of Labor and Social Protection of the Russian Federation of November 7, 2017 No. 768n “On Approval of the Professional Standard“ Specialist in the Field of Healthcare and Public Health”]. Retrieved from https://www.garant.ru/products/ipo/prime/doc/71722794/
  18. Pryadein, V. P. (2014). Psikhodiagnostika lichnosti. Izbrannyye psikhologicheskiye testy: Praktikum [Psychodiagnostics of personality. Selected Psychological Tests: Workshop]. Surgut: Surgutskiy gos. ped. un-t.
  19. Pyzhova, N. N. (2017). Lokus kontrolya i intellekt rukovoditelya kak pokazateli lichnostnoy zrelosti [Locus of Control and Intelligence of Manager as Indicators of Personal Maturity]. Nauchnyye trudy Respublikanskogo instituta vysshey shkoly [Scientific Works of the Republican Institute of Higher Education], 17(3), 309–316.
  20. Selman, R. L. (1980). The Growth of Interpersonal Understanding. New York: Academic Press.
  21. Smel'tsova, A. S., Shchukina, M. A. (2018). “Lichnostnaya zrelost' rukovoditelya”: razrabotka i pervichnaya psikhometricheskaya proverka oprosnika [Manager Personal maturity": Development and Initial Psychometric Testing of the Questionnaire]. Vestnik Vyatskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Herald of Vyatka State University], 2, 102–112.
  22. Woodcock, M., Francis, D. (1991). Raskreposhchennyy menedzher [The Unblocked Manager: a Practical Guide to Self-Development]. M.: Delo.
  23. Zankovskiy, A. N. (2011). Psikhologiya liderstva: ot povedencheskoy modeli k kul'turno-tsennostnoy paradigm [Psychology of Leadership: From Behavioral Models to Culture/Value Paradigm]. M.: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”.
  24. Zankovskiy, A. N. (2015). Psikhologiya organizatsionnogo liderstva: v poiskakh korporativnoy sinergii [Psychology of Organizational Leadership: In Search of Corporate Synergy]. M.: Izd-vo Litera.
  25. Zhuravlev, A. L. (2007). “Sotsial'no-psikhologicheskaya zrelost'”: popytka obosnovat' ponyatiye ["Socio-Psychological Maturity": Problem Statement]. In A. L. Zhuravlev, Ye. A. Sergiyenko (Eds.) Fenomen i kategoriya zrelosti v psikhologii [The Phenomenon and Category of Maturity in Psychology] (pp. 198–222) M.: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”.
  26. Zhuravlev, A. L. (2004). Psikhologiya upravlencheskogo vzaimodeystviya (teoreticheskiye i prikladnyye aspekty) [Psychology of Managerial Interaction (Theoretical and Applied Aspects)]. M.: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”.
  27. Zhuravlev, A. L., Sergiyenko, Ye. A. (Eds.) (2007). Fenomen i kategoriya zrelosti v psikhologii [Phenomenon and Category of Maturity in Psychology]. M.: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”.